1
|
Jia PF, Li YR, Wang LY, Lu XR, Guo X. Radiomics in esophagogastric junction cancer: A scoping review of current status and advances. Eur J Radiol 2024; 177:111577. [PMID: 38905802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This scoping review aimed to understand the advances in radiomics in esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer and assess the current status of radiomics in EGJ cancer. METHODS We conducted systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 18, 2012, to January 15, 2023, to identify radiomics articles related to EGJ cancer. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the studies using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS) tool, respectively. RESULTS A total of 120 articles were retrieved from the three databases, and after screening, only six papers met the inclusion criteria. These studies investigated the role of radiomics in differentiating adenocarcinoma from squamous carcinoma, diagnosing T-stage, evaluating HER2 overexpression, predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy, and prognosis in EGJ cancer. The median score percentage of RQS was 34.7% (range from 22.2% to 38.9%). The median score percentage of METRICS was 71.2% (range from 58.2% to 84.9%). CONCLUSION Although there is a considerable difference between the RQS and METRICS scores of the included literature, we believe that the research value of radiomics in EGJ cancer has been revealed. In the future, while actively exploring more diagnostic, prognostic, and biological correlation studies in EGJ cancer, greater emphasis should be placed on the standardization and clinical application of radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Fan Jia
- Department of Medical Imaging, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China
| | - Yu-Ru Li
- Department of Medical Imaging, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China
| | - Lu-Yao Wang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China
| | - Xiao-Rui Lu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China
| | - Xing Guo
- Department of Medical Imaging, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan G, Yan G, Li H, Liang H, Peng C, Bhetuwal A, McClure MA, Li Y, Yang G, Li Y, Zhao L, Fan X. Radiomics and Its Applications and Progress in Pancreatitis: A Current State of the Art Review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:922299. [PMID: 35814756 PMCID: PMC9259974 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.922299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiomics involves high-throughput extraction and analysis of quantitative information from medical images. Since it was proposed in 2012, there are some publications on the application of radiomics for (1) predicting recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), clinical severity of acute pancreatitis (AP), and extrapancreatic necrosis in AP; (2) differentiating mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focal autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from PDAC, and functional abdominal pain (functional gastrointestinal diseases) from RAP and chronic pancreatitis (CP); and (3) identifying CP and normal pancreas, and CP risk factors and complications. In this review, we aim to systematically summarize the applications and progress of radiomics in pancreatitis and it associated situations, so as to provide reference for related research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaowu Yan
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
| | - Gaowen Yan
- Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Suining, Suining, China
| | - Hongwei Li
- Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Mianyang and Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, China
| | - Hongwei Liang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chen Peng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Suining, Suining, China
| | - Anup Bhetuwal
- Sichuan Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Morgan A. McClure
- Department of Radiology and Imaging, Institute of Rehabilitation and Development of Brain Function, The Second Clinical Medical College of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, China
| | - Yongmei Li
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- *Correspondence: Yongmei Li
| | - Guoqing Yang
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
- Guoqing Yang
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
- Yong Li
| | - Linwei Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
| | - Xiaoping Fan
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deciphering the glioblastoma phenotype by computed tomography radiomics. Radiother Oncol 2021; 160:132-139. [PMID: 33984349 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumour which has, despite extensive treatment, a median overall survival of 15 months. Radiomics is the high-throughput extraction of large amounts of image features from radiographic images, which allows capturing the tumour phenotype in 3D and in a non-invasive way. In this study we assess the prognostic value of CT radiomics for overall survival in patients with a GBM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical data and pre-treatment CT images were obtained from 218 patients diagnosed with a GBM via biopsy who underwent radiotherapy +/- temozolomide between 2004 and 2015 treated at three independent institutes (n = 93, 62 and 63). A clinical prognostic score (CPS), a simple radiomics model consisting of volume based score (VPS), a complex radiomics prognostic score (RPS) and a combined clinical and radiomics (C + R)PS model were developed. The population was divided into three risk groups for each prognostic score and respective Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. RESULTS Patient characteristics were broadly comparable. Clinically significant differences were observed with regards to radiation dose, tumour volume and performance status between datasets. Image acquisition parameters differed between institutes. The cross-validated c-indices were moderately discriminative and for the CPS ranged from 0.63 to 0.65; the VPS c-indices ranged between 0.52 and 0.61; the RPS c-indices ranged from 0.57 to 0.64 and the combined clinical and radiomics model resulted in c-indices of 0.59-0.71. CONCLUSION In this study clinical and CT radiomics features were used to predict OS in GBM. Discrimination between low-, middle- and high-risk patients based on the combined clinical and radiomics model was comparable to previous MRI-based models.
Collapse
|
4
|
Shi Z, Foley KG, Pablo de Mey J, Spezi E, Whybra P, Crosby T, van Soest J, Dekker A, Wee L. External Validation of Radiation-Induced Dyspnea Models on Esophageal Cancer Radiotherapy Patients. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1411. [PMID: 31921668 PMCID: PMC6927468 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Radiation-induced lung disease (RILD), defined as dyspnea in this study, is a risk for patients receiving high-dose thoracic irradiation. This study is a TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of A Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis) Type 4 validation of previously-published dyspnea models via secondary analysis of esophageal cancer SCOPE1 trial data. We quantify the predictive performance of these two models for predicting the maximal dyspnea grade ≥ 2 within 6 months after the end of high-dose chemo-radiotherapy for primary esophageal cancer. Materials and methods: We tested the performance of two previously published dyspnea risk models using baseline, treatment and follow-up data on 258 esophageal cancer patients in the UK enrolled into the SCOPE1 multi-center trial. The tested models were developed from lung cancer patients treated at MAASTRO Clinic (The Netherlands) from the period 2002 to 2011. The adverse event of interest was dyspnea ≥ Grade 2 (CTCAE v3) within 6 months after the end of radiotherapy. As some variables were missing randomly and cannot be imputed, 212 patients in the SCOPE1 were used for validation of model 1 and 255 patients were used for validation of model 2. The model parameter Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1), as a predictor to both validated models, was imputed using the WHO performance status. External validation was performed using an automated, decentralized approach, without exchange of individual patient data. Results: Out of 258 patients with esophageal cancer in SCOPE1 trial data, 38 patients (14.7%) developed radiation-induced dyspnea (≥ Grade 2) within 6 months after chemo-radiotherapy. The discrimination performance of the models in esophageal cancer patients treated with high-dose external beam radiotherapy was moderate, area under curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% CI 0.55–0.76) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.58–0.77), respectively. The curves and AUCs derived by distributed learning were identical to the results from validation on a local host. Conclusion: We have externally validated previously published dyspnea models using an esophageal cancer dataset. FEV1 that is not routinely measured for esophageal cancer was imputed using WHO performance status. Prediction performance was not statistically different from previous training and validation sets. Risk estimates were dominated by WHO score in Model 1 and baseline dyspnea in Model 2. The distributed learning approach gave the same answer as local processing, and could be performed without accessing a validation site's individual patients-level data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenwei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Juan Pablo de Mey
- Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Emiliano Spezi
- School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Whybra
- School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Crosby
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Johan van Soest
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Andre Dekker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Leonard Wee
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Timmeren JE, Carvalho S, Leijenaar RTH, Troost EGC, van Elmpt W, de Ruysscher D, Muratet JP, Denis F, Schimek-Jasch T, Nestle U, Jochems A, Woodruff HC, Oberije C, Lambin P. Challenges and caveats of a multi-center retrospective radiomics study: an example of early treatment response assessment for NSCLC patients using FDG-PET/CT radiomics. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0217536. [PMID: 31158263 PMCID: PMC6546238 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prognostic models based on individual patient characteristics can improve treatment decisions and outcome in the future. In many (radiomic) studies, small size and heterogeneity of datasets is a challenge that often limits performance and potential clinical applicability of these models. The current study is example of a retrospective multi-centric study with challenges and caveats. To highlight common issues and emphasize potential pitfalls, we aimed for an extensive analysis of these multi-center pre-treatment datasets, with an additional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan acquired during treatment. Methods The dataset consisted of 138 stage II-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients from four different cohorts acquired from three different institutes. The differences between the cohorts were compared in terms of clinical characteristics and using the so-called ‘cohort differences model’ approach. Moreover, the potential prognostic performances for overall survival of radiomic features extracted from CT or FDG-PET, or relative or absolute differences between the scans at the two time points, were assessed using the LASSO regression method. Furthermore, the performances of five different classifiers were evaluated for all image sets. Results The individual cohorts substantially differed in terms of patient characteristics. Moreover, the cohort differences model indicated statistically significant differences between the cohorts. Neither LASSO nor any of the tested classifiers resulted in a clinical relevant prognostic model that could be validated on the available datasets. Conclusion The results imply that the study might have been influenced by a limited sample size, heterogeneous patient characteristics, and inconsistent imaging parameters. No prognostic performance of FDG-PET or CT based radiomics models can be reported. This study highlights the necessity of extensive evaluations of cohorts and of validation datasets, especially in retrospective multi-centric datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janna E. van Timmeren
- The D-Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic), GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Sara Carvalho
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic), GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph T. H. Leijenaar
- The D-Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther G. C. Troost
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cal Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Wouter van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic), GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic), GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Fabrice Denis
- Centre Jean Bernard, Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France
| | - Tanja Schimek-Jasch
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Jochems
- The D-Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Henry C. Woodruff
- The D-Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cary Oberije
- The D-Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- The D-Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Towards more Accessible Precision Medicine: Building a more Transferable Machine Learning Model to Support Prognostic Decisions for Micro- and Macrovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Med Syst 2019; 43:185. [PMID: 31098679 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1321-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Although machine learning models are increasingly being developed for clinical decision support for patients with type 2 diabetes, the adoption of these models into clinical practice remains limited. Currently, machine learning (ML) models are being constructed on local healthcare systems and are validated internally with no expectation that they would validate externally and thus, are rarely transferrable to a different healthcare system. In this work, we aim to demonstrate that (1) even a complex ML model built on a national cohort can be transferred to two local healthcare systems, (2) while a model constructed on a local healthcare system's cohort is difficult to transfer; (3) we examine the impact of training cohort size on the transferability; and (4) we discuss criteria for external validity. We built a model using our previously published Multi-Task Learning-based methodology on a national cohort extracted from OptumLabs® Data Warehouse and transferred the model to two local healthcare systems (i.e., University of Minnesota Medical Center and Mayo Clinic) for external evaluation. The model remained valid when applied to the local patient populations and performed as well as locally constructed models (concordance: .73-.92), demonstrating transferability. The performance of the locally constructed models reduced substantially when applied to each other's healthcare system (concordance: .62-.90). We believe that our modeling approach, in which a model is learned from a national cohort and is externally validated, produces a transferable model, allowing patients at smaller healthcare systems to benefit from precision medicine.
Collapse
|
7
|
A fiducial-less tracking method for radiation therapy of liver tumors by diaphragm disparity analysis part 2: validation study by using clinical data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s13566-018-0361-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|