Large-Scale Evaluation of CavBase for Analyzing the Polypharmacology of Kinase Inhibitors

Predictive in silico off-target profiling in drug discovery

Drug action can be rationalized as interaction of a molecule with proteins in a regulatory network of targets from a specific biological system. Both drug and side effects are often governed by interaction of the drug molecule with many, often unrelated, targets. Accordingly, arrays of protein–ligand interaction data from numerous in vitro profiling assays today provide growing evidence of polypharmacological drug interactions, even for marketed drugs. In vitro off-target profiling has therefore become an important tool in early drug discovery to learn about potential off-target liabilities, which are sometimes beneficial, but more often safety relevant. The rapidly developing field of in silico profiling approaches is complementing in vitro profiling. These approaches capitalize from large amounts of biochemical data from multiple sources to be exploited for optimizing undesirable side effects in pharmaceutical research. Therefore, current in silico profiling models are nowadays perceived as valuable tools in drug discovery, and promise a platform to support optimally informed decisions.

Are phylogenetic trees suitable for chemogenomics analyses of bioactivity data sets: the importance of shared active compounds and choosing a suitable data embedding method, as exemplified on Kinases

Background

‘Phylogenetic trees’ are commonly used for the analysis of chemogenomics datasets and to relate protein targets to each other, based on the (shared) bioactivities of their ligands. However, no real assessment as to the suitability of this representation has been performed yet in this area. We aimed to address this shortcoming in the current work, as exemplified by a kinase data set, given the importance of kinases in many diseases as well as the availability of large-scale datasets for analysis. In this work, we analyzed a dataset comprising 157 compounds, which have been tested at concentrations of 1 μM and 10 μM against a panel of 225 human protein kinases in full-matrix experiments, aiming to explain kinase promiscuity and selectivity against inhibitors. Compounds were described by chemical features, which were used to represent kinases (i.e. each kinase had an active set of features and an inactive set).

Results

Using this representation, a bioactivity-based classification was made of the kinome, which partially resembles previous sequence-based classifications, where particularly kinases from the TK, CDK, CLK and AGC branches cluster together. However, we were also able to show that in approximately 57% of cases, on average 6 kinase inhibitors exhibit activity against kinases which are located at a large distance in the sequence-based classification (at a relative distance of 0.6 – 0.8 on a scale from 0 to 1), but are correctly located closer to each other in our bioactivity-based tree (distance 0 – 0.4). Despite this improvement on sequence-based classification, also the bioactivity-based classification needed further attention: for approximately 80% of all analyzed kinases, kinases classified as neighbors according to the bioactivity-based classification also show high SAR similarity (i.e. a high fraction of shared active compounds and therefore, interaction with similar inhibitors). However, in the remaining ~20% of cases a clear relationship between kinase bioactivity profile similarity and shared active compounds could not be established, which is in agreement with previously published atypical SAR (such as for LCK, FGFR1, AKT2, DAPK1, TGFR1, MK12 and AKT1).

Conclusions

In this work we were hence able to show that (1) targets (here kinases) with few shared activities are difficult to establish neighborhood relationships for, and (2) phylogenetic tree representations make implicit assumptions (i.e. that neighboring kinases exhibit similar interaction profiles with inhibitors) that are not always suitable for analyses of bioactivity space. While both points have been implicitly alluded to before, this is to the information of the authors the first study that explores both points on a comprehensive basis. Excluding kinases with few shared activities improved the situation greatly (the percentage of kinases for which no neighborhood relationship could be established dropped from 20% to only 4%). We can conclude that all of the above findings need to be taken into account when performing chemogenomics analyses, also for other target classes.

Identification of Similar Binding Sites to Detect Distant Polypharmacology

The ability of small molecules to interact with multiple proteins is referred to as polypharmacology. This property is often linked to the therapeutic action of drugs but it is known also to be responsible for many of their side effects. Because of its importance, the development of computational methods that can predict drug polypharmacology has become an important line of research that led recently to the identification of many novel targets for known drugs. Nowadays, the majority of these methods are based on measuring the similarity of a query molecule against the hundreds of thousands of molecules for which pharmacological data on thousands of proteins are available in public sources. However, similarity-based methods are inherently biased by the chemical coverage offered by the active molecules present in those public repositories, which limits significantly their capacity to predict interactions with proteins structurally and functionally unrelated to any of the already known targets for drugs. It is in this respect that structure-based methods aiming at identifying similar binding sites may offer an alternative complementary means to ligand-based methods for detecting distant polypharmacology. The different existing approaches to binding site detection, representation, comparison, and fragmentation are reviewed and recent successful applications presented.

Chemogenomics in drug discovery: computational methods based on the comparison of binding sites

Novel computational methods for understanding relationships between ligands and all possible biological targets have emerged in recent years. Proteins are connected to each other based on the similarity of their ligands or based on the similarity of their binding sites. The assumption is that compounds sharing chemical similarity should share targets and that targets with a similar binding site should also share ligands. A large number of computational techniques have been developed to assess ligand and binding site similarity, which can be used to make quantitative predictions of the most probable biological target of a given compound. This review covers the recent advances in new computational methods for relating biological targets based on the similarity of their binding sites. Binding site comparisons are used for the prediction of their most likely ligands, their possible cross reactivity and selectivity. These comparisons can also be used to infer the function of novel uncharacterized proteins.

Subpocket analysis method for fragment-based drug discovery

Although two binding sites might be dissimilar overall, they might still bind the same fragments if they share suitable subpockets. Information about shared subpockets can be therefore used in fragment-based drug design to suggest new fragments or to replace existing fragments within an already known compound. A novel computational method called SubCav is described which allows the similarity searching and alignment of subpockets from a PDB-wide database against a user-defined query. The method is based on pharmacophoric fingerprints combined with a subpocket alignment algorithm. SubCav was shown to be effective in producing reasonable alignments for subpockets with low sequence similarity and be able to retrieve relevant subpockets from a large database of structures including those with different folds. It can also be used to analyze subpockets inside a protein family to facilitate drug design and to rationalize compound selectivity.