1
|
Mihailidis DN, Stratis A, Gingold E, Carlson R, DeForest W, Gray J, Lally MT, Pizzutiello R, Rong J, Spelic D, Hilohi MC, Massoth R. AAPM Task Group Report 261: Comprehensive quality control methodology and management of dental and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems. Med Phys 2024; 51:3134-3164. [PMID: 38285566 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems specifically designed and manufactured for dental, maxillofacial imaging (MFI) and otolaryngology (OLR) applications have been commercially available in the United States since 2001 and have been in widespread clinical use since. Until recently, there has been a lack of professional guidance available for medical physicists about how to assess and evaluate the performance of these systems and about the establishment and management of quality control (QC) programs. The owners and users of dental CBCT systems may have only a rudimentary understanding of this technology, including how it differs from conventional multidetector CT (MDCT) in terms of acceptable radiation safety practices. Dental CBCT systems differ from MDCT in several ways and these differences are described. This report provides guidance to medical physicists and serves as a basis for stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding how to manage and develop a QC program for dental CBCT systems. It is important that a medical physicist with experience in dental CBCT serves as a resource on this technology and the associated radiation protection best practices. The medical physicist should be involved at the pre-installation stage to ensure that a CBCT room configuration allows for a safe and efficient workflow and that structural shielding, if needed, is designed into the architectural plans. Acceptance testing of new installations should include assessment of mechanical alignment of patient positioning lasers and x-ray beam collimation and benchmarking of essential image quality performance parameters such as image uniformity, noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), spatial resolution, and artifacts. Several approaches for quantifying radiation output from these systems are described, including simply measuring the incident air-kerma (Kair) at the entrance surface of the image receptor. These measurements are to be repeated at least annually as part of routine QC by the medical physicist. QC programs for dental CBCT, at least in the United States, are often driven by state regulations, accreditation program requirements, or manufacturer recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitris N Mihailidis
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Eric Gingold
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ray Carlson
- Radiological Physics Services, Inc, Plymouth, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Mary T Lally
- Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, Maryland, USA
| | | | - John Rong
- Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David Spelic
- Food and Drug Administration, Center for Device and Radiological Health, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Mike C Hilohi
- Food and Drug Administration, Center for Device and Radiological Health, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard Massoth
- Sunflower Medical Physics, LLC, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnston A, Mahesh M, Uneri A, Rypinski TA, Boone JM, Siewerdsen JH. Objective image quality assurance in cone-beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies. Med Phys 2024; 51:2424-2443. [PMID: 38354310 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standards for image quality evaluation in multi-detector CT (MDCT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) are evolving to keep pace with technological advances. A clear need is emerging for methods that facilitate rigorous quality assurance (QA) with up-to-date metrology and streamlined workflow suitable to a range of MDCT and CBCT systems. PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility and workflow associated with image quality (IQ) assessment in longitudinal studies for MDCT and CBCT with a single test phantom and semiautomated analysis of objective, quantitative IQ metrology. METHODS A test phantom (CorgiTM Phantom, The Phantom Lab, Greenwich, New York, USA) was used in monthly IQ testing over the course of 1 year for three MDCT scanners (one of which presented helical and volumetric scan modes) and four CBCT scanners. Semiautomated software analyzed image uniformity, linearity, contrast, noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), 3D noise-power spectrum (NPS), modulation transfer function (MTF) in axial and oblique directions, and cone-beam artifact magnitude. The workflow was evaluated using methods adapted from systems/industrial engineering, including value stream process modeling (VSPM), standard work layout (SWL), and standard work control charts (SWCT) to quantify and optimize test methodology in routine practice. The completeness and consistency of DICOM data from each system was also evaluated. RESULTS Quantitative IQ metrology provided valuable insight in longitudinal quality assurance (QA), with metrics such as NPS and MTF providing insight on root cause for various forms of system failure-for example, detector calibration and geometric calibration. Monthly constancy testing showed variations in IQ test metrics owing to system performance as well as phantom setup and provided initial estimates of upper and lower control limits appropriate to QA action levels. Rigorous evaluation of QA workflow identified methods to reduce total cycle time to ∼10 min for each system-viz., use of a single phantom configuration appropriate to all scanners and Head or Body scan protocols. Numerous gaps in the completeness and consistency of DICOM data were observed for CBCT systems. CONCLUSION An IQ phantom and test methodology was found to be suitable to QA of MDCT and CBCT systems with streamlined workflow appropriate to busy clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Johnston
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mahadevappa Mahesh
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ali Uneri
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tatiana A Rypinski
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John M Boone
- Department of Radiology, University of California - Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walther M, Gottschalk O, Madry H, Müller PE, Steinwachs M, Niemeyer P, Niethammer TR, Tischer T, Petersen J, Feil R, Fickert S, Schewe B, Hörterer H, Ruhnau K, Becher C, Klos K, Plaass C, Rolauffs B, Behrens P, Spahn G, Welsch G, Angele P, Ahrend MD, Kasten P, Erggelet C, Ettinger S, Günther D, Körner D, Aurich M. Etiology, Classification, Diagnostics, and Conservative Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. 2023 Recommendations of the Working Group "Clinical Tissue Regeneration" of the German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology. Cartilage 2023; 14:292-304. [PMID: 37082983 PMCID: PMC10601568 DOI: 10.1177/19476035231161806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
METHODS Peer-reviewed literature was analyzed regarding different topics relevant to osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) treatment. This process concluded with a statement for each topic reflecting the best scientific evidence available for a particular diagnostic or therapeutic concept, including the grade of recommendation. Besides the scientific evidence, all group members rated the statements to identify possible gaps between literature and current clinical practice. CONCLUSION In patients with minimal symptoms, OLT progression to ankle osteoarthritis is unlikely. Risk factors for progression are the depth of the lesion on MRI, subchondral cyst formation, and the extent of bone marrow edema. Conservative management is the adaptation of activities to the performance of the ankle joint. A follow-up imaging after 12 months helps not to miss any progression. It is impossible to estimate the probability of success of conservative management from initial symptoms and imaging. Cast immobilization is an option in OLTs in children, with a success rate of approximately 50%, although complete healing, estimated from imaging, is rare. In adults, improvement by conservative management ranges between 45% and 59%. Rest and restrictions for sports activities seem to be more successful than immobilization. Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma can improve pain and functional scores for more than 6 months. If 3 months of conservative management does not improve symptoms, surgery can be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Walther
- Schön Klinik München Harlaching, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Munich, Germany
- Department of Orthopeadics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
- König-Ludwig-Haus, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Oliver Gottschalk
- Schön Klinik München Harlaching, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Munich, Germany
- Department of Orthopeadics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Henning Madry
- Institute of Experimental Orthopaedics and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Peter E. Müller
- Department of Orthopeadics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Steinwachs
- SportClinic Zürich, Klinik Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Niemeyer
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- OCM—Hospital for Orthopedic Surgery Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas R. Niethammer
- Department of Orthopeadics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Tischer
- Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Roman Feil
- Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Kath. Marienkrankenhaus gGmbH, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fickert
- Sporthopaedicum Straubing, Straubing, Germany
- Sporthopaedicum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Schewe
- Orthopädisch Chirurgisches Centrum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hubert Hörterer
- Schön Klinik München Harlaching, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Munich, Germany
- Department of Orthopeadics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Becher
- Internationales Zentrum für Orthopädie, ATOS Klinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Christian Plaass
- Orthopedic Clinic of Medical School Hannover, DIAKOVERE Annastift, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernd Rolauffs
- Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie and G.E.R.N. Forschungszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Gunter Spahn
- Center of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Eisenach, Eisenach, Germany
| | | | - Peter Angele
- Sporthopaedicum Straubing, Straubing, Germany
- Sporthopaedicum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Marc-Daniel Ahrend
- BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Philip Kasten
- Orthopädisch Chirurgisches Centrum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Erggelet
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- alphaclinic zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Ettinger
- Orthopedic Clinic of Medical School Hannover, DIAKOVERE Annastift, Hannover, Germany
| | - Daniel Günther
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery, and Sports Medicine, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Körner
- BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Aurich
- BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Abteilung für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Supanich M, Siewerdsen J, Fahrig R, Farahani K, Gang GJ, Helm P, Jans J, Jones K, Koenig T, Kuhls-Gilcrist A, Lin M, Riddell C, Ritschl L, Schafer S, Schueler B, Silver M, Timmer J, Trousset Y, Zhang J. AAPM Task Group Report 238: 3D C-arms with volumetric imaging capability. Med Phys 2023; 50:e904-e945. [PMID: 36710257 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
This report reviews the image acquisition and reconstruction characteristics of C-arm Cone Beam Computed Tomography (C-arm CBCT) systems and provides guidance on quality control of C-arm systems with this volumetric imaging capability. The concepts of 3D image reconstruction, geometric calibration, image quality, and dosimetry covered in this report are also pertinent to CBCT for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT). However, IGRT systems introduce a number of additional considerations, such as geometric alignment of the imaging at treatment isocenter, which are beyond the scope of the charge to the task group and the report. Section 1 provides an introduction to C-arm CBCT systems and reviews a variety of clinical applications. Section 2 briefly presents nomenclature specific or unique to these systems. A short review of C-arm fluoroscopy quality control (QC) in relation to 3D C-arm imaging is given in Section 3. Section 4 discusses system calibration, including geometric calibration and uniformity calibration. A review of the unique approaches and challenges to 3D reconstruction of data sets acquired by C-arm CBCT systems is give in Section 5. Sections 6 and 7 go in greater depth to address the performance assessment of C-arm CBCT units. First, Section 6 describes testing approaches and phantoms that may be used to evaluate image quality (spatial resolution and image noise and artifacts) and identifies several factors that affect image quality. Section 7 describes both free-in-air and in-phantom approaches to evaluating radiation dose indices. The methodologies described for assessing image quality and radiation dose may be used for annual constancy assessment and comparisons among different systems to help medical physicists determine when a system is not operating as expected. Baseline measurements taken either at installation or after a full preventative maintenance service call can also provide valuable data to help determine whether the performance of the system is acceptable. Collecting image quality and radiation dose data on existing phantoms used for CT image quality and radiation dose assessment, or on newly developed phantoms, will inform the development of performance criteria and standards. Phantom images are also useful for identifying and evaluating artifacts. In particular, comparing baseline data with those from current phantom images can reveal the need for system calibration before image artifacts are detected in clinical practice. Examples of artifacts are provided in Sections 4, 5, and 6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Supanich
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Pat Helm
- Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Kyle Jones
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - MingDe Lin
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Mike Silver
- Canon Medical Systems USA, Long Beach, California, USA
| | | | | | - Jie Zhang
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Papadakis AE, Damilakis J. Assessment of abdominal organ dose and image quality in varying arc trajectory interventional C-arm cone beam CT. Phys Med 2022; 102:46-54. [PMID: 36095946 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of varying arc exposure trajectory on radiation dose to radiosensitive organs and to assess image quality in abdominal C-arm cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) interventional procedures using a latest generation system. METHODS An anthropomorphic phantom that simulates the average adult individual was used. Individual-specific Monte Carlo (MC) simulation dosimetry was performed to estimate organ doses (OD) in abdominal C-arm CBCT. Seven examination protocols prescribed by the system for vascular and soft tissue CBCT, were simulated. These protocols are differentiated in the range of the arc exposure trajectory and the level of radiation dose delivered to the patient. OD was estimated for liver, adrenals, kidneys, pancreas, stomach, gall bladder, spleen, bone and skin. Image noise, signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and in-plane spatial resolution were assessed using CT-specific image quality assessment phantoms. RESULTS OD was found to depend on the range of arc trajectory and was higher for posterior located organs. In vascular protocols OD ranged from 4.75 mGy for skin to 0.60 mGy for bone. Image noise was higher in vascular protocols than in soft tissue ones. SNR and CNR were significantly modified among different soft tissue protocols (P < 0.05). In-plane spatial resolution was found 0.80 lp/mm in vascular as opposed to 0.41 lp/mm in soft tissue protocols. CONCLUSIONS The current results may be used to estimate OD for different examination protocols and enable operators choose the appropriate acquisition protocol on the preprogrammed interventional task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonios E Papadakis
- Medical Physics Department, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Stavrakia 71110, Crete, Greece.
| | - John Damilakis
- Medical Physics Department, University of Crete, Stavrakia 71110, Crete, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun H, Wang N, Wang X, Huang G, Chang Y, Liu Y. A study of different minimum segment area parameters on automatic IMRT plans for cervical cancer using Pinnacle3 9.10 TPS. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29290. [PMID: 36086767 PMCID: PMC10980374 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Based on Pinnacle39.10 treatment planning system (TPS) automatic planning module, we investigated the effect of minimum segmentation area (MSA) parameters on Auto-Plan Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (AP-IMRT) without affecting the dose distribution of the target and the Organ at Risk (OAR). The results provided the basis for the ideal MSA parameters in the design of AP-IMRT plan. Ten patients with cervical cancer in our hospital were selected randomly for AP-IMRT design. Each patient was devised with 10 AP-IMRT plans. The prescription dose of PTV was 50 Gy/25 fractions. The radiotherapy plans of all patients were adopted with 7 field-averaged fixed fields. The MSA was set to 4 cm2, 9 cm2, 14 cm2, 20 cm2, 25 cm2, 40 cm2, 50 cm2, 60 cm2, 80 cm2, and 100 cm2. Plan quality and delivery efficiency were evaluated based on dose-volume histograms (DVHs), control points, monitor units (MUs), dosimetric measurement verification results, and plan delivery time. Except for the small difference in monitor units, the number of segmentations and target dose coverage, there were no statistically significant differences between the other dosimetric parameters in the planning target volumes. With the increase of MSA, the total number of MUs in AP-IMRT decreased from (649 ± 32) MUs to (312 ± 26) MUs, and the total number of segmentations decreased from (69 ± 1) to (28 ± 3). There was no statistical significance in the dose distribution of AP-IMRT target area with the MSA of 4-50 cm2 (P > .05). There was no significant difference in OAR dose between AP-IMRT plans with different MSA (P > .05). The calculated gamma indices using the 3% /3 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria. Both of the gamma pass rate and DTA pass rate all ≥95% under the condition of MSA are greater than 4 cm2, and the difference was no statistically significant (P > .05). The plan delivery times decreased with increasing MSA (P < .05). When using Pinnacle3 9.10 TPS to design AP-IMRT plan for cervical cancer, the parameter of MSA can be increased appropriately. Increasing the MSA allows for improved plan delivery accuracy and efficiency without significantly affecting the AP-IMRT plan quality. The MSA in the range of 14 to 50 cm2 can obtain a more reasonable dose distribution in the target area while the dose of target area and OAR had no significant changes. It is important to improve the plan quality, delivery accuracy, and efficiency for cervical AP-IMRT radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitao Sun
- Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ning Wang
- Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xuetao Wang
- Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Guosen Huang
- Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yaohua Chang
- School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ying Liu
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hatamikia S, Biguri A, Herl G, Kronreif G, Reynolds T, Kettenbach J, Russ T, Tersol A, Maier A, Figl M, Siewerdsen JH, Birkfellner W. Source-detector trajectory optimization in cone-beam computed tomography: a comprehensive review on today’s state-of-the-art. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging is becoming increasingly important for a wide range of applications such as image-guided surgery, image-guided radiation therapy as well as diagnostic imaging such as breast and orthopaedic imaging. The potential benefits of non-circular source-detector trajectories was recognized in early work to improve the completeness of CBCT sampling and extend the field of view (FOV). Another important feature of interventional imaging is that prior knowledge of patient anatomy such as a preoperative CBCT or prior CT is commonly available. This provides the opportunity to integrate such prior information into the image acquisition process by customized CBCT source-detector trajectories. Such customized trajectories can be designed in order to optimize task-specific imaging performance, providing intervention or patient-specific imaging settings. The recently developed robotic CBCT C-arms as well as novel multi-source CBCT imaging systems with additional degrees of freedom provide the possibility to largely expand the scanning geometries beyond the conventional circular source-detector trajectory. This recent development has inspired the research community to innovate enhanced image quality by modifying image geometry, as opposed to hardware or algorithms. The recently proposed techniques in this field facilitate image quality improvement, FOV extension, radiation dose reduction, metal artifact reduction as well as 3D imaging under kinematic constraints. Because of the great practical value and the increasing importance of CBCT imaging in image-guided therapy for clinical and preclinical applications as well as in industry, this paper focuses on the review and discussion of the available literature in the CBCT trajectory optimization field. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first study that provides an exhaustive literature review regarding customized CBCT algorithms and tries to update the community with the clarification of in-depth information on the current progress and future trends.
Collapse
|
8
|
Karius A, Szkitsak J, Boronikolas V, Fietkau R, Bert C. Quality assurance and long-term stability of a novel 3-in-1 X-ray system for brachytherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13727. [PMID: 35848090 PMCID: PMC9512339 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose A novel, mobile 3‐in‐1 X‐ray system featuring radiography, fluoroscopy, and cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been launched for brachytherapy recently. Currently, there is no quality assurance (QA) procedure explicitly applicable to this system equipped with innovative technologies such as dynamic jaws and motorized lasers. We developed a dedicated QA procedure and, based on its performance for a duration of 6 months, provide an assessment of the device's stability over time. Methods With the developed QA procedure, we assessed the system's planar and CBCT‐imaging performance by investigating geometric accuracy, CT‐number stability, contrast‐noise‐ratio, uniformity, spatial resolution, low‐contrast detectability, dynamic range, and X‐ray exposure using dedicated phantoms. Furthermore, we evaluated geometric stability by using the flexmap‐approach and investigated the device's laser‐ and jaw‐positioning accuracy with an in‐house test phantom. CBCT‐ and planar‐imaging protocols for pelvis, breast, and abdomen imaging were examined. Results Planar‐ and CBCT‐imaging performances were widely stable with a geometric accuracy ≤1 mm, CT‐number stability of up to 46 HU, and uniformity variations of up to 48 HU over time. For planar imaging, low‐contrast detectability and dynamic range exceeded current recommendations. Although geometric stability was considered tolerable, partly substantial positioning inaccuracies of up to more than 120 mm and −13 mm were obtained for lasers and jaws, respectively. X‐ray exposure showed small variations of ≤0.56 μGy and ≤0.76 mGy for planar‐ and CBCT‐imaging, respectively. The conductance of the QA procedure allowed a smooth evaluation of the system's overall performance. Conclusion We developed a QA workflow for a novel 3‐in‐1 X‐ray system allowing to assess the device's imaging and hardware performance. The system showed in general a reasonable imaging performance and stability over time, whereas improvements regarding laser and jaw accuracy are strictly required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Karius
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Juliane Szkitsak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Vasilios Boronikolas
- Abteilung für medizinische Physik, Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland.,Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland.,Partnerstandort Freiburg, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland.,Partnerstandort Freiburg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sheth NM, Uneri A, Helm PA, Zbijewski W, Siewerdsen JH. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector. Med Phys 2022; 49:3053-3066. [PMID: 35363391 PMCID: PMC10153656 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indirect detection flat-panel detectors (FPDs) consisting of hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) thin-film transistors (TFTs) are a prevalent technology for digital x-ray imaging. However, their performance is challenged in applications requiring low exposure levels, high spatial resolution, and high frame rate. Emerging FPD designs using metal oxide TFTs may offer potential performance improvements compared to FPDs based on a-Si:H TFTs. PURPOSE This work investigates the imaging performance of a new indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO) TFT-based detector in 2D fluoroscopy and 3D cone-beam CT (CBCT). METHODS The new FPD consists of a sensor array combining IGZO TFTs with a-Si:H photodiodes and a 0.7-mm thick CsI:Tl scintillator. The FPD was implemented on an x-ray imaging bench with system geometry emulating intraoperative CBCT. A conventional FPD with a-Si:H TFTs and a 0.6-mm thick CsI:Tl scintillator was similarly implemented as a basis of comparison. 2D imaging performance was characterized in terms of electronic noise, sensitivity, linearity, lag, spatial resolution (modulation transfer function, MTF), image noise (noise-power spectrum, NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) with entrance air kerma (EAK) ranging from 0.3 to 1.2 μGy. 3D imaging performance was evaluated in terms of the 3D MTF and noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ), soft-tissue contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and image quality evident in anthropomorphic phantoms for a range of anatomical sites and dose, with weighted air kerma, K w ${K_w}$ , ranging from 0.8 to 4.9 mGy. RESULTS The 2D imaging performance of the IGZO-based FPD exhibited up to ∼1.7× lower electronic noise than the a-Si:H FPD at matched pixel pitch. Furthermore, the IGZO FPD exhibited ∼27% increase in mid-frequency DQE (1 mm-1 ) at matched pixel size and dose (EAK ≈ 1.0 μGy) and ∼11% increase after adjusting for differences in scintillator thickness. 2D spatial resolution was limited by the scintillator for each FPD. The IGZO-based FPD demonstrated improved 3D NEQ at all spatial frequencies in both head (≥25% increase for all dose levels) and body (≥10% increase for K w ${K_w}$ ≤2 mGy) imaging scenarios. These characteristics translated to improved low-contrast visualization in anthropomorphic phantoms, demonstrating ≥10% improvement in CNR and extension of the low-dose range for which the detector is input-quantum limited. CONCLUSION The IGZO-based FPD demonstrated improvements in electronic noise, image lag, and NEQ that translated to measurable improvements in 2D and 3D imaging performance compared to a conventional FPD based on a-Si:H TFTs. The improvements are most beneficial for 2D or 3D imaging scenarios involving low-dose and/or high-frame rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niral Milan Sheth
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ali Uneri
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Wojciech Zbijewski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Karius A, Bert C. QAMaster: A new software framework for phantom-based computed tomography quality assurance. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13588. [PMID: 35297569 PMCID: PMC8992959 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The regular evaluation of imaging performance of computed tomography (CT) scanners is essential for CT quality assurance. For automation of this process, the software QAMaster was developed at the Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, which provides based on CT scans of the CatPhan® 504 (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, USA) automated image quality analysis and documentation by evaluating CT number accuracy, spatial linearity, uniformity, contrast-noise-ratio, spatial resolution, noise, and slice thickness. Dose assessment is supported by calculations of the weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIw ) and weighted cone beam dose index (CBDIw ). QAMaster was tested with CatPhan® 504 scans and compared to manual evaluations of these scans, whereby high consistency of the respective results was observed. The CT numbers, spatial linearity, uniformity, contrast-noise-ratio, noise, and slice thickness deviated by only (0.13 ± 0.25) HU, (0.02 ± 0.05) mm, (-0.01 ± 0.03)%, 0.8 ± 1.8, (0.131 ± 0.05) HU, and (0.004 ± 0.005) mm between both evaluations, respectively. The QAMaster results for spatial resolution did not differ significantly (p = 0.34) from the CatPhan® 504 based manual resolution assessment. Dose computations were fully consistent between QAMaster and manual calculations. Thus, QAMaster proved to be a comprehensive and functional software for performing an automated CT quality assurance routine. QAMaster will be open-source after its release.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Karius
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Karius A, Karolczak M, Strnad V, Bert C. Technical evaluation of the cone-beam computed tomography imaging performance of a novel, mobile, gantry-based X-ray system for brachytherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 23:e13501. [PMID: 34905285 PMCID: PMC8833290 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose A novel, mobile cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) system for image‐guided adaptive brachytherapy was recently deployed at our hospital as worldwide first site. Prior to the device's clinical operation, a profound characterization of its imaging performance was conducted. This was essential to optimize both the imaging workflow and image quality for achieving the best possible clinical outcomes. We present the results of our investigations. Methods The novel CBCT‐system features a ring gantry with 121 cm clearance as well as a 43.2 × 43.2 cm2 flat‐panel detector, and is controlled via a tablet‐personal computer (PC). For evaluating its imaging performance, the geometric reproducibility as well as imaging fidelity, computed tomography (CT)‐number accuracy, uniformity, contrast‐noise‐ratio (CNR), noise characteristics, and spatial resolution as fundamental image quality parameters were assessed. As dose metric the weighted cone‐beam dose index (CBDIw) was measured. Image quality was evaluated using standard quality assurance (QA) as well as anthropomorphic upper torso and breast phantoms. Both in‐house and manufacturer protocols for abdomen, pelvis, and breast imaging were examined. Results Using the in‐house protocols, the QA phantom scans showed altogether a high image quality, with high CT‐number accuracy (R2 > 0.97) and uniformity (<12 Hounsfield Unit (HU) cupping), reasonable noise and imaging fidelity, and good CNR at bone–tissue transitions of up to 28:1. Spatial resolution was strongly limited by geometric instabilities of the device. The breast phantom scans fulfilled clinical requirements, whereas the abdomen and pelvis scans showed severe artifacts, particularly at air/bone–tissue transitions. Conclusion With the novel CBCT‐system, achieving a high image quality appears possible in principle. However, adaptations of the standard protocols, performance enhancements in image reconstruction referring to artifact reductions, as well as the extinction of geometric instabilities are imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Karius
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marek Karolczak
- Institute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Henkestraße 91, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang X, Zbijewski W, Huang Y, Uneri A, Jones CK, Lo SFL, Witham TF, Luciano M, Anderson WS, Helm PA, Siewerdsen JH. Intraoperative cone-beam and slot-beam CT: 3D image quality and dose with a slot collimator on the O-arm imaging system. Med Phys 2021; 48:6800-6809. [PMID: 34519364 PMCID: PMC10174643 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the 3D imaging performance and radiation dose for a prototype slot-beam configuration on an intraoperative O-arm™ Surgical Imaging System (Medtronic Inc., Littleton, MA) and identify potential improvements in soft-tissue image quality for surgical interventions. METHODS A slot collimator was integrated with the O-arm™ system for slot-beam axial CT. The collimator can be automatically actuated to provide 1.2° slot-beam longitudinal collimation. Cone-beam and slot-beam configurations were investigated with and without an antiscatter grid (12:1 grid ratio, 60 lines/cm). Dose, scatter, image noise, and soft-tissue contrast resolution were evaluated in quantitative phantoms for head and body configurations over a range of exposure levels (beam energy and mAs), with reconstruction performed via filtered-backprojection. Qualitative imaging performance across various anatomical sites and imaging tasks was assessed with anthropomorphic head, abdomen, and pelvis phantoms. RESULTS The dose for a slot-beam scan varied from 0.02-0.06 mGy/mAs for head protocols to 0.01-0.03 mGy/mAs for body protocols, yielding dose reduction by ∼1/5 to 1/3 compared to cone-beam, owing to beam collimation and reduced x-ray scatter. The slot-beam provided an ∼6-7× reduction in scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) compared to the cone-beam, yielding SPR ∼20-80% for head and body without the grid and ∼7-30% with the grid. Compared to cone-beam scans at equivalent dose, slot-beam images exhibited an ∼2.5× increase in soft-tissue contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for both grid and gridless configurations. For slot-beam scans, a further ∼10-30% improvement in CNR was achieved when the grid was removed. Slot-beam imaging could benefit certain interventional scenarios in which improved visualization of soft tissues is required within a fairly narrow longitudinal region of interest ( ± 7 mm in z )--for example, checking the completeness of tumor resection, preservation of adjacent anatomy, or detection of complications (e.g., hemorrhage). While preserving existing capabilities for fluoroscopy and cone-beam CT, slot-beam scanning could enhance the utility of intraoperative imaging and provide a useful mode for safety and validation checks in image-guided surgery. CONCLUSIONS The 3D imaging performance and dose of a prototype slot-beam CT configuration on the O-arm™ system was investigated. Substantial improvements in soft-tissue image quality and reduction in radiation dose are evident with the slot-beam configuration due to reduced x-ray scatter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxuan Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Wojciech Zbijewski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yixuan Huang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ali Uneri
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Craig K Jones
- The Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sheng-Fu L Lo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Timothy F Witham
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark Luciano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu P, Boone JM, Hernandez AM, Mahesh M, Siewerdsen JH. Theory, method, and test tools for determination of 3D MTF characteristics in cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2021; 48:2772-2789. [PMID: 33660261 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The modulation transfer function (MTF) is widely used as an objective metric of spatial resolution of medical imaging systems. Despite advances in capability for three-dimensional (3D) isotropic spatial resolution in computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT), MTF evaluation for such systems is typically reported only in the axial plane, and practical methodology for assessment of fully 3D spatial resolution characteristics is lacking. This work reviews fundamental theoretical relationships of two-dimensional (2D) and 3D spread functions and reports practical methods and test tools for analysis of 3D MTF in CBCT. METHODS Fundamental aspects of 2D and 3D MTF measurement are reviewed within a common notational framework, and three MTF test tools with analysis code are reported and made available online (https://istar.jhu.edu/downloads/): (a) a multi-wire tool for measurement of the axial plane MTF [denoted as M T F ( f r ; φ = 0 ∘ ) , where φ is the measurement angle out of the axial plane] as a function of position in the axial plane; (b) a wedge tool for measurement of the MTF in any direction in the 3D Fourier domain [e.g., φ = 45°, denoted as M T F ( f r ; φ = 45 ∘ ) ]; and (c) a sphere tool for measurement of the MTF in any or all directions in the 3D Fourier domain. Experiments were performed on a mobile C-arm with CBCT capability, showing that M T F ( f r ; φ = 45 ∘ ) yields an informative one-dimensional (1D) representation of the overall 3D spatial resolution characteristics, capturing important characteristics of the 3D MTF that might be missed in conventional analysis. The effects of anisotropic filters and detector readout mode were investigated, and the extent to which a system can be said to provide "isotropic" resolution was evaluated by quantitative comparison of MTF at various φ . RESULTS All three test tools provided consistent measurement of M T F ( f r ; φ = 0 ∘ ) , and the wedge and sphere tools demonstrated how measurement of the MTF in directions outside the axial plane ( φ > 0 ∘ ) can reveal spatial resolution characteristics to which conventional axial MTF measurement is blind. The wedge tool was shown to reduce statistical measurement error compared to the sphere tool due to improved sampling, and the sphere tool was shown to provide a basis for measurement of the MTF in any or all directions (outside the null cone) from a single scan. The C-arm system exhibited non-isotropic spatial resolution with conventional non-isotropic 1D apodization filters (i.e., frequency cutoff filters) - which is common in CBCT - and implementation of isotropic 2D apodization yielded quantifiably isotropic MTF. Asymmetric pixel binning modes were similarly shown to impart non-isotropic effects on the 3D MTF, and the overall 3D MTF characteristics were evident in each case with a single, 1D measurement of the 1D M T F ( f r ; φ = 45 ∘ ). CONCLUSION Three test tools and corresponding MTF analysis methods were presented within a consistent framework for analysis of 3D spatial resolution characteristics in a manner amenable to routine, practical measurements. Experiments on a CBCT C-arm validated many intuitive aspects of 3D spatial resolution and quantified the extent to which a CBCT system may be considered to have isotropic resolution. Measurement of M T F ( f r ; φ = 45 ∘ ) provided a practical 1D measure of the underlying 3D MTF characteristics and is extensible to other CT or CBCT systems offering high, isotropic spatial resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengwei Wu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - John M Boone
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Andrew M Hernandez
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Mahadevappa Mahesh
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.,Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Becker AE, Hernandez AM, Schwoebel PR, Boone JM. Cone beam CT multisource configurations: evaluating image quality, scatter, and dose using phantom imaging and Monte Carlo simulations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 65:235032. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
15
|
Alcorn SR, Zhou XC, Bojechko C, Rubo RA, Chen MJ, Dieckmann K, Ermoian RP, Ford EC, Kobyzeva D, MacDonald SM, McNutt TR, Nechesnyuk A, Nilsson K, Sjostrand H, Smith KS, Stock M, Tryggestad EJ, Villar RC, Winey BA, Terezakis SA. Low-Dose Image-Guided Pediatric CNS Radiation Therapy: Final Analysis From a Prospective Low-Dose Cone-Beam CT Protocol From a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 19:1533033820920650. [PMID: 32329413 PMCID: PMC7225835 DOI: 10.1177/1533033820920650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography protocols for image-guided radiotherapy may permit target localization while minimizing radiation exposure. We prospectively evaluated a lower-dose cone-beam protocol for central nervous system image-guided radiotherapy across a multinational pediatrics consortium. Methods: Seven institutions prospectively employed a lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography central nervous system protocol (weighted average dose 0.7 mGy) for patients ≤21 years. Treatment table shifts between setup with surface lasers versus cone-beam computed tomography were used to approximate setup accuracy, and vector magnitudes for these shifts were calculated. Setup group mean, interpatient, interinstitution, and random error were estimated, and clinical factors were compared by mixed linear modeling. Results: Among 96 patients, with 2179 pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography acquisitions, median age was 9 years (1-20). Setup parameters were 3.13, 3.02, 1.64, and 1.48 mm for vector magnitude group mean, interpatient, interinstitution, and random error, respectively. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant differences in mean vector magnitude by age, gender, performance status, target location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, or steroid or anesthesia use. Providers rated >99% of images as adequate or better for target localization. Conclusions: A lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography protocol demonstrated table shift vector magnitude that approximate clinical target volume/planning target volume expansions used in central nervous system radiotherapy. There were no significant clinical predictors of setup accuracy identified, supporting use of this lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography protocol across a diverse pediatric population with brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xian Chiong Zhou
- The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Michael J Chen
- Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Universität Klinik Für Strahlentherapie und Strahlenbiologie, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Daria Kobyzeva
- Federal Scientific Clinical Center of Children's Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | - Alexey Nechesnyuk
- Federal Scientific Clinical Center of Children's Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | | - Markus Stock
- Universität Klinik Für Strahlentherapie und Strahlenbiologie, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hernandez AM, Shin DW, Abbey CK, Seibert JA, Akino N, Goto T, Vaishnav JY, Boedeker KL, Boone JM. Validation of synthesized normal‐resolution image data generated from high‐resolution acquisitions on a commercial CT scanner. Med Phys 2020; 47:4775-4785. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Craig K. Abbey
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
| | - J. Anthony Seibert
- Department of Radiology University of California Davis Sacramento CA USA
| | | | | | | | | | - John M. Boone
- Department of Radiology University of California Davis Sacramento CA USA
| |
Collapse
|