Quality of life in children with Down syndrome and its association with parent and child demographic characteristics: Parent-reported measures

Instruments for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with Down syndrome: a scoping review

The construct of quality of life (QoL) includes aspects of health and well-being of people. Down syndrome [DS] or trisomy 21 is one of the most common congenital anomalies. DS is characterized by motor and cognitive alterations that affect health and QOL of both the child and caregiver.In pediatrics, there are various instruments to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and QoL. The advantage of these instruments is that they can be implemented in any type of disease and population in general. However, they may have certain disadvantages, such as the difficulty in evaluating specific aspects of each disease or condition related to Down syndrome. The aim of this study was to identify 1: instruments used to assess quality of life in children with Down syndrome. 2: psychometrics properties of instruments validated in children with Down syndrome to assess quality of life. Methods A Scoping review was conducted to identify instruments used in children and adolescents with Down syndrome, and a second systematic searched psychometric properties of these instruments. The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Epistemonikos and other sources were explored with a search strategy that included keywords such as "Down syndrome," "Quality of life" or "Life Quality," "Health-Related Quality of Life" and psychometrics properties. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COSMIN (Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) methodology. Results Twenty-seven studies were selected that used twelve instruments to evaluate quality of life in children or adolescents with Down syndrome. Two of the twelve evaluated quality of life and ten health-related quality of life. In the second search, ten studies reported the psychometric properties of six instruments evaluated in minors with Down Syndrome. Conclusion There is limited information available regarding the psychometric properties of instruments used to assess quality of life, particularly health-related quality of life. Commonly employed instruments in this area include the PedsQL 4.0 and KIDSCREEN. Notably, while the PedsQL 4.0 lacks specific evaluation in children with DS, data from KIDSCREEN assessments are inconsistently reported. Rigorous evaluation of the performance of Kidslife and Kidslife Down in clinical settings is necessary, or the development of new instruments tailored for children with DS is warranted to comprehensively assess quality of life in clinical settings.

Quality of life of children and young adults with Down syndrome from caregivers' perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Down syndrome (DS) negatively impacts the well-being of affected individuals. This study aimed to summarise the evidence on quality of life (QOL) of children and young adults with DS using quantitative measures from caregivers' perspective and identify factors that affected their QOL.

Method

Database search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL on 24 April 2024. Meta-analysis using random effects model was conducted where feasible. All studies underwent qualitative synthesis. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023413532).

Results

Seventeen studies involving 3038 children with DS using various QOL measures were included: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) (8 studies), KIDSCREEN (4 studies), KidsLife (2 studies), The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research Academic Medical Center Children's QOL (2 studies) and Personal Outcome Scale (1 study). Meta-analysis on PedsQL studies compared scores between children with DS and typically developing (TD) children. Total scale score was lower in children with DS (mean 70.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 64.31-76.24) compared to TD children (mean 88.17, 95% CI 80.50-95.83). All subdomains of PedsQL were also lower in children with DS. Within the domain of psychosocial health, children with DS had statistically significant lower social functioning (standardised mean difference -1.40, 95% CI -2.27 to -0.53) and school functioning (standardised mean difference -1.09, 95% CI -1.55 to -0.62) scores, but similar emotional functioning scores. Qualitative synthesis revealed poorer subdomain QOL compared to TD children, especially in social functioning and cognitive functioning. QOL worsened during adolescent years. Family variables (parental education and occupation) did not affect parental perception of children's QOL. Children with DS who had higher intelligent quotient had better QOL.

Conclusion

Children with DS have lower caregiver-reported QOL than TD children, especially in social functioning and school functioning subdomains.

Quality of life in children with Down syndrome and its association with parent and child demographic characteristics: Parent-reported measures

BACKGROUND

This study aims to explore the association between the quality of life (QoL) in children with Down syndrome (DS) and its relationship with demographic characteristics of both parents and children. The investigation encompasses five domains: physical and psychological well-being, autonomy and parental relationship, social well-being, and peers, as well as school and the learning environment.

METHOD

An online questionnaire, the KIDSCREEN-27, was used to measure the QoL of 112 families with DS in Saudi Arabia, referred to as "Parent-Reported Measures." Descriptive statistics were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences.

RESULTS

The study found that the QoL of children with DS showed high scores in the psychological well-being, autonomy, parental relations, school, and learning environment domains. However, the physical and social well-being and peer domains had lower scores, although still considered "good scores." Family income had a positively significant influence on all QoL domains. Specifically, higher family income was associated with better QoL outcomes, except for social well-being. Parental age was found to influence psychological well-being, while parental education and the relationship between the parent and child influenced social well-being. Lastly, the child's gender was found to have an impact on the school and learning environment domain.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the importance of understanding the impact of the demographic variability of children with DS and their parents on the QoL of their children. It emphasizes the need to address the needs of families with lower incomes and the importance of parental education and relationships with their children in improving social well-being. The findings could aid policymakers and healthcare providers in improving the QoL for families with children who have DS.