Myoclonus: An Electrophysiological Diagnosis

Myoclonus: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myoclonus, a common hyperkinetic movement disorder, can be disabling for patients. It is important to identify and classify myoclonus correctly to ensure appropriate workup and treatment. While the clinical history, examination, and process of classifying myoclonus remain largely unchanged, new causes and triggers for myoclonus are being elucidated, and new genetic causes have been found. Treatment can be challenging, though preliminary data about new options has been promising.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this article, we will briefly outline the process of classifying and treating myoclonus. We will then discuss three specific scenarios where myoclonus has been identified: myoclonus associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections, spinal myoclonus following surgery or anesthesia of the spine, and auricular myoclonus. We will also discuss new genetic findings associated with myoclonus-dystonia, and promising results regarding the use of perampanel in treating myoclonus.

SUMMARY

The process of describing unique scenarios associated with myoclonus has helped us build our understanding of the causes, genetic background, expected prognosis, and effective treatment of specific types of myoclonus. We hope that further studies on this topic will help tailor treatment.

Myoclonus: Differential diagnosis and current management

Myoclonus classically presents as a brief (10-50 ms duration), non-rhythmic jerk movement. The etiology could vary considerably ranging from self-limited to chronic or even progressive disorders, the latter falling into encephalopathic pictures that need a prompt diagnosis. Beyond the etiological classification, others evaluate myoclonus' body distribution (i.e., clinical classification) or the location of the generator (i.e., neurophysiological classification); particularly, knowing the anatomical source of myoclonus gives inputs on the observable clinical patterns, such as EMG bursts duration or EEG correlate, and guides the therapeutic choices. Among all the chronic disorders, myoclonus often presents itself as a manifestation of epilepsy. In this context, myoclonus has many facets. Myoclonus occurs as one, or the only, seizure manifestation while it can also present as a peculiar type of movement disorder; moreover, its electroclinical features within specific genetically determined epileptic syndromes have seldom been investigated. In this review, following a meeting of recognized experts, we provide an up-to-date overview of the neurophysiology and nosology surrounding myoclonus. Through the dedicated exploration of epileptic syndromes, coupled with pragmatic guidance, we aim to furnish clinicians and researchers alike with practical advice for heightened diagnostic management and refined treatment strategies. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this work, we described myoclonus, a movement characterized by brief, shock-like jerks. Myoclonus could be present in different diseases and its correct diagnosis helps treatment.

Electrophysiology in Functional Movement Disorders: An Update

Background

Functional movement disorders (FMD) are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, both to the neurologist and psychiatrists. The phenomenology is varied and can present as tremors, dystonia, jerks/myoclonus, gait disorder, other abnormal movements or a combination. There has been an increase in the use of electrophysiological studies that are an important tool in the evaluation of FMDs.

Methods

We searched the database platforms of MEDLINE, Google scholar, Web of Sciences, Scopus using the Medical Subject Heading terms (MeSH) for all the articles from 1st January 1970 till November 2022. A total of 658 articles were obtained by the search mechanism. A total of 79 relevant articles were reviewed thoroughly, of which 26 articles that had electrophysiological data were included in the present review.

Results

Variability, distractibility and entertainability can be demonstrated in functional tremors by using multichannel surface electromyography. Voluntary ballistic movements tend to decrease the tremor, while loading the tremulous limb with weight causes the tremor amplitude to increase in functional tremor. Presence of Bereitschaftspotential demonstrates the functional nature of palatal tremor and myoclonus. Co-contraction testing may be helpful in differentiating functional from organic dystonia. The R2 blink reflex recovery cycle has been found to be abnormally enhanced in organic blepharospasm, whereas it is normal in presumed functional blepharospasm. Plasticity is found to be abnormally high in organic dystonia and normal in functional dystonia, in addition to enhanced facilitation in patients with organic dystonia.

Conclusions

Electrophysiological tests supplement clinical examination and helps in differentiating FMD from organic movement disorders.

Rethinking the neurophysiological concept of cortical myoclonus

Cortical myoclonus is thought to result from abnormal electrical discharges arising in the sensorimotor cortex. Given the ease of recording of cortical discharges, electrophysiological features of cortical myoclonus have been better characterized than those of subcortical forms, and electrophysiological criteria for cortical myoclonus have been proposed. These include the presence of giant somatosensory evoked potentials, enhanced long-latency reflexes, electroencephalographic discharges time-locked to individual myoclonic jerks and significant cortico-muscular connectivity. Other features that are assumed to support the cortical origin of myoclonus are short-duration electromyographic bursts, the presence of both positive and negative myoclonus and cranial-caudal progression of the jerks. While these criteria are widely used in clinical practice and research settings, their application can be difficult in practice and, as a result, they are fulfilled only by a minority of patients. In this review we reappraise the evidence that led to the definition of the electrophysiological criteria of cortical myoclonus, highlighting possible methodological incongruencies and misconceptions. We believe that, at present, the diagnostic accuracy of cortical myoclonus can be increased only by combining observations from multiple tests, according to their pathophysiological rationale; nevertheless, larger studies are needed to standardise the methods, to resolve methodological issues, to establish the diagnostic criteria sensitivity and specificity and to develop further methods that might be useful to clarify the pathophysiology of myoclonus.

The role of laboratory investigations in the classification of tremors

INTRODUCTION

Tremor is the most common movement disorder. Although clinical examination plays a significant role in evaluating patients with tremor, laboratory tests are useful to classify tremors according to the recent two-axis approach proposed by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society.

METHODS

In the present review, we will discuss the usefulness and applicability of the various diagnostic methods in classifying and diagnosing tremors. We will evaluate a number of techniques, including laboratory and genetic tests, neurophysiology, and neuroimaging. The role of newly introduced innovative tremor assessment methods will also be discussed.

RESULTS

Neurophysiology plays a crucial role in tremor definition and classification, and it can be useful for the identification of specific tremor syndromes. Laboratory and genetic tests and neuroimaging may be of paramount importance in identifying specific etiologies. Highly promising innovative technologies are being developed for both clinical and research purposes.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, laboratory investigations may support clinicians in the diagnostic process of tremor. Also, combining data from different techniques can help improve understanding of the pathophysiological bases underlying tremors and guide therapeutic management.

Utility of Neurophysiological Evaluation in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice

Background

Quantitative and objective neurophysiological assessment can help to define the predominant phenomenology and provide diagnoses that have prognostic and therapeutic implications for movement disorders.

Objectives

Evaluate the agreement between initial indications and final diagnoses after neurophysiological evaluations in a specialized movement disorders center.

Methods

Electrophysiological studies conducted for movement disorders from 2003 to 2021 were reviewed. The indications were classified according to predominant phenomenology and the diagnoses categorized in subgroups of phenomenology.

Results

A total of 509 studies were analyzed. 51% (259) of patients were female, with a mean age of 51 years (ranges 5 to 89 years). The most common reasons for referral were evaluation of functional movement disorders (FMD), followed by jerky movements, tremor and postural instability. Regarding FMD referrals, there was a diagnostic change in 13% of the patients after electrophysiological assessment. The patients with jerky movements as indication had a diagnosis other than myoclonus in 27% of them, and tremor was not confirmed in 20% of the cases. In patients with an electrophysiological diagnosis of FMD, it was not suspected in 30% of the referrals. Similarly, tremor was not mentioned in the referral of 17% of the patients with this electrophysiological diagnosis and myoclonus was not suspected in 13% of the cases.

Conclusions

Electrophysiological assessment has utility in the evaluation of movement disorders, even in patients evaluated by movement disorders neurologists. More studies are needed to standardize the protocols between centers and to promote the availability and use of these techniques among movement disorders clinics.

How to Do an Electrophysiological Study of Myoclonus

SUMMARY

Diagnosing and characterizing myoclonus can be challenging. Many authors agree on the need to complement the clinical findings with an electrophysiological study to characterize the movements. Besides helping to rule out other movements that may look like myoclonus, electrophysiology can help localize the source of the movement. This article aims to serve as a practical manual on how to do a myoclonus study. For this purpose, the authors combine their experience with available evidence. The authors provide detailed descriptions of recording poly-electromyography, combining electroencephalography and electromyography, Bereitschaftspotentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and startle techniques. The authors discuss analysis considerations for these data and provide a simplified algorithm for their interpretation. Finally, the authors discuss some factors that they believe have hindered the broader use of these useful techniques.

Disorders of Movement due to Acquired and Traumatic Brain Injury

Purpose of Review

Both traumatic and acquired brain injury can result in diffuse multifocal injury affecting both the pyramidal and extrapyramidal tracts. Thus, these patients may exhibit signs of both upper motor neuron syndrome and movement disorder simultaneously which can further complicate diagnosis and management. We will be discussing movement disorders following acquired and traumatic brain injury.

Recent Findings

Multiple functions including speech, swallowing, posture, mobility, and activities of daily living can all be affected. Medical treatment and rehabilitation-based therapy can be especially challenging due to accompanying cognitive deficits and severity of the disorder which can involve multiple limbs in addition to muscles of the face and axial skeleton. Tremor and dystonia are the most reported movement disorders following traumatic brain injury. Dystonia and myoclonus are well documented following hypoxic ischemic brain injuries. Electrophysiological studies such as dynamic surface poly-electromyography can assist with identifying phenomenology, especially differentiating between jerk-like phenomenon and help guide further work up and management. Management with medications remains challenging due to potential adverse effects. Surgical interventions including stereotactic surgery, deep brain stimulation, and intrathecal baclofen pumps have been reported, but most of the evidence supporting them has been limited to primarily case reports except for post-traumatic tremor.

Summary

Brain injury can lead to motor disorders, movement disorders, visual (processing) deficits, and vestibular deficits which often coexist with cognitive deficits making it challenging to treat and rehabilitate these patients. Unfortunately, the evidence regarding the medical management and rehabilitation of brain injury patients with movement disorders is sparse and leaves much to be desired.

Evaluation of movement and brain activity

Clinical neurophysiology studies can contribute important information about the physiology of human movement and the pathophysiology and diagnosis of different movement disorders. Some techniques can be accomplished in a routine clinical neurophysiology laboratory and others require some special equipment. This review, initiating a series of articles on this topic, focuses on the methods and techniques. The methods reviewed include EMG, EEG, MEG, evoked potentials, coherence, accelerometry, posturography (balance), gait, and sleep studies. Functional MRI (fMRI) is also reviewed as a physiological method that can be used independently or together with other methods. A few applications to patients with movement disorders are discussed as examples, but the detailed applications will be the subject of other articles.

Myoclonus- A Review

Myoclonus is a hyperkinetic movement disorder characterized by a sudden, brief, involuntary jerk. Positive myoclonus is caused by abrupt muscle contractions, while negative myoclonus by sudden cessation of ongoing muscular contractions. Myoclonus can be classified in various ways according to body distribution, relation to activity, neurophysiology, and etiology. The neurophysiological classification of myoclonus by means of electrophysiological tests is helpful in guiding the best therapeutic strategy. Given the diverse etiologies of myoclonus, a thorough history and detailed physical examination are key to the evaluation of myoclonus. These along with basic laboratory testing and neurophysiological studies help in narrowing down the clinical possibilities. Though symptomatic treatment is required in the majority of cases, treatment of the underlying etiology should be the primary aim whenever possible. Symptomatic treatment is often not satisfactory, and a combination of different drugs is often required to control the myoclonus. This review addresses the etiology, classification, clinical approach, and management of myoclonus.

Jerks of the latissimus dorsi muscle and intercostal neuralgia after posterolateral thoracotomy

Introduction

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is a common complication related to intercostal nerve injury. During this type of surgery, although less frequently, thoracodorsal and long thoracic nerves can also be injured, and jerks of peripheral origins may appear. We report a case with intercostal neuralgia and latissimus dorsi muscle jerks after posterolateral thoracotomy.

Case report

A 55-year-old woman with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome presented with a typical picture of PTPS along the right T5 dermatome following posterolateral thoracotomy at the level of the fifth intercostal space. Approximately six months after the surgery she developed frequent jerk-like involuntary movements of the right latissimus dorsi muscle. Neuropathic pain along the T5 dermatome was partially relieved with thoracic epidural block. No special attention was paid to the jerks until three years later. A neurophysiological study demonstrated a peripheral origin of these movements and the patient was then treated with periodic injections of botulinum toxin. In response, involuntary movements of the latissimus dorsi muscle disappeared.

Significance

To our knowledge, this is the first case with PTPS and post-thoracotomy latissimus dorsi muscle jerks in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. A correct diagnosis together with identification of iatrogenic neuropathic disorders allow the delivery of targeted treatments. In such cases clinical neurophysiology helps to determine a correct diagnosis.

Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders: An Update

Since its initial approval in 1989 by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of blepharospasm and other facial spasms, botulinum toxin (BoNT) has evolved into a therapeutic modality for a variety of neurological and non-neurological disorders. With respect to neurologic movement disorders, BoNT has been reported to be effective for the treatment of dystonia, bruxism, tremors, tics, myoclonus, restless legs syndrome, tardive dyskinesia, and a variety of symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease. More recently, research with BoNT has expanded beyond its use as a powerful muscle relaxant and a peripherally active drug to its potential central nervous system applications in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. Although BoNT is the most potent biologic toxin, when it is administered by knowledgeable and experienced clinicians, it is one of the safest therapeutic agents in clinical use. The primary aim of this article is to provide an update on recent advances in BoNT research with a focus on novel applications in the treatment of movement disorders. This comprehensive review of the literature provides a critical review of evidence-based clinical trials and highlights recent innovative pilot studies.