Thalamic surgery and tremor

Essential tremor: from bedside to bench and back to bedside

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The last several years have witnessed a remarkable increase in research on essential tremor, with consequent advances in our understanding of this entity. An attempt to both summarize and frame this work has not been undertaken.

RECENT FINDINGS

Here, I show that observations on essential tremor arising from clinical practice/clinical studies have guided scientific studies of this disorder. In turn, the results of scientific studies are beginning to be translated back to the bedside to improve treatment. Recent essential tremor research has given rise to several novel and intriguing ideas about the disease. These include the following: essential tremor may represent a family of diseases rather than a single disease; essential tremor seems to be a disease of the cerebellum or cerebellar system; essential tremor may be neurodegenerative; low gamma aminobutyric acid tone seems to be a central feature of essential tremor. As with many emerging ideas, there is significant discussion and debate over these emerging ideas, and this fuels additional scientific studies.

SUMMARY

The flow of ideas from clinical observations about essential tremor, to their translation into scientific studies, and their translation back to the bedside, is expected to eventually lead to improvements at the patient interface.

Deep brain stimulation: indications and evidence

Deep brain stimulation is a minimally invasive targeted neurosurgical intervention that enables structures deep in the brain to be stimulated electrically by an implanted pacemaker. It has become the treatment of choice for Parkinson's disease, refractory to, or complicated by, drug therapy. Its efficacy has been demonstrated robustly by randomized, controlled clinical trials, with multiple novel brain targets having been discovered in the last 20 years. Multifarious clinical indications for deep brain stimulation now exist, including dystonia and tremor in movement disorders; depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and Tourette's syndrome in psychiatry; epilepsy, cluster headache and chronic pain, including pain from stroke, amputation, trigeminal neuralgia and multiple sclerosis. Current research argues for novel indications, including hypertension and orthostatic hypotension. The development, principles, indications and effectiveness of the technique are reviewed here. While deep brain stimulation is a standard and widely accepted treatment for Parkinson's disease after 20 years of experience, in chronic pain it remains restricted to a handful of experienced, specialist centers willing to publish outcomes despite its use for over 50 years. Reasons are reviewed and novel approaches to appraising clinical evidence in functional neurosurgery are suggested.

An Overview of Surgical Therapy for Movement Disorders

Surgical treatments are an important consideration in the management of many movement disorders, particularly for patients refractory to medications. Increasing number of published reports have demonstrated an overall improvement in motor function, activities of daily living and quality of life particularly with deep brain stimulation. In addition the procedure is also relatively safe. In this article, we review the various types of movement disorders that may benefit from surgical intervention.

Role of surgery in the treatment of motor complications

When medications no longer provide patients with Parkinson's disease a reasonable quality of life due to the presence of levodopa-associated motor fluctuations and dyskinesias, surgical treatment is often pursued. Numerous studies have examined the antiparkinsonian efficacy of procedures currently available, but surprisingly few studies have evaluated their effect on motor response complications in a systematic, controlled manner, using appropriate instruments. Nonetheless, the combined evidence from uncontrolled case series and more recent randomized controlled trials reviewed here indicates that unilateral pallidotomy, bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation, and bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation all substantially alleviate levodopa-induced dyskinesias and, to a lesser extent, motor fluctuations. Incorporation of standardized, validated instruments for the quantification of motor response complications in future surgical study protocols will not only allow more accurate comparison of different interventions but also will help physicians select the most appropriate procedure for their patients.

Is the target for thalamic deep brain stimulation the same as for thalamotomy?

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has virtually replaced thalamotomy for the treatment of essential tremor. It is thought that the site for DBS is the same as the optimal lesion site; however, this match has not been investigated previously. We sought to determine whether the location of thalamic DBS matched the site at which thalamotomy would be performed. Eleven patients who had detailed microelectrode recording and stimulation for placement of DBS electrodes and subsequent successful tremor control were analysed. An experienced surgeon, blinded to outcome and final electrode position, selected the ideal thalamotomy site based on the reconstructed maps obtained intraoperatively. When the site of long-term clinically used DBS and theoretical thalamotomy location was calculated in three-dimensional space and compared for each of the x, y, and z axes in stereotactic space, there was no significant difference in the mediolateral location of DBS and theoretical lesion site. There was also no difference between the theoretical lesion site and the placement of the tip of the electrode; however, the active electrodes used for chronic stimulation were significantly more anterior (P = 0.005) and dorsal (P = 0.034) to the ideal thalamotomy target. This mismatch may reflect the compromise required between adverse and beneficial effects with chronic stimulation, but it also suggests different mechanisms of effect of DBS and thalamotomy.

Deep brain stimulation for tremor [correction of trauma]: patient selection and evaluation

The selection of patients with movement disorders for deep brain stimulation is becoming a common neurological and neurosurgical task. Deep brain stimulation is suitable for different forms of tremor, which can often not be treated with medication. This suitability applies for essential tremor, monosymptomatic tremor at rest, cerebellar or multiple sclerosis tremor, Holmes' tremor, primary writing tremor or tremor in neuropathies. The appropriate selection of patients is critical for the outcome of surgical relief of tremors. Considering the risks of any stereotactic intervention, the following must apply: (1) motor symptoms lead to a relevant disability in activities of daily living, despite optimal medical treatment; (2) biological age of the patient; (3) neurosurgical contraindications; (4) the patient is neither demented nor severely depressed. If these conditions are fulfilled, the individual chances of improvement of the target symptoms need to be checked, based on the following guidelines: (1) the kind of tremor, (2) the natural course of the tremor, (3) the chances for medical treatment in a particular patient, (4) the outcome of surgery in a specific condition, (5) the individual risks for a patient to suffer from complications. The outcome of surgery for tremor depends on the clinical type and distribution. Distal limb tremors are easier to treat than proximal limb tremors. Intention tremor is more difficult to treat than rest or postural tremor. The indication for surgical treatment depends on the analysis of the individual risk-benefit ratio, which also has to take into account the patients' social, professional, and familial background. The patient needs to be well informed about his individual risk-benefit ratio and of alternative treatments, before undergoing stereotactic surgery.

Stereotactic neurosurgery for tremor

The role of the motor thalamus as surgical target in stereotactic neurosurgery for different kinds of tremor is discussed. For tremor in Parkinson's disease, the subthalamic nucleus becomes more and more often the surgical target, because this target also gives relief of other and more incapacitating symptoms (hypokinesia, rigidity). Stimulation is as effective in tremor suppression as coagulation but has less adverse events and permits bilateral surgery. In selected cases, thalamotomy can still be indicated.

Hypermetabolism in the ventrolateral thalamus in unilateral Parkinsonian resting tremor: a positron emission tomography study

Tremorogenesis in Parkinson's disease (PD) is assumed to involve a cerebral network including the thalamus. An imaging study was performed on eight PD patients with strictly unilateral resting tremor using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coregistered to 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Increased metabolic activity of high statistical significance (P<0.001) was found in the anterior ventrolateral nuclear group of the thalamus located contralateral to the tremor side. The metabolic changes significantly covaried with tremor amplitudes. For the first time, it could be demonstrated that thalamic metabolic changes associated with tremor in PD are localized in the ventral lateral anterior nucleus (VLa). The results are discussed with respect to previous studies on tremor generation.

Treatment of tremor and dystonia

Treatment of movement disorders has expanded beyond traditional therapies with oral medications to include injection of drugs like botulinum toxin and the use of surgical interventions in cases that do not respond to medical therapy. This article provides an overview to the diagnosis and treatment of tremor and dystonia. The distinguishing features of rest, postural, and kinectic tremor are detailed with medical and surgical modalities for treatment. A discussion of idiopathic and secondary dystonia with focus on diagnosis and medical and surgical treatments encompasses the second part of the article.