Expectations of Benefit in a Trial of a Candidate Disease-Modifying Treatment for Parkinson Disease

Clinical trials for cognition in Parkinson's disease: Where are we and how can we do better?

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and has a substantial impact on quality of life. Despite numerous trials targeting various PD features, we still lack effective treatments for cognition beyond cholinesterase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the gaps in recent clinical trials with cognitive outcomes in PD and consider areas for improvement.

METHODS

We examined recent clinical trials with cognitive outcomes in PD registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, excluding trials without cognitive outcomes, non-interventional studies, and in atypical Parkinsonian disorders. Included trials were categorized by treatment approach (investigational medicinal product, behavioral, physical activity, device-based). Details of trial design and outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

178 trials at different stages of trial completion were considered. 46 trials were completed, 25 had available results. Mean follow-up duration was 29.9 weeks. Most common cognitive measure was Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Most were performed in North America or Europe. Majority of the participants identified as non-Hispanic and White. Only eight trials showed improvement in cognition, none showed improvement beyond four months. These included trials of international medicinal products, cognitive and physical interventions and devices. GRADE certainty levels ranged from Moderate to Very Low. Only mevidalen had a Moderate certainty for potential clinical effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Amongst a large number of trials for cognition in PD, only a small proportion were completed. Few showed significant improvement, with no proven long-lasting effects. Trial design, lack of enrichment for at-risk groups, short follow-up duration, insensitive outcome measures likely contribute to lack of detectable benefit and should be considered in future trials.

The Lessebo Effect in Disease Modification Trials in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

The impact of expectation of benefit on outcomes is well established in Parkinson's disease (PD). A reduction of a treatment effect due to a perceived placebo allocation (lessebo effect) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was documented for symptomatic treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the lessebo effect in disease modification RCTs (DMT) in PD.

METHODS

Subject-level meta-analyses of active treatment arms of DMT (n = 1149 subjects): FS-1, FS-TOO (probability of placebo allocation/P_(placebo)  = 0.33) and DATATOP, PRECEPT, QE2 (P_(placebo)  = 0.25). We tested the association between P_(placebo) and time to dopaminergic treatment initiation using a marginal Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The adjusted hazard ratio (P_(placebo)  = 0.25 vs. 0.33) for initiation of dopaminergic treatment was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.92-1.43).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe the lessebo effect in DMT. The necessary use of a placebo (and no active comparator) is a limitation. The prospective measurement of expectation of benefit could help to evaluate the many impacts of placebo use. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Therapeutic Misestimation in Patients with Degenerative Ataxia: Lessons from a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The absence of effective treatments may render patients with degenerative cerebellar ataxias susceptible to a placebo response, which could affect the outcome of clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively examine expectations of benefit in participants of an ataxia trial and identify determinants of possible therapeutic misestimation.

METHODS

Individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 who participated in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial received a custom-designed questionnaire about short-term and long-term treatment expectations, allocation preferences, and interpretation of treatment arm assignment based on the presence or absence of clinical improvement. To evaluate whether expectations were specifically related to the application of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or more generally reflect an overly positive attitude of patients with ataxia toward trial participation and results, the last questions involved a hypothetical scenario in which an oral drug was tested against placebo with an aim identical to that of our tDCS study.

RESULTS

All 20 trial participants completed the questionnaire. If allocated to the active treatment arm, 75% of patients expected short-term health benefits and 55% thought they would still have less severe ataxia at 1-year follow-up compared with baseline. After 2 weeks, an average reduction in ataxia severity of 31.5% (standard deviation, 22.2%) was anticipated. Conversely, 65% associated a lack of improvement with probable or definite allocation to the placebo group. High expectations of benefit were neither related to the type of intervention nor to clinical or demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic misestimation is common in patients with degenerative ataxia and requires special attention in future trials. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Comparative efficacy of surgical approaches to disease modification in Parkinson disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) may optimally be treated with a disease-modifying therapy to slow progression. We compare data underlying surgical approaches proposed to impart disease modification in PD: (1) cell transplantation therapy with stem cell-derived dopaminergic neurons to replace damaged cells; (2) clinical trials of growth factors to promote survival of existing dopaminergic neurons; (3) subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation early in the course of PD; and (4) abdominal vagotomy to lower risk of potential disease spread from gut to brain. Though targeted to engage potential mechanisms of PD these surgical approaches remain experimental, indicating the difficulty in translating therapeutic concepts into clinical practice. The choice of outcome measures to assess disease modification separate from the symptomatic benefit will be critical to evaluate the effect of the disease-modifying intervention on long-term disease burden, including imaging studies and clinical rating scales, i.e., Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale. Therapeutic interventions will require long follow-up times (i.e., 5-10 years) to analyze disease modification compared to symptomatic treatments. The promise of invasive, surgical treatments to achieve disease modification through mechanistic approaches has been constrained by the reality of translating these concepts into effective clinical trials.