3
|
van der Velden S, Kunnen B, Koppert WJC, Steenbergen JHL, Dietze MMA, Beijst C, Viergever MA, Lam MGEH, de Jong HWAM. A Dual-layer Detector for Simultaneous Fluoroscopic and Nuclear Imaging. Radiology 2019; 290:833-838. [PMID: 30620257 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To develop and evaluate a dual-layer detector capable of acquiring intrinsically registered real-time fluoroscopic and nuclear images in the interventional radiology suite. Materials and Methods The dual-layer detector consists of an x-ray flat panel detector placed in front of a γ camera with cone beam collimator focused at the x-ray focal spot. This design relies on the x-ray detector absorbing the majority of the x-rays while it is more transparent to the higher energy γ photons. A prototype was built and dynamic phantom images were acquired. In addition, spatial resolution and system sensitivity (evaluated as counts detected within the energy window per second per megabecquerel) were measured with the prototype. Monte Carlo simulations for an improved system with varying flat panel compositions were performed to assess potential spatial resolution and system sensitivity. Results Experiments with the dual-layer detector prototype showed that spatial resolution of the nuclear images was unaffected by the addition of the flat panel (full width at half maximum, 13.6 mm at 15 cm from the collimator surface). However, addition of the flat panel lowered system sensitivity by 45%-60% because of the nonoptimized transmission of the flat panel. Simulations showed that an attenuation of 27%-35% of the γ rays in the flat panel could be achieved by decreasing the crystal thickness and housing attenuation of the flat panel. Conclusion A dual-layer detector was capable of acquiring real-time intrinsically registered hybrid images, which could aid interventional procedures involving radionuclides. Published under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra van der Velden
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.V.D.V., B.K., W.J.C.K., J.H.L.S., M.M.A.D., C.B., M.G.E.H.L., H.W.A.M.D.J.) and Image Sciences Institute (S.V.D.V., B.K., M.M.A.D., M.A.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Britt Kunnen
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.V.D.V., B.K., W.J.C.K., J.H.L.S., M.M.A.D., C.B., M.G.E.H.L., H.W.A.M.D.J.) and Image Sciences Institute (S.V.D.V., B.K., M.M.A.D., M.A.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wilco J C Koppert
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.V.D.V., B.K., W.J.C.K., J.H.L.S., M.M.A.D., C.B., M.G.E.H.L., H.W.A.M.D.J.) and Image Sciences Institute (S.V.D.V., B.K., M.M.A.D., M.A.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H L Steenbergen
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.V.D.V., B.K., W.J.C.K., J.H.L.S., M.M.A.D., C.B., M.G.E.H.L., H.W.A.M.D.J.) and Image Sciences Institute (S.V.D.V., B.K., M.M.A.D., M.A.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn M A Dietze
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.V.D.V., B.K., W.J.C.K., J.H.L.S., M.M.A.D., C.B., M.G.E.H.L., H.W.A.M.D.J.) and Image Sciences Institute (S.V.D.V., B.K., M.M.A.D., M.A.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Casper Beijst
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.V.D.V., B.K., W.J.C.K., J.H.L.S., M.M.A.D., C.B., M.G.E.H.L., H.W.A.M.D.J.) and Image Sciences Institute (S.V.D.V., B.K., M.M.A.D., M.A.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Max A Viergever
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.V.D.V., B.K., W.J.C.K., J.H.L.S., M.M.A.D., C.B., M.G.E.H.L., H.W.A.M.D.J.) and Image Sciences Institute (S.V.D.V., B.K., M.M.A.D., M.A.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.V.D.V., B.K., W.J.C.K., J.H.L.S., M.M.A.D., C.B., M.G.E.H.L., H.W.A.M.D.J.) and Image Sciences Institute (S.V.D.V., B.K., M.M.A.D., M.A.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hugo W A M de Jong
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.V.D.V., B.K., W.J.C.K., J.H.L.S., M.M.A.D., C.B., M.G.E.H.L., H.W.A.M.D.J.) and Image Sciences Institute (S.V.D.V., B.K., M.M.A.D., M.A.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Velden S, Dietze MMA, Viergever MA, de Jong HWAM. Fast technetium-99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry. Med Phys 2019; 46:345-355. [PMID: 30347130 PMCID: PMC7379506 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The efficiency of radioembolization procedures could be greatly enhanced if results of the 99m Tc-MAA pretreatment procedure were immediately available in the interventional suite, enabling 1-day procedures as a result of direct estimation of the hepatic radiation dose and lung shunt fraction. This would, however, require a relatively fast, but still quantitative, SPECT procedure, which might be achieved with acquisition protocols using nonuniform durations of the projection images. METHODS SPECT liver images of the 150-MBq 99m Tc-MAA pretreatment procedure were simulated for eight different lesion locations and two different lesion sizes using the digital XCAT phantom for both single- and dual-head scanning geometries with respective total acquisition times of 1, 2, 5, 10, and 30 min. Three nonuniform projection-time acquisition protocols ("half-circle SPECT (HCS)," "nonuniform SPECT (NUS) I," and "NUS II") for fast quantitative SPECT of the liver were designed and compared with the standard uniform projection-time protocol. Images were evaluated in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), activity recovery coefficient (ARC), tumor/non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio, and lung shunt fraction (LSF) estimation. In addition, image quality was verified with a physical phantom experiment, reconstructed with both clinical and Monte Carlo-based reconstruction software. RESULTS Simulations showed no substantial change in image quality and dosimetry by usage of a nonuniform projection-time acquisition protocol. Upon shortening acquisition times, CNR dropped, but ARC, T/N ratio, and LSF estimates were stable across all simulated acquisition times. Results of the physical phantom were in agreement with those of the simulations. CONCLUSION Both uniform and nonuniform projection-time acquisition liver SPECT protocols yield accurate dosimetric metrics for radioembolization treatment planning in the interventional suite within 10 min, without compromising image quality. Consequently, fast quantitative SPECT of the liver in the interventional suite is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra van der Velden
- Radiology and Nuclear MedicineUniversity Medical Center UtrechtP.O. Box 855003508 GAUtrechtNetherlands
- Image Sciences InstituteUtrecht University and University Medical Center UtrechtP.O. Box 855003508 GAUtrechtNetherlands
| | - Martijn M. A. Dietze
- Radiology and Nuclear MedicineUniversity Medical Center UtrechtP.O. Box 855003508 GAUtrechtNetherlands
- Image Sciences InstituteUtrecht University and University Medical Center UtrechtP.O. Box 855003508 GAUtrechtNetherlands
| | - Max A. Viergever
- Image Sciences InstituteUtrecht University and University Medical Center UtrechtP.O. Box 855003508 GAUtrechtNetherlands
| | - Hugo W. A. M. de Jong
- Radiology and Nuclear MedicineUniversity Medical Center UtrechtP.O. Box 855003508 GAUtrechtNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bastiaannet R, Kappadath SC, Kunnen B, Braat AJAT, Lam MGEH, de Jong HWAM. The physics of radioembolization. EJNMMI Phys 2018; 5:22. [PMID: 30386924 PMCID: PMC6212377 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-018-0221-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Radioembolization is an established treatment for chemoresistant and unresectable liver cancers. Currently, treatment planning is often based on semi-empirical methods, which yield acceptable toxicity profiles and have enabled the large-scale application in a palliative setting. However, recently, five large randomized controlled trials using resin microspheres failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in either progression-free survival or overall survival in both hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer. One reason for this might be that the activity prescription methods used in these studies are suboptimal for many patients.In this review, the current dosimetric methods and their caveats are evaluated. Furthermore, the current state-of-the-art of image-guided dosimetry and advanced radiobiological modeling is reviewed from a physics' perspective. The current literature is explored for the observation of robust dose-response relationships followed by an overview of recent advancements in quantitative image reconstruction in relation to image-guided dosimetry.This review is concluded with a discussion on areas where further research is necessary in order to arrive at a personalized treatment method that provides optimal tumor control and is clinically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remco Bastiaannet
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E01.132, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S. Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler St, Unit 1352, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Britt Kunnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E01.132, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur J. A. T. Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E01.132, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G. E. H. Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E01.132, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo W. A. M. de Jong
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E01.132, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abbaspour S, Tanha K, Mahmoudian B, Assadi M, Pirayesh Islamian J. A Monte Carlo study on the performance evaluation of a parallel hole collimator for a HiReSPECT: A dedicated small-animal SPECT. Appl Radiat Isot 2018; 139:53-60. [PMID: 29704706 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 04/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Collimator geometry has an important contribution on the image quality in SPECT imaging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of parallel hole collimator hole-size on the functional parameters (including the spatial resolution and sensitivity) and the image quality of a HiReSPECT imaging system using SIMIND Monte Carlo program. To find a proper trade-off between the sensitivity and spatial resolution, the collimator with hole diameter ranges of 0.3-1.5 mm (in steps of 0.3 mm) were used with a fixed septal and hole thickness values (0.2 mm and 34 mm, respectively). Lead, Gold, and Tungsten as the LEHR collimator material were also investigated. The results on a 99mTc point source scanning with the experimental and also simulated systems were matched to validate the simulated imaging system. The results on the simulation showed that decreasing the collimator hole size, especially in the Gold collimator, improved the spatial resolution to 18% and 3.2% compared to the Lead and the Tungsten, respectively. Meanwhile, the Lead collimator provided a good sensitivity in about of 7% and 8% better than that of Tungsten and Gold, respectively. Overall, the spatial resolution and sensitivity showed small differences among the three types of collimator materials assayed within the defined energy. By increasing the hole size, the Gold collimator produced lower scatter and penetration fractions than Tungsten and Lead collimator. The minimum detectable size of hot rods in micro-Jaszczak phantom on the iterative maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstructed images, were determined in the sectors of 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.4 and 2.6 mm for scanning with the collimators in hole sizes of 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2 and 1.5 mm at a 5 cm distance from the phantom. The Gold collimator with hole size of 0.3 mm provided a better image quality with the HiReSPECT imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Abbaspour
- Department of Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Kaveh Tanha
- The Persian Gulf Nuclear Medicine Research Center, The Persian Gulf Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Babak Mahmoudian
- Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Majid Assadi
- The Persian Gulf Nuclear Medicine Research Center, The Persian Gulf Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Jalil Pirayesh Islamian
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Attar Neyshaburi St, Azadi Ave, Tabriz 5166614766, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Velden S, Bastiaannet R, Braat AJAT, Lam MGEH, Viergever MA, de Jong HWAM. Estimation of lung shunt fraction from simultaneous fluoroscopic and nuclear images. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:8210-8225. [PMID: 28837044 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa8840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Radioembolisation with yttrium-90 (90Y) is increasingly used as a treatment of unresectable liver malignancies. For safety, a scout dose of technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) is used prior to the delivery of the therapeutic activity to mimic the deposition of 90Y. One-day procedures are currently limited by the lack of nuclear images in the intervention room. To cope with this limitation, an interventional simultaneous fluoroscopic and nuclear imaging device is currently being developed. The purpose of this simulation study was to evaluate the accuracy of estimating the lung shunt fraction (LSF) of the scout dose in the intervention room with this device and compare it against current clinical methods. METHODS A male and female XCAT phantom, both with two respiratory profiles, were used to simulate various LSFs resulting from a scout dose of 150 MBq 99mTc-MAA. Hybrid images were Monte Carlo simulated for breath-hold (5 s) and dynamic breathing (10 frames of 0.5 s) acquisitions. Nuclear images were corrected for attenuation with the fluoroscopic image and for organ overlap effects using a pre-treatment CT-scan. For comparison purposes, planar scintigraphy and mobile gamma camera images (both 300 s acquisition time) were simulated. Estimated LSFs were evaluated for all methods and compared to the phantom ground truth. RESULTS In the clinically relevant range of 10-20% LSF, hybrid imaging overestimated LSF with approximately 2 percentage points (pp) and 3 pp for the normal and irregular breathing phantoms, respectively. After organ overlap correction, LSF was estimated with a more constant error. Errors in planar scintigraphy and mobile gamma camera imaging were more dependent on LSF, body shape and breathing profile. CONCLUSION LSF can be estimated with a constant minor error with a hybrid imaging device. Estimated LSF is highly dependent on true LSF, body shape and breathing pattern when estimated with current clinical methods. The hybrid imaging device is capable of accurately estimating LSF within a few seconds in an interventional setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra van der Velden
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Mail E01.132, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands. Image Sciences Institute, UMC Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|