Drugs controlling triglyceride metabolism

Rosiglitazone plus metformin: combination therapy for Type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is a common disease associated with an increased risk of long-term complications, in particular cardiovascular disease. Intervention trials have provided evidence that strict metabolic control can substantially reduce the burden of the disease. However, in order to accomplish this, the pathogenetic defects must be tackled by appropriate therapy. Insulin resistance is a common defect in these patients and it is even more severe in those who are obese. Insulin resistance not only contributes to impaired glucose homeostasis, but also to the development of dyslipidaemia, hypertension, inflammatory response and endothelial dysfunction, thus exacerbating the cardiovascular risk. Improvement of insulin sensitivity can be obtained with metformin and thiazolidinediones. These drugs act through different mechanisms with metformin exerting a prevalent effect on the liver and glitazones improving insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissue. Because of different mechanisms, the association of the two compounds is likely to result in an additive effect. Clinical trials available indicate that the combination of the two drugs results in greater improvement in plasma glucose concentration and HbA(1c) as compared to single therapy, without increasing the occurrence of specific side effects. More recently, the two compounds have been associated in the same tablet, thus providing the opportunity for a more convenient treatment that may encourage patient compliance and, at the same time, provide a tool to assess whether a more aggressive intervention on insulin resistance may produce favourable effects on the cardiovascular risk.

Pharmacodynamic activity of lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase, and pharmacokinetic parameters measured in normolipidaemic subjects receiving ciprofibrate (100 or 200 mg/day) or micronised fenofibrate (200 mg/day) therapy for 23 days

The activities of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic lipase (HL) were investigated after 23 days of ciprofibrate (100 mg or 200 mg) therapy or fenofibrate (200 mg) therapy. In a double-blind, double-placebo, cross-over study, three groups of six healthy volunteers received either 100 mg ciprofibrate/day followed by 200 mg fenofibrate 'high bioavailability' (HB)/day, or vice versa (group A), 200 mg ciprofibrate HB/day followed by 200 mg fenofibrate HB/day, or vice versa (group B), or 100 mg ciprofibrate/day followed by 200 mg ciprofibrate/day, or vice versa (group C). Fasting plasma lipid levels and safety parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. One hundred milligrams ciprofibrate/day therapy was found to be approximately as effective as 200 mg fenofibrate HB/day therapy in altering the lipid profile. The highest activation of LPL was obtained after treatment with 200 mg ciprofibrate/day. A modest, but statistically significant, increase in HL activity was found after 100 or 200 mg ciprofibrate treatment. Investigation of the pharmacokinetics of ciprofibrate and fenofibric acid revealed a shorter time to reach peak plasma levels, but a longer elimination half life for the ciprofibrate preparations in comparison with fenofibrate. A dose of 200 mg ciprofibrate/day is more effective than 100 mg ciprofibrate/day at increasing LPL and HL activity; however, 200 mg ciprofibrate/day is also associated with a potential detrimental change in safety parameters. Two hundred milligrams fenofibrate HB/day therapy may represent an alternative therapy to 100 mg ciprofibrate/day for hyperlipidaemic patients.