Microsurgical breast reconstruction and primary hypercoagulable disorders

BACKGROUND

Primary hypercoagulable disorders pose a significant challenge to microsurgeons and have traditionally been regarded as a relative contraindication to free tissue transfer. Since free flaps offer numerous advantages in breast reconstruction, there is an effort to expand the population to whom these operations can be safely offered. The purpose of this study is to describe our chemoprophylaxis regimen in cases of primary hypercoagulability, as well as to compare flap outcomes and complications between women with and without hypercoagulability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single institution retrospective review identified 15 patients (25 flaps) with known primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from 2010 through 2020. There were 785 patients (1268 flaps) without primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction, including 40 patients (73 flaps) with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), evaluated for comparison. Patient characteristics, thromboprophylaxis regimen, and surgical outcomes were collected. In carrying out this cohort study, we have adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with primary hypercoagulability were identified, including heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation (n = 12), protein S deficiency (n = 1), prothrombin mutation (n = 1), and primary antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 1). Thirteen of these (87%) were discharged with an extended LMWH course. There was no postoperative VTE or mortality in this cohort, and no significant difference in hematoma or transfusion compared with the control group (p = .31, p = .87, respectively). The flap loss rate was 4% in the hypercoagulable group compared with 0.92% in the control group (p = .15). The salvage for arterial or venous compromise in the hypercoagulable group was poor (0% vs. 52%, p = .3).

CONCLUSION

Microsurgical breast reconstruction in women with primary hypercoagulability disorders is feasible with acceptable risk of flap loss but poor salvage potential. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis with extended prophylactic LMWH in this population appears to be a safe regimen.

Thrombophilia and Preoperative Deep Venous Thrombosis and Their Effect on Free Flap Survival: A Scoping Review

Background: A proper preoperative planning is essential to prevent flap failure. However, venous workup for flaps has not been commonly performed or utilized as a preoperative screening tool. A scoping review was conducted to explore preoperative venous system screening, including deep vein thrombosis diagnosis, and its effect on flap survival rate. This review identified existing gaps of knowledge and emphasized potential research areas for future studies. Methods: Two independent reviewers searched 3 electronic databases from inception to September 2020. Retrieved appropriate articles were selected systematically by title, abstract, and full review of the article. Studies were included if they enrolled patients who had thrombophilia or deep venous thrombosis (DVT) preoperatively and had undergone a free flap reconstruction. For eligible studies, the following information was extracted: basic demographics (sex, age, comorbidities), preoperative scans type, free flap type, clotting mode (causes), wound type, and flap survival. Results: Seventeen articles were found eligible for this review. Traumatic aetiology was found in 63 (33.6%) patients, while 124 (66.3%) patients had a non-traumatic aetiology. Preoperative screening for patients with non-traumatic aetiology was reported in 119 patients. In these patients, the flap survived in 107 (89.91%) patients. Four studies investigating patients with traumatic DVT aetiology, 60 patients (out of 63) had a preoperative computed tomography angiography or duplex. Those patients had 100% flap survival rates. Conclusion: Further investigations are required to identify venous thrombosis incidence in patients with non-traumatic thrombosis aetiology as this cohort of patients is at high risk of flap failure. Finally, the prognostic validity of available preoperative screening tools to identify high-risk patients should be assessed, such as imaging techniques, which would include venous duplex scanning, may prevent failure in free flap surgery.

Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Disorders of Hemostasis: Perioperative Risks and Management

BACKGROUND

Surgical and technological advances have resulted in the widespread adoption of microsurgical breast reconstruction. Many comorbidities that potentially might impair vasculature and wound healing are no longer considered contraindications for these procedures. However, some uncertainty still prevails regarding the perioperative management of patients with disorders of hemostasis.

METHODS

The authors combined a literature review with a retrospective chart review of patients with disorders of hemostasis who had undergone microsurgical breast reconstruction at the senior author's (J.F.) center between 2015 to 2020. Several disorders associated with thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic complications were identified, and a standardized risk assessment and management strategy was developed in cooperation with a hematologist.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 studies were identified comprising 29 patients who had a defined disorder of hemostasis and underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction. Seventeen microsurgical breast reconstructions were performed on 11 patients at the senior author's (J.F.) center. High factor VIII levels, heterozygous factor V Leiden, and heterozygous prothrombin mutation G20210A were the most common genetic or mixed genetic/acquired thrombophilic conditions. As expected, hereditary antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiencies were rare. Among hemorrhagic disorders, thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, and von Willebrand disease or low von Willebrand factor levels were those factors most frequently associated with increased perioperative bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients should be screened for elevated risk of thrombosis or bleeding before undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction, and positive screening should prompt a complete hematologic evaluation. Interdisciplinary management of these disorders with a hematologist is essential to minimize risks and to obtain optimal reconstructive results.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, IV.

The prognostic role of extended preoperative hypercoagulability work-up in high-risk microsurgical free flaps: a single-center retrospective case series of patients with heterozygotic factor V Leiden thrombophilia

INTRODUCTION

Hypercoagulability is associated with an increased risk of microvascular complications and free flap failures. The authors present their experience and approach to diagnosing and treating patients with heterozygotic factor V Leiden (hFVL) thrombophilia undergoing free flap reconstruction.

METHODS

Between November 2009 and June 2018, 23 free flap surgeries were performed in 15 hypercoagulable patients with hFVL. According to the timing of perioperative hypercoagulability work-up, they were grouped into flaps with established diagnoses prior to surgery (Group A) versus flaps with unknown diagnoses prior to surgery (Group B). Baseline characteristics and perioperative complications were compared between both groups, including revision surgeries due to microvascular thromboses, acute bleedings, hematomas, flap necroses, and reconstructive failures.

RESULTS

HFVL mutations had been confirmed preoperatively in 14 free flap surgeries (61%, Group A), whereas in 9 free flap surgeries (39%, Group B), mutations were only diagnosed postoperatively after the occurrence of microvascular thromboses had warranted extended hypercoagulability work-up. The overall rate of intraoperative flap thromboses was 9% (n = 2), whereas the overall rate of postoperative flap thromboses was 43% (n = 10). The corresponding salvage rates were 100% (n = 2/2) for intraoperative and 40% (n = 4/10) for postoperative pedicle thromboses. A total of five free flaps were lost (22%). Upon comparison, flaps with an unconfirmed diagnosis prior to surgery were at ten times higher risk for developing total necroses (flaps lost in Group B = 4/9 versus Group A = 1/14; OR: 10.4; 95% CI 1.0, 134.7; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Meticulous preoperative work-up of patients with any history of hypercoagulability can help reduce free flap loss rates, thus improving surgical outcomes and increasing patient safety.

Safety of DIEP Flap Reconstruction in Patients with Factor V Leiden: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background:

Factor V Leiden (FVL) is the most common inherited thrombophilia in White people. Thrombotic complications resulting from free flap breast reconstruction in FVL patients have been studied to a limited degree. We evaluated whether patients heterozygous for a FVL mutation undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction had increased risk of micro- or macrovascular thrombotic complications compared with patients without a diagnosed thrombophilia.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective cohort study of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstructions at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (1/2015–12/2020) comparing patients diagnosed as FVL heterozygotes compared with matched controls without a diagnosed thrombophilia. Patients were matched using coarsened exact matching algorithm based on clinical characteristics. The primary outcomes were micro- (return to OR for flap compromise, flap loss) and macrovascular (venous thromboembolism) complications.

Results:

A total of 506 patients (812 flaps) were included in this study. Eleven patients (17 flaps) were FVL heterozygotes. After matching, 10 patients (16 flaps) with FVL were matched to 55 patients (94 flaps). The return to OR for flap compromise was 0% in the FVL cohort compared with 5% (n = 5/94, 3/94 flaps lost, P = 1.00) in the matched controls (1.9%, n = 15/795 in unmatched controls, 0.6%, n = 5/795 loss rate). There were zero venous thromboembolism events among FVL patients compared with 2% of controls (n = 1/55).

Conclusions:

FVL heterozygosity did not increase the risk of micro- or macrovascular complications in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. This study supports the safety of microvascular reconstruction in this group of patients when appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is given.

Free flap thrombosis in patients with hypercoagulability: A systematic review

Background

Even with satisfactory anastomosis technique and adequate experience of the surgeon, flap loss due to thrombosis can still occur due to the patient’s underlying condition. Patients with hypercoagulability due to etiologies such as malignancy, hereditary conditions, and acquired thrombophilia are among those who could benefit from free flap procedures. This review aimed to evaluate the risk of free flap thrombosis in patients with hypercoagulability and to identify the most effective thromboprophylaxis regimen.

Methods

This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were explored. Types of free flaps, types of hypercoagulable states, thrombosis prevention protocols, thrombosis complication rates, and flap vitality outcomes were reviewed. Samples from the included studies were pooled to calculate the relative risk of free flap thrombosis complications in patients with hypercoagulability compared to those without hypercoagulability.

Results

In total, 885 articles underwent title, abstract, and full-text screening. Six articles met the inclusion criteria. The etiologies of hypercoagulability varied. The overall incidence of thrombosis and flap loss in hypercoagulable patients was 13% and 10.3%, respectively. The thrombosis risk was two times higher in hypercoagulable patients (P=0.074) than in controls. Thromboprophylaxis regimens were variable. Heparin was the most commonly used regimen.

Conclusions

Hypercoagulability did not significantly increase the risk of free flap thrombosis. The most effective thromboprophylaxis regimen could not be determined due to variation in the regimens. Further well-designed studies should be conducted to confirm this finding.

Two successful cases of DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction in patients with Factor V Leiden

Factor V Leiden (FVL) is the most common inherited hypercoagulable condition. It is a genetic disorder caused by a missense mutation that prevents inactivation of Factor V in the clotting cascade, leading to overproduction of thrombin and excess clotting. This pathophysiological process is especially unfavorable in patients undergoing free tissue transfer. Many authors have noted a propensity for both venous and arterial thrombosis leading to partial or complete flap loss. To date, there have been no published reports of patients with FVL undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction without flap complications. Here, the authors present two cases of successful free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction in patients with diagnosed FVL. The perioperative thromboelastography lab values are evaluated to help guide anticoagulation regimen for these high-risk procedures.

Bilateral Breast Reconstruction with Abdominal Free Flaps: A Single Centre, Single Surgeon Retrospective Review of 55 Consecutive Patients

Breast reconstruction using free tissue transfer is an increasingly utilised oncoplastic procedure. The aim was to review all bilateral breast reconstructions using abdominal free flaps by a single surgeon over an 11-year period (2003–2014). A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction using abdominal free flaps between 2003 and 2014 by the senior author (DAM). Data analysed included patient demographics, indication for reconstruction, surgical details, and complications. Fifty-five female patients (mean 48.6 years [24–71 years]) had bilateral breast reconstruction. The majority (41, 74.5%) underwent immediate reconstruction and DIEP flaps were utilised on 41 (74.5%) occasions. Major surgical complications occurred in 6 (10.9%) patients, all of which were postoperative vascular compromise of the flap. Failure to salvage the reconstruction occurred on 3 (5.5%) occasions resulting in a total flap failure rate of 2.7%. Obesity (>30 kg/m²) and age > 60 years were shown to have a statistically increased risk of developing postoperative complications (P < 0.05). Our experience demonstrates that abdominal free flaps for bilateral breast reconstruction fares well, with a flap failure rate of 2.7%. Increased body mass index and patient age (>60 years) were associated with higher complication rates.

Intra-flap thrombosis secondary to acute sickle crisis: a case report

We present the case of a 40-year-old patient with sickle cell trait who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction with microvascular TRAM flap transfer. Intraoperatively, the patient developed arterial anastomotic thrombosis of the right breast flap. The left breast flap had already been harvested and was placed on ice. Both anastomoses were then successfully completed. Postoperatively, the patient developed a pulmonary embolism and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. On postoperative day 12, the left cutaneous Doppler signals were lost, and exploration revealed a thrombosed pedicle and nonviable left breast flap. Pathologic specimen evaluation revealed sickled cells within the flap microvasculature. We believe that prolonged ischemia time and hypothermia precipitated erythrocyte sickling within the flap, causing intra-flap thrombosis that propagated to the pedicle. While sickle cell diseases are not a contraindication to free tissue transfer, we believe that flap cooling should be utilized with caution in this circumstance.