Combination of QF-PCR and aCGH is an efficient diagnostic strategy for the detection of chromosome aberrations in recurrent miscarriage

Recurrent pregnancy loss: fewer chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception? a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities detected in products of conception (POCs) between recurrent pregnancy loss and sporadic pregnancy loss.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to December 31, 2020. Relevant studies analysing the association between the number of pregnancy losses and the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities were included. Independent data extraction was conducted and study quality was assessed. Meta-analyses were carried out to calculate odds ratios by using fixed- or random-effects models according to statistical homogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 8320 POCs in 19 studies were identified for the meta-analyses. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in sporadic pregnancy loss was significantly higher than that in recurrent pregnancy loss. In subgroup analyses, the following studies reported a high incidence of abnormal outcomes of sporadic pregnancy loss: studies with ≥ 300 samples, studies published before 2014, studies conducted in European and American countries, and studies with analyses using conventional karyotype techniques. Moreover, the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in women with two pregnancy losses was significantly higher than that in women with three or more pregnancy losses. However, there was no difference in the distribution of abnormal types between sporadic and recurrent pregnancy loss or between two and three or more pregnancy losses.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities detected in POCs was lower in recurrent pregnancy loss than in sporadic pregnancy loss, and decreased with an increasing number of pregnancy losses.

Application of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for identification of chromosomal aberrations in the recurrent pregnancy loss

Spontaneous abortion occurs in 8–20% of recognized pregnancies and usually takes place in the first trimester (7–11 weeks). There are many causes of pregnancy loss, but the most important (about 75%) is the presence of chromosomal aberrations. We present the results of oligonucleotide array application in a cohort of 62 miscarriage cases. The inclusion criteria for the study were the loss after 8th week of pregnancy and the appearance of recurrent miscarriages. DNA was extracted from trophoblast or fetal skin fibroblasts. In the 62 tested materials from recurrent miscarriages, the detection rate was 56.5% (35/62). The most commonly found were aneuploidies (65%) (chromosomal trisomy 14, 16, 18, 21, and 22), Turner syndrome, and triploidy (17.1%). Other chromosomal abnormalities included pathogenic and likely pathogenic structural aberrations: 1) pathogenic: deletion 7p22.3p12.3 and duplication 9p24.3p13.2 inherited from the normal father, deletion 3q13.31q22.2 and deletion 3q22.3q23 of unknown inheritance and duplication of 17p12 inherited from father with foot malformation; 2) likely pathogenic variants: deletion 17p13.1 inherited from normal mother, deletion 5q14.3 of unknown inheritance and de novo deletion 1q21.1q21.2. Among these aberrations, six CNVs (copy number variants) were responsible for the miscarriage: deletion 7p22.3p12.3 and duplication 9p24.3p13.2, deletion 3q13.31q22.2 and deletion 3q22.3q23, and deletion 17p13.1 and deletion 1q21.1q21.2. Other two findings were classified as incidental findings (deletion 5q14.3 and 17p12 duplication). Our research shows that 17% of the aberrations (6/35 abnormal results) that cannot be identified by the routine kariotype analysis are structural aberrations containing genes important for fetal development, the mutations of which may cause spontaneous abortion.

Usefulness of combined NGS and QF-PCR analysis for product of conception karyotyping

Purpose

Since chromosomal abnormalities can be detected in more than half of miscarriages, cytogenetic testing of the product of conception (POC) can provide important information when preparing for a subsequent pregnancy. Conventional karyotyping is the common diagnostic method for a POC but can be problematic due to the need for cell culture.

Methods

We here conducted shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) for alternative POC cytogenomic analysis. Since female euploidy samples can include 69,XXX triploidy, additional QF-PCR was performed in these cases.

Results

We here analyzed POC samples from miscarriages in 300 assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies and detected chromosomal abnormalities in 201 instances (67.0%). Autosomal aneuploidy (151 cases, 50.3%) was the most frequent abnormality, consistent with prior conventional karyotyping data. Mosaic aneuploidy was detected in seven cases (2.0%). Notably, the frequency of triploidy was 2.3%, 10-fold lower than the reported frequency in non-ART pregnancies. Structural rearrangements were identified in nine samples (3%), but there was no case of segmental mosaicism.

Conclusions

These data suggest that NGS-based sWGS, with the aid of QF-PCR, is a viable alternative karyotyping procedure that does not require cell culture. This method could also assist with genetic counseling for couples who undergoes embryo selection based on PGT-A data.

Diagnostic accuracy and value of chromosomal microarray analysis for chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal detection: A prospective clinical study

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has emerged as a primary diagnostic tool for the evaluation of developmental delay and structural malformations in children. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and value of CMA and karyotyping on diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in Fujian province of South China.In the study, 410 clinical samples were collected from pregnant women between March 2015 and December 2016, including 3 villus (0.73%, 3/410), 296 amniotic fluid (72.20%, 296/410), and 111 umbilical cord blood (27.07%, 111/410). All samples were screening for chromosomal abnormalities by both using CMA and karyotyping.The success rate of CMA and karyotyping was 100% (410/410) and 99.27% (407/410), respectively. Sixty-one (14.88%, 61/410) samples were presented with chromosomal abnormalities by using CMA, whereas 47 (11.55%, 47/407) samples were shown with chromosomal abnormalities by using karyotyping. Thirty-one (8.61%, 31/360) samples with normal karyotypes were found to exist chromosomal abnormalities by using CMA. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of karyotyping on the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities was 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.87-0.93), the sensitivity and specificity was 87.56% and 91.22%, respectively. The area under the curve of CMA on the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.90-0.95), with 90.68% sensitivity and 94.40% specificity. Notably, the combination of CMA and karyotyping could improve the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities.CMA has a better diagnostic value for screening chromosomal abnormalities, especially for those pregnant women with normal karyotypes. This study has guiding value for prenatal diagnosis in Fujian province of South China.

Combination of QF-PCR and aCGH is an efficient diagnostic strategy for the detection of chromosome aberrations in recurrent miscarriage

Background

Our aim was to conduct a comprehensive genetic evaluation using the combination of QF‐PCR (quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction) and aCGH (array comparative genomic hybridization) for the detection of the frequency and type of chromosome aberrations in recurrent miscarriage (RM) in the clinical setting.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted on 73 first‐trimester products of conception (POC) between September 2014 and February 2017. The POCs were collected from 73 women with at least one previous miscarriage and analyzed for chromosomal anomalies using QF‐PCR and aCGH as part of the routine clinical evaluation.

Results

Chromosome aberrations were detected in 52/73 POCs (71.2%), of which 41 (56.2%) were identified by QF‐PCR and an additional 11 (15.1%) by aCGH. Numerical aberrations constituted 92.3% of abnormalities, with trisomies as the most common subtype (72.9%). Causative structural aberrations were found in three samples (5.8%). The frequency of chromosome aberrations was not dependent on the number of previous miscarriages, whereas it significantly increased with advanced maternal age.

Conclusion

Our results confirm that chromosome aberrations are the most common cause of RM and that QF‐PCR and aCGH combination should be included in the routine genetic analysis of POCs of couples with miscarriage.