1
|
Knoth J, Sturdza A, Zaharie A, Dick V, Kronreif G, Nesvacil N, Widder J, Kirisits C, Schmid MP. Transrectal ultrasound for intraoperative interstitial needle guidance in cervical cancer brachytherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:684-690. [PMID: 38409394 PMCID: PMC11272749 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02207-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to prospectively assess the visibility of interstitial needles on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in cervical cancer brachytherapy patients and evaluate its impact on implant and treatment plan quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS TRUS was utilized during and after applicator insertion, with each needle's visibility documented through axial images at the high-risk clinical target volume's largest diameter. Needle visibility on TRUS was scored from 0 (no visibility) to 3 (excellent discrimination, margins distinct). Quantitative assessment involved measuring the distance between tandem and each needle on TRUS and comparing it to respective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Expected treatment plan quality based on TRUS images was rated from 1 (meeting all planning objectives) to 4 (violation of High-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) and/or organ at risk (OAR) hard constraints) and compared to the final MRI-based plan. RESULTS Analysis included 23 patients with local FIGO stage IB2-IVA, comprising 41 applications with a total of 230 needles. A high visibility rate of 99.1% (228/230 needles) was observed, with a mean visibility score of 2.5 ± 0.7 for visible needles. The maximum and mean difference between MRI and TRUS measurements were 8 mm and -0.1 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, with > 3 mm discrepancies in 3.5% of needles. Expected treatment plan quality after TRUS assessment exactly aligned with the final MRI plan in 28 out of 41 applications with only minor deviations in all other cases. CONCLUSION Real-time TRUS-guided interstitial needle placement yielded high-quality implants, thanks to excellent needle visibility during insertion. This supports the potential of TRUS-guided brachytherapy as a promising modality for gynecological indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Knoth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Zaharie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - V Dick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Kronreif
- Austrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - N Nesvacil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - M P Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knoth J, Nesvacil N, Sturdza A, Kronreif G, Widder J, Kirisits C, Schmid MP. Toward 3D-TRUS image-guided interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Brachytherapy 2021; 21:186-192. [PMID: 34876361 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To qualitatively and quantitatively analyze needle visibility in combined intracavitary and interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy on 3D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in comparison to gold standard MRI. METHODS AND MATERIALS Image acquisition was done with a customized TRUS stepper unit and software (Medcom, Germany; Elekta, Sweden; ACMIT, Austria) followed by an MRI on the same day with the applicator in place. Qualitative assessment was done with following scoring system: 0 = no visibility 1 (= poor), 2 (= fair), 3 (= excellent) discrimination, quantitative assessment was done by measuring the distance between each needle and the tandem two centimeters (cm) above the ring and comparing to the respective measurement on MRI. RESULTS Twenty-nine implants and a total of 188 needles (132 straight, 35 oblique, 21 free-hand) were available. Overall, 79% were visible (87% straight, 51% oblique, 76% free-hand). Mean visibility score was 1.4 ± 0.5 for all visible needles. Distance of the visible needles to tandem was mean ± standard deviation (SD) 21.3 millimeters (mm) ± 6.5 mm on MRI and 21.0 mm ± 6.4 mm on TRUS, respectively. Difference between MRI and TRUS was max 14 mm, mean ± SD -0.3 mm ± 2.6 mm. 11% differed more than 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS Straight needles were better detectable than oblique needles (87% vs. 51%). Detectability was impaired by insufficient rotation of the TRUS probe, poor image quality or anatomic variation. As needles show a rather indistinct signal on TRUS, online detection with a standardized imaging protocol in combination with tracking should be investigated, aiming at the development of real time image guidance and online treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Knoth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nicole Nesvacil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gernot Kronreif
- Austrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wr. Neustadt, Austria
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maximilian Paul Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A machine-learning approach based on 409 treatments to predict optimal number of iodine-125 seeds in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:541-548. [PMID: 34759979 PMCID: PMC8565637 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.109789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Low-dose-rate brachytherapy is a key treatment for low-risk or favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. The number of radioactive seeds inserted during the procedure depends on prostate volume, and is not easy to predict without pre-planning. Consequently, a large number of unused seeds may be left after treatment. The objective of the present study was to predict the exact number of seeds for future patients using machine learning and a database of 409 treatments. Material and methods Database consisted of 18 dosimetric and efficiency parameters for each of 409 cases. Nine predictive algorithms based on machine-learning were compared in this database, which was divided into training group (80%) and test group (20%). Ten-fold cross-validation was applied to obtain robust statistics. The best algorithm was then used to build an abacus able to predict number of implanted seeds from expected prostate volume only. As an evaluation, the abacus was also applied on an independent series of 38 consecutive patients. Results The best coefficients of determination R2 were given by support vector regression, with values attaining 0.928, 0.948, and 0.968 for training set, test set, and whole set, respectively. In terms of predicted seeds in test group, mean square error, median absolute error, mean absolute error, and maximum error were 2.55, 0.92, 1.21, and 7.29, respectively. The use of obtained abacus in 38 additional patients resulted in saving of 493 seeds (393 vs. 886 remaining seeds). Conclusions Machine-learning-based abacus proposed in this study aims at estimating the necessary number of seeds for future patients according to past experience. This new abacus, based on 409 treatments and successfully tested in 38 new patients, is a good alternative to non-specific recommendations.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wilby S, Palmer A, Polak W, Bucchi A. A review of brachytherapy physical phantoms developed over the last 20 years: clinical purpose and future requirements. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:101-115. [PMID: 34025743 PMCID: PMC8117707 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.103593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Within the brachytherapy community, many phantoms are constructed in-house, and less commercial development is observed as compared to the field of external beam. Computational or virtual phantom design has seen considerable growth; however, physical phantoms are beneficial for brachytherapy, in which quality is dependent on physical processes, such as accuracy of source placement. Focusing on the design of physical phantoms, this review paper presents a summary of brachytherapy specific phantoms in published journal articles over the last twenty years (January 1, 2000 - December 31, 2019). The papers were analyzed and tabulated by their primary clinical purpose, which was deduced from their associated publications. A substantial body of work has been published on phantom designs from the brachytherapy community, but a standardized method of reporting technical aspects of the phantoms is lacking. In-house phantom development demonstrates an increasing interest in magnetic resonance (MR) tissue mimicking materials, which is not yet reflected in commercial phantoms available for brachytherapy. The evaluation of phantom design provides insight into the way, in which brachytherapy practice has changed over time, and demonstrates the customised and broad nature of treatments offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Wilby
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Clinical Hematology, and Oncology Centre, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Cosham, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Antony Palmer
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Clinical Hematology, and Oncology Centre, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Cosham, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Wojciech Polak
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Clinical Hematology, and Oncology Centre, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Cosham, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Bucchi
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Younes H, Troccaz J, Voros S. Machine learning and registration for automatic seed localization in 3D US images for prostate brachytherapy. Med Phys 2021; 48:1144-1156. [PMID: 33511658 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE New radiation therapy protocols, in particular adaptive, focal or boost brachytherapy treatments, require determining precisely the position and orientation of the implanted radioactive seeds from real-time ultrasound (US) images. This is necessary to compare them to the planned one and to adjust automatically the dosimetric plan accordingly for next seeds implantations. The image modality, the small size of the seeds, and the artifacts they produce make it a very challenging problem. The objective of the presented work is to setup and to evaluate a robust and automatic method for seed localization in three-dimensional (3D) US images. METHODS The presented method is based on a prelocalization of the needles through which the seeds are injected in the prostate. This prelocalization allows focusing the search on a region of interest (ROI) around the needle tip. Seeds localization starts by binarizing the ROI and removing false positives using, respectively, a Bayesian classifier and a support vector machine (SVM). This is followed by a registration stage using first an iterative closest point (ICP) for localizing the connected set of seeds (named strand) inserted through a needle, and secondly refining each seed position using sum of squared differences (SSD) as a similarity criterion. ICP registers a geometric model of the strand to the candidate voxels while SSD compares an appearance model of a single seed to a subset of the image. The method was evaluated both for 3D images of an Agar-agar phantom and a dataset of clinical 3D images. It was tested on stranded and on loose seeds. RESULTS Results on phantom and clinical images were compared with a manual localization giving mean errors of 1.09 ± 0.61 mm on phantom image and 1.44 ± 0.45 mm on clinical images. On clinical images, the mean errors of individual seeds orientation was 4.33 ± 8 . 51 ∘ . CONCLUSIONS The proposed algorithm for radioactive seed localization is robust, tested on different US images, accurate, giving small mean error values, and returns the five cylindrical seeds degrees of freedom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hatem Younes
- University of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, F-38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Jocelyne Troccaz
- University of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, F-38000, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble INP, INSERM, F-38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Sandrine Voros
- University of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, F-38000, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble INP, INSERM, F-38000, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Golshan M, Karimi D, Mahdavi S, Lobo J, Peacock M, Salcudean SE, Spadinger I. Automatic detection of brachytherapy seeds in 3D ultrasound images using a convolutional neural network. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 65:035016. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab64b5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
7
|
BrachyView: Reconstruction of seed positions and volume of an LDR prostate brachytherapy patient plan using a baseline subtraction algorithm. Phys Med 2019; 66:66-76. [PMID: 31563727 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.09.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE BrachyView is a novel in-body imaging system developed with the objective to provide real-time intraoperative dosimetry for low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy treatments. The BrachyView coordinates combined with conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging, provides the possibility to localise the effective position of the implanted seeds inside the prostate volume, providing a unique tool for intra-operative verification of the quality of the implantation. This research presents the first complete LDR brachytherapy plan reconstructed by the BrachyView system and is used to evaluate the effectiveness of an imaging algorithm with baseline subtraction. METHODS A plan featuring 98 I-125 brachytherapy seeds, with an average activity of 0.248 mCi, were implanted into a prostate gel phantom under TRUS guidance. Images of implanted seeds were obtained by the BrachyView after the implantation of seeds. The baseline subtraction algorithm is applied as a pixel-to-pixel counts subtraction and is applied to every second projection obtained after the implantation of each needle. Seed positions and effectiveness of the baseline reconstruction in the identification of seeds were verified by a high-resolution post-implant CT scan. RESULTS A complete brachytherapy plan has been reconstructed with a 100% detection rate. This is possible due to the effectiveness of the baseline subtraction, with its application an overall increase of 11.3% in position accuracy and 8.2% increase in detection rate was noted. CONCLUSION It has been demonstrated that the BrachyView system shows the potential to be a solution to providing clinics with the means for intraoperative dosimetry for LDR prostate brachytherapy treatments.
Collapse
|