Syndactylizing arterialized venous flaps for multiple finger injuries

Syndactylized glabrous flaps for multiple finger palmar defects

BACKGROUND

Palmar finger or pulp defects require coverage with glabrous tissue to achieve a good match with the lost tissue. The management of multiple finger palmar or pulp defects is challenging because these defects may not always be suitable for local or pedicled flaps. In such situations, syndactylizing free or pedicled flaps can be used.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated the results of free glabrous flaps syndactylizing across multiple finger defects. The two flaps used were the superficial branch of the radial artery (SUPBRA) flap and hypothenar free flap. Seven syndactylized glabrous free flaps were used to cover the defects in 16 fingers. The functional results and complaints were also assessed.

RESULTS

Mean flap size was 14.35 cm2. Six flaps survived. Postoperative evaluation data were obtained for the 13 fingers. All the patients returned to their previous work. All patients had a diminished protective sensation of at least 4.31 according to the SWM test. The mean two-point discrimination score of the patients was 9.9 mm (7-14). One finger had a PIP joint flexion contracture of 30°, no donor-site complaints were observed.

CONCLUSION

The advantages of these flaps include single operation site, strong glabrous tissue coverage, low risk of flexion contracture, and adequate tissue size for large defects. Disadvantages include two-stage and complex microsurgical operations, prolonged treatment, and hospital stay.

One-stage coverage of multi-digital pulp defects with sensate flaps from the foot

BACKGROUND

The reconstruction of the digital pulp defects was a mix of the sensation, function, and aesthetics. As the conventional flaps became out of date, the sensate flaps were increasingly utilized in covering such defects. In this report, we present our experience with some novel flaps design, located on the foot.

METHOD

From April 2015 to September 2018, nine patients received the free sensate flaps to resurface soft tissue defects in the multi-digital pulps. And all flaps were harvested from each aspect of the foot, which dimensions were tailored to the defects. The cutaneous nerve was preserved within the flap. Standardized assessment of outcome in terms of sensory, functional, and esthetic scores of the reconstructed pulps was completed.

RESULTS

Nineteen flaps survived completely without significant complications, and mild venous congestion was observed in one flap. The free sensate flaps were performed for digital pulp reconstruction in 9 patients: 6 male and 3 female patients with a mean age of 49 years (ranged, 16 to 72 years). The defects involved 3 thumbs, 6 index fingers, 5 long fingers, 3 ring fingers, and 2 little fingers. All flaps were available for a mean follow-up of 30 months (ranged, 24 to 36 months). The functional and esthetic outcomes were satisfied for all flaps, as well as the sensory restoration.

CONCLUSION

The sensate flap from the foot is a remarkable alternative for digital pulp reconstruction with less morbidity and better outcomes. Furthermore, the foot region presents a sensitive, glabrous skin with the proper bulkiness and allows for easy dissection.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unconventional Perfusion Flaps in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Although unconventional perfusion flaps have been in clinical use since 1975, many surgeons are still deterred from using them, because of some reports of high necrosis rates.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all articles written in English, French, German, Spanish, and Portuguese on the clinical use of unconventional perfusion flaps and indexed to PubMed from 1975 until July 15, 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 134 studies and 1445 patients were analyzed. The estimated survival rate of unconventional perfusion flaps was 89.5 percent (95 percent CI, 87.3 to 91.3 percent; p < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of unconventional perfusion flaps (95 percent CI, 89.9 to 93.7 percent; p < 0.001) presented complete or nearly complete survival. Most defects mandating unconventional perfusion flap reconstruction were caused by trauma (63.6 percent), especially of the hand and fingers (75.1 percent). The main complication of all types of flaps was a variable degree of necrosis (7.5 percent of all unconventional perfusion flaps presented marginal necrosis; 9.2 percent and 5.5 percent had significant and complete necrosis, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the rate of postoperative infection and the need for a new flap (Pearson coefficient, 0.405; p = 0.001). Flaps used to reconstruct the upper limb showed better survival than those transferred to the head and neck or to the lower limb (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Unconventional perfusion flaps show high survival rates and should probably be used more liberally, particularly in the realm of upper limb reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.