1
|
Latorre A, Ganos C, Hamada M, Phielipp N, Rocchi L, Merchant S, Tijssen MA, van der Veen S, Chen R. Diagnostic Utility of Clinical Neurophysiology in Jerky Movement Disorders: A Review from the MDS Clinical Neurophysiology Study Group. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2024. [PMID: 39691090 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Revised: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myoclonus and other jerky movement disorders are hyperkinetic disorders, the diagnosis of which heavily relies on clinical neurophysiological testing. However, formal diagnostic criteria are lacking, and recently the utility and reliability of these tests have been questioned. OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to assess the utilization of clinical neurophysiology testing to identify possible gaps and boundaries that might guide the development of new methods for a more precise diagnosis and in-depth understanding of myoclonus. METHODS We reviewed electrophysiological features of cortical myoclonus, subcortical myoclonus (ie, myoclonus associated with dystonia, brainstem myoclonus), excessive startle reflex, spinal myoclonus (ie, spinal segmental and propriospinal myoclonus), peripheral myoclonus and mimics of myoclonus of peripheral origin (hemifacial spasm, minipolymyoclonus, myokymia), functional jerky movements, chorea, and tics. RESULTS Electrophysiological features that support the recognition of myoclonus subtypes, such as muscle burst duration, muscle pattern of activation, measures of cortical excitability, or movement-related cortical potentials, have been identified. These significantly contribute to the diagnosis of jerky movement disorders, but their reliability is uncertain. Despite the significant advancements, several unresolved questions persist. Factors contributing to this include the absence of systematic neurophysiological assessment and standardized methods, alongside the limited number of patients investigated using these techniques. CONCLUSION Although clinical neurophysiology remains the "gold standard" for defining and diagnosing myoclonus, our review highlighted the need to enhance the quality and reliability of neurophysiological testing in jerky movement disorders. Further studies including larger cohorts of patients recruited from different centers, employing standardized and optimized electrophysiological techniques, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Latorre
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christos Ganos
- Movement Disorder Clinic, Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Masashi Hamada
- Department of Neurology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nicolas Phielipp
- Department of Neurology, Parkinson's and Movement Disorders Program, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Lorenzo Rocchi
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Shabbir Merchant
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marina A Tijssen
- Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sterre van der Veen
- Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Münchau A, Klein C, Beste C. Rethinking Movement Disorders. Mov Disord 2024; 39:472-484. [PMID: 38196315 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
At present, clinical practice and research in movement disorders (MDs) focus on the "normalization" of altered movements. In this review, rather than concentrating on problems and burdens people with MDs undoubtedly have, we highlight their hidden potentials. Starting with current definitions of Parkinson's disease (PD), dystonia, chorea, and tics, we outline that solely conceiving these phenomena as signs of dysfunction falls short of their complex nature comprising both problems and potentials. Such potentials can be traced and understood in light of well-established cognitive neuroscience frameworks, particularly ideomotor principles, and their influential modern derivatives. Using these frameworks, the wealth of data on altered perception-action integration in the different MDs can be explained and systematized using the mechanism-oriented concept of perception-action binding. According to this concept, MDs can be understood as phenomena requiring and fostering flexible modifications of perception-action associations. Consequently, although conceived as being caught in a (trough) state of deficits, given their high flexibility, people with MDs also have high potential to switch to (adaptive) peak activity that can be conceptualized as hidden potentials. Currently, clinical practice and research in MDs are concerned with deficits and thus the "deep and wide troughs," whereas "scattered narrow peaks" reflecting hidden potentials are neglected. To better delineate and utilize the latter to alleviate the burden of affected people, and destigmatize their conditions, we suggest some measures, including computational modeling combined with neurophysiological methods and tailored treatment. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Münchau
- Institute of Systems Motor Science, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christine Klein
- Institute of Neurogenetics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christian Beste
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saft C, Burgunder JM, Dose M, Jung HH, Katzenschlager R, Priller J, Nguyen HP, Reetz K, Reilmann R, Seppi K, Landwehrmeyer GB. Differential diagnosis of chorea (guidelines of the German Neurological Society). Neurol Res Pract 2023; 5:63. [PMID: 37993913 PMCID: PMC10666412 DOI: 10.1186/s42466-023-00292-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Choreiform movement disorders are characterized by involuntary, rapid, irregular, and unpredictable movements of the limbs, face, neck, and trunk. These movements often initially go unnoticed by the affected individuals and may blend together with seemingly intended, random motions. Choreiform movements can occur both at rest and during voluntary movements. They typically increase in intensity with stress and physical activity and essentially cease during deep sleep stages. In particularly in advanced stages of Huntington disease (HD), choreiform hyperkinesia occurs alongside with dystonic postures of the limbs or trunk before they typically decrease in intensity. The differential diagnosis of HD can be complex. Here, the authors aim to provide guidance for the diagnostic process. This guidance was prepared for the German Neurological Society (DGN) for German-speaking countries. RECOMMENDATIONS Hereditary (inherited) and non-hereditary (non-inherited) forms of chorea can be distinguished. Therefore, the family history is crucial. However, even in conditions with autosomal-dominant transmission such as HD, unremarkable family histories do not necessarily rule out a hereditary form (e.g., in cases of early deceased or unknown parents, uncertainties in familial relationships, as well as in offspring of parents with CAG repeats in the expandable range (27-35 CAG repeats) which may display expansions into the pathogenic range). CONCLUSIONS The differential diagnosis of chorea can be challenging. This guidance prepared for the German Neurological Society (DGN) reflects the state of the art as of 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Saft
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Huntington-Zentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Jean-Marc Burgunder
- Department of Neurology, Schweizerisches Huntington-Zentrum, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Dose
- Kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum Taufkirchen/München-Ost, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans Heinrich Jung
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Regina Katzenschlager
- Department of Neurology, Karl Landsteiner Institute for Neuroimmunological and Neurodegenerative Disorders, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria
| | - Josef Priller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Neuropsychiatry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Huu Phuc Nguyen
- Department of Human Genetics, Huntington-Zentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Kathrin Reetz
- Department of Neurology, Euregional Huntington Centre Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ralf Reilmann
- George-Huntington-Institute, Muenster, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Universitaetsklinikum Muenster (UKM), Westfaelische Wilhelms-University, Muenster, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Seppi
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bonomo R, Elia AE, Bonomo G, Romito LM, Mariotti C, Devigili G, Cilia R, Giossi R, Eleopra R. Deep brain stimulation in Huntington's disease: a literature review. Neurol Sci 2021; 42:4447-4457. [PMID: 34471947 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05527-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Huntington's disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by involuntary movements, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes. The complex constellation of clinical symptoms still makes the therapeutic management challenging. In the new era of functional neurosurgery, deep brain stimulation (DBS) may represent a promising therapeutic approach in selected HD patients. METHODS Articles describing the effect of DBS in patients affected by HD were selected from Medline and PubMed by the association of text words with MeSH terms as follows: "Deep brain stimulation," "DBS," and "HD," "Huntington's disease," and "Huntington." Details on repeat expansion, age at operation, target of operation, duration of follow-up, stimulation parameters, adverse events, and outcome measures were collected. RESULTS Twenty eligible studies, assessing 42 patients with HD, were identified. The effect of globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS on Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) total score revealed in 10 studies an improvement of total score from 5.4 to 34.5%, and in 4 studies, an increase of motor score from 3.8 to 97.8%. Bilateral GPi-DBS was reported to be effective in reducing Chorea subscore in all studies, with a mean percentage reduction from 21.4 to 73.6%. CONCLUSIONS HD patients with predominant choreic symptoms may be the best candidates for surgery, but the role of other clinical features and of disease progression should be elucidated. For this reason, there is a need for more reliable criteria that may guide the selection of HD patients suitable for DBS. Accordingly, further studies including functional outcomes as primary endpoints are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Bonomo
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, Italy
- Experimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Antonio E Elia
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giulio Bonomo
- Neurosurgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi M Romito
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, Italy
| | - Caterina Mariotti
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Grazia Devigili
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Cilia
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giossi
- Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Eleopra
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maciel R, Maia DP, Cardoso F. Comment on: Voluntary Inhibitory Control of Chorea. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021; 8:634-635. [PMID: 33981804 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Maciel
- Movement Disorders Unit Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil
| | - Débora P Maia
- Movement Disorders Unit Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil
| | - Francisco Cardoso
- Movement Disorders Unit Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bonomo R, Latorre A, Bhatia KP. Reply to Comment on: Voluntary Inhibitory Control of Chorea. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021; 8:636. [PMID: 33981805 PMCID: PMC8088102 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Bonomo
- Department of Clinical and Movement NeurosciencesUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
- Experimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Milano‐BicoccaMonzaItaly
| | - Anna Latorre
- Department of Clinical and Movement NeurosciencesUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Kailash P. Bhatia
- Department of Clinical and Movement NeurosciencesUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berlot R, Rothwell JC, Bhatia KP, Kojović M. Variability of Movement Disorders: The Influence of Sensation, Action, Cognition, and Emotions. Mov Disord 2020; 36:581-593. [PMID: 33332680 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with movement disorders experience fluctuations unrelated to disease progression or treatment. Extrinsic factors that contribute to the variable expression of movement disorders are environment related. They influence the expression of movement disorders through sensory-motor interactions and include somatosensory, visual, and auditory stimuli. Examples of somatosensory effects are stimulus sensitivity of myoclonus on touch and sensory amelioration in dystonia but also some less-appreciated effects on parkinsonian tremor and gait. Changes in visual input may affect practically all types of movement disorders, either by loss of its compensatory role or by disease-related alterations in the pathways subserving visuomotor integration. The interaction between auditory input and motor function is reflected in simple protective reflexes and in complex behaviors such as singing or dancing. Various expressions range from the effect of music on parkinsonian bradykinesia to tics. Changes in body position affect muscle tone and may result in marked fluctuations of rigidity or may affect dystonic manifestations. Factors intrinsic to the patient are related to their voluntary activity and cognitive, motivational, and emotional states. Depending on the situation or disease, they may improve or worsen movement disorders. We discuss various factors that can influence the phenotypic variability of movement disorders, highlighting the potential mechanisms underlying these manifestations. We also describe how motor fluctuations can be provoked during the clinical assessment to help reach the diagnosis and appreciated to understand complaints that seem discrepant with objective findings. We summarize advice and interventions based on the variability of movement disorders that may improve patients' functioning in everyday life. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rok Berlot
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - John C Rothwell
- Department of Clinical and Motor Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kailash P Bhatia
- Department of Clinical and Motor Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maja Kojović
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|