Safety of entacapone and apomorphine coadministration in levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease patients: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results of a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study

The Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitor Entacapone in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: Personal Reflections on a First-in-Class Drug Development Programme 40 Years On

In the 1980s, Orion Pharma, then a mid-ranking Nordic area pharmaceutical company, established a drug development programme on the inhibition of catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT). This enzyme, which plays an important role in the inactivation of catecholamine neurotransmitters and drugs with a catechol structure, thus came under consideration as a target in the innovative translational and clinical programme we describe in this historical review. The starting point was the conjecture that a peripherally acting COMT inhibitor might improve entry of levodopa into the brain. This had potentially significant implications for the medical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). The rationale was that more efficient delivery of levodopa to the brain might allow the high therapeutic doses of levodopa to be reduced and the dose interval to be extended. Elucidation of structure-activity relations paved the way for the discovery and development of entacapone, a 5-nitrocatechol that was a potent and highly specific inhibitor of COMT. Experience in phase III clinical trials established that entacapone, used as an adjunct to regular or controlled-release levodopa preparations (also including a peripherally acting dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor), increased ON-time and reduced OFF-time and improved clinical condition in patients with PD experiencing wearing-off, often with a reduced daily levodopa dose. Several of these studies also identified that entacapone improved patients' quality of life and was cost-effective. Subsequently, entacapone has been amalgamated into a triple-combination preparation (Stalevo®) with levodopa and carbidopa to create a flexible and convenient drug therapy for patients with PD who have end-of-dose motor fluctuations not stabilised on levodopa/dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor treatment. This review offers a historical perspective on a successful programme of drug development by researchers who played central roles in the progress from exploratory hypothesis to registered pharmaceutical product.

Levodopa/carbidopa and entacapone in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: efficacy, safety and patient preference

Levodopa (LD) is the oldest, most efficacious and best-tolerated drug for dopaminergic substitution of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Its main drawback is its short half-life, which supports onset of motor complications in the long term. Therefore well-informed PD patients mostly accept LD therapy as late as possible. Recent LD trials indicate that a combination of LD with carbidopa (CD) and the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor entacapone (EN) may reduce the onset of these motor complications to a certain extent. This observation is further supported by pharmacokinetic trials and experimental research, but there is still a need to confirm this in a clinical trial, which is under way. Additionally, combined LD/CD/EN was superior to LD/CD administration regarding cognition, muscle behavior and gastrointestinal function in small clinical trials. Moreover there is accumulating evidence that combined COMT inhibition with LD administration reduces homocysteine synthesis. In the long term, homocysteine elevation supports onset of arteriosclerosis-related disorders, which are more frequent in PD patients according to epidemiological studies than in the normal healthy population. The introduction of LD/CD/EN in one tablet supported patients' preference of COMT inhibition as an essential component of LD/DDI therapy, as this combination reduced number and size of tablets.

Balancing short-term symptom control and long-term functional outcomes in patients with Parkinson's disease

Levodopa has played a central role in the treatment of Parkinson's disease for nearly 40 years and remains the single most effective symptomatic treatment for the disease. However, the response to levodopa therapy changes over time, and its long-term use is commonly associated with disabling motor complications. For this reason, the appropriate role of levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease-in particular, the question of when to initiate therapy with the drug-has been a matter of controversy. Because levodopa is the most effective treatment for Parkinson's disease, the management of this disease becomes a matter of balancing short-term symptom control with long-term functional outcomes. This article provides an overview of the basis for levodopa-associated motor complications and their impact on patients' clinical function and quality of life, followed by a discussion of strategies for managing these complications to achieve optimum symptom control while minimizing the adverse effects of long-term therapy.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease : an update

Pharmacotherapy for Parkinson's disease is focused on dopaminergic drugs, mainly the dopamine precursor levodopa and dopamine receptor agonists. The elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of levodopa from plasma (in combination with a decarboxylase inhibitor) of about 1.5 hours becomes more influential as the disease progresses. The long-duration of response to levodopa, which is evident in early Parkinson's disease, diminishes and after a few years of treatment motor performance is closely correlated to the fluctuating plasma concentrations of levodopa. Absorption of levodopa in the proximal small intestine depends on gastric emptying, which is erratic and may be slowed in Parkinson's disease. The effects of levodopa on motor function are dependent on gastric emptying in patients in the advanced stages of disease. The current treatment concept is continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS). Sustained-release formulations of levodopa may provide more stable plasma concentrations. Oral liquid formulations shorten the time to reach peak concentration and onset of effect but do not affect plasma levodopa variability. The t(1/2) of levodopa can be prolonged by adding a catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor (entacapone or tolcapone), which may reduce fluctuations in plasma concentrations, although both peak and trough concentrations are increased with frequent administration. Intravenous and enteral (duodenal/jejunal) infusions of levodopa yield stable plasma levodopa concentrations and motor performance. Enteral infusion is feasible on a long-term basis in patients with severe fluctuations. Among the dopamine receptor agonists the ergot derivatives bromocriptine, cabergoline, dihydroergocryptine and pergolide, and the non-ergot derivatives piribedil, pramipexole and ropinirole, have longer t(1/2) compared with levodopa. Thus, they stimulate dopamine receptors in a less pulsatile manner, yet pharmacokinetic studies of repeated doses of dopamine receptor agonists are few. Optimisation of these drugs is often performed with standardised titration schedules. Apomorphine and lisuride have short t(1/2) and are suitable for subcutaneous infusion, with results similar to those of levodopa infusion. Transdermal administration of dopamine receptor agonists such as rotigotine might be an alternative in the future. In general, initial dopamine receptor agonist monotherapy is associated with poorer motor performance and lower incidence of motor complications compared with levodopa. Buccal administration of the monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor selegiline (deprenyl) provides better absorption and less formation of metabolites compared with standard tablets. To conclude, several new drugs, formulations and routes of administration have been introduced in the treatment of Parkinson's disease during the last decade, mainly with CDS as the aim. CDS can be approached by optimising the use of dopaminergic drugs based on pharmacokinetic data.

A review of intermittent subcutaneous apomorphineinjections for the rescue management of motor fluctuations associated with advanced Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

As Parkinson's disease (PD) progresses,despite optimized pharmacotherapy, patients experience more frequent fluctuations between symptomatic improvement ("on" times) and the return of motor features ("off" times). Apomorphine, the first injectable dopamine agonist available in the United States, is indicated for the acute treatment of "off" episodes (eg, end-of-dose wearing-off episodes, unpredictable "on/off" episodes) in patients with advanced PD who are receiving medically optimal antiparkinsonian therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the pharmacology,clinical efficacy, and tolerability of intermittent subcutaneous apomorphine injections for the management of "off" episodes in patients with PD.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1966-July 2005), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-July 2005) were searched for original research and review articles published in English. The search terms were apomorphine and Parkinson's disease. The reference lists of articles were also consulted, as was selected information provided by the manufacturer of apomorphine. All relevant identified studies on intermittent subcutaneous administration of apomorphine were included in the review; trials of continuous subcutaneous infusion and non-subcutaneous administration of apomorphine were excluded.

RESULTS

Intermittent subcutaneous administration of apomorphine produced consistent rescue from "of" episodes in patients with advanced PD, with a symptomatic motor improvement between the predose "off" state and postdose "on" state similar to that achieved with levodopa. The onset of effect occurred within 20 minutes, and the duration of effect was approximately 100 minutes. The therapeutic rescue dose ranged from 2 to 6 mg. During the clinical development program for subcutaneously injected apomorphine, patients required a mean of approximately 3 rescue doses per day. Common adverse effects occurring in > or =20% of patients were injection-site reaction, yawning, dyskinesias, drowsiness, nausea and vomiting, dizziness or postural dizziness, and rhinorrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

The available clinical studies indicate that apomorphine is effective in providing prompt and consistent rescue from "off" episodes in patients with PD. Antiemetic prophylaxis and close medical supervision are recommended when initiating apomorphine therapy.

Entacapone in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

The development of fluctuations in motor response and involuntary movements commonly complicate the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors delay the breakdown of levodopa, which leads to an increase in levodopa bioavailability and more stable concentrations of plasma levodopa. The addition of a COMT inhibitor therefore combines the rapid onset of levodopa with prolonged efficacy, and theoretically provides a more continuous stimulation of dopamine receptors with reduced risk of motor complications. Randomised, controlled trials have shown that in patients with PD who have motor fluctuations, the addition of the COMT-inhibitor entacapone results in an improvement in motor fluctuations, particularly of the "wearing-off" type, with about 1.0-1.7 h more on-time and less off-time per day, reduced required levodopa dose, modest improvement in motor and disability scores (mean total unified PD rating scale [UPDRS] scores of about 4.5), and in some but not all studies improvement of health-related quality of life [HRQOL] scores.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Patients with stable PD, without motor fluctuations, also have improved HRQOL scores on treatment with entacapone in addition to levodopa with a dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor. However, in a recent large multicentre study, UPDRS motor and disability scores were not improved despite significant improvements in HRQOL scores. The disparity between results on clinical rating scales and HRQOL scores suggests that these scales give different and potentially complementary information on health status changes in PD, and that entacapone provides benefit that may not be captured with standard clinical rating scales. Whether entacapone combined with levodopa can delay dyskinesia or motor fluctuations in patients with untreated PD is unknown; however, in animal studies, a decrease in motor complications has been reported in drug-naive animals given frequent doses of levodopa combined with entacapone. WHERE NEXT?: Clinical studies are underway to address the hypothesis that motor complications in PD can be delayed if entacapone is given from the start of treatment. Until the results of these trials are available, entacapone is indicated as a useful adjunct to levodopa in the symptomatic treatment of patients with PD with and without motor fluctuations. In addition, future trials should specifically assess the effect of entacapone on HRQOL in PD.