1
|
Shao W, Xie Y, Wu J, Zhang L, Jan S, Lu HM. Investigating beam range uncertainty in proton prostate treatment using pelvic-like biological phantoms. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34433134 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac212c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to develop a method for verifying site-specific and/or beam path specific proton beam range, which could reduce range uncertainty margins and the associated treatment complications. It investigates the range uncertainties from both CT HU to relative stopping power conversion and patient positioning errors for prostate treatment using pelvic-like biological phantoms. Three 25 × 14 × 12 cm3phantoms, made of fresh animal tissues mimicking the pelvic anatomies of prostate patients, were scanned with a general electric CT simulator. A 22 cm circular passive scattering beam with 29 cm range and 8 cm modulation width was used to measure the water equivalent path lengths (WEPL) through the phantoms at multiple points using the dose extinction method with a MatriXXPT detector. The measured WEPLs were compared to those predicted by TOPAS simulations and ray-tracing WEPL calculations. For the three phantoms, the WEPL differences between measured and theoretical prediction (WDMT) are below 1.8% for TOPAS, and 2.5% for ray-tracing. WDMT varies with phantom anatomies by about 0.5% for both TOPAS and ray-tracing. WDMT also correlates with the tissue types of a specific treated region. For the regions where the proton beam path is parallel to sharp bone edges, the WDMTs of TOPAS and ray-tracing respectively reach up to 1.8% and 2.5%. For the region where proton beams pass through just soft tissues, the WDMT is mostly less than 1% for both TOPAS and ray-tracing. For prostate treatments, range uncertainty depends on the tissue types within a specific treated region, patient anatomies and the range calculation methods in the planning algorithms. Our study indicates range uncertainty is less than 2.5% for the whole treated region with both ray-tracing and TOPAS, which suggests the potential to reduce the current 3.5% range uncertainty margin used in the clinics by at least 1% even for single-energy CT data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wencheng Shao
- Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.,Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America.,Department of Radiation Physics, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunhe Xie
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Jianan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Liyan Zhang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Schuemann Jan
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Hsiao-Ming Lu
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America.,Hefei Ion Medical Center and Ion Medical Research Institute, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The status of medical physics in radiotherapy in China. Phys Med 2021; 85:147-157. [PMID: 34010803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present an overview of the status of medical physics in radiotherapy in China, including facilities and devices, occupation, education, research, etc. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The information about medical physics in clinics was obtained from the 9-th nationwide survey conducted by the China Society for Radiation Oncology in 2019. The data of medical physics in education and research was collected from the publications of the official and professional organizations. RESULTS By 2019, there were 1463 hospitals or institutes registered to practice radiotherapy and the number of accelerators per million population was 1.5. There were 4172 medical physicists working in clinics of radiation oncology. The ratio between the numbers of radiation oncologists and medical physicists is 3.51. Approximately, 95% of medical physicists have an undergraduate or graduate degrees in nuclear physics and biomedical engineering. 86% of medical physicists have certificates issued by the Chinese Society of Medical Physics. There has been a fast growth of publications by authors from mainland of China in the top international medical physics and radiotherapy journals since 2018. CONCLUSIONS Demand for medical physicists in radiotherapy increased quickly in the past decade. The distribution of radiotherapy facilities in China became more balanced. High quality continuing education and training programs for medical physicists are deficient in most areas. The role of medical physicists in the clinic has not been clearly defined and their contributions have not been fully recognized by the community.
Collapse
|
3
|
Neppl S, Landry G, Kurz C, Hansen DC, Hoyle B, Stöcklein S, Seidensticker M, Weller J, Belka C, Parodi K, Kamp F. Evaluation of proton and photon dose distributions recalculated on 2D and 3D Unet-generated pseudoCTs from T1-weighted MR head scans. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1429-1434. [PMID: 31271093 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1630754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The recent developments of magnetic resonance (MR) based adaptive strategies for photon and, potentially for proton therapy, require a fast and reliable conversion of MR images to X-ray computed tomography (CT) values. CT values are needed for photon and proton dose calculation. The improvement of conversion results employing a 3D deep learning approach is evaluated. Material and methods: A database of 89 T1-weighted MR head scans with about 100 slices each, including rigidly registered CTs, was created. Twenty-eight validation patients were randomly sampled, and four patients were selected for application. The remaining patients were used to train a 2D and a 3D U-shaped convolutional neural network (Unet). A stack size of 32 slices was used for 3D training. For all application cases, volumetric modulated arc therapy photon and single-field uniform dose pencil-beam scanning proton plans at four different gantry angles were optimized for a generic target on the CT and recalculated on 2D and 3D Unet-based pseudoCTs. Mean (absolute) error (MAE/ME) and a gradient sharpness estimate were used to quantify the image quality. Three-dimensional gamma and dose difference analyses were performed for photon (gamma criteria: 1%, 1 mm) and proton dose distributions (gamma criteria: 2%, 2 mm). Range (80% fall off) differences for beam's eye view profiles were evaluated for protons. Results: Training 36 h for 1000 epochs in 3D (6 h for 200 epochs in 2D) yielded a maximum MAE of 147 HU (135 HU) for the application patients. Except for one patient gamma pass rates for photon and proton dose distributions were above 96% for both Unets. Slice discontinuities were reduced for 3D training at the cost of sharpness. Conclusions: Image analysis revealed a slight advantage of 2D Unets compared to 3D Unets. Similar dose calculation performance was reached for the 2D and 3D network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Neppl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching bei München, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching bei München, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching bei München, Germany
| | - David C. Hansen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ben Hoyle
- University Observatory, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Sophia Stöcklein
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Weller
- University Observatory, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
- Optical and Interpretative Astronomy, Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching bei München, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching bei München, Germany
| | - Florian Kamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Santos DM, Wachowicz K, Burke B, Fallone BG. Proton beam behavior in a parallel configured
MRI
‐proton therapy hybrid: Effects of time‐varying gradient magnetic fields. Med Phys 2018; 46:822-838. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D. M. Santos
- Department of Medical Physics Cross Cancer Institute 11560 University Avenue AB T6G 1Z2 Canada
| | - K. Wachowicz
- Department of Medical Physics Cross Cancer Institute 11560 University Avenue AB T6G 1Z2 Canada
- Department of Oncology Medical Physics Division University of Alberta 11560 University Avenue Edmonton AB T6G 1Z2 Canada
| | - B. Burke
- Department of Oncology Medical Physics Division University of Alberta 11560 University Avenue Edmonton AB T6G 1Z2 Canada
| | - B. G. Fallone
- Department of Medical Physics Cross Cancer Institute 11560 University Avenue AB T6G 1Z2 Canada
- Department of Oncology Medical Physics Division University of Alberta 11560 University Avenue Edmonton AB T6G 1Z2 Canada
- Department of Physics University of Alberta 11322 – 89 Avenue Edmonton AB T6G 2G7 Canada
- MagnetTx Oncology Solutions, Ltd. PO Box 52112 Edmonton AB Canada
| |
Collapse
|