Should treatment for Parkinson's disease start immediately on diagnosis or delayed until functional disability develops?

Optimizing levodopa therapy, when and how? Perspectives on the importance of delivery and the potential for an early combination approach

INTRODUCTION

There is currently a resurgence of levodopa as the initial treatment of choice for most patients with Parkinson's disease, albeit at lower doses than previously used. The addition of adjuvant treatments (including MAO-B inhibitors, COMT inhibitors and dopamine agonists) is an established strategy to reduce motor complications that develop with sustained levodopa therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors discuss the evidence underpinning current levodopa optimization strategies, during early disease and once motor complications occur. To support the discussion, the authors performed a broad PubMed search with the terms 'levodopa/L-dopa/L-Dopa, and Parkinson's disease,' restricted to clinical trials. There is now a wealth of evidence that improving levodopa delivery to the brain improves outcomes and we discuss how agents can be combined earlier in the course of disease to leverage the full potential of this strategy.

EXPERT OPINION

Levodopa remains the cornerstone of antiparkinsonian therapy. Several promising advances in formulation have been made and include novel extended-release oral drugs as well as non-oral delivery systems. However, evidence has long suggested that anti-parkinsonian medications may be better used in combination earlier in the disease, and consequently patients will benefit from low doses of several agents rather than ever larger levodopa doses.

Considerations before initiating therapy in Parkinsonism: basing on the quality of life

OBJECTIVE

Improvement of quality-of-life (QoL) has been termed as a primary objective in initiating therapy in both Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy Parkinsonian subtype (MSA-P). We aimed to compare the determinants of life quality in drug naïve PD and MSA-P patients.

METHODS

Eighty-six drug-naïve PD patients and thirty-five drug-naïve MSA-P patients were included to explore the determinants of QoL. Demographic information, motor deficits, and non-motor symptoms were included in the clinical assessment.

RESULTS

Both motor and non-motor functions were more severely impaired in the drug-naïve MSA-P patients, with higher PDQ-39 scores indicating poorer QoL. Physical discomfort and stigma were the main affected sub-domains in PD, while mobility and activity of daily life were the main affected ones in MSA-P. BECK depressive scores and UPDRS-III scores were independent variables of PDQ-39 in MSA-P patients. Age, depression, disease stages and non-motor scores were independent variables of PDQ-39 in PD patients.

INTERPRETATION

Drug-naïve MSA-P patients suffered from more severe motor and non-motor disability, as well as poorer QoL. Depression and non-motor symptoms were proved to be the most critical determinants for QoL in PD, while motor function was supposed to be the major determinant for MSA-P. When initiating therapy, physicians need to focus more on motor functions in drug-naïve MSA-P patients, but on depression in PD patients.

Earlier Dopaminergic Treatment in Parkinson's Disease Is Not Associated With Improved Outcomes

Background

The appropriate timing of dopaminergic treatment initiation in Parkinson's disease (PD) remains a matter of debate. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether earlier initiation of treatment was associated with less worsening of total UPDRS scores over 48 months.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis of data from the CALM-PD (Comparison of the Agonist Pramipexole With Levodopa on Motor Complications of Parkinson's Disease) trial to examine the associations between years since diagnosis and 48-month changes in total and component UPDRS scores, Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Scale (PDQUALIF) score, and the EuroQol-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) score.

Results

There were no associations between years since PD diagnosis and 48-month changes in total UPDRS, component UPDRS scores, PDQUALIF score, or EuroQol-5D VAS score.

Conclusion

Earlier treatment was not associated with improved long-term outcomes in this secondary analysis. Prospective studies are required to determine the appropriate timing of initiation of dopaminergic treatment to inform clinical practice.

Algorithms for the treatment of motor problems in Parkinson's disease

Several different strategies are effective for medical treatment of motor problems in Parkinson's disease (PD). Many guidelines and evidence-based reviews are available, but there is no documentation or consensus in favor of just one treatment strategy. This review presents two algorithms that may be helpful when deciding how to treat a PD patient at various stages of the disease. The first algorithm suggests one way to treat PD from the first onset of motor symptoms. It is largely based on treatment recommendations from the Scandinavian countries and Germany. The other algorithm is meant as assistance for choosing among the different device-aided treatments for advanced PD. There is not sufficient comparative data to recommend one particular line of treatment, neither in early PD nor in advanced disease with motor complications. Individualized treatment is needed for each patient. The current algorithms only represent an alternative for aiding treatment decisions.

A predictive model to identify Parkinson disease from administrative claims data

OBJECTIVE

To use administrative medical claims data to identify patients with incident Parkinson disease (PD) prior to diagnosis.

METHODS

Using a population-based case-control study of incident PD in 2009 among Medicare beneficiaries aged 66-90 years (89,790 cases, 118,095 controls) and the elastic net algorithm, we developed a cross-validated model for predicting PD using only demographic data and 2004-2009 Medicare claims data. We then compared this model to more basic models containing only demographic data and diagnosis codes for constipation, taste/smell disturbance, and REM sleep behavior disorder, using each model's receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

We observed all established associations between PD and age, sex, race/ethnicity, tobacco smoking, and the above medical conditions. A model with those predictors had an AUC of only 0.670 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.668-0.673). In contrast, the AUC for a predictive model with 536 diagnosis and procedure codes was 0.857 (95% CI 0.855-0.859). At the optimal cut point, sensitivity was 73.5% and specificity was 83.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Using only demographic data and selected diagnosis and procedure codes readily available in administrative claims data, it is possible to identify individuals with a high probability of eventually being diagnosed with PD.

Efficacy of rasagiline for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: an updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Rasagiline is a second-generation potent selective inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-B. The aim of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of rasagiline in treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), both as monotherapy and combination therapy.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until 9 March 2016 using the keywords: Rasagiline, Azilect, Parkinson's disease. Randomized controlled trials of patients with PD who were randomized to treatment with rasagiline or placebo were included. Outcomes were unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) and the three subscales.

RESULTS

Ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 2709 patients were evaluated. The overall analysis revealed a significant improvement in change of total UPDRS scores in 1 mg/day and 2 mg/day rasagiline groups compared to placebo. Significant improvement in Part I (Mentation) of UPDRS scores was observed in 1 mg/day, but not in 2 mg/day rasagiline treatment group. Part II (ADL) and Part III (Motor) subscales significantly improved with both doses of rasagiline. Both monotherapy and combination therapy significantly improved total UPDRS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the efficacy of rasagiline in PD. Further studies are required to establish the optimal dose of rasagiline, as well as to determine its effectiveness in different combination therapy protocols. KEY MESSAGES Rasagiline treatment was associated with significant improvement of UPDRS scores and the scores of the subscales. Both monotherapy and combination therapy significantly improved total UPDRS scores. Effect of rasagiline on total UPDRS scores was not dose-dependent.

Nondopaminergic therapy of motor and nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: a clinician's perspective

Patients with Parkinson's disease suffer from impaired motor behavior due to the dopaminergic striatal deficit and nonmotor symptoms, which also result from nondopaminergic neuronal death. This review provides a personal opinion on treatment strategies for symptoms, resulting at least partially from nondopaminergic neurodegeneration, and on therapeutic modulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission. Patient-tailored treatment regimes on the basis of an individual risk benefit ratio as essential precondition try to balance all these symptoms. Individually varying heterogeneity of symptoms, nonlinear disease progression, treatment response, acceptance, tolerability and safety of applied therapies demand a close, consistent relationship between patient and treating physician. Daily maintenance of patients does not ask for too detailed treatment guidelines.

Initial treatment of Parkinson's disease in 2016: The 2000 consensus conference revisited

In 2000, a French consensus conference proposed guidelines for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Since then, new drugs have been concocted, new studies have been published and clinicians have become aware of some drug-induced adverse effects that were little known in the past. This has led us to reconsider the recommendations published 16 years ago. Thus, the aim of the present review is to present the recent data related to the different medications and non-pharmacological approaches available for PD, with a special focus on early-stage PD. Levodopa (LD), dopamine agonists (DAs), catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors (COMT-Is), anticholinergics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOB-Is) and amantadine have been considered, and their efficacy and safety for both motor as well as non-motor aspects are reported here. This has led to our proposal for a revised therapeutic strategy for the initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed PD patients, based on the available literature and the relative benefits/side effects balance.

Early versus delayed initiation of pharmacotherapy in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease and pathologically is characterised by a progressive loss of dopaminergic cells of the nigrostriatal pathway. Clinically, PD is mainly defined by the presence of the motor symptoms of bradykinesia, rigidity, rest tremor and postural instability, but non-motor symptoms such as depression, dementia and autonomic disturbances are recognised as integral parts of the disease. Although pharmacotherapy for PD was introduced almost 50 years ago, and has improved significantly over the intervening period, the timing of initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed PD remains controversial. While some physicians favour an early start of pharmacotherapy at or soon after diagnosis, others prefer to delay pharmacological treatment until a certain degree of disability has developed. This article aims to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both strategies by exploring their effects on symptoms, disease progression and quality of life. Although the data on putative disease-modifying effects of early pharmacological intervention in PD are still inconclusive, we believe that the most important indication for an early initiation of anti-parkinsonian treatment should be to maintain the quality of life of PD patients and to secure their socioeconomic status as long as possible.

Prodromal symptoms and early detection of Parkinson's disease in general practice: a nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Timely diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD), facilitating early intervention, depends largely on the GP's awareness of early symptomatology. For general practice, it is unknown which prodromal symptoms (symptoms preceding the typical motor symptoms of PD) demand the GP's alertness.

OBJECTIVE

To assess prodromal symptoms that should alert the GP to the possibility of PD in primary care patients.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was carried out in a population of approximately 12000 patients registered in the Continuous Morbidity Registration database affiliated with the University of Nijmegen in the Netherlands. The database pools subject data from four primary care practices. The subjects comprised all 86 patients diagnosed with PD between 1972 and 2007, and 78 controls, matched by sex, age, socioeconomic status and primary care practice. The primary measures of outcome were the prodromal symptoms presenting in the two years prior to the diagnosis of PD. The number (and type) of referrals and diagnostic tests were also assessed.

RESULTS

In the two-year period prior to diagnosis, PD patients more often presented with functional somatic symptoms, constipation, hyperhidrosis and sleep disorders than controls. Patients also more frequently experienced more than one prodromal symptom and were more often referred within the primary care team or to a medical specialist.

CONCLUSIONS

Prodromal symptoms of PD are encountered in general practice. GPs should be alert when patients present with multiple prodromal symptoms in a two-year period, especially considering the benefits of early intervention, and the future possibilities for disease-modifying therapy.

[Drug treatment of early-stage (de novo and "honeymoon") Parkinson disease]

In this article, we discuss the management of motor symptoms during the early phases of Parkinson's disease, excluding that of any other clinical manifestation. We relied primarily upon recently published data and do not describe older publications relating to anticholinergic drugs or amantadine. The initial pharmacological treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) is symptomatic and remains based upon dopaminergic drugs. However, the development of new drugs has broadened the range of strategic options and improved overall patient management. Announcing the diagnosis is a critical moment, as pointed out by patients' associations. Patients should be advised to maintain personal, professional, social and physical activities as long as possible. The potential benefit of early pharmacological treatment should be explained, focusing on the possible disease-modifying effect of drugs such as rasagiline. According to current guidelines, L-Dopa is preferred in patients above 65years of age, while those below 65 should be treated with dopamine agonists. Like monoamine oxidase inhibitors B (MAOI-B), synthetic dopamine agonists exhibit several advantages: easy-to-use treatment with a once-daily administration, delayed L-Dopa initiation, significant efficacy on motor symptoms (although lower than that of L-Dopa). MOAI can be prescribed in association with L-Dopa or dopamine agonists. Rasagiline also delays L-Dopa initiation, and consequently motor complications.