Severe bilateral tremor in a liver transplant recipient taking cyclosporine

Neurologic complications in non-neurological intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Neurologists are frequently called to evaluate patients in the intensive care units who are not waking up. This often poses a diagnostic and prognostic dilemma.

REVIEW SUMMARY

The initial evaluation starts with abstracting the prehospital and in-hospital history, followed by bedside clinical and neurologic examination to establish a differential diagnosis. The subsequent work-up is based on clinical suspicion where reversible life-threatening causes should be immediately identified. After confirming the diagnosis and implementation of the appropriate medical management, a prompt family meeting and counseling is recommended. The role of neurologists in clinical diagnosis and prognostication of the coma patient, as well as diagnosing brain death is instrumental.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review, we explore a practical systematic approach to patients with decreased level of consciousness. The most common causes of impaired alertness in different non-neurologic critical care units and commonly used prognostication tools are presented. Finally a brief introduction of hypothermia, a novel therapeutic approach is also discussed.

Systemic diseases that cause movement disorders

The present review is aimed at providing practical assistance to the clinical neurologist in reaching a diagnosis, understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of movement disorders associated with systemic diseases, and determining appropriate therapy. Infectious disease by direct effect or as an acquired autoimmune neurological disease, stroke, hypoxia-ischemia, paraneoplastic syndromes, collagen disorders, endocrine, liver and kidney diseases that may cause hypokinetic or hyperkinetic abnormal movement are considered separately. The type and evolution of abnormal movement caused by systemic disease vary with age and underlying pathology. Therapy for abnormal movements should include a primary treatment for the systemic disease.

Postural hand tremor before and following liver transplantation and immunosuppression with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in patients without clinical signs of hepatic encephalopathy

OBJECTIVE

To assess tremor characteristics and severity in patients with severe liver disease without hepatic encephalopathy and following orthotopic liver transplantation (LTX) and immunosuppression (IS) with cyclosporin A (CsA) or tacrolimus (FK 506).

METHODS

A total of 35 consecutive patients were included into the prospective study and serum levels of CsA (n = 29) or FK 506 (n = 6) were monitored following LTX. Tremor characteristics and severity were assessed by two-blinded raters before and following LTX. In addition, accelerometric recordings were taken before and after LTX, and compared with 16 normal controls without tremor and without clinical signs of hepatic encephalopathy or liver disease. Accelerometry was performed while sitting in a comfortable chair with the forearms supported and included rest and postural condition with and without weight load (500 g) on each hand. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired t-test and t-test for independent samples were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The clinical rating revealed no rest but a mild postural hand tremor before LTX with a significant increase following LTX (p < 0.001). After LTX the mean score of postural tremor was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in patients with plasma levels of >850 ng CsA/ml compared with patients with lower levels. Patients and normal controls showed comparable mean peak frequencies of rest and postural hand tremor. The mean amplitude of postural hand tremor was significantly higher in patients before and after LTX compared with controls. In the majority of patients (89%) and controls (88%), the dominant tremor frequency decreased significantly (>1.5 Hz) when applying a weight load on each hand.

CONCLUSION

The present study is the first to describe hand tremor characteristics in patients with severe liver disease without clinical signs of hepatic encephalopathy and in patients following LTX and IS. Compared with normal controls the patients showed a significant postural hand tremor prior and post-LTX and an increase of mean tremor amplitude following LTX and CsA/FK 506 treatment. The decrease of the dominant tremor frequency with weight load and an increase of tremor amplitude with higher plasma levels of CsA are both indicative of an enhanced physiological or toxic tremor.

Neurologic complications of transplantation

BACKGROUND

Organ transplantation is one of the most dynamic fields in medicine and has evolved into a life-saving option for thousands of patients with previously fatal conditions. The posttransplantation clinical course is frequently associated with neurologic complications that are usually related to pretransplant morbidity, the surgical procedure of transplantation, immunosuppression, and opportunistic infection.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Neurologic complications of organ transplantation may be divided into complications common to all types of allografts and complications that are specific for a particular type of organ transplantation. The most common complications include seizures, opportunistic central nervous system (CNS) infection, metabolic encephalopathy, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and drug-related adverse events. Opportunistic CNS infection may have a subtle presentation and should not be overlooked, as the consequences of delayed treatment may be grave. Neurotoxicity of immunosuppressive agents is also a frequent cause of neurologic complications and may occur in the setting of normal serum drug levels. The clinical course of transplant patients is frequently complex, requiring close cooperation between the transplant team and specialty consultants. Prolonged survival of transplant patients will shift the focus of neurologic complications from acute, perioperative to chronic complications of immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic complications of organ transplantation are commonly related to opportunistic infection or neurotoxicity of immunosuppressive agents, requiring careful titration of immunosuppression. Timely diagnosis of CNS infection or other causes of neurologic dysfunction may significantly improve recovery and outcome in these patients.