Upper and lower extremity reconstructive applications utilizing free flaps from the medial genicular arterial system: A systematic review

The Medial Femoral Trochlea Osteochondral Flap for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The medial femoral trochlea flap has been used to resurface scaphoids with recalcitrant proximal pole fractures or avascular necrosis, providing vascularized osteochondral tissue with similar morphological characteristics. This article aims to review the contemporary literature on its use for scaphoid reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE assessed the use of medial femoral trochlea flaps in scaphoids.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included, with 76 patients at a mean age of 26 years. Forty-three patients underwent clinical review, and 10 patients underwent radiographic evaluation, at a mean 23.3 months of follow-up. Flaps were generally performed for proximal pole fractures, avascular necrosis, nonunion, or failure of prior fixation; 94.4% of the flaps united. No marked change in sagittal plane motion was noted; reductions were seen in axial and coronal plane motion. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores improved from a mean of 25.2 to 11.5. Radiographic markers also improved. A total of 12.3% of patients had unplanned return to theater. Three patients required early revision for vascular thrombosis, and 1 patient suffered a volar carpal dislocation. Three patients underwent salvage procedures for ongoing pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Although technically demanding, promising early-term to medium-term results are noted with the use of medial femoral trochlea flaps in the scaphoid.

Clinical applications and cadaveric study of the free descending genicular artery perforator flap without the saphenous vein

BACKGROUND

The descending genicular artery (DGA) and medial thigh region have been underused as donor sites for perforator flaps. This study evaluated the anatomical relationship between the perforators of the DGA and the saphenous vein (SV) to review the clinical applications of the free descending genicular artery perforator (DGAP) flap for locoregional reconstruction.

METHODS

Fifteen cadavers were arterially perfused with red latex and dissected. Thirty-one patients with extremity tissue defects were treated with a free DGAP flap, including six patients who received a chimeric flap. The minimum distance between the DGAP and the SV was measured during surgery.

RESULTS

In all patients, the skin branch of the descending genicular artery was found in the medial femoral condyle plane in front of the SV. The average distance between the descending genicular artery perforator and the SV was 3.71 ± 0.38 cm (range: 2.9-4.3 cm). Thirty flaps survived completely, and one flap developed partial necrosis; however, this flap healed two weeks after skin grafting. The average follow-up time was 11.23 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the SV can be preserved when harvesting the descending genicular artery perforator flap, causing less damage to the donor site and having no effect on flap survival. The free descending genicular artery perforator flap without the SV is a better therapy for complicated tissue defects.

Patient-Reported Lower Extremity Outcomes Following Fibula or Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flaps for Upper Extremity Defects

BACKGROUND

Free fibula flap (FFF) and medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap are commonly used for upper extremity osseous reconstruction, yet donor-site morbidity has never been systematically compared.

METHODS

Patients who underwent an FFF or MFC for upper extremity extra-carpal osseous reconstruction at 3 academic hand centers were retrospectively identified. Only patients who underwent reconstruction for a defect in which either flap type is routinely used or has been described in the literature were deemed eligible. Patients who agreed to participate were asked to complete the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and Lower Limb Core Scale (LLCS). The reported population norm median score of LEFS is 77 points. The LLCS population norm mean score is 90.52 points.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (10 MFC, 11 FFF) were enrolled. The median LEFS score for patients after MFC was 76 (interquartile range [IQR], 49-80) points and 75 (IQR, 56-79) points after FFF. The median LLCS score for patients after MFC was 96.4 (IQR, 87.9-100) points and 100 (IQR, 91-100) points after FFF. Median LEFS scores were slightly below the population norm, whereas median LLCS scores were above the norm for both FFF and MFC. All patients stated they would have the surgery again and that any dysfunction or pain in the leg was justified by the benefit in the arm.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering whether to use an MFC or FFF for upper extremity reconstruction, both flap types appear to result in modest and comparable donor-site morbidity.

Expanding Indications of the Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: Systematic Review in Head and Neck Reconstruction

The medial femoral condyle free flap serves as an attractive reconstructive option for small- to intermediate-sized bony defects. It is commonly applied in the extremities with limited reports in the head and neck.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results

Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria, yielding 166 cases for analysis, with a majority of the cohort from a single study (n = 107; 64.4%). However, all included studies represented novel reconstructive sites and surgical indications. Flap components were described in 157 cases; periosteum was used only in four cases (2.5%), whereas all others are composed of cortical bone combined with periosteum, cancellous bone, and/or cartilage (97.5%). Additionally, a skin island was used in 43 cases (25.9%). Flap measurements were reported in 51 cases, averaging 4.5 ± 2.7 cm in length. Seven cases listed skin island dimensions, averaging 20.2 ± 12.8 cm². The descending genicular artery was the primary pedicle employed (n = 162; 97.6%), while the superior medial genicular was used in the descending genicular artery's absence (n = 4; 2.4%). Descending genicular artery pedicle length from 15 reporting cases averaged 6.4 ± 1.2 cm. Successful reconstructions totaled 160 cases (96.4%). Recipient complications were seen in 16 cases (9.6%) with six constituting flap failures (3.6%). Donor site complications were minimal (n = 6; 3.6%); however, this included one major complication of femoral shaft fracture.

Conclusion

The medial femoral condyle free flap is an effective reconstructive option for the head and neck due to its versatile nature, low complication profile at both recipient and donor site, ease of harvest, and two-team approach.

Merits of the free periosteal femoral condyle flap in the management of advanced mandibular osteoradionecrosis

The management of advanced mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is poorly codified and requires repeated time-consuming, morbid surgical procedures. The free periosteal medial femoral condyle flap could be used for the management of extensive mandibular ORN with fracture, to avoid non-conservative surgery such as mandibulectomy. The purpose of this study was to report the authors' experience using periosteal flaps for advanced ORN and to assess the therapeutic effectiveness of these flaps in this context. A series of 10 patients who underwent bone revascularization with a free periosteal femoral flap for the management of advanced ORN (Notani class III) is reported. The onset of bone consolidation, length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, donor site morbidity, and the option of dental rehabilitation in the event of a successful outcome were assessed. Osteogenesis was observed in 70% of cases. Thirty percent of patients benefited from dental implant rehabilitation. The mean follow-up was 73.1 months. No patient experienced any sequelae at the flap harvest site. In the authors' opinion, the free periosteal medial femoral condyle flap appears to offer a therapeutic solution for patients with advanced stages of ORN.

Vascularized Bone Grafts in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Review of Options and Indications

Vascularized bone grafts have demonstrated increased perfusion, structural integrity, and ability to achieve good outcomes in challenging clinical situations when compared with nonvascularized grafts. These grafts may be pedicled or free, and bring perfused, viable bone into areas of impaired healing. Although numerous grafts have been described, a few grafts have demonstrated particular usefulness and versatility. Pedicled grafts from the distal radius, medial femoral condyle, ribs, and fibula have improved outcomes in challenging situations without the need for microsurgery. Free grafts from the fibula and medial femoral condyle/trochlea, although they require microsurgical anastomosis, can be transferred to virtually any site in the body and have expanding indications. The capacity of these grafts to achieve favorable outcomes in difficult cases make them a powerful tool for orthopaedic surgeons to have in their armamentarium.

A retrospective evaluation of 182 free flaps in extremity reconstruction and review of the literature

Introduction: During the past decades, free flaps have been given a central role in the reconstructive surgery. Especially in the extremities, where there is a scarcity of available tissues for local flaps, free flaps play a central part. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors contributing to partial and total flap failure. Patients and methods: In a retrospective cohort study, all data concerning patients who underwent free flap reconstruction of the extremities during the first five years since the founding of the department of plastic surgery were gathered. Patient- and surgery-related risk factors were analyzed in correlation to the postoperative complications. Results: In total, 182 free flaps were included in this study. Partial and total flap failure were noted in 21.42% and 17.03%, respectively. A correlation was seen between the time lapsed from debridement until flap coverage, with flaps performed between day 4 and 14 having the least quote of flap failure (p=0.022). Gender, age, arterial hypertension, nicotine abuse, diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease and the number of anastomosed veins were not significantly associated with free flap failure. Conclusion: Our study showed that free flaps can be safely performed in healthy patients as well as in patients with risk factors, with an acceptable flap loss rate. Randomized controlled studies are needed to clarify the exact role of each risk factor in free flap surgery.

Surgical Solution for Total Carpectomy due to Destructive Wrist Pan-Osteomyelitis Using a Free Femoral Condyle Osteocutaneous Flap for Wrist Arthrodesis

Osteomyelitis of the hand is rare, even more so in the carpal bones. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a higher infection rate overall, and up to a 14-fold increase in the incidence of septic arthritis of the hand. The destruction of immunologic barriers, such as cartilage and joint capsules, as well as the use of immunosuppressive medications will have an impact on the higher incidence of articular infections and osteomyelitis in these patients. Infection in these cases is often overlooked because of the similarity of presentation to an acute event of RA. When osteomyelitis is present, rapid and aggressive treatment should be given. Surgical debridement, lavage, and excision of necrotic bone is the best choice, followed by cemented antibiotic impregnated spacer to resolve the acute scenario. Vascularized bone grafts (VBG) can then be used for a definitive solution, as these have great biologic properties that increase the possibility of a good outcome. We hereby present a report of a wrist arthrodesis, using a free medial femoral condyle VBG for the treatment of destructive osteomyelitis of the carpal bones in a female patient with RA.

Donor site morbidity after the harvest of microvascular flaps from the medial and lateral femoral condyle region: Objective, radiologic, and patient-reported outcome of a multi-center trial

BACKGROUND

With the experience-based hypothesis of low donor site morbidity (DSM) for free flaps from the distal femur, this cohort study aimed to evaluate the DSM according to objective and reproducible criteria.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-six patients who had a flap harvest from either the medial or lateral femoral condyle region between 2005 and 2017 were included. A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients. In total, 97 patients were available for a follow-up examination. Outcomes were assessed according to objective (Knee Society Score; Larson Knee Score; OAK Score; 0-100 points), patient-reported (IKDC Score; KOOS Score; 0-100 points), and radiologic criteria (Kellgren and Lawrence Score; MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 1,529 days (range: 248-4,810). The mean Knee Society Score (94.8 ± 10.1), Larson Knee Score (94.5 ± 10.1), and OAK Score (95.5 ± 6.6) showed nearly unimpaired knee function. The overall patient-reported DSM was low (IKDC Score: 86.7 ± 17.4; KOOS Score: 89.3 ± 17.1). Osteochondral (OC) flaps had a significantly higher DSM, regardless of the donor site. Bone flaps did not show any relevant radiologic morbidity in the Kellgren and Lawrence Score. Besides the procedure-associated cartilage lesions at the OC donor sites, MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score did not show any significant presence of further knee pathologies in the bilateral MRI Scans. The obvious cartilage lesions did not have a relevant impact on the knee function of most patients.

CONCLUSION

The DSM for bone and soft-tissue flaps from the femoral condyle region is negligible. OC flaps are associated with a significantly higher DSM, although a clinically relevant impact on knee function was not evident in the majority of patients.

The Medial Femoral Condyle Flap in the Pediatric Patient

BACKGROUND

The use of free flaps from the medial femoral condyle has grown in popularity and is now a workhorse in the reconstruction of skeletal defects. The utility of this technique has not yet been described for the pediatric patient population. The authors present their series of pediatric patients who underwent surgery using a medial femoral condyle free flap or a variant thereof in skeletal reconstruction and demonstrate the efficacy of this technique in this population.

METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients aged 18 years or younger who required a medial femoral condyle flap for skeletal reconstruction was undertaken. Operative technique, radiographs, and clinical outcomes were recorded. A novel technique (Innocenti) was used to avoid the distal femoral physis in which a Kirschner wire was placed under fluoroscopic guidance just proximal to the growth plate.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients met inclusion criteria, with an average age of 14.7 years (range, 7 to 18 years) and mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 3 to 120 months). Six were skeletally immature at the time of medial femoral condyle harvest, with the last patient having organic bone disease, putting her at risk for pathologic fracture. All 13 patients achieved bony union, and no patients suffered pathologic fractures or physeal injuries; no patients developed length discrepancies.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors present the first series of corticocancellous medial femoral condyle free flaps in the pediatric population along with a novel technique to avoid injury to the physis in skeletally immature patients. This technique is effective for a variety of skeletal defects or nonunions and is safe for growing patients without causing physeal arrest or growth disturbance.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Corticoperiosteal medial femoral condyle flap for recalcitrant nonunion in ankle and foot: Outcomes and radiological evaluation of donor site morbidity

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of free corticoperiosteal medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap for ankle, hindfoot and midfoot reconstruction in patients with recalcitrant nonunion.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ankle and foot reconstruction using the MFC flap at our clinic were recruited for assessment of the union rate, time to union and functional outcome. Furthermore, a clinical and radiological examination of the donor knee was performed using both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with a mean follow-up time of 2.5 years were included; 10 of them had a previously failed ankle and foot arthrodesis. Union was achieved in 11 patients in an average time of 10 months after MFC flap surgery. Donor site morbidity was minor with no radiological evidence for soft tissue or bone complication.

CONCLUSION

MFC flaps are a useful and safe reconstructive tool and may be considered after failed ankle and foot arthrodesis.

The medial femoral condyle free flap: An excellent option for difficult cases: case series

The use of the medial femoral condyle free flap is a versatile option for the treatment of upper extremity non unions and reconstructive procedures associated with bone loss or osteonecrosis. The benefit of this type of flap is the viability of the bone which favors primary ossification and increases bone density. Vascularized free bone flaps are especially useful for the treatment of recalcitrant nonunions, or nonunions that have failed three or more treatments to obtain consolidation. We present a case series of three patients treated with medial femoral condyle free flap for reconstruction of the upper extremity of different etiologies at the level of the distal humerus, distal radius and distal phalanx of the thumb.

A Review on the Orthoplastic Approach to Lower Limb Reconstruction

Just as in the craft of carpentry, a stable foundation and framework are absolutely essential to the final function of a building, but no more important than the drywall, trim, and paint that make the building functional, durable, and livable. Reconstruction of the lower extremity is similar; the orthopaedic surgeon must obtain stable fixation of the damaged or diseased bone once a thorough debridement of nonviable bone is performed, while the plastic or orthopaedic soft tissue surgeon must provide vascularized, stable coverage. These two components are complementary and both contribute to the success or failure of functional limb restoration. The stability of bone repair will predict the ultimate functional status, while the vascularized envelope will enhance the biology of bone and soft tissue healing. When both components are properly attended to, the result is often a functional limb with an acceptable appearance. While a single surgeon need not perform both of these tasks (although some may choose to do so), the orthopaedic and plastic surgeon involved in this care must have a clear understanding of each other's role and their importance for a good outcome. This is what we call the orthoplastic approach to reconstructive surgery of the extremities, that is, the application of principles and practice of both specialties applied simultaneously to optimize the outcomes in limb reconstruction. In this review article, we discuss the history of orthoplastic surgery, the key elements of orthoplastic surgery, and thoughts on factors that lead to good outcomes through select cases.

Donor-Site Morbidity of Vascularized Bone Flaps from the Distal Femur: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Vascularized grafts from the femur, including the medial femoral condyle and medial femoral trochlea, are increasingly being used. It is critical to understand the lower extremity complications from flap harvest.

METHODS

The authors searched available literature reporting on femoral flaps using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science. After article selection, data were collected regarding demographics, procedure details, outcomes, and complications. The authors classified outcomes as good, fair, or poor based on pain, range-of-motion, sensory changes, subjective reporting, patient-reported outcomes, and other donor-site complications, including the need for additional procedures.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty articles were identified. Forty-five met criteria for review, with data available for 283 patients. No patients had range-of-motion deficits beyond 1 year. Two percent of patients (six of 283) required additional donor-site procedures, with one report of a femur fracture after medial femoral condyle harvest. Only one study on 45 medial femoral trochlea patients presented patient-reported outcomes regarding the knee. Few objective data were presented. Twenty-eight articles presented adequate complication data for 252 patients to be rated as good, fair, or poor. Overall, 89 percent had good outcomes without donor-site complications. Of the 176 medial femoral condyle patients with outcomes reported, 92 percent had good outcomes; and 71 percent of the 48 medial femoral trochlea patients had good outcomes reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the reported donor-site morbidity from medial femoral condyle and medial femoral trochlea harvest is low. Chronic knee pain and sensory changes are most frequently reported, especially in medial femoral trochlea patients.