• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4610433)   Today's Articles (6257)   Subscriber (49378)
For: Buchwald F, Girschick T, Seeland M, Kramer S. Using Local Models to Improve (Q)SAR Predictivity. Mol Inform 2011;30:205-18. [DOI: 10.1002/minf.201000154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2010] [Accepted: 02/15/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Lin X, Li X, Lin X. A Review on Applications of Computational Methods in Drug Screening and Design. Molecules 2020;25:E1375. [PMID: 32197324 PMCID: PMC7144386 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25061375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 222] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]  Open
2
Leal FD, da Silva Lima CH, de Alencastro RB, Castro HC, Rodrigues CR, Albuquerque MG. Hologram QSAR models of a series of 6-arylquinazolin-4-amine inhibitors of a new Alzheimer's disease target: dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase-1A enzyme. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:5235-53. [PMID: 25756379 PMCID: PMC4394473 DOI: 10.3390/ijms16035235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Revised: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]  Open
3
Multiscale quantum chemical approaches to QSAR modeling and drug design. Drug Discov Today 2014;19:1921-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2014] [Revised: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 09/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
4
Sheridan RP. Global Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Models vs Selected Local Models as Predictors of Off-Target Activities for Project Compounds. J Chem Inf Model 2014;54:1083-92. [DOI: 10.1021/ci500084w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
5
Piir G, Sild S, Maran U. Comparative analysis of local and consensus quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches for the prediction of bioconcentration factor. SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2013;24:175-199. [PMID: 23410132 DOI: 10.1080/1062936x.2012.762426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
6
Fayet G, Rotureau P, Prana V, Adamo C. Global and local quantitative structure-property relationship models to predict the impact sensitivity of nitro compounds. PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS 2012. [DOI: 10.1002/prs.11499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
7
Jeliazkova N. Web tools for predictive toxicology model building. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2012;8:791-801. [PMID: 22577953 DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2012.685158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA