Initial evaluation of Advanced Collapsed cone Engine dose calculations in water medium for I-125 seeds and COMS eye plaques

Generation and comparison of 3D dosimetric reference datasets for COMS eye plaque brachytherapy using model-based dose calculations

PURPOSE

A joint Working Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the Australasian Brachytherapy Group (ABG) was created to aid in the transition from the AAPM TG-43 dose calculation formalism, the current standard, to model-based dose calculations. This work establishes the first test cases for low-energy photon-emitting brachytherapy using model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs).

ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS

Five test cases are developed: (1) a single model 6711 125 I brachytherapy seed in water, 13 seeds (2) individually and (3) in combination in water, (4) the full Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) 16 mm eye plaque in water, and (5) the full plaque in a realistic eye phantom. Calculations are done with four Monte Carlo (MC) codes and a research version of a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). For all test cases, local agreement of MC codes was within ∼2.5% and global agreement was ∼2% (4% for test case 5). MC agreement was within expected uncertainties. Local agreement of TPS with MC was within 5% for test case 1 and ∼20% for test cases 4 and 5, and global agreement was within 0.4% for test case 1 and 10% for test cases 4 and 5.

DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES

Dose distributions for each set of MC and TPS calculations are available online (https://doi.org/10.52519/00005) along with input files and all other information necessary to repeat the calculations.

POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS

These data can be used to support commissioning of MBDCAs for low-energy brachytherapy as recommended by TGs 186 and 221 and AAPM Report 372. This work additionally lays out a sample framework for the development of test cases that can be extended to other applications beyond eye plaque brachytherapy.

Uncertainties Associated with Clonogenic Assays using a Cs-137 Irradiator and Ir-192 Afterloader: A Comprehensive Compilation for Radiation Researchers

Clonogenic assays are the gold standard for measuring cell clonogenic survival and enable quantification of a cell line's radiosensitivity through the calculation of the surviving fraction, the ratio of cell clusters (colonies) formed after radiation exposure compared to the number formed without exposure. Such studies regularly utilize Cs-137 irradiators. While uncertainties for specific procedural aspects have been described previously, a comprehensive review has not been completed. We therefore quantified uncertainties associated with clonogenic assays performed using a Cs-137 Shepherd irradiator, and a recently established brachytherapy afterloader in vitro radiation delivery apparatus (BAIRDA), through a series of experiments and a literature review. The clonogenic assay is subject to uncertainties that affect the determination of the surviving fraction (e.g., accuracy of the number of cells seeded, potential effects of hypothermia, and the threshold number of cells for a cluster to be identified as a colony). Furthermore, dose delivery uncertainties related to both the Cs-137 irradiator and BAIRDA were also quantified. The combined standard (k = 1) uncertainty was ± 6.0% in the surviving fraction for the Cs-137 irradiator (±6.3% for BAIRDA), up to ± 1.3% in the dose delivered by the Cs-137 irradiator, and up to ± 2.2% in the dose delivered by BAIRDA. The largest individual uncertainties were associated with the number of cells seeded on a plate (3.4%) and inter-observer variability in counting (4.1%), suggesting that effective reduction of uncertainties in the conduct of the clonogenic assay proper may provide the greatest relief on the uncertainty budget. Finally, measurable impact on experimental findings was assessed by applying this uncertainty to clonogenic assays of SW756 cells using either a Cs-137 irradiator or BAIRDA, introducing a maximum shift in the reported radiobiological parameters a/b and T1/2 of 0.3 Gy and 0.4 h, respectively, while the 95% confidence interval increased by 0.5 Gy and decreased by 0.4 h, respectively. Though the overall impact on radiobiological parameter estimation was small, the individual uncertainties could have a significant influence in other applications of in vitro experiments in radiation biology. Hence, better understanding of the uncertainties associated with both clonogenic assays and the radiation source used can improve the accuracy of experimental analysis and reproducibility of the results.

AAPM recommendations on medical physics practices for ocular plaque brachytherapy: Report of task group 221

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed Task Group 221 (TG-221) to discuss a generalized commissioning process, quality management considerations, and clinical physics practice standards for ocular plaque brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is also, in part, to aid the clinician to implement recommendations of the AAPM TG-129 report, which placed emphasis on dosimetric considerations for ocular brachytherapy applicators used in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS). This report is intended to assist medical physicists in establishing a new ocular brachytherapy program and, for existing programs, in reviewing and updating clinical practices. The report scope includes photon- and beta-emitting sources and source:applicator combinations. Dosimetric studies for photon and beta sources are reviewed to summarize the salient issues and provide references for additional study. The components of an ocular plaque brachytherapy quality management program are discussed, including radiation safety considerations, source calibration methodology, applicator commissioning, imaging quality assurance tests for treatment planning, treatment planning strategies, and treatment planning system commissioning. Finally, specific guidelines for commissioning an ocular plaque brachytherapy program, clinical physics practice standards in ocular plaque brachytherapy, and other areas reflecting the need for specialized treatment planning systems, measurement phantoms, and detectors (among other topics) to support the clinical practice of ocular brachytherapy are presented. Expected future advances and developments for ocular brachytherapy are discussed.