First application of a high-resolution silicon detector for proton beam Bragg peak detection in a 0.95 T magnetic field

An external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and DNA damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Magnetic field effects on the radiobiological effectiveness during treatment of magnetic resonance (MRI) guided particle therapy are being debated. This study aims at assessing the influence of a perpendicular magnetic field on the biological effects in two human cancer cell lines irradiated with proton or carbon ions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In vitro cell irradiations were performed in water inside a perpendicular magnetic field of 0 and 1T for both protons and carbon ions. Samples were located in the center of a spread-out Bragg peak at 8cm water equivalent depth with a dose averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) of 4.2 or 83.4keV/μm for protons and carbon ions, respectively. Physical dose levels of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6Gy were employed. The irradiation field was shifted and laterally enlarged, to compensate for the beam deflection due to the magnetic field and ensure consistent and homogenous irradiations of the flasks. The human cancer cell lines SKMel (Melanoma) and SW1353 (chondrosarcoma) were selected which represent a high and a low (α/β)x ratio cell type. Cell survival curves were generated applying a linear-quadratic curve fit. DNA damage and DNA damage clearance were assessed via γH2AX foci quantification at 1 and 24h post radiation treatment.

RESULTS

Without a magnetic field, RBE10 values of 1.04±0.03 (SW1353) and 1.51±0.06 (SKMel) as well as RBE80 values of 0.93±0.15 (SW1353) and 2.28±0.40 (SKMel) were calculated for protons. Carbon treatments yielded RBE10 values of 1.68±0.04 (SW1353) and 2.30±0.07 (SKMel) and RBE80 values of 2.19±0.24 (SW1353) and 4.06±0.33 (SKMel). For a field strength of B=1T, RBE10 values of 1.06±0.03 (SW1353) and 1.47±0.06 (SKMel) resulted from protons, while RBE10 values of 1.70±0.05 (SW1353) and 2.37±0.08 (SKMel) were obtained for carbon ions. RBE80 values were calculated to be 1.06±0.12 (SW1353) and 2.33±0.40 (SKMel) following protons and 2.13±0.25 (SW1353) and 4.29±0.35 (SKMel) following carbon treatments. Substantially increased γH2AX foci per nucleus were found in both cell lines 1h after radiation with both ion species. At the 24h time point only carbon treated samples of both cell lines showed increased γH2AX levels. The presence of the magnetic field did neither influence the survival parameters of either cell line, nor initial DNA damage and DNA damage clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying a perpendicular magnetic field did not influence the cell survival, DNA repair, nor the biological effectiveness of protons or carbon ions in two human cancer cell lines.

A portable magnet for radiation biology and dosimetry studies in magnetic fields

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In the current and rapidly evolving era of real-time MRI-guided radiotherapy, our radiation biology and dosimetry knowledge is being tested in a novel way. This paper presents the successful design and implementation of a portable device used to generate strong localized magnetic fields. These are ideally suited for small scale experiments that mimic the magnetic field environment inside an MRI-linac system, or more broadly MRI-guided particle therapy as well.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A portable permanent magnet based device employing an adjustable steel yoke and magnetic field focusing cones has been designed, constructed and tested. The apparatus utilises two banks of Nd₂ Fe₁₄ B permanent magnets totalling around 50 kg in mass to generate a strong magnetic field throughout a small volume between two pole tips. The yoke design allows adjustment of the pole tip gap and exchanging of the focusing cones. Further to this, beam portal holes are present in the yoke and focusing cones, allowing for radiation beams of up to 5 x 5 cm² to pass through the region of high magnetic field between the focusing cone tips. Finite element magnetic modelling was performed to design and characterise the performance of the device. Automated physical measurements of the magnetic field components at various locations were measured to confirm the performance. The adjustable pole gap and interchangeable cones allows rapid changing of the experimental set-up to allow different styles of measurements to be performed.

RESULTS

A mostly uniform magnetic field of 1.2 T can be achieved over a volume of at least 3 x 3 x 3 cm³ . This can be reduced in strength to 0.3 T but increased in volume to 10 x 10 x 10 cm³ via removal of the cone tips and/or adjustment of the steel yoke. Although small, these volumes are sufficient to house radiation detectors, cell culture dishes and various phantom arrangements targeted at examining small radiation field dosimetry inside magnetic field strengths that can be changed with ease. Most important is the ability to align the magnetic field both perpendicular to, or inline with the radiation beam. To date, the system has been successfully used to conduct published research in the areas of radiation detector performance, lung phantom dosimetry, and how small clinical electron beams behave in these strong magnetic fields.

CONCLUSIONS

A portable, relatively inexpensive, and simple to operate device has successfully been constructed and used for performing radiation oncology studies around the theme of MRI-guided radiotherapy. This can be in either inline and perpendicular magnetic fields of up to 1.2 T with x-ray and particle beams.

Influence of 0.35 T magnetic field on the response of EBT3 and EBT-XD radiochromic films

PURPOSE

To investigate the inconsistency of recent literature on the effect of magnetic field on the response of radiochromic films, we studied the influence of 0.35 T magnetic field on dosimetric response of EBT3 and EBT-XD Gafchromic^TM films.

METHODS

Two different models of radiochromic films, EBT3 and EBT-XD, were investigated. Pieces of films samples from two different batches for each model were irradiated at different dose levels ranging from 1 to 20 Gy using 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) x-rays generated by a clinical MR-guided radiotherapy system (B = 0.35 T). Film samples from the same batch were irradiated at corresponding dose levels using 6 MV FFF beam from a conventional linac (B = 0) for comparison. The net optical density was measured 48 h postirradiation using a flatbed scanner. The absorbance spectra were also measured over 500-700 nm wavelength range using a fiber-coupled spectrometer with 2.5 nm resolution. To study the effect of fractionated dose delivery to EBT3 (/EBT-XD) films, 8 (/16) Gy dose was delivered in four 2 (/4) Gy fractions with 24 h interval between fractions.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the net optical density and net absorbance of the films irradiated with or without the presence of magnetic field. No dependency on the orientation of the film during irradiation with respect to the magnetic field was observed. The fractionated dose delivery resulted in the same optical density as delivering the whole dose in a single fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

The 0.35 T magnetic field employed in the ViewRay^® MR-guided radiotherapy system did not show any significant influence on the response of EBT3 and EBT-XD Gafchromic^TM films.