Soft tissue coverage of a total gluteal defect with a combination of perforator-based flaps: A case report

Bilateral gluteal reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps and saphenofemoral arteriovenous loops

The use of liquid silicone injections for soft tissue augmentation harbors numerous risks and is not approved by the FDA. Still, such injections are frequently performed by unlicensed providers, often in the gluteal region, and can lead to infection, soft-tissue breakdown, scarring, and disfigurement. The purpose of this case report was to demonstrate the use of immediate, abdominally based free flaps for reconstruction in a patient with bilateral total gluteal defects and limited inflow options in the setting of remote silicone injections. The patient is a 45-year-old female who developed chronically infected injected silicone in the bilateral buttocks leading to draining abscesses and soft tissue breakdown. The patient required radical debridement and excision of the bilateral buttocks to remove all foreign material. After intermediate skin grafting of the residual wounds, the patient then was deemed a candidate for bilateral free flap reconstruction of the buttocks. On exploration of the bilateral defects, both 20 cm × 10 cm in size, the gluteal vessels were non-usable, and preoperative CTA additionally had revealed no suitable posteriorly based perforators. Therefore, bilateral arteriovenous (AV) loops, measuring 30 cm in length, were then constructed utilizing the greater saphenous veins anastomosed to the femoral arteries which were then tunneled to the defect. The soft tissue defects were concurrently reconstructed with bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps measuring 16 cm × 12 cm. The postoperative course was complicated by small seromas in each groin requiring drain placement by interventional radiology on postoperative day 16. Otherwise, the patient's buttocks healed well, and functionally, the patient had regained the ability to sit and was satisfied with the aesthetic appearance of the reconstruction as of last follow-up at 10 months. Abdominally based free flap reconstruction with AV loops, in this case, provided for successful reconstruction of otherwise challenging soft-tissue defects with limited inflow options.

Free Flap Reconstruction of Oncologic Gluteal Defects

ABSTRACT

A number of studies have already examined gluteal reconstruction with free flaps. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of free flap reconstruction for oncologic gluteal defects. This retrospective cohort study included 23 patients who underwent immediate soft tissue reconstruction for an oncologic gluteal defect. Fifteen patients underwent reconstruction with a free flap and 8 with a regional flap. The postoperative results were compared between the free and regional flaps. In the free flap group, the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap was used in 12 patients, the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in 2 patients, and the anterolateral thigh flap in 1 patient. Recipient vessels were the inferior gluteal vessels or their branches in 8 patients and the superior gluteal vessels or their branches in 7 patients. All flaps have fully survived in both groups without vascular compromise. Dehiscence of the gluteal wound tended to be more common in the regional flap group; however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. The use of free flap reconstruction for large oncologic defects in the gluteal region is a feasible and reliable option. Tension-free wound closure and simplified suture lines can provide reliable wound coverage irrespective of the postoperative patient's position or movement. Because of the risk of postoperative compression on the vascular pedicle, selecting the appropriate recipient vessel and type of microvascular anastomosis is key for the success of free flap transfer in this region.

Combined versus Single Perforator Propeller Flaps for Reconstruction of Large Soft Tissue Defects: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Sufficient wound closure of large soft tissue defects remains a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. We aimed to investigate whether combined perforator propeller flaps (PPFs) are suitable to expand reconstructive options. Patients undergoing PPF reconstruction surgery between 2008 and 2021 were screened and evaluated retrospectively. Of 86 identified patients, 69 patients received one perforator propeller flap, while 17 patients underwent combined PPF reconstruction with multiple flaps. We chose major complications as our primary outcome and defined those as complications that required additional surgery. Postoperatively, 27 patients (31.4%) suffered major complications. The propeller flap size, the type of intervention as well as the operation time were not associated with a higher risk of major complications. A defect size larger than 100 cm², however, was identified as a significant risk factor for major complications among single PPFs but not among combined PPFs (OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.01−8.36; p = 0.05 vs. OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.02−3.37; p = 0.32). In conclusion, combined PPFs proved to be a reliable technique and should be preferred over single PPFs in the reconstruction of large soft tissue defects at the trunk and proximal lower extremity.