Which dyskinesia scale best detects treatment response?: Dyskinesia Scale Detecting Treatment Response

Novel and experimental therapeutics for the management of motor and non-motor Parkinsonian symptoms

BACKGROUND  : Both motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) have a substantial detrimental influence on the patient's quality of life. The most effective treatment remains oral levodopa. All currently known treatments just address the symptoms; they do not completely reverse the condition.

METHODOLOGY

In order to find literature on the creation of novel treatment agents and their efficacy for PD patients, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and other online libraries.

RESULTS

According to the most recent study on Parkinson's disease (PD), a great deal of work has been done in both the clinical and laboratory domains, and some current scientists have even been successful in developing novel therapies for PD patients.

CONCLUSION

The quality of life for PD patients has increased as a result of recent research, and numerous innovative medications are being developed for PD therapy. In the near future, we will see positive outcomes regarding PD treatment.

Dyskinesia and Pain in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: Post Hoc Analysis from the Phase 3b, Open-Label, Randomized DYSCOVER Study

INTRODUCTION

The DYSCOVER study was a phase 3b, open-label, randomized trial (NCT02799381) that evaluated levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) versus optimized medical treatment (OMT) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and a high burden of dyskinesia at baseline (defined as Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale [UDysRS] total score ≥ 30). At week 12, patients receiving LCIG versus OMT experienced significant improvements in dyskinesia, pain, and health-related outcomes. The objective of this analysis was to examine correlations between dyskinesia, pain, and health-related outcomes in PD.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis assessed correlations between UDysRS, King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale (KPPS), 8-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II, Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) or Change (CGI-C), and "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia at baseline and after 12 weeks of LCIG or OMT. Correlations were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficients (categorization: weak, r = 0.20-0.39; moderate, r = 0.40-0.59; strong, r ≥ 0.60).

RESULTS

Among 61 patients, moderate-to-strong positive and significant correlations were observed between UDysRS and KPPS scores (baseline, r = 0.47; week 12 change from baseline [CFB], r = 0.63; all p < 0.001). UDysRS and KPPS scores had moderate-to-strong positive and highly significant correlations with PDQ-8 scores (baseline, r = 0.45 and 0.46, respectively; CFB, r = 0.54 and 0.64, respectively; all p < 0.001). Moderate positive and significant correlations were observed between UDysRS and CGI-S/CGI-C scores (baseline, r = 0.41; CFB, r = 0.47; all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with high dyskinesia burden, positive correlations were observed between dyskinesia, pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at baseline. Improvements in dyskinesia and pain were associated with improvements in HRQoL, demonstrating the clinical burden of troublesome dyskinesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02799381.

Effects of Continuous Dopaminergic Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease Gait: A Longitudinal Prospective Study with Levodopa Intestinal Gel Infusion

Background

Gait issues, including reduced speed, stride length and freezing of gait (FoG), are disabling in advanced phases of Parkinson's disease (PD), and their treatment is challenging. Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) can improve these symptoms in PD patients with suboptimal control of motor fluctuations, but it is unclear if continuous dopaminergic stimulation can further improve gait issues, independently from reducing Off-time.

Objective

To analyze before (T0) and after 3 (T1) and 6 (T2) months of LCIG initiation: a) the objective improvement of gait and balance; b) the improvement of FoG severity; c) the improvement of motor complications and their correlation with changes in gait parameters and FoG severity.

Methods

This prospective, longitudinal 6-months study analyzed quantitative gait parameters using wearable inertial sensors, FoG with the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFoG-Q), and motor complications, as per the MDS-UPDRS part IV scores.

Results

Gait speed and stride length increased and duration of Timed up and Go and of sit-to-stand transition was significantly reduced comparing T0 with T2, but not between T0-T1. NFoG-Q score decreased significantly from 19.3±4.6 (T0) to 11.8±7.9 (T1) and 8.4±7.6 (T2) (T1-T0 p = 0.018; T2-T0 p < 0.001). Improvement of MDS-UPDRS-IV (T0-T2, p = 0.002, T0-T1 p = 0.024) was not correlated with improvement of gait parameters and NFoG-Q from T0 to T2. LEDD did not change significantly after LCIG initiation.

Conclusion

Continuous dopaminergic stimulation provided by LCIG infusion progressively ameliorates gait and alleviates FoG in PD patients over time, independently from improvement of motor fluctuations and without increase of daily dosage of dopaminergic therapy.

A single centre prospective study of three device-assisted therapies for Parkinson's disease

Comparative studies assessing outcomes with the three device-assisted therapies could help to individualise treatment for patients living with Parkinson's disease. We designed a single-centre non-randomised prospective observational study assessing the quality of life (QoL), motor and non-motor outcomes at 6 and 12-months in patients treated with subcutaneous apomorphine continuous 16-hours infusion (APO), levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) or subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). In this study, 66 patients were included (13 APO; 19 LCIG; 34 STN-DBS). At baseline, cognitive, non-motor and motor scores were significantly less severe in the STN-DBS group, whereas the LCIG group had a longer disease duration and higher non-motor scores. In the APO group, there were no statistically significant changes in non-motor, motor and QoL scales. The LCIG group had significant changes in QoL and motor scales that were significant after multiple comparison analysis at 6 and 12-months. The STN-DBS group showed improvement in QoL scores and non-motor and motor scores at 6 and 12-months after multiple comparison analysis. In this real-life prospective study, device-assisted therapies showed differences in their effects on QoL and motor and non-motor function at 12-months. However, there were also differences in baseline characteristics of the patient groups that were not based on pre-determined selection criteria. Differences in characteristics of patients offered and/or treatment with different device-assisted therapies may reflect within-centre biases that may, in turn, influence perceptions of treatment efficacy or outcomes. Treatment centres should be aware of this potential confounder when assessing and offering device-assisted treatment options to their patients and potential baseline differences need to be taken into consideration when comparing the results of non-randomised studies.

5-HT1A agonists for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease

Levodopa is the most effective agent for treating the symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, levodopa-induced dyskinesia remains a significant complication that manifests after few years of treatment, for which therapeutic options remain limited. Several agonists of the serotonin type 1A (5-HT_1A) receptor with varying levels of efficacy and interaction at other sites, have been tested in the clinic. Clinical trials testing 5-HT_1A agonists have yielded inconsistent results in alleviating dyskinesia, especially that the antidyskinetic benefit observed was often accompanied by an adverse effect on motor function. In this article, we summarize and analyze the various clinical trials performed with 5-HT_1A agonists in PD patients with dyskinesia and offer perspectives on the future of this class of agents in PD.

Doxycycline to treat levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

 Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is a common motor complication of levodopa therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Doxycycline is a widely used and inexpensive tetracycline with anti-inflammatory properties.

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxycycline in patients with PD and LID.

METHODS

 This was an open-label, uncontrolled, single-arm, single-center, phase 2 proof-of-concept study in patients with PD with functional impact of dyskinesia, which used levodopa three times daily, in a movement disorders clinic in Brazil. Participants were treated with doxycycline 200 mg/day for 12 weeks, with evaluations at baseline, week 4, and week 12 of treatment. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) total score at week 12, evaluated by two blinded raters. Key secondary outcomes measures were OFF time and ON time with troublesome dyskinesia in the PD home diary.

RESULTS

 Eight patients with PD were treated and evaluated. Doxycycline 200 mg/day reduced the UDysRS total score at week 12, compared with baseline (Friedman χ² = 9.6; p = 0.008). Further, doxycycline reduced the ON time with troublesome dyskinesia (Friedman χ² = 10.8; p = 0.004) without worsening parkinsonism. There were no severe adverse events, and dyspepsia was the commonest event.

CONCLUSION

 In this preliminary, open-label and uncontrolled trial, doxycycline was effective in reducing LID and safe after a 12-week treatment. Further well-designed placebo-controlled clinical trials with a longer duration and a larger number of participants are needed.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

 https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br, identifier: RBR-1047fwbf.

Practically Defined Off-State Dyskinesia Following Repeated Intraputamenal Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Administration

BACKGROUND

We recently showed that by employing an enhanced drug-delivery approach, repeated administration of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) can produce a spatially distributed increased ¹⁸ F-DOPA positron emission tomography (PET) uptake, suggesting sprouting of dopaminergic terminals throughout the putamen structure. Despite this, we failed to prove a significant measurable clinical response. Since, however, we have identified a subject demonstrating a temporal relationship between repeated GDNF infusions and dyskinesia arising in the practically defined off (pracoff) state.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the development of pracoff dyskinesia across our study population and consider its utility as an indicator that trophic factor-induced terminal sprouting can affect enhanced endogenous dopamine levels.

METHODS

This was a blinded retrospective analysis of videotaped motor assessments at eight weekly study visits. Dyskinesia in the pracoff and supramaximal on state were rated using the Clinical Dyskinesia Rating Scale. Logistic regression was employed to explore the predictors of pracoff dyskinesia. Generalized estimated equations were used to estimate the cumulative effect of repeated GDNF infusions.

RESULTS

Mild-moderate choreiform dyskinesia in the pracoff state were seen in 47 assessments in 17 (n = 41) subjects. During the 18-month timeframe, each subsequent 8-week period of receiving GDNF increased the risk of demonstrating pracoff state dyskinesia by 34% (odds ratio [OR], 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20, 1.50); P < 0.001). An increasing supramaximal on dyskinesia score (OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.07, 1.30]; P = 0.001) also increased the likelihood of pracoff dyskinesia at that visit.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first description of increasingly prevalent pracoff-state dyskinesia developing during the course of a trophic factor study. This may provide a surrogate marker that GDNF can enable recovery of endogenous dopamine release even in advanced Parkinson's disease. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Levodopa Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: DUOGLOBE Final 3-Year Results

BACKGROUND

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) improves motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD).

OBJECTIVE

To present the final 36-month efficacy and safety results from DUOGLOBE (DUOdopa/Duopa in Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease - a GLobal OBservational Study Evaluating Long-Term Effectiveness; NCT02611713).

METHODS

DUOGLOBE was an international, prospective, long-term, real-world, observational study of patients with aPD initiating LCIG in routine clinical care. The primary endpoint was change in patient-reported "Off" time to Month 36. Safety was assessed by monitoring serious adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

Significant improvements in "Off" time were maintained over 3 years (mean [SD]: -3.3 hours [3.7]; p < 0.001). There were significant improvements to Month 36 in total scores of the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (-5.9 [23.7]; p = 0.044), Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (-14.3 [40.5]; p = 0.002), Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 (-5.8 [12.9]; p < 0.001), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (-1.8 [6.0]; p = 0.008). Health-related quality of life and caregiver burden significantly improved through Months 24 and 30, respectively (Month 24, 8-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire Summary Index, -6.0 [22.5]; p = 0.006; Month 30, Modified Caregiver Strain Index, -2.3 [7.6]; p = 0.026). Safety was consistent with the well-established LCIG profile (SAEs: 54.9% of patients; discontinuations: 54.4%; discontinuations due to an adverse event: 27.2%). Of 106 study discontinuations, 32 patients (30.2%) continued LCIG outside the study.

CONCLUSION

DUOGLOBE demonstrates real-world, long-term, reductions in motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with aPD treated with LCIG.

An Update on Nondopaminergic Treatments for Motor and Non-motor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease

Nondopaminergic neurotransmitters such as adenosine, norepinephrine, serotonin, glutamate, and acetylcholine are all involved in Parkinson's disease (PD) and promote its symptoms. Therefore, nondopaminergic receptors are key targets for developing novel preparations for the management of motor and non-motor symptoms in PD, without the potential adverse events of dopamine replacement therapy. We reviewed English-written articles and ongoing clinical trials of nondopaminergic treatments for PD patients till 2014 to summarize the recent findings on nondopaminergic preparations for the treatment of PD patients. The most promising research area of nondopaminergic targets is to reduce motor complications caused by traditional dopamine replacement therapy, including motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Istradefylline, Safinamide, and Zonisamide were licensed for the management of motor fluctuations in PD patients, while novel serotonergic and glutamatergic agents to improve motor fluctuations are still under research. Sustained- release agents of Amantadine were approved for treating levodopa induced dyskinesia (LID), and serotonin 5HT1B receptor agonist also showed clinical benefits to LID. Nondopaminergic targets were also being explored for the treatment of non-motor symptoms of PD. Pimavanserin was approved globally for the management of hallucinations and delusions related to PD psychosis. Istradefylline revealed beneficial effect on daytime sleepiness, apathy, depression, and lower urinary tract symptoms in PD subjects. Droxidopa may benefit orthostatic hypotension in PD patients. Safinamide and Zonisamide also showed clinical efficacy on certain non-motor symptoms of PD patients. Nondopaminergic drugs are not expected to replace dopaminergic strategies, but further development of these drugs may lead to new approaches with positive clinical implications.

A New Paradigm in Parkinson's Disease Evaluation With Wearable Medical Devices: A Review of STAT-ONTM

In the past decade, the use of wearable medical devices has been a great breakthrough in clinical practice, trials, and research. In the Parkinson's disease field, clinical evaluation is time limited, and healthcare professionals need to rely on retrospective data collected through patients' self-filled diaries and administered questionnaires. As this often leads to inaccurate evaluations, a more objective system for symptom monitoring in a patient's daily life is claimed. In this regard, the use of wearable medical devices is crucial. This study aims at presenting a review on STAT-ONTM, a wearable medical device Class IIa, which provides objective information on the distribution and severity of PD motor symptoms in home environments. The sensor analyzes inertial signals, with a set of validated machine learning algorithms running in real time. The device was developed for 12 years, and this review aims at gathering all the results achieved within this time frame. First, a compendium of the complete journey of STAT-ONTM since 2009 is presented, encompassing different studies and developments in funded European and Spanish national projects. Subsequently, the methodology of database construction and machine learning algorithms design and development is described. Finally, clinical validation and external studies of STAT-ONTM are presented.

Outcomes Impacting Quality of Life in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease Patients Treated with Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel

Background:

It is believed that motor symptoms, including dyskinesia, and non-motor symptoms impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), and that improvements in these metrics are correlated.

Objective:

Investigate the relationship between HRQoL and measures of PD severity and treatment efficacy, including motor and non-motor symptoms.

Methods:

This was a planned investigation of an international, prospective, single-arm, post-marketing observational study of the long-term effectiveness of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) in patients with advanced PD. Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) were calculated for baseline and change from baseline at 12 months between HRQoL and motor and non-motor symptoms.

Results:

A total of 195 patients were included. At baseline, HRQoL was moderately positively correlated with Activities of Daily Living (UPDRS II, PCC = 0.44), non-motor symptoms (0.48), and measures of sleep (0.50 and 0.40); all p < 0.001. After 12 months of treatment with LCIG, improvements in HRQoL were moderately positively correlated with improvement from baseline in non-motor symptoms (PCC = 0.42), sleep (0.54), and daytime sleepiness (0.40; all p < 0.001), and weakly correlated with improvement in dyskinesia signs and symptoms (PCC = 0.23; p = 0.011). Improvement in HRQoL was not correlated with improvements in OFF time or dyskinesia time.

Conclusion:

Both at baseline and for change from baseline at 12 months, HRQoL was correlated with baseline and change from baseline in dyskinesia, Activities of Daily Living, and non-motor symptoms, including sleep; but not with baseline or change in OFF time.

Levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease increase cerebrospinal fluid nitric oxide metabolites' levels

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is a common complication of Parkinson's disease (PD) therapy. Nitric oxide in the central nervous system may have a role in its pathophysiology. The present work investigates plasma and CSF levels of nitric oxide metabolites nitrite and nitrate in patients with PD, LID, and healthy control. We measured plasma and CSF nitrite and nitrate levels in patients with PD with and without LID and in healthy controls. The levels of plasma and CSF nitrite and nitrate were measured by ozone-based chemiluminescence. Sixty-seven participants were enrolled. CSF nitrite levels in patients with PD and LID were higher than in patients with PD without LID and healthy controls. CSF/plasma ratio of nitrite was higher in patients with PD and LID than in patients with PD without LID. The CSF/plasma ratio of nitrite in patients with PD and LID was higher than 1, indicating an intrathecal production of NO in patients with this motor complication. There was an increase in nitrate levels of CSF and CSF/plasma ratio of nitrate in patients with PD and LID compared to the healthy controls. Sex, age at evaluation, disease duration, and levodopa equivalent daily doses, as well as processing and storage time, did not critically influence these results. The present study demonstrated an increase in nitrite and nitrate levels in the central nervous system of patients with PD and LID. This finding strengthens the role of NO on LID pathophysiology.

Amantadine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders

The efficacy of amantadine in the symptomatic treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease, discovered serendipitously more than 50 years ago, has stood the test of time and the drug is still commonly used by neurologists today. Its pharmacological actions are unique in combining dopaminergic and glutamatergic properties, which account for its dual effect on parkinsonian signs and symptoms and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Furthermore, amantadine has additional and less well-defined pharmacological effects, including on anticholinergic and serotonergic activity. Evidence from randomised controlled trials over the past 5 years has confirmed the efficacy of amantadine to treat levodopa-induced dyskinesias in patients with Parkinson's disease, and clinical studies have also provided support for its potential to reduce motor fluctuations. Other uses of amantadine, such as in the treatment of drug-induced parkinsonism, atypical parkinsonism, Huntington's disease, or tardive dyskinesia, lack a strong evidence base. Future trials should examine its role in the management of motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with early Parkinson's disease and those with other movement disorders.

Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Reduces Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease in a Randomized Trial

Background

There are limited data regarding the effectiveness of levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) for dyskinesia.

Objective

Compare the effectiveness of LCIG versus oral optimized medical treatment (OMT) for dyskinesia in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) using the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS).

Methods

This phase 3b, open‐label, multicenter, 12‐week, interventional study (NCT02799381) randomized 63 LCIG naïve patients with advanced PD (UDysRS ≥30) to LCIG (N = 30) or OMT (N = 33) treatment. Dyskinesia impact was assessed at baseline through week 12 using the UDysRS. PD‐related motor and non‐motor symptoms, and quality of life (QoL) were also assessed.

Results

Dyskinesias measured by UDysRS were significantly reduced in the LCIG group (n = 24; −17.37 ± 2.79) compared with the OMT group (n = 26; −2.33 ± 2.56) after 12 weeks (−15.05 ± 3.20; 95% CI, −21.47 to −8.63; P < 0.0001). At week 12, LCIG versus OMT also demonstrated significant improvements in “On” time without troublesome dyskinesia (P = 0.0001), QoL (P < 0.0001), global impression of change (P < 0.0001), activities of daily living (P = 0.0006), and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (P = 0.0762). Treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported in 27 (44.3%) patients (LCIG, 18 [64.3%]; OMT, 9 [27.3%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 2 (7.1%) LCIG‐treated patients.

Conclusions

LCIG significantly reduced dyskinesia compared with OMT. LCIG showed efficacy for treatment of troublesome dyskinesia in patients with advanced PD while demonstrating benefits in both motor and non‐motor symptoms and QoL. © 2021 AbbVie Inc. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson Movement Disorder Society

Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Experimental Pharmacotherapy for L-Dopa-Induced Dyskinesia

L-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is the most frequent motor complication associated with chronic L-dopa treatment in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying LID suggest that abnormalities in multiple neurotransmitter systems, in addition to dopaminergic nigrostriatal denervation and altered dopamine release and reuptake dynamics at the synaptic level, are involved in LID development. Increased knowledge of neurobiological LID substrates has led to the development of several drug candidates to alleviate this motor complication. However, with the exception of amantadine, none of the pharmacological therapies tested in humans have demonstrated clinically relevant beneficial effects. Therefore, LID management is still one of the most challenging problems in the treatment of PD patients. In this review, we first describe the known pathophysiological mechanisms of LID. We then provide an updated report of experimental pharmacotherapies tested in clinical trials of PD patients and drugs currently under study to alleviate LID. Finally, we discuss available pharmacological LID treatment approaches and offer our opinion of possible issues to be clarified and future therapeutic strategies.

Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Safinamide is a novel anti-parkinsonian drug with possible anti-dyskinetic properties. Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disease. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of safinamide administration compared to placebo in PD patients on multiple outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, and trial databases were searched up to 23 December 2020 for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing safinamide to placebo, alone or as add-on therapy in PD. Data were extracted from literature and regulatory agencies. Primary outcomes were ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, OFF-time, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) section III (UPDRS-III). Secondary outcomes included any dyskinesia rating scale (DRS), ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia, UPDRS-II, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). In order to estimate mean difference (MD) and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), generic inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel methods were used for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Analyses were performed grouping by PD with (PDwMF) or without (PDwoMF) motor fluctuations, safinamide dose, and concomitant dopaminergic treatment. Summary of findings with GRADE were performed.

RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 2792 participants were identified. In PDwMF patients, safinamide 100 mg as add-on to levodopa (L-dopa) significantly increased ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia (MD = 0.95 h; 95% CI from 0.41 to 1.49), reduced OFF-time (MD = - 1.06 h; 95% CI from - 1.60 to - 0.51), and improved UPDRS-III (MD = - 2.77; 95% CI from - 4.27 to - 1.28) with moderate quality of evidence. Similar results were observed for the 50 mg dose. However, the quality of evidence was moderate only for ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, whereas for OFF-time and UPDRS-III was low. In PDwoMF patients taking a single dopamine agonist, safinamide 100 mg resulted in little to no clinically significant improvement in UPDRS-III (MD = - 1.84; 95% CI from - 3.19 to - 0.49), with moderate quality of evidence. Conversely, in PDwoMF patients, the 200 mg and 50 mg doses showed nonsignificant improvement in UPDRS-III, with very low and moderate quality of evidence, respectively. In PDwMF patients taking safinamide 100 mg or 50 mg, nonsignificant differences were observed for ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia and DRS, with high and low quality of evidence, respectively. In the same patients, UPDRS-II was significantly improved at the 100 mg and 50 mg dose, with high and moderate quality of evidence. In PDwoMF, UPDRS-II showed a little yet significant difference only at 100 mg, with low quality of evidence. PDQ-39 resulted significantly improved only with the 100 mg dose in PDwMF, with low quality of evidence.

CONCLUSION

Overall, safinamide is effective in PDwMF patients taking L-dopa both at 100 and 50 mg daily. Evidence for efficacy in early PD is limited. Further trials are needed to better evaluate the anti-dyskinetic properties of safinamide.

Development, Efficacy and Safety of Once-daily, Bedtime, Extended-release Amantadine (Gocovri®) to Treat Dyskinesia and OFF Time in Parkinson’s Disease

Collapse

Expanding phenomenologic heterogeneity of tardive syndromes: Time for an updated assessment tool

Tardive syndromes (TDS) are a group of hyperkinetic and hypokinetic movement disorders that occurs after exposure to dopamine receptor blocking agents such as antipsychotic and antiemetic drugs. The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) is a widely used instrument that has become the standard for assessment of tardive dyskinesia (TDD), the most common form of TDS. However, the AIMS has a number of clinimetric limitations and was designed primarily to assess the anatomic distribution and severity of involuntary movements without regard to phenomenology. To build on recent advances in understanding and treatment of TDS, re-evaluation and revision of the AIMS that could aid both clinical practice and research may be worthwhile. Challenges, such as retaining the efficiency of the current AIMS, incorporating evaluation of impairment in daily activities, and re-training clinicians for a revised examination procedure and rating instrument, are very likely surmountable.

New Sensor and Wearable Technologies to Aid in the Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a degenerative disorder of the brain characterized by the impairment of the nigrostriatal system. This impairment leads to specific motor manifestations (i.e., bradykinesia, tremor, and rigidity) that are assessed through clinical examination, scales, and patient-reported outcomes. New sensor-based and wearable technologies are progressively revolutionizing PD care by objectively measuring these manifestations and improving PD diagnosis and treatment monitoring. However, their use is still limited in clinical practice, perhaps because of the absence of external validation and standards for their continuous use at home. In the near future, these systems will progressively complement traditional tools and revolutionize the way we diagnose and monitor patients with PD.

Parkinson's Disease Multimodal Complex Treatment (PD-MCT): Analysis of Therapeutic Effects and Predictors for Improvement

Parkinson’s disease Multimodal Complex Treatment (PD-MCT) is a multidisciplinary inpatient treatment approach that has been demonstrated to improve motor function and quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). In this study, we assessed the efficacy of PD-MCT and calculated predictors for improvement. We performed a prospective analysis in a non-randomized, open-label observational patient cohort. Study examinations were done at baseline (BL), at discharge after two-weeks of inpatient treatment (DC) and at a six-week follow-up examination (FU). Besides Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III as a primary outcome, motor performance was measured by the Timed Up-and-Go (TUG), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Perdue Pegboard Test (PPT). Until DC, motor performance improved significantly in several parameters and was largely maintained until FU (MDS-UPDRS III BL-to-DC: −4.7 ± 1.2 (SE) p = 0.0012, BL-to-FU: −6.1 ± 1.3 p = 0.0001; TUG BL-to-DC: −2.5 ± 0.9 p = 0.015, BL-to-FU: 2.4 ± 0.9 p = 0.027; BBS BL-to-DC: 2.4 ± 0.7 p = 0.003, BL-to-FU: 1.3 ± 0.7 p = 0.176, PPT BL-to-DC: 3.0 ± 0.5 p = 0.000004, BL-to-FU: 1.7 ± 0.7 p = 0.059). Overall, nontremor items were more therapy responsive than tremor items. Motor complications evaluated with MDS-UPDRS IV occurred significantly less frequent at DC (−1.8 ± 0.5 p = 0.002). Predictor analyses revealed an influence of initial motor impairment and disease severity on the treatment response in different motor aspects. In summary, we demonstrate a significant positive treatment effect of PD-MCT on motor function of PD patients which can be maintained in several parameters for an extended time period of six weeks and identify predictors for an improvement of motor function.

A Pooled Analysis From Phase 2b and 3 Studies in Japan of Istradefylline in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Characterization of patient factors associated with istradefylline efficacy may facilitate personally optimized treatment.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine which patient factors are associated with favorable istradefylline treatment outcomes in PD patients with motor complications.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis of data from two identical phase 2b and 3 Japanese studies of istradefylline. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association of 12 patient characteristics with favorable outcomes.

RESULTS

Off time reduction and increased good on time with istradefylline provided a significantly favorable response in patients aged ≥65 years. Off time reduction was more favorable in patients with ≥8-hour daily off time at baseline. Improvement in UPDRS Part III was favorable in patients with UPDRS Part III baseline score ≥ 20.

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient factors influenced the effect of istradefylline on motor fluctuations, motor function, activities of daily living, and clinical impression. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Pharmacokinetics of ADS-5102 (Amantadine) Extended Release Capsules Administered Once Daily at Bedtime for the Treatment of Dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Preclinical and clinical studies suggest amantadine immediate-release (IR) may reduce dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD), although higher doses are associated with increased CNS adverse events (AEs). ADS-5102 is an extended release amantadine capsule formulation, designed for once-daily dosing at bedtime (qhs) to provide high concentrations upon waking and throughout the day, with lower concentrations in the evening. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of ADS-5102 were assessed in two phase I studies in healthy subjects, and a blinded, randomized phase II/III dose-finding study in PD patients.

METHODS

The first phase I study assessed single ADS-5102 doses (68.5, 137, and 274 mg) in a crossover design, whereas the second phase I study evaluated ADS-5102 137 mg for 7 days followed by amantadine IR 81 mg twice daily (or reverse order). In the phase II/III double-blind study, PD patients with dyskinesia were randomized to ADS-5102 (210, 274, or 338 mg) or placebo for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Single ADS-5102 doses resulted in a slow initial rise in amantadine plasma concentration, with delayed time to maximum concentration (12-16 h). Amantadine plasma concentrations were higher in PD patients versus healthy volunteers. The steady-state profile of once-daily ADS-5102 was significantly different from that of twice-daily amantadine IR, such that the two formulations are not bioequivalent. PK modeling suggested the recommended daily ADS-5102 dosage (274 mg qhs) resulted in 1.4- to 2.0-fold higher amantadine plasma concentrations during the day versus amantadine IR.

CONCLUSIONS

ADS-5102 can be administered once-daily qhs to achieve high amantadine plasma concentrations in the morning and throughout the day, when symptoms of dyskinesia occur.

Which Scale Best Detects Treatment Response of Tremor in Parkinsonism?

BACKGROUND

Several scales are available for rating the severity of tremor at present. However, the sensitivity to change of these instruments has remained to be clarified.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sensitivity of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale, the Part III of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and the MDS-UPDRS Tremor Scale to the effects of various antitremor treatments.

METHODS

Enrolling subjects with parkinsonism associated with tremor, we analyzed two scenarios: (1) tremor changes associated with acute levodopa challenge (n = 287) and (2) a 12-month outcome of different treatment options (n = 512) including deep brain stimulation (n = 146), levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion (n = 30), and initiating (n = 63) or adjusting oral antiparkinsonian medication (n = 273). Changes in tremor scales were assessed by effect size values (Cohen's d and eta-square).

RESULTS

Part B of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale was the most sensitive to acute levodopa challenge (Cohen's d = -1.04, η2 = 0.12). However, Part A of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale showed the highest effect size, which was a small one (Cohen's d = -0.33, η2 = 0.03), for detecting a treatment-related change in the severity of tremor during long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale has a better ability to capture changes due to levodopa challenge or antiparkinsonian treatment than MDS-UPDRS Part III or MDS-UPDRS Tremor Scale.

Contemporary Options for the Management of Motor Complications in Parkinson's Disease: Updated Clinical Review

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic, progressive condition affecting around 1% of the population older than 60 years. Upon long-term treatment with levodopa, the mainstay of treatment in PD, most patients, especially younger ones exposed to higher doses, will experience symptoms related to end-of-dose deterioration, peak-dose dyskinesias, and other motor fluctuations. Therapeutic strategies are grounded on modification of oral levodopa pharmacokinetics to extend levodopa benefit and development of new routes of drug delivery (e.g., levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion) or long-acting formulations of existing dopaminergic drugs to prolong the duration of striatal dopamine receptors stimulation. As our understanding of the pathophysiology of motor complications evolves, our therapeutic armamentarium is actively expanding and the focus of research is now actively pointing to the new non-dopaminergic agents acting both within the basal ganglia and in other brain regions (e.g., drugs acting on glutamate, GABA, serotonin, and calcium channels). Despite the fact that trials comparing the different therapeutic strategies are lacking, we aimed at devising practical evidence- and experience-guided suggestions for the clinical management of motor complications, emphasizing that this should always be an individualized endeavor. This review summarizes the pharmacological management of motor complications in PD, including new formulations and routes of delivery, and the newer released drugs such as istradefylline, opicapone, safinamide, and zonisamide. Advanced therapeutic strategies for selected cases such as treatment with apomorphine and surgical techniques (deep brain stimulation) are also discussed. A comprehensive knowledge of the available options and evidence is fundamental for the successful management of these challenging complications.

Motion Sensor-Based Assessment of Parkinson's Disease Motor Symptoms During Leg Agility Tests: Results From Levodopa Challenge

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a degenerative, progressive disorder of the central nervous system that mainly affects motor control. The aim of this study was to develop data-driven methods and test their clinimetric properties to detect and quantify PD motor states using motion sensor data from leg agility tests. Nineteen PD patients were recruited in a levodopa single dose challenge study. PD patients performed leg agility tasks while wearing motion sensors on their lower extremities. Clinical evaluation of video recordings was performed by three movement disorder specialists who used four items from the motor section of the unified PD rating scale (UPDRS), the treatment response scale (TRS) and a dyskinesia score. Using the sensor data, spatiotemporal features were calculated and relevant features were selected by feature selection. Machine learning methods like support vector machines (SVM), decision trees, and linear regression, using ten-fold cross validation were trained to predict motor states of the patients. SVM showed the best convergence validity with correlation coefficients of 0.81 to TRS, 0.83 to UPDRS #31 (body bradykinesia and hypokinesia), 0.78 to SUMUPDRS (the sum of the UPDRS items: #26-leg agility, #27-arising from chair, and #29-gait), and 0.67 to dyskinesia. Additionally, the SVM-based scores had similar test-retest reliability in relation to clinical ratings. The SVM-based scores were less responsive to treatment effects than the clinical scores, particularly with regards to dyskinesia. In conclusion, the results from this study indicate that using motion sensors during leg agility tests may lead to valid and reliable objective measures of PD motor symptoms.

Naftazone in advanced Parkinson's disease: An acute L-DOPA challenge randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

There is an unmet need to better control motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD). Naftazone, which exhibits glutamate release inhibition properties, has shown antiparkinsonian and antidyskinetic activity in preclinical models of PD and in a clinical proof of concept study.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial in PD patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia testing naftazone 160 mg/day versus placebo for 14 days. The two co-primary endpoints were the area under curve (AUC) of motor (MDS-UPDRS part III) and dyskinesia (AIMS) scores during an acute levodopa challenge performed at the end of each period. Secondary endpoints were UDysRS and axial symptoms scores during the challenge; AIMS, UDysRS, and time spent with or without dyskinesia the day before the challenge. The primary analysis was performed in the per protocol population.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included in the analysis. There was no difference between naftazone and placebo for the AUC of MDS-UPDRS III (-89, 95%CI[-1071; 893], p = 0.85), and AIMS (70, 95%CI[-192; 332], p = 0.57). At the end of treatment periods, AIMS score tended to be lower with naftazone than placebo (4.4 ± 3.4 versus 6.7 ± 4.4, p = 0.07), but UDysRS scores and other secondary outcomes were not different. Naftazone was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not confirm previous results on the efficacy of naftazone on dyskinesia nor motor fluctuations highlighting the problem of translating results obtained in preclinical models into clinical trials. Further investigation of naftazone may be conducted in PD with longer treatment duration.

Effects of mGluR5 Antagonists on Parkinson's Patients With L-Dopa-Induced Dyskinesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Modulation of Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) may be a novel therapeutic approach to manage Parkinson's disease (PD) Patients with L-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). Objectives: The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of mGluR5 antagonists for the treatment of LID patients. Methods: Several electronic databases were consulted up to July 30, 2017. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared mGluR5 antagonists vs. placebo in LID patients were included. Pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Results: Nine trials including 776 patients met all inclusion criteria. We pooled the whole data and found apparent difference between mGluR5 antagonists and placebo in terms of mAIMS (p = 0.010). However, there was no significant improvements on antidyskinetic in terms of LFADLDS (p = 0.42) and UPDRS Part IV (p = 0.20). Meanwhile, the effect size of UPDRS part III was similar in mGluR5 antagonist groups with in placebo groups (p = 0.25). Adverse events incidence was higher with mGluR5 antagonists than with placebo, especially at the expense of increased dizziness (16.3 vs. 4.3%), visual hallucination (10.1 vs. 1.1%), or fatigue (10.1 vs. 4.8%). Conclusions: mGluR5 antagonists had a greater treatment effect on the mAIMS in LID patients, however, there was no improvements on antidyskinetic in terms of LFADLDS and UPDRS Part IV compared with placebo. According to these results, we unable to recommend mGluR5 antagonists for the routine treatment of LID patients right now.

Minimal clinically important difference for the historic parts of the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale

BACKGROUND

Motor complications represent an important clinical problem in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). The Motor Complications Part of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Part IV) and the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) are among the most reliable instruments to evaluate these problems. The minimal clinically important difference thresholds are the smallest changes in the outcome measures that are clinically meaningful.

AIMS

The aim of our study was to calculate the minimal clinically important difference thresholds for the MDS-UPDRS Part IV and the historic parts of the UDysRS.

METHODS

A total of 1044 paired investigations of 436 patients were analyzed. Changes in the respective outcome measures (MDS-UPDRS Part IV, UDysRS Parts I and II) were compared to the Patient-rated Global Impression of Improvement scores (anchors). Subsequently, we applied receiver-operating characteristic analysis to ascertain the MCID thresholds with optimal sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Any improvement greater than 2.1 points or any worsening greater than 1.8 points on UDysRS Part I represents a minimal, yet clinically meaningful change. In reference to UDysRS Part II, the smallest changes considered clinically relevant are 1.8 and 1.7 points for improvement and deterioration, respectively. The thresholds for the MDS-UPDRS Part IV are 0.9 points for improvement and 0.8 points for worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

Our estimates may allow the judgment of the clinical relevance of numeric changes in the dyskinesia scales.

Efficacy and safety of amantadine for the treatment of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia

L-DOPA induced dyskinesias (LIDs) may affect up to 40% of Parkinson's disease (PD) and impact negatively health-related quality of life. Amantadine has demonstrated significant antidyskinetic effects in animal PD models and in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with PD. These effects are thought to be related to the blockade of NMDA receptors modulating cortico-striatal glutamatergic-dopaminergic interactions involved in the genesis of LIDs. There are three pharmaceutical forms of amantadine currently available in the market: an oral immediate-release (IR) formulation, which is widely available; an extended-release (ER) formulation (ADS-5102) which has been recently developed and approved by the FDA; and an intravenous infusion (IV) solution, which is not commonly used in clinical practice. RCTs with amantadine IR or ER, involving more than 650 patients have shown consistent and long-lasting reductions in LIDs. Interestingly, ADS-5102 not only reduced LIDs, but also reduced significantly at the same time the duration of daily OFF-time, a unique finding compared with other antiparkinsonian medications that usually reduce time spent OFF at the cost of worsening of LIDs. Amantadine IR might also have possible effects on other PD symptoms such as apathy or fatigue. The most common adverse reactions with amantadine are constipation, cardiovascular dysfunction including QT prolongation, orthostatic hypotension and edema, neuropsychiatric symptoms such as hallucinations, confusion and delirium, nausea and livedo reticularis. Corneal degeneration is rare but critical. In summary, amantadine immediate and extended-release are effective and safe for the treatment of LIDs.

Verification of a Method for Measuring Parkinson's Disease Related Temporal Irregularity in Spiral Drawings

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive movement disorder caused by the death of dopamine-producing cells in the midbrain. There is a need for frequent symptom assessment, since the treatment needs to be individualized as the disease progresses. The aim of this paper was to verify and further investigate the clinimetric properties of an entropy-based method for measuring PD-related upper limb temporal irregularities during spiral drawing tasks. More specifically, properties of a temporal irregularity score (TIS) for patients at different stages of PD, and medication time points were investigated. Nineteen PD patients and 22 healthy controls performed repeated spiral drawing tasks on a smartphone. Patients performed the tests before a single levodopa dose and at specific time intervals after the dose was given. Three movement disorder specialists rated videos of the patients based on the unified PD rating scale (UPDRS) and the Dyskinesia scale. Differences in mean TIS between the groups of patients and healthy subjects were assessed. Test-retest reliability of the TIS was measured. The ability of TIS to detect changes from baseline (before medication) to later time points was investigated. Correlations between TIS and clinical rating scores were assessed. The mean TIS was significantly different between healthy subjects and patients in advanced groups (p-value = 0.02). Test-retest reliability of TIS was good with Intra-class Correlation Coefficient of 0.81. When assessing changes in relation to treatment, TIS contained some information to capture changes from Off to On and wearing off effects. However, the correlations between TIS and clinical scores (UPDRS and Dyskinesia) were weak. TIS was able to differentiate spiral drawings drawn by patients in an advanced stage from those drawn by healthy subjects, and TIS had good test-retest reliability. TIS was somewhat responsive to single-dose levodopa treatment. Since TIS is an upper limb high-frequency-based measure, it cannot be detected during clinical assessment.

ADS-5102 (Amantadine) Extended-Release Capsules for Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson Disease (EASE LID Study): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Medical treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in Parkinson disease (PD) is an unmet need.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ADS-5102 (amantadine) extended-release 274-mg capsules for treatment of LID in patients with PD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted between May 7, 2014, and July 22, 2015, at 44 North American sites among patients with PD treated with levodopa who experienced at least 1 hour of troublesome dyskinesia per day with at least mild functional impact.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive placebo or 274 mg of ADS-5102 administered orally at bedtime for up to 25 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy analysis was the change from baseline to week 12 in the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale total score for ADS-5102 vs placebo in the modified intent-to-treat population. OFF time (amount of time the PD medication is not controlling motor symptoms) was a key secondary end point. Safety analyses included all patients who received the study drug (ADS-5102 or placebo).

Results

A total of 189 patients were screened, and 126 were randomized; the modified intent-to-treat population included 121 patients (51 women and 70 men; mean [SD] age, 64.7 [9.1] years). At week 12, the least-squares mean (SE) change in the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale score was -15.9 (1.6) for ADS-5102 (n = 63) and -8.0 (1.6) for placebo (n = 58) (treatment difference, -7.9; 95% CI, -12.5 to -3.3; P < .001). OFF time decreased by a mean (SE) of 0.6 (0.3) hours for ADS-5102 and increased by 0.3 (0.3) hours for placebo (treatment difference, -0.9 hours; 95% CI, -1.6 to -0.2; P = .02). Common adverse events for ADS-5102 vs placebo included visual hallucinations (15 [23.8%] vs 1 [1.7%]), peripheral edema (15 [23.8%] vs 0), and dizziness (14 [22.2%] vs 0). Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation for 13 patients receiving ADS-5102 (20.6%) vs 4 patients receiving placebo (6.9%).

Conclusions and Relevance

ADS-5102, 274 mg at bedtime, may be an effective treatment for LID. An additional benefit is reduced OFF time. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an oral treatment reducing both LID and OFF time in patients with PD with dyskinesia.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02136914.

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of ADS-5102 (amantadine) extended-release capsules for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (EASE LID 3)

BACKGROUND

The treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD) is an unmet need with no approved drug therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of 274 mg ADS-5102 (amantadine) extended-release capsules (equivalent to 340-mg amantadine HCl) for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

PD patients with ≥1 hour of troublesome dyskinesia and at least mild functional impact were randomized to placebo or ADS-5102 once daily at bedtime for 13 weeks. The primary efficacy analysis was based on change from baseline to week 12 on the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale total score in the modified intent-to-treat population. OFF time was a key secondary measure.

RESULTS

At week 12, least-squares mean change in the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale was -20.7 (standard error 2.2) for ADS-5102 (n = 37) and -6.3 (standard error 2.1) for placebo (n = 38; treatment difference -14.4, 95% confidence interval -20.4 to -8.3, P < .0001), indicating improvement in levodopa-induced dyskinesia. OFF time decreased 0.5 hours (standard error 0.3) for ADS-5102 from a baseline mean of 2.6 hours and increased 0.6 hours (standard error 0.3) for placebo from a baseline mean of 2.0 hours (treatment difference -1.1 hours, 95% confidence interval -2.0 to -0.2, P = .0199). The most common adverse events (ADS-5102 versus placebo) included dry mouth (13.5% versus 2.6%), nausea (13.5% versus 2.6%), decreased appetite (10.8% versus 0%), insomnia (10.8% versus 0%), orthostatic hypotension (10.8% versus 0%), constipation (8.1% versus 0%), falls (8.1% versus 5.3%), and visual hallucinations (8.1% versus 5.3%). Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 19% versus 8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ADS-5102 274 mg is an oral pharmacotherapy demonstrating a significant decrease in levodopa-induced dyskinesia and improving OFF time. © 2017 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

An updated meta-analysis of amantadine for treating dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease

In recent years, a few of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about amantadine for treating dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD) were completed. Here, we conducted a systematic literature review about the clinical research to provide the updated evidence for treating dyskinesia. Electronic search of Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other databases up to May 2016 for relevant studies was performed. We selected the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale IV (UPDRS IV) and Dyskinesia Rating Scales (DRS) as efficacy outcomes of amantadine on dyskinesia. Pooled data from included studies was then used to carry out meta-analysis. A total of eleven eligible RCTs that involved 356 PD patients with existing dyskinesia were included in the present study. The results of meta-analysis showed that amantadine significantly improved UPDRS IV (P < 0.0001) and DRS (P < 0.00001). Meanwhile, there was a mild reduction in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III after amantadine treatment in advanced PD patients with dyskinesia (P = 0.01) compared with placebo. High dosage of amantadine obviously improved existing dyskinesia in PD, yet at the expense of the increased adverse events. It was necessary to detect the optimal therapeutic efficacy to balance the incidence of adverse events when we used amantadine to treat existing dyskinesia in PD patients.

Drug-Induced Dyskinesia, Part 1: Treatment of Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia

Dyskinesias encompass a variety of different hyperkinetic phenomenologies, particularly chorea, dystonia, stereotypies, and akathisia. Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is one of the main types of drug-induced dyskinesia, occurring in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have been treated with levodopa for long time, but this side effect may be encountered even within a few weeks or months after initiation of levodopa therapy. Based on the temporal pattern in relationship to levodopa dosing, LIDs are divided into "peak-dose dyskinesia," "diphasic dyskinesia," and "wearing off" or "off-period" dyskinesia, of which peak-dose dyskinesia is the most common, followed by off-period, and then diphasic dyskinesia. Treatment strategy includes identifying the kind of dyskinesia and tailoring treatment accordingly. Peak-dose dyskinesia is treated mainly by reducing individual doses of levodopa and adding amantadine and dopamine agonists, whereas off-period dystonia often responds to baclofen and botulinum toxin injections. Diphasic dyskinesias, occurring particularly in patients with young-onset PD, are the most difficult to treat. While fractionation of levodopa dosage is the most frequently utilized strategy, many patients require deep brain stimulation to control their troublesome motor fluctuations and LIDs. A variety of emerging (experimental) drugs currently in development promise to provide better control of LIDs and other levodopa-related complications in the near future.

Clinical Assessments in Parkinson's Disease: Scales and Monitoring

Measurement of disease state is essential in both clinical practice and research in order to assess the severity and progression of a patient's disease status, effect of treatment, and alterations in other relevant factors. Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disorder expressed through many motor and nonmotor manifestations, which cause disabilities that can vary both gradually over time or come on suddenly. In addition, there is a wide interpatient variability making the appraisal of the many facets of this disease difficult. Two kinds of measure are used for the evaluation of PD. The first is subjective, inferential, based on rater-based interview and examination or patient self-assessment, and consist of rating scales and questionnaires. These evaluations provide estimations of conceptual, nonobservable factors (e.g., symptoms), usually scored on an ordinal scale. The second type of measure is objective, factual, based on technology-based devices capturing physical characteristics of the pathological phenomena (e.g., sensors to measure the frequency and amplitude of tremor). These instrumental evaluations furnish appraisals with real numbers on an interval scale for which a unit exists. In both categories of measures, a broad variety of tools exist. This chapter aims to present an up-to-date summary of the most relevant characteristics of the most widely used scales, questionnaires, and technological resources currently applied to the assessment of PD. The review concludes that, in our opinion: (1) no assessment methods can substitute the clinical judgment and (2) subjective and objective measures in PD complement each other, each method having strengths and weaknesses.

Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel can improve both motor and non-motor experiences of daily living in Parkinson's disease: An open-label study

BACKGROUND

Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel therapy (LCIG) can efficiently improve several motor and non-motor symptoms of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The recently developed Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) improved the original UPDRS making it a more robust tool to evaluate therapeutic changes. However, previous studies have not used the MDS-UPDRS and the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) to assess the efficacy of LCIG.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to determine if the MDS-UPDRS and UDysRS could detect improvement in the experiences of daily living following 1-year LCIG treatment.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, open-label study, 34 consecutive patients undergoing LCIG treatment were enrolled. Patients were examined twice: prior to LCIG initiation and 12 months later. Impact of PD-related symptoms and dyskinesia was assessed by the MDS-UPDRS and UDysRS.

RESULTS

Non-motor Experiences of Daily Living part of MDS-UPDRS improved from 20 (median, interquartile-range, IQR:14-23) to 16 points (median, IQR:12-20, p = 0.044) and the Motor Experiences of Daily Living ameliorated from 24 (median, IQR:20-29) to 18 points (median, IQR:13-25, p = 0.025). Health-related quality of life, measured by PDQ-39, also improved from 35.4 (median, IQR:26.9-50.3) to 27.0 (median, IQR:21.3-31.4) points (p = 0.003). The total score of UDysRS decreased from 47 (median, IQR:36-54) to 34 (median, IQR:21-45) points (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

As far as the authors are aware of, our paper is the first to evaluate the impact of LCIG on dyskinesia by the means of UDysRS. Changes in MDS-UPDRS and UDysRS confirm that LCIG treatment can efficiently improve experiences of daily living in advanced PD.

Clinical Management of Drug-Induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson’s Disease: Why Current Approaches May Need to Be Changed to Optimise Quality of Life

Parkinson’s disease is a complex, progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with both motor and non-motor symptoms. Current treatment strategies mainly target the alleviation of motor symptoms through dopaminergic replacement therapy. Many patients with Parkinson’s disease will eventually experience motor complications associated with their anti-parkinsonian medication. One of those complications is drug-induced dyskinesia. This paper firstly reviews current approaches to the management of drug-induced dyskinesia, from modifications to the titration of medication, to more invasive approaches like deep brain stimulation. Following this we describe a recent proposal suggesting that the treatment of dyskinesia should be based on the impact on daily activities of patients rather than on the mere presence of the condition. Next, we discuss how this approach could improve the quality of life of patients and their caregivers and finally, we suggest possible ways of implementing this approach in practice.

A Phase 2A Trial of the Novel mGluR5-Negative Allosteric Modulator Dipraglurant for Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

The metabotropic glutamate receptor 5-negative allosteric modulator dipraglurant reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the MPTP-macaque model. The objective of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability (primary objective), and efficacy (secondary objective) of dipraglurant on levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

The study was a phase 2A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (2:1), 4-week, parallel-group, multicenter dose-escalation (from 50 mg once daily to 100 mg 3 times daily) clinical trial involving 76 PD subjects with moderate to severe levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Safety and tolerability were assessed based on clinical and biological examination and adverse events recording. Secondary efficacy outcome measures included the modified Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, UPDRS, and diaries. Pharmacokinetics were measured at 3 visits following a single dose.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were exposed to dipraglurant and 24 to placebo. There were no major safety concerns. Two subjects did not complete the study because of adverse events. Most frequent adverse events included dyskinesia, dizziness, nausea, and fatigue. Dipraglurant significantly reduced peak dose dyskinesia (modified Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) on day 1 (50 mg, 20%; P = 0.04) and on day 14 (100 mg, 32%; P =0 .04) and across a 3-hour postdose period on day 14 (P = 0.04). There was no evidence of worsening of parkinsonism. Dipraglurant was rapidly absorbed (tmax = 1 hour). The 100-mg dose led to a mean Cmax of 1844 ng/mL on day 28.

CONCLUSIONS

Dipraglurant proved to be safe and well tolerated in its first administration to PD patients. Its efficacy in reversing levodopa-induced dyskinesia warrants further investigations in a larger number of patients. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.