Recovery of touch after median nerve lesion and subsequent repair

Comparative Effectiveness Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Peripheral Nerve Repair Using Direct Repair and Connector-assisted Repair

Background

This clinical literature systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess differences in outcomes between nerves repaired with direct repair (DR) and connector-assisted repair (CAR).

Methods

A systematic literature review for DR and CAR was performed. Studies from 1980 through August 2023 were included if DR or CAR repairs were performed in upper extremities with nerve gaps less than 5 mm and reported sensory Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) outcomes or equivalent. Comparative analyses were planned for meaningful recovery (MR) rate (at both S3 and S3+ or better), postsurgical neuroma, cold intolerance, altered sensation, pain, and revision rate.

Results

There were significant differences in MR rates for CAR and DR. At the MRCC S3 threshold, 96.1% of CAR and 81.3% of DR achieved MR (P < 0.0001). At the MRCC S3+ threshold, 87.1% of CAR and 54.2% of DR achieved this higher threshold of MR (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in neuroma rate or pain scores in our dataset. Altered sensation (dysesthesia, paresthesia, hyperesthesia, or hypersensitivity) was not discussed in any CAR studies, so no analysis could be performed. The revision rate for both procedures was 0%. The proportion of patients with cold intolerance was 46.2% in the DR studies, which was significantly higher than the 10.7% of patients in the CAR group.

Conclusions

Significantly more patients achieved sensory MR and fewer had cold intolerance when the CAR technique, instead of the DR technique, was performed to repair peripheral nerve injuries.

Application of Various Methods to Evaluate the Postoperative Characteristics of Expanded Pedicled Deltopectoral Flap for Large Facial Scars

ABSTRACT

The expanded pedicled deltopectoral flap (EPDF) has been widely used to repair large facial scars. Although doctors and patients are usually satisfied with the outcomes, the actual functional recovery and cosmetic effects of EPDF are still unknown. It is, therefore, necessary to objectively investigate the effect of transferred EPDF by using a variety of methods. From January 2008 to December 2018, 52 patients who underwent EPDF surgery at Xijing Hospital were enrolled. Sense of touch, static 2-point discrimination, elasticity, and color were measured. Thermesthesia and algesthesia were also tested. Postoperative scars were evaluated using the patient and observer scar assessment scale. Satisfaction of patients, doctors, and laypersons was investigated. The algaesthesis, thalposis, and rhigosis scores were 4.7 ± 0.7, 3.7 ± 0.9, and 4.5 ± 0.8, respectively. The tactile score was 0.3 ± 0.2 mN, and 2-point discrimination was 10.1 ± 4.8 mm. L*, a*, hemoglobin, and melanin content of the flaps were significantly different when compared with normal skin (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of doctors, patients, and laypersons was 88.5%, 71.2%, and 67.3%, respectively. The higher satisfaction of patients was mainly associated with the smaller color difference between the flap and the surrounding skin, and lower patient and observer scar assessment scale score. These results confirm that excellent functional recovery and reliable cosmetic effects are observed when facial scars are repaired with EPDF. The methods used in this study can be applied to the evaluation of functional recovery and cosmetic outcomes of transferred flaps, which may provide a more comprehensive understanding of flap assessment.

Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the factors associated with sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries.

DATA SOURCES:

The online PubMed database was searched for English articles describing outcomes after the repair of median, ulnar, radial, and digital nerve injuries in humans with a publication date between 1 January 1990 and 16 February 2011.

STUDY SELECTION:

The following types of article were selected: (1) clinical trials describing the repair of median, ulnar, radial, and digital nerve injuries published in English; and (2) studies that reported sufficient patient information, including age, mechanism of injury, nerve injured, injury location, defect length, repair time, repair method, and repair materials. SPSS 13.0 software was used to perform univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and to investigate the patient and intervention factors associated with outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Sensory function was assessed using the Mackinnon-Dellon scale and motor function was assessed using the manual muscle test. Satisfactory motor recovery was defined as grade M4 or M5, and satisfactory sensory recovery was defined as grade S3⁺ or S4.

RESULTS:

Seventy-one articles were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that repair time, repair materials, and nerve injured were independent predictors of outcome after the repair of nerve injuries (P < 0.05), and that the nerve injured was the main factor affecting the rate of good to excellent recovery.

CONCLUSION:

Predictors of outcome after the repair of peripheral nerve injuries include age, gender, repair time, repair materials, nerve injured, defect length, and duration of follow-up.

Comparison of assessment tools to score recovery of function after repair of traumatic lesions of the median nerve

In this paper the recovery after repair of the median nerve has been used to compare different assessment tools for evaluation of peripheral nerve function: touch (moving 2-point discrimination (2PD); Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilament, motor (Medical Research Council (MRC) scale), combined motor and sensory (Dellon modification of the Moberg pick up test; Moberg Recognition test), and pain (visual analogue scale; pinprick-test). The mean (SD) age of our 28 patients was 28 (12) years. The mean (SD) follow-up period was 5 years, 2 months (2 years, 8 months). On the operated side three patients (11%) had a moving 2PD of less than 4 mm. The results of the moving 2PD were compared with those of the SW monofilaments, but with a poor correlation. The MRC score correlated well with opposition movement of the thumb and muscle wasting (p<0.01). We recommend a number of tests to evaluate (the chronological return of) peripheral nerve function.

Lower touch sensibility in the extremities of healthy Indians: further deterioration with age

Touch sensibility testing is a cost-effective, psychophysical measure of peripheral nerve function and impairment. However, there is limited information regarding the natural variability in touch sensibility across different populations and different age groups. We studied 568 healthy Indian volunteers without any clinical evidence of peripheral nerve disease. Touch sensibility was evaluated bilaterally in palms, feet, and heels, using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, with target forces ranging from 0.008 to 300 g. No differences were observed between the right and the left limbs. The lowest target force detected ranged from 0.4 to 2 g in the palms and 1.4 to 15 g in the feet. These values showed further increase with age. Women compared with men had higher sensibility in the palms in most age groups. Touch sensibility thresholds recorded in a large group of Indians were higher than that reported in other populations. These findings have clinical implications for the diagnosis of early nerve impairment in the elderly and in disease states drawing attention to geographic variations in touch sensation.