Erythropoietin in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: Feasibility and Proof-of-Principle Issues from a Randomized Controlled Study

Spinocerebellar ataxias: from pathogenesis to recent therapeutic advances

Spinocerebellar ataxia is a phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous group of autosomal dominant-inherited degenerative disorders. The gene mutation spectrum includes dynamic expansions, point mutations, duplications, insertions, and deletions of varying lengths. Dynamic expansion is the most common form of mutation. Mutations often result in indistinguishable clinical phenotypes, thus requiring validation using multiple genetic testing techniques. Depending on the type of mutation, the pathogenesis may involve proteotoxicity, RNA toxicity, or protein loss-of-function. All of which may disrupt a range of cellular processes, such as impaired protein quality control pathways, ion channel dysfunction, mitochondrial dysfunction, transcriptional dysregulation, DNA damage, loss of nuclear integrity, and ultimately, impairment of neuronal function and integrity which causes diseases. Many disease-modifying therapies, such as gene editing technology, RNA interference, antisense oligonucleotides, stem cell technology, and pharmacological therapies are currently under clinical trials. However, the development of curative approaches for genetic diseases remains a global challenge, beset by technical, ethical, and other challenges. Therefore, the study of the pathogenesis of spinocerebellar ataxia is of great importance for the sustained development of disease-modifying molecular therapies.

NeuroEPO plus (NeuralCIM®) in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's clinical syndrome: the ATHENEA randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

NeuroEPO plus is a recombinant human erythropoietin without erythropoietic activity and shorter plasma half-life due to its low sialic acid content. NeuroEPO plus prevents oxidative damage, neuroinflammation, apoptosis and cognitive deficit in an Alzheimer's disease (AD) models. The aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of neuroEPO plus.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2-3 trial involving participants ≥ 50 years of age with mild-to-moderate AD clinical syndrome. Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 0.5 or 1.0 mg of neuroEPO plus or placebo intranasally 3 times/week for 48 weeks. The primary outcome was change in the 11-item cognitive subscale of the AD Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog11) score from baseline to 48 weeks (range, 0 to 70; higher scores indicate greater impairment). Secondary outcomes included CIBIC+, GDS, MoCA, NPI, Activities of Daily Living Scales, cerebral perfusion, and hippocampal volume.

RESULTS

A total of 174 participants were enrolled and 170 were treated (57 in neuroEPO plus 0.5 mg, 56 in neuroEPO plus 1.0 mg and 57 in placebo group). Mean age, 74.0 years; 121 (71.2%) women and 85% completed the trial. The median change in ADAS-Cog11 score at 48 weeks was -3.0 (95% CI, -4.3 to -1.7) in the 0.5 mg neuroEPO plus group, -4.0 (95% CI, -5.9 to -2.1) in the 1.0 mg neuroEPO plus group and 4.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 6.1) in the placebo group. The difference of neuroEPO plus 0.5 mg vs. placebo was 7.0 points (95% CI, 4.5-9.5) P = 0.000 and between the neuroEPO plus 1.0 mg vs. placebo was 8.0 points (95% CI, 5.2-10.8) P = 0.000. NeuroEPO plus treatment induced a statistically significant improvement in some of clinical secondary outcomes vs. placebo including CIBIC+, GDS, MoCA, NPI, and the brain perfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Among participants with mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease clinical syndrome, neuroEPO plus improved the cognitive evaluation at 48 weeks, with a very good safety profile. Larger trials are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of neuroEPO plus in Alzheimer's disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://rpcec.sld.cu Identifier: RPCEC00000232.

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: new genes and progress towards treatments

Dominantly inherited spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are associated with phenotypes that range from pure cerebellar to multisystemic. The list of implicated genes has lengthened in the past 5 years with the inclusion of SCA37/DAB1, SCA45/FAT2, SCA46/PLD3, SCA47/PUM1, SCA48/STUB1, SCA50/NPTX1, SCA25/PNPT1, SCA49/SAM9DL, and SCA27B/FGF14. In some patients, co-occurrence of multiple potentially pathogenic variants can explain variable penetrance or more severe phenotypes. Given this extreme clinical and genetic heterogeneity, genome sequencing should become the diagnostic tool of choice but is still not available in many clinical settings. Treatments tested in phase 2 and phase 3 studies, such as riluzole and transcranial direct current stimulation of the cerebellum and spinal cord, have given conflicting results. To enable early intervention, preataxic carriers of pathogenic variants should be assessed with biomarkers, such as neurofilament light chain and brain MRI; these biomarkers could also be used as outcome measures, given that clinical outcomes are not useful in the preataxic phase. The development of bioassays measuring the concentration of the mutant protein (eg, ataxin-3) might facilitate monitoring of target engagement by gene therapies.

Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Inherited Neuropathies: A Systematic Review

The management of inherited neuropathies relies mostly on the treatment of symptoms. In recent years, a better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms that underlie neuropathies has allowed for the development of disease-modifying therapies. Here, we systematically review the therapies that have emerged in this field over the last five years. An updated list of diseases with peripheral neuropathy as a clinical feature was created based on panels of genes used clinically to diagnose inherited neuropathy. This list was extended by an analysis of published data by the authors and verified by two experts. A comprehensive search for studies of human patients suffering from one of the diseases in our list yielded 28 studies that assessed neuropathy as a primary or secondary outcome. Although the use of various scales and scoring systems made comparisons difficult, this analysis identified diseases associated with neuropathy for which approved therapies exist. An important finding is that the symptoms and/or biomarkers of neuropathies were assessed only in a minority of cases. Therefore, further investigation of treatment efficacy on neuropathies in future trials must employ objective, consistent methods such as wearable technologies, motor unit indexes, MRI or sonography imaging, or the use of blood biomarkers associated with consistent nerve conduction studies.