Positional Tremor and its Treatment

Diagnostic Uncertainties in Tremor

The approach and diagnosis of patients with tremor may be challenging for clinicians. According to the most recent consensus statement by the Task Force on Tremor of the International Parkinson Movement Disorder Society, the differentiation between action (i.e., kinetic, postural, intention), resting, and other task- and position-specific tremors is crucial to this goal. In addition, patients with tremor must be carefully examined for other relevant features, including the topography of the tremor, since it can involve different body areas and possibly associate with neurological signs of uncertain significance. Following the characterization of major clinical features, it may be useful to define, whenever possible, a particular tremor syndrome and to narrow down the spectrum of possible etiologies. First, it is important to distinguish between physiological and pathological tremor, and, in the latter case, to differentiate between the underlying pathological conditions. A correct approach to tremor is particularly relevant for appropriate referral, counseling, prognosis definition, and therapeutic management of patients. The purpose of this review is to outline the possible diagnostic uncertainties that may be encountered in clinical practice in the approach to patients with tremor. In addition to an emphasis on a clinical approach, this review discusses the important ancillary role of neurophysiology and innovative technologies, neuroimaging, and genetics in the diagnostic process.

Bayesian Interpretation of Essential Tremor Plus

Essential tremor (ET) plus is a new tremor classification that was introduced in 2018 by a task force of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Patients with ET plus meet the criteria for ET but have one or more additional systemic or neurologic signs of uncertain significance or relevance to tremor (“soft signs”). Soft signs are not sufficient to diagnose another tremor syndrome or movement disorder, and soft signs in ET plus are known to have poor interrater reliability and low diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the clinical significance of ET plus must be interpreted probabilistically when judging whether a patient is more likely to have ET or a combined tremor syndrome, such as dystonic tremor. Such a probabilistic interpretation is possible with Bayesian analysis. This review presents a Bayesian analysis of ET plus in patients suspected of having ET versus a dystonic tremor syndrome, which is the most common differential diagnosis in patients referred for ET. Bayesian analysis of soft signs provides an estimate of the probability that a patient with possible ET is more likely to have an alternative diagnosis. ET plus is a distinct tremor classification and should not be viewed as a subtype of ET. ET plus covers a more-comprehensive phenotyping of people with possible ET, and the clinical interpretation of ET plus is enhanced with Bayesian analysis of associated soft signs.

A case of position dependent tremor

A 79-year-old woman presented 3 years' history of hand shaking while drinking a cup of tea. The tremor was seen bilaterally, more predominantly on the left, and it also appeared when reading a book or writing. It was also induced by flexing the elbow to about 90 degrees or more without any specific task. Although there was no family history, the tremor in the present case was clinically diagnosed as essential tremor, because there were no other movement abnormalities, and other causes of tremor were excluded by laboratory tests. The tremor was dependent on the position of the involved extremity regardless of the kind of tasks. Position-specific tremor is discussed in relation to postural tremor.