A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Perampanel for Essential Tremor

Essential tremor - drug treatments present and future

INTRODUCTION

The main treatment options for essential tremor (ET), which is probably one of the most common movement disorders, have been propranolol and primidone, for many years. This review aims to synthesize therapeutic attempts with other drugs.

AREAS COVERED

We have reviewed the current state of the pharmacological treatment of ET, both in patients and in experimental models of this disease, with special emphasis on the data published in the last 5 years. Based on the results in experimental models of ET, proposals have been made for future alternative therapeutic options.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of drugs other than propranolol and primidone has not shown a greater degree of efficacy than these in the treatment of ET, although according to certain evidence-based guidelines topiramate and phenobarbital could be alternative drugs. The results on the effectiveness of other drugs have been variable. For patients with refractory ET, especially those with head tremor, local injections with botulinum toxin A may be useful. According to the results of various experimental models, T calcium channel blockers, modulators of GABAA receptors (GABAARs), GABAB receptors (GABABRs), and glutamatergic neurotransmission, and drugs that decrease the expression of LINGO-1 could be interesting options for the future, among others.

Search for Novel Therapies for Essential Tremor Based on Positive Modulation of α6-Containing GABAA Receptors

Background

Prior work using GABAA receptor subunit knockouts and the harmaline model has indicated that low-dose alcohol, gaboxadol, and ganaxolone suppress tremor via α6βδ GABAA receptors. This suggests that drugs specifically enhancing the action of α6βδ or α6βγ2 GABAA receptors, both predominantly expressed on cerebellar granule cells, would be effective against tremor. We thus examined three drugs described by in vitro studies as selective α6βδ (ketamine) or α6βγ2 (Compound 6, flumazenil) receptor modulators.

Methods

In the first step of evaluation, the maximal dose was sought at which 6/6 mice pass straight wire testing, a sensitive test for psychomotor impairment. Only non-impairing doses were used to evaluate for anti-tremor efficacy in the harmaline model, which was assessed in wildtype and α6 subunit knockout littermates.

Results

Ketamine, in maximally tolerated doses of 2.0 and 3.5 mg/kg had minimal effect on harmaline tremor in both genotypes. Compound 6, at well-tolerated doses of 1-10 mg/kg, effectively suppressed tremor in both genotypes. Flumazenil suppressed tremor in wildtype mice at doses (0.015-0.05 mg/kg) far lower than those causing straight wire impairment, and did not suppress tremor in α6 knockout mice.

Discussion

Modulators of α6βδ and α6βγ2 GABAA receptors warrant attention for novel therapies as they are anticipated to be effective and well-tolerated. Ketamine likely failed to attain α6βδ-active levels. Compound 6 is an attractive candidate, but further study is needed to clarify its mechanism of action. The flumazenil results provide proof of principle that targeting α6βγ2 receptors represents a worthy strategy for developing essential tremor therapies.

Highlights

We tested for harmaline tremor suppression drugs previously described as in vitro α6βδ or α6βγ2 GABAA receptor-selective modulators. Well-tolerated flumazenil doses suppressed tremor in α6-wildtype but not α6-knockout mice. Compound 6 and ketamine failed to display this profile, likely from off-target effects. Selective α6 modulators hold promise as tremor therapy.

Perampanel: Medical Alternative for Essential Tremor?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of perampanel in patients with refractory essential tremor (ET).

METHODS

We recruited patients from our movement disorders clinic with the diagnosis of severe refractory ET, and perampanel 4 mg at night was initiated.Assessments were conducted at baseline and after 1 month of treatment with perampanel 4 mg/d. Details about tolerance and effectiveness were collected. Clinical evaluation was conducted with the Fahn-Tolosa-Marín scale, and statistical analysis was carried out with Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test.

RESULTS

This study included 18 patients with severe ET (11 females, 7 males; mean age: 75.1 ± 12.03 years; mean duration of ET: 17.4 ± 17.03 years). Perampanel significantly improved patients' average score with refractory ET ( P ≤ 0.0001). This improvement has been occasionally quite relevant. However, a proportion of patients did not tolerate perampanel because of several adverse effects including dizziness, ataxia, irritability, and instability.

CONCLUSIONS

Perampanel had a markedly positive antitremor effect in patients with ET and could be an alternative treatment. However, this drug is not devoid of adverse effects.

Non-Persistence of Tremorolytic Effect of Perampanel in Essential Tremor: Real-World Experience with 50 Patients

Background

We describe our experience of using perampanel to treat essential tremor (ET) over 12 months.

Methods

We enrolled 50 ET patients in an open-label trial. Perampanel was titrated to 4 mg/day as adjuvant therapy. The main outcome measures were baseline, +1, +3, +6, and + 12 month scores of the Tremor Clinical Rating Scale (TCRS) and the Glass scale (GS).

Results

Twenty patients withdrew because of adverse effects. At +1 month, 27 of 30 patients improved: 68% reduction in both TCRS 1 + 2 (P < 0.001) and TCRS 3 (P < 0.001); TCRS 4 + 1.8 and GS 1.1 point reduction. By +12 months non-persistence of therapeutic effect occurred in 70% of patients: the mean reduction in TCRS 1 + 2 was 33% (P = 0.03), TCRS 3 (0.04), TCRS 4 + 0.8, GS 0.2 points reduction.

Conclusions

We report important peramapanel acute tremorolytic effects, but poor tolerance to adverse effects and a non-sustained therapeutic effect in most patients.

Antiseizure Drugs and Movement Disorders

The relationship between antiseizure drugs and movement disorders is complex and not adequately reviewed so far. Antiseizure drugs as a treatment for tremor and other entities such as myoclonus and restless leg syndrome is the most common scenario, although the scientific evidence supporting their use is variable. However, antiseizure drugs also represent a potential cause of iatrogenic movement disorders, with parkinsonism and tremor the most common disorders. Many other antiseizure drug-induced movement disorders are possible and not always correctly identified. This review was conducted by searching for all the possible combinations between 15 movement disorders (excluding ataxia) and 24 antiseizure drugs. The main objective was to describe the movement disorders treated and worsened or induced by antiseizure drugs. We also summarized the proposed mechanisms and risk factors involved in the complex interaction between antiseizure drugs and movement disorders. Antiseizure drugs mainly used to treat movement disorders are clonazepam, gabapentin, lacosamide, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, phenobarbital, pregabalin, primidone, topiramate, and zonisamide. Antiseizure drugs that worsen or induce movement disorders are cenobamate, ethosuximide, felbamate, lamotrigine, phenytoin, tiagabine, and vigabatrin. Antiseizure drugs with a variable effect on movement disorders are carbamazepine and valproate while no effect on movement disorders has been reported for brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, and stiripentol. Although little information is available on the adverse effects or benefits on movement disorders of newer antiseizure drugs (such as brivaracetam, cenobamate, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, and rufinamide), the evidence collected in this review should guide the choice of antiseizure drugs in patients with concomitant epilepsy and movement disorders. Finally, these notions can lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology and treatments of movement disorders.

Is the inferior olive central to essential tremor? Yes

We consider the question whether the inferior olive (IO) is required for essential tremor (ET). Much evidence shows that the olivocerebellar system is the main system capable of generating the widespread synchronous oscillatory Purkinje cell (PC) complex spike (CS) activity across the cerebellar cortex that would be capable of generating the type of bursting cerebellar output from the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) that could underlie tremor. Normally, synchronous CS activity primarily reflects the effective electrical coupling of IO neurons by gap junctions, and traditionally, ET research has focused on the hypothesis of increased coupling of IO neurons as the cause of hypersynchronous CS activity underlying tremor. However, recent pathology studies of brains from humans with ET and evidence from mutant mice, particularly the hotfoot17 mouse, that largely replicate the pathology of ET, suggest that the abnormal innervation of multiple Purkinje cells (PCs) by climbing fibers (Cfs) is related to tremor. In addition, ET brains show partial PC loss and axon terminal sprouting by surviving PCs. This may provide another mechanism for tremor. It is proposed that in ET, these three mechanisms may promote tremor. They all involve hypersynchronous DCN activity and an intact IO, but the level at which excessive synchronization occurs may be at the IO level (from abnormal afferent activity to this nucleus), the PC level (via aberrant Cfs), or the DCN level (via terminal PC collateral innervation).

An Open-Label Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Perampanel in Cervical Dystonia

Background

Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common focal isolated dystonia. Preclinical studies report that AMPA-selective glutamate receptor antagonists improve dystonia. Perampanel is a clinically available, AMPA receptor antagonist that has shown efficacy and safety in epilepsy.

Objectives

To determine safety and tolerability of perampanel in CD.

Methods

We performed a phase 2a, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate tolerability and safety of perampanel in CD. Included subjects had primary CD; those on botulinum toxin were 8 weeks post last injection. All subjects received perampanel 2 mg/day, titrated 2 mg weekly over 6 weeks, to maximum 12 mg/day; maintenance phase was 4 weeks, ending at week 10. Primary endpoints included tolerability, defined as ability to remain on perampanel for the maintenance period, at any dose level and safety, determined from adverse events (AEs) collected at each visit. Secondary exploratory endpoints included Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), quality of life (cervical dystonia impact profile [CIDP]-58) and Clinical Global Impression of change (CGI).

Results

CD participants (n = 25) were recruited. Eight subjects withdrew; 4 because of AEs, 3 for other reasons and 1 lost to follow up. One subject tolerated 12 mg/day. Eight subjects (30.8%) tolerated 2 mg, whereas 19.2% tolerated 4 mg/day, and 15.4% tolerated 6 mg or 8 mg/day. All subjects experienced AEs. The most common AEs were dizziness, imbalance, and irritability. Exploratory endpoints of TWSTRS showed some improved pain scores and CIDP-58 improved sleep.

Conclusions

Tolerability to perampanel was variable in CD subjects. Lower doses would be considered for future studies in this population.

Increased Purkinje Cell Complex Spike and Deep Cerebellar Nucleus Synchrony as a Potential Basis for Syndromic Essential Tremor. A Review and Synthesis of the Literature

We review advances in understanding Purkinje cell (PC) complex spike (CS) physiology that suggest increased CS synchrony underlies syndromic essential tremor (ET). We searched PubMed for papers describing factors that affect CS synchrony or cerebellar circuits potentially related to tremor. Inferior olivary (IO) neurons are electrically coupled, with the degree of coupling controlled by excitatory and GABAergic inputs. Clusters of coupled IO neurons synchronize CSs within parasagittal bands via climbing fibers (Cfs). When motor cortex is stimulated in rats at varying frequencies, whisker movement occurs at ~10 Hz, correlated with synchronous CSs, indicating that the IO/CS oscillatory rhythm gates movement frequency. Intra-IO injection of the GABA_A receptor antagonist picrotoxin increases CS synchrony, increases whisker movement amplitude, and induces tremor. Harmaline and 5-HT_2a receptor activation also increase IO coupling and CS synchrony and induce tremor. The hotfoot17 mouse displays features found in ET brains, including cerebellar GluRδ2 deficiency and abnormal PC Cf innervation, with IO- and PC-dependent cerebellar oscillations and tremor likely due to enhanced CS synchrony. Heightened coupling within the IO oscillator leads, through its dynamic control of CS synchrony, to increased movement amplitude and, when sufficiently intense, action tremor. Increased CS synchrony secondary to aberrant Cf innervation of multiple PCs likely also underlies hotfoot17 tremor. Deep cerebellar nucleus (DCN) hypersynchrony may occur secondary to increased CS synchrony but might also occur from PC axonal terminal sprouting during partial PC loss. Through these combined mechanisms, increased CS/DCN synchrony may plausibly underlie syndromic ET.