1
|
Foltynie T, Bruno V, Fox S, Kühn AA, Lindop F, Lees AJ. Medical, surgical, and physical treatments for Parkinson's disease. Lancet 2024; 403:305-324. [PMID: 38245250 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01429-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Although dopamine replacement therapy remains a core component of Parkinson's disease treatment, the onset of motor fluctuations and dyskinetic movements might require a range of medical and surgical approaches from a multidisciplinary team, and important new approaches in the delivery of dopamine replacement are becoming available. The more challenging, wide range of non-motor symptoms can also have a major impact on the quality of life of a patient with Parkinson's disease, and requires careful multidisciplinary management using evidence-based knowledge, as well as appropriately tailored strategies according to the individual patient's needs. Disease-modifying therapies are urgently needed to prevent the development of the most disabling refractory symptoms, including gait and balance difficulties, cognitive impairment and dementia, and speech and swallowing impairments. In the third paper in this Series, we present the latest evidence supporting the optimal treatment of Parkinson's disease, and describe an expert approach to many aspects of treatment choice where an evidence base is insufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Foltynie
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
| | - Veronica Bruno
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Susan Fox
- Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson Disease, Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fiona Lindop
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Specialist Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Community Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - Andrew J Lees
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hariz M. Pros and Cons of Ablation for Functional Neurosurgery in the Neurostimulation Age. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2023; 34:291-299. [PMID: 36906335 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Should one recommend stereotactic ablation for Parkinson disease, tremor, dystonia, and obsessive compulsive disorder, in this era of DBS? The answer depends on several variables such as the symptoms to treat, the patient's preferences and expectations, the surgeons' competence and preference, the availability of financial means (by government health care, by private insurance), the geographical issues, and not least the current and dominating fashion at that particular time. Both ablation and stimulation can be either used alone or even combined (provided expertise in both of them) to treat various symptoms of movement and mind disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwan Hariz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Umeå 90185, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|