Reconstruction of Abdominal Defects After Open Abdomen Treatment Using Propeller Flaps of the Superior and Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery System: Report of Two Cases

Open abdomen treatment (OAT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In cases where primary or delayed fascial closure cannot be achieved, vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction are indicated, which often result in a planned ventral hernia. If secondary skin closure is not feasible, common treatment of granulated abdominal defects involves split-thickness skin-grafting or healing by secondary intention leading to significant scarring and sometimes mutilating defects. Late enteroatmospheric fistulae may develop as a result of instable scar tissue or insufficient soft tissue coverage. Perforator propeller flaps have been described for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the abdomen; however, not for OAT-induced abdominal defects. We report two complex cases of OAT-induced abdominal wall defects of 20 × 8 and 22 × 10 cm, which were reconstructed with a propeller flap based on the superior epigastric artery perforator in the first case and the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator in the second case. The flaps were rotated into each of the abdominal defects following the propeller flap concept with primary closure of the donor sites and successful reconstruction of both defects. At 1-year follow-up, both patients developed asymptomatic incisional ventral hernias. Secondary-stage abdominal wall reconstruction was not considered due to satisfaction with the reconstructive result and feared complications. Pedicled perforator flaps designed based on either the superior or deep inferior epigastric artery system are useful reconstructive options for midline abdominal defects without necessity for pedicle lengthening, microsurgical anastomosis, or another donor site beyond the abdomen. In conclusion, soft tissue coverage of OAT-induced abdominal defects in critically ill patients can be achieved with the presented propeller flaps avoiding poor results of skin grafting or secondary intention healing.

From Angiosomal to Bi-Angiosomal and Extra-Angiosomal Pedicled Perforator Flaps: Optimizing the Use of Local Tissues in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

The use of free-style and propeller perforator-based flaps has been popularized for the reconstruction of moderate size defects in the trunk and extremities, while their application in the field of abdominal reconstruction is seldom reported. The purpose of this report is to describe the authors experience with the use of pedicled perforator-based flaps in abdominal wall reconstruction, presenting the innovative concept of transition from angiosomal to bi-angiosomal and extra-angiosomal perforator flaps and showing applications of the different flap designs according to the multiple clinical scenarios.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 15 patients underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with angiosomal, bi-angiosomal, and extra-angiosomal pedicled perforator-based flaps harvested from the surrounding abdominal subunits for superficial or full thickness defects of the abdominal wall of moderate and large dimensions. The defects were consequent to soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) resection in 11 and 4 cases, respectively. Operative data, post-operative course, and complications were recorded. Moreover, at 12 months follow-up, patients were asked to rate the esthetic and functional outcomes of the reconstructive procedure on a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Ten angiosomal perforator flaps (4 DIEP, 4 SCIP, 1 SEAP, and 1 LICAP flaps) and 5 bi-angiosomal and extra-angiosomal conjoined perforator flaps including different vascular territories (3 bilateral DIEP, 1 bilateral SEAP, and 1 ipsilateral DIEP-SEAP flap) were successfully transferred in 15 patients. In two patients, microsurgical anastomoses were performed to guarantee proper vascularization of the additional cutaneous territory. Mean age was 59.3 years. Defect sizes ranged from 98 to 408 cm2 (mean size was 194.7 cm2). Mean operative time was 280 min. Flap surface ranged from 108 to 336 cm2 (mean surface was 209.3 cm2). No major complications were registered. One bi-angiosomal bilateral DIEP flap suffered from partial necrosis and required an additional flap reconstruction. All patients underwent a 12-month follow-up except one, who did not show for clinical follow-up but responded at the Likert scale at clinical follow-up at 9 months. Overall patients' satisfaction was high, with mean esthetic and functional ratings of 4.27 and 3.87.

CONCLUSION

The use of local tissues is an under-utilized solution in the field of abdominal wall reconstruction. Angiosomal, bi-angiosomal, and extra-angiosomal perforator flaps proved to be a reliable option to provide the transfer of a significant amount of tissue and offer like with like reconstruction while maximizing flap survival.

Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge

Background

Soft tissue defects in the distal third of the leg and malleolus are difficult to cover and often require free tissue transfer, even for small-sized defects. Propeller flaps were designed as an alternative to free tissue transfer, but are reportedly associated with high complication rates. The aim of our study was to assess our institutional experience with the propeller flap technique and to predict its outcome in lower-limb reconstruction.

Methods

All patients who had undergone propeller flap reconstruction of a distal leg defect between 2013 and 2018 were included. Demographic, clinical, and follow-up data were analyzed.

Results

Complications occurred in 17 of 82 propeller flaps (20.7%), comprising 11 cases of partial necrosis and six of total necrosis. There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index smoking, diabetes mellitus, and soft tissue defect sites between the groups of patients with versus without flap necrosis (p > 0.05). In univariate analysis, there were also no significant differences between these two groups in the length and width of the fascial pedicle, and the ratio of the flap length to the flap width (p > 0.05). Interestingly, there were significant differences between the two groups in the distance between the flap perforator, the shortest distance from the perforator to the defect location, and the rotation angle of the flap (p < 0.05). In multivariable logistic regression analysis with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), the shortest distance from the perforator to the defect location was a significant risk factor for flap complications (p = 0.000; OR = 0.806). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that when the shortest distance from the flap to the wound was less than 3.5 cm, the necrosis rate of the flap was markedly increased (AUC = 76.1); this suggests that the effective safe flap–wound distance was 3.5 cm.

Conclusions

Propeller flaps are a reliable option for reconstruction in carefully selected patients with traumatic defects of the lower limb and malleolus. We found that the effective safe distance was 3.5 cm from the flap to the wound.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for complications of perforator flaps in plantar reconstruction. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to October 2020. Only studies on reconstructing plantar defects with perforator flaps were included, and specific data were required for each patient in the included studies. A total of 14 studies involving 111 flaps were identified and included in the meta‐analysis. Our meta‐analysis identified two risk factors for postoperative complications: flap size over 50 cm² (risk ratio [RR] = 3.12; P = .02), diabetes mellitus foot (RR = 3.26; P = .03). No significant differences were found regarding heel defects (P = .34), single perforator (P = .57), age older than 60 years (P = .19), chronic aetiology (P = .13), trauma (P = .33), tumour resection (P = .60), ulcer (P = .84), and burn (P = .76). Although more high‐quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed, this meta‐analysis indicated that flap size over 50 cm² and diabetes mellitus foot were significant risk factors for postoperative complications of perforator flaps in plantar reconstruction.

Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction

Reconstruction of the lower extremity is considered a major challenge due to frequent bone exposure and the absence of local tissue redundancy, as well as often due to the presence of vascular insufficiency. Many surgeons have preferred free flaps especially for reconstructing the more distal lower limb defects until the evolution of pedicled perforator flaps and propeller flaps in particular provided a like-with-like reconstruction of the lower extremity without affecting the main vessels of the limb or the underlying muscles, and without the risk of any microanastomosis especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps as local flaps in the lower extremity are best suited for small- and medium-sized defects with minimal donor-site morbidity, regardless of the cause of the defect. Any of the three source vessels of the leg can provide reliable perforators for propeller flap coverage of the distal leg and foot. The three main risk factors that are relative contraindications may be advanced age, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease.

Soft tissue coverage of a total gluteal defect with a combination of perforator-based flaps: A case report

Soft tissue defects in the buttock area are often related to decubitus ulcers, which are usually small to medium-large size and can be regularly treated with local flaps. However, when the defects have bigger size, such as those involving the whole gluteal region, the coverage can become more challenging, since this specific area needs both a good resistance to pressure and an acceptable functional result. The most common solution for similar cases is the use of multiple local flaps, or, in extreme situations, a free flap. In particular, local flaps based on perforator vessels are, in selected cases, a consolidated alternative to free flap allowing an efficient reconstruction of soft tissue defects using adjacent similar tissues, providing the benefit of "like with like" coverage. Here we present a case of a large mycosis fungoides nidus of the gluteal region measuring 25 cm × 18 cm reconstructed using two large perforator flaps adjacent to the defect combined with a remote one for coverage of the donor site. The cranial flap was designed based on a perforator arising from the superior gluteal artery and transferred into the defect by means of a V-Y advancement, while the two caudal propeller flaps in the posterior thigh were both based on perforators of the profunda femoris artery and rotated 180°, respectively. To obtain a tension-free cover of the donor site defect we applied the concept of "sequential" propeller flaps. Post-operative course was uneventful and the patient was ambulatory with assistive devices after 1 week. At 6 months follow-up, wounds were completely healed without complications and a good functional result was obtained. This report showed the great coverage potential of multiple perforator-based local flaps when properly combined allowing primary closure of the donor site. In particular, we managed to reconstruct a total gluteal defect using just ipsilateral side tissue, reducing morbidity, and obtaining a stable result.

Total aesthetic subunit reconstruction of the burned anterior abdomen using pre-expanded pedicled anterolateral thigh flap-A case report

Combination of tissue expansion and perforator flaps broadened the reconstructive options in burn cases with wide scar contractures. We report a case of total aesthetic subunit reconstruction of the anterior abdominal skin using a pre-expanded pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap in a patient with postburn contractures. Seventeen-year-old girl had a history of scalding burn to the anterior abdomen, resulting in tight contractures inhibiting her mobility. After an expansion period of 6 months, the flap of 27 × 30 cm was elevated at the suprafascial plane and tunneled to the anterior abdomen. The flap was used to resurface the defect from xyphoid process down to the mons pubis and bilaterally at linea semilunaris. Postoperative course was uneventful. A good quality aesthetic and functional reconstruction was achieved at the 10-year follow-up. Pre-expanded pedicled ALT flaps may be considered as an option in extensive scarring requiring large amounts of tissue.

[Application of pedicled anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap for full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction after tumor resection]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effectiveness of pedicled anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap for full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction after tumor resection.

METHODS

Between September 2010 and December 2017, 18 patients with abdominal wall tumors were collected. There were 11 males and 7 females, with an average age of 45.2 years (range, 29-68 years). Histologic diagnosis included desmoid tumor in 8 cases, sarcomas in 6 cases, malignant teratoma in 2 cases, and colon adenocarcinoma in 2 cases. All abdominal wall defects were full-thickness defects. Peritoneum continuity was reconstructed with mesh; the lateral vastus muscular flaps were used to fill the dead space and rebuild the abdominal wall strength; the abdominal wall soft tissue defects were repaired with pedicled anterolateral thigh flaps. The size of abdominal wall defects ranged from 15 cm×6 cm to 25 cm×22 cm; the size of lateral vastus muscular flap ranged from 10 cm×8 cm to 22 cm×10 cm; the size of anterolateral thigh flap ranged from 14.0 cm×8.0 cm to 21.0 cm×8.5 cm. The bilateral pedicled anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flaps were harvested to repair the extensive abdominal wall defects in 2 cases. All donor sites were sutured directly.

RESULTS

All wounds healed smoothly and all flaps survived totally. All donor sites healed smoothly. The mean follow-up time was 22.5 months (range, 11-56 months). No tumor recurrence occurred, the abdominal function and appearance were satisfactory, no abdominal hernia was noted. Only linear scar left at the donor sites.

CONCLUSION

Pedicled anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap combined with mesh is fit for large full-thickness abdominal defect reconstruction.

Management of skin and subcutaneous tissue in complex open abdominal wall reconstruction

PURPOSE

Open abdominal wall reconstruction is often a complex endeavor, usually performed on patients with multiple risk factors and co-morbidities.

METHODS

In this article, we review soft tissue management techniques that can optimize the skin and subcutaneous tissue, with the goal of reducing surgical-site occurrences.

RESULTS

Regardless of the hernia repair technique used, outcomes can be highly dependent on the appropriate management of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Indeed, dehiscence and surgical-site infection can jeopardize the entire reconstruction, especially in cases where synthetic mesh might become exposed and/or infected, setting up a "vicious cycle" (Holihan et al. in J Am Coll Surg 221:478-485, 2015).

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary cooperation between the general and plastic surgeon is useful in cases of tenuous blood supply to the abdominal skin, in cases of redundant, marginal or excessive skin, and in cases of deficient skin.

A simple concept for covering pressure sores: wound edge-based propeller perforator flap

We present a new surgical modification to allow propeller perforator flaps to cover pressure sores at various locations. We used a propeller perforator flap concept based on the detection of newly formed perforator vessels located 1 cm from the wound margin and stimulated by the chronic inflammation process. Between January 2009 and January 2017, 33 wound edge-based propeller perforator flaps were used to cover pressure sores at various locations in 28 patients. In four cases more than one flap was used on the same patient. The patients comprised 18 males and 10 females with a mean age of 41·25 (range, 16-70) years. All patients underwent follow-up for 0-12 months. The mean follow-up duration was 5·03 months. Venous congestion was observed in three flaps that were rotated by 180° (9·1%). However, there was a significant difference between flaps rotated by 90° and 180° according to the complication rate (P = 0·034). Out of 33 flaps, 29 flaps healed uneventfully. Patients were able to sit and lie on their flaps three weeks after surgery. In our study, we were able to obtain satisfying final results using these novel flaps.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps in Lower Extremity Defects: Identification of Risk Factors for Complications

BACKGROUND

Currently, increased interest in the perforator-pedicled propeller flap should not obscure the fact that it is, in reality, a complex procedure requiring experience and monitoring similar to free flaps. Through a meta-analysis, the authors aimed to identify the risk factors of perforator-pedicled propeller flap failure in lower extremity defects.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1991 to May of 2014 for articles describing perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in the lower extremity. The study selection met the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Fixed-effects models were used.

RESULTS

Forty articles complied with the inclusion criteria, representing 428 perforator-pedicled propeller flaps. The most common cause was posttraumatic (55.2 percent). Most of the defects were at the distal third of the lower leg (45.6 percent). The arc of rotation was 180 degrees for 34.3 percent. Complications were found in 25.2 percent, including partial necrosis (10.2 percent) and complete necrosis (3.5 percent). Complete flap survival was found in 84.3 percent. The authors identified three significant risk factors: age older than 60 years (relative risk, 1.61; p = 0.03), diabetes (relative risk, 2.00; p = 0.02), and arteriopathy (relative risk, 3.12; p = 0.01). No significant results were found regarding smoking status other than a tendency (p = 0.06), acute cause (p = 0.59), posttraumatic cause (p = 0.97), distal third of the lower leg (p = 0.66), fascia inclusion (p = 0.70), and pedicle rotation greater than 120 degrees (p = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Age older than 60 years, diabetes, and arteriopathy are significant risk factors of perforator-pedicled propeller flap complications in the lower extremity.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, IV.

Pedicled posteromedial thigh (PMT) flap: A new alternative for groin defect reconstruction

The posterior medial thigh is mainly vascularized by the profunda femoris artery (PFA), which nourishes the adductor magnus muscle and overlying skin, to supply a number of perforators that can potentially be used as pedicles for local perforator flaps. Here we present two cases utilizing the pedicled posteromedial thigh flap (PMT) to reconstruct the groin defects. Two patients underwent resection for metastatic malignant melanoma resulting in large defects of the groin with exposure of major inguinal vessels; the dimensions of the skin defects were 15 cm × 5 cm and 16 cm × 6 cm, two ipsilateral pedicled PMT flaps were designed to cover the defects. The pedicled PMT flaps were based on perforators arising from the PFA and were transposed through a submuscular tunnel into the defect. The postoperative course was uneventful and the wounds were reconstructed successfully. The pedicled PMT flap may be an option for reconstruction of groin defects and could be incorporated into the armamentarium of the reconstructive microsurgeon. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:339-343, 2017.

Coverage of supraumbilical abdominal wall defects: The tunnelled-pedicled ALT technique

Abdominal wall defects are a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. Although the utility of anterolateral thigh perforator (ALT) flap has been well established for lower abdominal wall reconstruction, pedicled ALT flap is usually not considered for supraumbilical defects in the most recent algorithms. The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a tunneled pedicled ALT flap for reconstruction of supraumbilical defect from a series of patients. From July 2009 to September2014, six patients underwent delayed abdominal wall coverage using pedicled ALT flaps and reinforcement with polypropylene meshes. Defects occurred after surgical complications and abdominal trauma. Flaps were tunneled beneath the rectus femoris and sartorius muscles to increase the pedicle length. The size of the skin islands ranged from 22-29 × 10-14 cm. All flaps survived and the healing of the wounds was successful. Partial dehiscence of donor site occurred in one patient, and small wound dehiscence due to minimal distal necrosis was observed in another patient. No functional problems were reported in donor site, and no complications occurred in 6-68 months of follow-up. The tunneled pedicled ALT flap may provide a reliable alternative method for abdominal wall reconstruction, including supraumbilical defects. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:119-127, 2017.

Complex abdominal wall defect reconstruction using a latissimus dorsi free flap with mesh after malignant tumor resection

PURPOSE

Extended and full-thickness abdominal wall defects are commonly reconstructed using free flaps. Published surgical outcomes involving the latissimus dorsi (LD) free flap procedure are limited and are less numerous than those with free flaps involving the thigh. The aim of this report was to describe the immediate and long-term evaluation of complex abdominal wall reconstruction using a LD free flap with mesh.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2013, nine patients with extended malignant tumors of the abdominal wall underwent surgeries. After the surgical resection, the mean defect size was 385 cm² (range: 190-650 cm² ). Full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction was performed with a combination of LD free flaps and meshes. The immediate and long-term outcomes were assessed regarding the complications, sustainable strength of the abdominal wall and cancer recurrence.

RESULTS

The meshes measured 927 cm² in average (range: 500-1036 cm² ). Eight Parietex Composite® and 1 Bard Collamend Implant® were used. No donor site complications occurred, and complete LD flap survival was achieved without partial necrosis or thrombosis. One obese patient who received a porcine dermis mesh developed an eventration four days postoperatively and exhibited a limited amount of abdominal skin necrosis around the flap. Two patients died from cancer evolution. After a mean follow-up of 60.4 months (range: 29-94 months), clinical evaluation of the abdomen revealed 2 patients without anomalies, 4 cases of abdominal bulging without functional discomfort and 1 case of major abdominal distension.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex abdominal reconstruction with LD free flap and mesh allows extended satisfactory coverage with a low incidence of flap and donor site complications. However, patients should be advised of the significant risk of abdominal bulging. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:38-43, 2017.