The quest for multifunctional and dedicated PET instrumentation with irregular geometries

We focus on reviewing state-of-the-art developments of dedicated PET scanners with irregular geometries and the potential of different aspects of multifunctional PET imaging. First, we discuss advances in non-conventional PET detector geometries. Then, we present innovative designs of organ-specific dedicated PET scanners for breast, brain, prostate, and cardiac imaging. We will also review challenges and possible artifacts by image reconstruction algorithms for PET scanners with irregular geometries, such as non-cylindrical and partial angular coverage geometries and how they can be addressed. Then, we attempt to address some open issues about cost/benefits analysis of dedicated PET scanners, how far are the theoretical conceptual designs from the market/clinic, and strategies to reduce fabrication cost without compromising performance.

Accurate modeling and performance evaluation of a total-body pet scanner using Monte Carlo simulations

BACKGROUND

The limited axial field-of-view (FOV) of conventional clinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners (∼15 to 26 cm) allows detecting only 1% of all coincidence photons, hence limiting significantly their sensitivity. To overcome this limitation, the EXPLORER consortium developed the world's first total-body PET/CT scanner that significantly increased the sensitivity, thus enabling to decrease the scan duration or injected dose.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to perform and validate Monte Carlo simulations of the uEXPLORER PET scanner, which can be used to devise novel conceptual designs and geometrical configurations through obtaining features that are difficult to obtain experimentally.

METHODS

The total-body uEXPLORER PET scanner was modeled using GATE Monte Carlo (MC) platform. The model was validated through comparison with experimental measurements of various performance parameters, including spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, and image quality, according to NEMA-NU2 2018 standards. Furthermore, the effects of the time coincidence window and maximum ring difference on the count rate and noise equivalent count rate (NECR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, the validation study showed that there was a good agreement between the simulation and experimental results. The differences between the simulated and experimental total sensitivity for the NEMA and extended phantoms at the center of the FOV were 2.3% and 0.0%, respectively. The difference in peak NECR was 9.9% for the NEMA phantom and 1.0% for the extended phantom. The average bias between the simulated and experimental results of the full-width-at-half maximum (FWHM) for six different positions and three directions was 0.12 mm. The simulations showed that using a variable coincidence time window based on the maximum ring difference can reduce the effect of random coincidences and improve the NECR compared to a constant time coincidence window. The NECR corresponding to 252-ring difference was 2.11 Mcps, which is larger than the NECR corresponding to 336-ring difference (2.04 Mcps).

CONCLUSION

The developed MC model of the uEXPLORER PET scanner was validated against experimental measurements and can be used for further assessment and design optimization of the scanner.

Comparative studies of the sensitivities of sparse and full geometries of Total-Body PET scanners built from crystals and plastic scintillators

BACKGROUND

Alongside the benefits of Total-Body imaging modalities, such as higher sensitivity, single-bed position, low dose imaging, etc., their final construction cost prevents worldwide utilization. The main aim of this study is to present a simulation-based comparison of the sensitivities of existing and currently developed tomographs to introduce a cost-efficient solution for constructing a Total-Body PET scanner based on plastic scintillators.

METHODS

For the case of this study, eight tomographs based on the uEXPLORER configuration with different scintillator materials (BGO, LYSO), axial field-of-view (97.4 cm and 194.8 cm), and detector configurations (full and sparse) were simulated. In addition, 8 J-PET scanners with different configurations, such as various axial field-of-view (200 cm and 250 cm), different cross sections of plastic scintillator, and multiple numbers of plastic scintillator layers (2, 3, and 4), based on J-PET technology have been simulated by GATE software. Furthermore, Siemens' Biograph Vision has been simulated to compare the results with standard PET scans. Two types of simulations have been performed. The first one with a centrally located source with a diameter of 1 mm and a length of 250 cm, and the second one with the same source inside a water-filled cylindrical phantom with a diameter of 20 cm and a length of 183 cm.

RESULTS

With regards to sensitivity, among all the proposed scanners, the ones constructed with BGO crystals give the best performance ([Formula: see text] 350 cps/kBq at the center). The utilization of sparse geometry or LYSO crystals significantly lowers the achievable sensitivity of such systems. The J-PET design gives a similar sensitivity to the sparse LYSO crystal-based detectors while having full detector coverage over the body. Moreover, it provides uniform sensitivity over the body with additional gain on its sides and provides the possibility for high-quality brain imaging.

CONCLUSION

Taking into account not only the sensitivity but also the price of Total-Body PET tomographs, which till now was one of the main obstacles in their widespread clinical availability, the J-PET tomography system based on plastic scintillators could be a cost-efficient alternative for Total-Body PET scanners.

Walk-through flat panel total-body PET: a patient-centered design for high throughput imaging at lower cost using DOI-capable high-resolution monolithic detectors

PURPOSE

Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) systems have a much higher sensitivity than standard axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET systems for imaging the torso or full body, which allows faster and/or lower dose imaging. Despite its very high sensitivity, current total-body PET (TB-PET) throughput is limited by patient handling (positioning on the bed) and often a shortage of available personnel. This factor, combined with high system costs, makes it hard to justify the implementation of these systems for many academic and nearly all routine nuclear medicine departments. We, therefore, propose a novel, cost-effective, dual flat panel TB-PET system for patients in upright standing positions to avoid the time-consuming positioning on a PET-CT table; the walk-through (WT) TB-PET. We describe a patient-centered, flat panel PET design that offers very efficient patient throughput and uses monolithic detectors (with BGO or LYSO) with depth-of-interaction (DOI) capabilities and high intrinsic spatial resolution. We compare system sensitivity, component costs, and patient throughput of the proposed WT-TB-PET to a SAFOV (= 26 cm) and a LAFOV (= 106 cm) LSO PET systems.

METHODS

Patient width, height (= top head to start of thighs) and depth (= distance from the bed to front of patient) were derived from 40 randomly selected PET-CT scans to define the design dimensions of the WT-TB-PET. We compare this new PET system to the commercially available Siemens Biograph Vision 600 (SAFOV) and Siemens Quadra (LAFOV) PET-CT in terms of component costs, system sensitivity, and patient throughput. System cost comparison was based on estimating the cost of the two main components in the PET system (Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs) and scintillators). Sensitivity values were determined using Gate Monte Carlo simulations. Patient throughput times (including CT and scout scan, patient positioning on bed and transfer) were recorded for 1 day on a Siemens Vision 600 PET. These timing values were then used to estimate the expected patient throughput (assuming an equal patient radiotracer injected activity to patients and considering differences in system sensitivity and time-of-flight information) for WT-TB-PET, SAFOV and LAFOV PET.

RESULTS

The WT-TB-PET is composed of two flat panels; each is 70 cm wide and 106 cm high, with a 50-cm gap between both panels. These design dimensions were justified by the patient sizes measured from the 40 random PET-CT scans. Each panel consists of 14 × 20 monolithic BGO detector blocks that are 50 × 50 × 16 mm in size and are coupled to a readout with 6 × 6 mm SiPMs arrays. For the WT-TB-PET, the detector surface is reduced by a factor of 1.9 and the scintillator volume by a factor of 2.2 compared to LAFOV PET systems, while demonstrating comparable sensitivity and much better uniform spatial resolution (< 2 mm in all directions over the FOV). The estimated component cost for the WT-TB-PET is 3.3 × lower than that of a 106 cm LAFOV system and only 20% higher than the PET component costs of a SAFOV. The estimated maximum number of patients scanned on a standard 8-h working day increases from 28 (for SAFOV) to 53-60 (for LAFOV in limited/full acceptance) to 87 (for the WT-TB-PET). By scanning faster (more patients), the amount of ordered activity per patient can be reduced drastically: the WT-TB-PET requires 66% less ordered activity per patient than a SAFOV.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a monolithic BGO or LYSO-based WT-TB-PET system with DOI measurements that departs from the classical patient positioning on a table and allows patients to stand upright between two flat panels. The WT-TB-PET system provides a solution to achieve a much lower cost TB-PET approaching the cost of a SAFOV system. High patient throughput is increased by fast patient positioning between two vertical flat panel detectors of high sensitivity. High spatial resolution (< 2 mm) uniform over the FOV is obtained by using DOI-capable monolithic scintillators.

Evaluation of cost-effective system designs for long axial field-of-view PET scanners

Objective. Current commercial positron emission tomography (PET) scanners have excellent performance and diagnostic image quality primarily due to improvements in scanner sensitivity and time-of-flight (TOF) resolution. Recent years have seen the development of total-body PET scanners with longer axial field-of-view (AFOV) that increase sensitivity for single organ imaging, and also image more of the patient in a single bed position thereby enabling multi-organ dynamic imaging. While studies have shown significant capabilities of these systems, cost will be a major factor in their widespread adoption in the clinic. Here we evaluate alternative designs that achieve many advantages of long AFOV PET while utilizing cost-effective detector hardware.Approach. We utilize Monte Carlo simulations and clinically relevant lesion detectability metric to study the impact of scintillator type lutetium oxyorthosilicate or bismuth germanate (LSO or BGO), scintillator thickness (10-20 mm), and TOF resolution on resultant image quality in a 72 cm long scanner. Detector TOF resolution was varied based on current scanner performance, as well as expected future performance from detector designs that currently hold most promise for scaling into a scanner.Main results. Results indicate that BGO is competitive with LSO (both 20 mm thick) if we assume that it uses TOF (e.g. Cerenkov timing with 450 ps fwhm and Lorentzian distribution) and the LSO scanner has TOF resolution similar to the latest PMT-based scanners (∼500-650 ps). Alternatively, a system using 10 mm thick LSO with 150 ps TOF resolution can also provide similar performance. Both these alternative systems can provide cost savings (25%-33%) relative to a scanner using 20 mm LSO with ∼50% of effective sensitivity, but still 500%-700% higher than a conventional AFOV scanner.Significance. Our results have relevance to the development of long AFOV PET, where reduced cost of these alternative designs can provide wider accessibility for use in situations requiring imaging of multiple organs simultaneously.

Publicly available framework for simulating and experimentally validating clinical PET systems

BACKGROUND

Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are a powerful tool to model medical imaging systems. However, before simulations can be considered the ground truth, they have to be validated with experiments.

PURPOSE

To provide a pipeline that models a clinical positron emission tomography (PET)/CT system using MC simulations after extensively validating the results against experimental measurements.

METHODS

A clinical four-ring PET imaging system was modeled using Geant4 application for tomographic emission (v. 9.0). To validate the simulations, PET images were acquired of a cylindrical phantom, point source, and image quality phantom with the modeled system and the simulations of the experimental procedures. For the purpose of validating the quantification capabilities and image quality provided by the simulation pipeline, the simulations were compared against the measurements in terms of their count rates and sensitivity as well as their image uniformity, resolution, recovery coefficients (RCs), coefficients of variation, contrast, and background variability.

RESULTS

When compared to the measured data, the number of true detections in the MC simulations was within 5%. The scatter fraction was found to be 30.0% ± 2.2% and 28.8% ± 1.7% in the measured and simulated scans, respectively. Analyzing the measured and simulated sinograms, the sensitivities were found to be 8.2 and 7.8 cps/kBq, respectively. The fraction of random coincidences were 19% in the measured data and 25% in the simulation. When calculating the image uniformity within the axial slices, the measured image exhibited a uniformity of 0.015 ± 0.005, whereas the simulated image had a uniformity of 0.029 ± 0.011. In the axial direction, the uniformity was measured to be 0.024 ± 0.006 and 0.040 ± 0.015 for the measured and simulated data, respectively. Comparing the image resolution, an average percentage difference of 2.9% was found between the measurements and simulations. The RCs calculated in both the measured and simulated images were found to be within the EARL ranges, except for that of the simulation of the smallest sphere. The coefficients of variation for the measured and simulated images were found to be 12% and 13%, respectively. Lastly, the background variability was consistent between the measurements and simulations, whereas the average percentage difference in the sphere contrasts was found to be 8.8%.

CONCLUSION

The clinical PET/CT system was modeled and validated to provide a simulation pipeline for the community. The pipeline and the validation procedures have been made available (https://github.com/teaghan/PET_MonteCarlo).

The potential of a medium-cost long axial FOV PET system for nuclear medicine departments

PURPOSE

Total body positron emission tomography (TB-PET) has recently been introduced in nuclear medicine departments. There is a large interest in these systems, but for many centers, the high acquisition cost makes it very difficult to justify their current operational budget. Here, we propose medium-cost long axial FOV scanners as an alternative.

METHODS

Several medium-cost long axial FOV designs are described with their advantages and drawbacks. We describe their potential for higher throughput, more cost-effective scanning, a larger group of indications, and novel research opportunities. The wider spread of TB-PET can also lead to the fast introduction of new tracers (at a low dose), new methodologies, and optimized workflows.

CONCLUSIONS

A medium-cost TB-PET would be positioned between the current standard PET-CT and the full TB-PET systems in investment but recapitulate most advantages of full TB-PET. These systems could be more easily justified financially in a standard academic or large private nuclear medicine department and still have ample research options.

Physical performance of adaptive axial FOV PET scanners with a sparse detector block rings or a checkerboard configuration

Objective. Using Monte-Carlo simulations, we evaluated the physical performance of a hypothetical state-of-the-art clinical PET scanner with adaptive axial field-of-view (AFOV) based on the validated GATE model of the Siemens Biograph VisionTM PET/CT scanner. Approach. Vision consists of 16 compact PET rings, each consisting of 152 mini-blocks of 5 × 5 Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate crystals (3.2 × 3.2 × 20 mm3). The Vision 25.6 cm AFOV was extended by adopting (i) a sparse mini-block ring (SBR) configuration of 49.6 cm AFOV, with all mini-block rings interleaved with 16 mm axial gaps, or (ii) a sparse mini-block checkerboard (SCB) configuration of 51.2 cm AFOV, with all mini-blocks interleaved with gaps of 16 mm (transaxial) × 16 mm (axial) width in checkerboard pattern. For sparse configurations, a ‘limited’ continuous bed motion (limited-CBM) acquisition was employed to extend AFOVs by 2.9 cm. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, image quality (IQ), NECR and scatter fraction were assessed per NEMA NU2-2012. Main Results. All IQ phantom spheres were distinguishable with all configurations. SBR and SCB percent contrast recovery (% CR) and background variability (% BV) were similar (p-value > 0.05). Compared to Vision, SBR and SCB %CRs were similar (p-values > 0.05). However, SBR and SCB %BVs were deteriorated by 30% and 26% respectively (p-values < 0.05). SBR, SCB and Vision exhibited system sensitivities of 16.6, 16.8, and 15.8 kcps MBq−1, NECRs of 311 kcps @35 kBq cc−1, 266 kcps @25.8 kBq cc−1, and 260 kcps @27.8 kBq cc−1, and scatter fractions of 31.2%, 32.4%, and 32.6%, respectively. SBR and SCB exhibited a smoother sensitivity reduction and noise enhancement rate from AFOV center to its edges. SBR and SCB attained comparable spatial resolution in all directions (p-value > 0.05), yet, up to 1.5 mm worse than Vision (p-values < 0.05). Significance. The proposed sparse configurations may offer a clinically adoptable solution for cost-effective adaptive AFOV PET with either highly-sensitive or long-AFOV acquisitions.

Monte Carlo evaluation of hypothetical long axial field-of-view PET scanner using GE discovery MI PET front-end architecture

PURPOSE

The development of total-body PET scanners is of growing interest in the PET community. Investigation into the imaging properties of a hypothetical extended axial field-of-view (AFOV) GE Healthcare SiPM-based Discovery MI (DMI) system architecture has not yet been performed. In this work, we assessed its potential as a whole-body scanner using Monte Carlo simulations. The aim of this work was to (1) develop and validate a Monte Carlo model of a 4-ring scanner and (2) extend its AFOV up to 2 m to evaluate performance gain through NEMA-based evaluation.

METHODS

The DMI 4-ring geometry and its pulse digitization scheme were modeled within the GATE Monte Carlo platform using published literature. The GATE scanner model was validated by comparing results against published NEMA performance measurements. Following the validation of the 4-ring model, the model was extended to simulate 8, 20, 30, and 40-ring systems. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, NECR, and scatter fraction were characterized with modified NEMA NU-2 2018 standards; however, the image quality measurements were not acquired due to computational limitations. Spatial resolutions were simulated for all scanner ring configurations using point sources to examine the effects of parallax errors. NEMA count rates were estimated using a standard 70 cm scatter phantom and an extended version of scatter phantom of length 200 cm with (1-800) MBq of ¹⁸ F for all scanners. Sensitivity was evaluated using NEMA methods with a 70 cm standard and a 200 cm long line source.

RESULTS

The average FWHM of the radial/tangential/axial spatial resolution reconstructed with filtered back-projection at 1 and 10 cm from the scanner center were 3.94/4.10/4.41 mm and 5.29/4.89/5.90 mm for the 4-ring scanner. Sensitivity was determined to be 14.86 cps/kBq at the center of the FOV for the 4-ring scanner using a 70 cm line source. Sensitivity enhancement up to 21-fold and 60-fold were observed for 1 m and 2 m AFOV scanners compared to 4-ring scanner using a 200 cm long line source. Spatial resolution simulations in a 2 m AFOV scanner suggest a maximum degradation of ∼23.8% in the axial resolution compared to the 4-ring scanner. However, the transverse resolution was found to be relatively constant when increasing the axial acceptance angle up to ±70°. The peak NECR was 212.92 kcps at 22.70 kBq/mL with a scatter fraction of 38.9% for a 4-ring scanner with a 70 cm scatter phantom. Comparison of peak NECR using the 200 cm long scatter phantom relative to the 4-ring scanner resulted in a NECR gain of 15 for the 20-ring and 28 for the 40-ring geometry. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, and scatter fraction showed an agreement within ∼7% compared with published measured values.

CONCLUSIONS

The 4-ring DMI scanner simulation was successfully validated against published NEMA measurements. Sensitivity and NECR performance of extended 1 and 2 meters AFOV scanners based upon the DMI architecture were subsequently simulated. Increases in sensitivity and count-rate performance are consistent with prior simulation studies utilizing extensions of the Siemens mCT architecture and published NEMA measurements with the uEXPLORER system. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Unparalleled and revolutionary impact of PET imaging on research and day to day practice of medicine

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is the most quantitative modality for assessing disease activity at the molecular and cellular levels, and therefore, it allows monitoring its course and determining the efficacy of various therapeutic interventions. In this scientific communication, we describe the unparalleled and revolutionary impact of PET imaging on research and day to day practice of medicine. We emphasize the critical importance of the development and synthesis of novel radiotracers (starting from the enormous impact of F-Fluorodeouxyglucose (FDG) introduced by investigators at the University of Pennsylvania (PENN)) and PET instrumentation. These innovations have led to the total-body PET systems enabling dynamic and parametric molecular imaging of all organs in the body simultaneously. We also present our perspectives for future development of molecular imaging by multiphoton PET systems that will enable users to extract substantial information (owing to the evolving role of positronium imaging) about the related molecular and biological bases of various disorders, which are unachievable by the current PET imaging techniques.

Simulating NEMA characteristics of the modular total-body J-PET scanner-an economic total-body PET from plastic scintillators

The purpose of the presented research is estimation of the performance characteristics of the economic total-body Jagiellonian-PET system (TB-J-PET) constructed from plastic scintillators. The characteristics are estimated according to the NEMA NU-2-2018 standards utilizing the GATE package. The simulated detector consists of 24 modules, each built out of 32 plastic scintillator strips (each with cross section of 6 mm times 30 mm and length of 140 or 200 cm) arranged in two layers in regular 24-sided polygon circumscribing a circle with the diameter of 78.6 cm. For the TB-J-PET with an axial field-of-view (AFOV) of 200 cm, a spatial resolutions (SRs) of 3.7 mm (transversal) and 4.9 mm (axial) are achieved. The noise equivalent count rate (NECR) peak of 630 kcps is expected at 30 kBq cc^-1. Activity concentration and the sensitivity at the center amounts to 38 cps kBq^-1. The scatter fraction (SF) is estimated to 36.2 %. The values of SF and SR are comparable to those obtained for the state-of-the-art clinical PET scanners and the first total-body tomographs: uExplorer and PennPET. With respect to the standard PET systems with AFOV in the range from 16 to 26 cm, the TB-J-PET is characterized by an increase in NECR approximately by factor of 4 and by the increase of the whole-body sensitivity by factor of 12.6 to 38. The time-of-flight resolution for the TB-J-PET is expected to be at the level of CRT = 240 ps full width at half maximum. For the TB-J-PET with an AFOV of 140 cm, an image quality of the reconstructed images of a NEMA IEC phantom was presented with a contrast recovery coefficient and a background variability parameters. The increase of the whole-body sensitivity and NECR estimated for the TB-J-PET with respect to current commercial PET systems makes the TB-J-PET a promising cost-effective solution for the broad clinical applications of total-body PET scanners. TB-J-PET may constitute an economic alternative for the crystal TB-PET scanners, since plastic scintillators are much cheaper than BGO or LYSO crystals and axial arrangement of the strips significantly reduces the costs of readout electronics and SiPMs.

Performance Characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system with long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2-2018 Standard

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers) PET/CT system. This new system is based on the Siemens Biograph Vision 600, using the same silicon photomultiplier-based detectors with 3.2×3.2×20-mm lutetium-oxoorthosilicate crystals. The Quadra's 32 detector rings provide a fourfold larger axial field of view (AFOV) of 106 cm, enabling imaging of major organs in one bed position. Methods: Physical performance of the scanner was evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2018 standard with additional experiments to characterize energy resolution. Image quality was assessed with foreground to background ratios of 4:1 and 8:1. Additionally, a clinical ¹⁸F-FDG-PET study was reconstructed with varying frame durations. In all experiments, data were acquired using the Quadra's maximum ring distance of 322 crystals (MRD 322), while image reconstructions could only be performed with a maximum ring distance of 85 crystals rings (MRD 85). Results: The spatial resolution at full width half maximum in radial, tangential and axial directions were 3.3, 3.4 and 3.8 mm respectively. The sensitivity was 83 cps/kBq for MRD 85 and 176 cps/kBq for MRD 322. The NECRs at peak were 1613 kcps for MRD 85 and 2956 kcps for MRD 322, both at 27.5 kBq/mL. The respective scatter fractions at peak NECR equaled 36 % and 37 %. The TOF resolution at peak NECR was 228 ps for MRD 85 and 230 ps for MRD 322. Image contrast recovery ranged from 69.6% to 86.9 % for 4:1 contrast ratios and from 77.7 % to 92.6 % for 8:1 contrast ratios reconstructed using PSF-TOF with 8 iterations and 5 subsets. Thirty seconds frames provided readable lesion detectability and acceptable noise levels in clinical images. Conclusion: The Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT has similar spatial and time resolution compared to the Biograph Vision 600 but exhibits improved sensitivity and NECR due to its extended AFOV. The reported spatial resolution, time resolution, and sensitivity makes it a competitive new device in the class of PET-scanners with extended AFOV.

Pitfalls on PET/MRI

A decade of PET/MRI clinical imaging has passed and many of the pitfalls are similar to those on earlier studies. However, techniques to overcome them have emerged and continue to develop. Although clinically significant lung nodules are demonstrable, smaller nodules may be detected using ultrashort/zero echo-time (TE) lung MRI. Fast reconstruction ultrashort TE sequences have also been used to achieve high-resolution lung MRI even with free-breathing. The introduction and improvement of time-of-flight scanners and increasing the axial length of the PET detector arrays have more than doubled the sensitivity of the PET part of the system. MRI for attenuation correction has provided many potential pitfalls, including misclassification of tissue classes based on MRI information for attenuation correction. Although the use of short echo times have helped to address these pitfalls, one of the most exciting developments has been the use of deep learning algorithms and computational neural networks to rapidly provide soft tissue, fat, bone and air information for the attenuation correction as a supplement to the attenuation correction information from fat-water imaging. Challenges with motion correction, particularly respiratory and cardiac remain but are being addressed with respiratory monitors and using PET data. In order to address truncation artefacts, the system manufacturers have developed methods to extend the MR field-of-view for the purpose of the attenuation and scatter corrections. General pitfalls like stitching of body sections for individual studies, optimum delivery of images for viewing and reporting, and resource implications for the sheer volume of data generated remain Methods to overcome these pitfalls serve as a strong foundation for the future of PET/MRI. Advances in the underlying technology with significant evolution in hard-ware and software and the exiting developments in use of deep learning algorithms and computational neural networks will drive the next decade of PET/MRI imaging.

Scanner Design Considerations for Long Axial Field-of-View PET Systems

This article describes aspects of PET scanner design for long axial field-of-view systems and how these choices have an impact on scanner performance.

Polaroid-PET: a PET scanner with detectors fitted with Polaroid for filtering unpolarized optical photons-a Monte Carlo simulation study

We propose and evaluate the performance of an improved preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanner design, referred to as Polaroid-PET, consisting of a detector equipped with a layer of horizontal Polaroid to filter scintillation photons with vertical polarization. This makes it possible to improve the spatial resolution of PET scanners based on monolithic crystals. First, a detector module based on a lutetium-yttrium orthosilicate monolithic crystal with 10 mm thickness and silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) was implemented in the GEANT4 Monte Carlo toolkit. Subsequently, a layer of Polaroid was inserted between the crystal and the SiPMs. Two preclinical PET scanners based on ten detector modules with and without Polaroid were simulated. The performance of the proposed detector modules and corresponding PET scanner for the two configurations (with and without Polaroid) was assessed using standard performance parameters, including spatial resolution, sensitivity, optical photon ratio detected for positioning, and image quality. The detector module fitted with Polaroid led to higher spatial resolution (1.05 mm FWHM) in comparison with a detector without Polaroid (1.30 mm FHWM) for a point source located at the center of the detector module. From 100% of optical photons produced in the scintillator crystal, 65% and 66% were used for positioning in the detectors without and with Polaroid, respectively. Polaroid-PET resulted in higher axial spatial resolution (0.83 mm FWHM) compared to the scanner without Polaroid (1.01 mm FWHM) for a point source at the center of the field of view (CFOV). The absolute sensitivity at the CFOV was 4.37% and 4.31% for regular and Polaroid-PET, respectively. Planar images of a grid phantom demonstrated the potential of the detector with a Polaroid in distinguishing point sources located at close distances. Our results indicated that Polaroid-PET may improve spatial resolution by filtering the reflected optical photons according to their polarization state, while retaining the high sensitivity expected with monolithic crystal detector blocks.

Performance Characteristics of Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanners with Axial Gaps

The introduction of long (>60 cm) axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET systems has shown their potential for clinical and research applications. LAFOV scanners are expensive, so there is interest in designing systems with longer axial coverage while mitigating cost by introducing detector gaps. We used measurements on the PennPET Explorer (64-cm AFOV prototype) and simulations of scanners up to 143-cm long to assess scanner performance with axial gaps introduced by varying the number of detector rows in each ring. Removing detectors reduces the total sensitivity and results in a non-uniform axial noise profile. Axial resolution shows small (<0.5 mm) loss from the edge of the AFOV to the center, even for a 143-cm AFOV scanner with an unrestricted acceptance angle. The presence of large axial gaps increases the variability in axial resolution and contrast recovery across the AFOV compared to a system without gaps. More modest axial gaps show less variable behavior. The results suggest that designs where the gap is no larger than one-half of the width of a detector ring may be preferred, although the optimal choice of scanner design with the trade-offs of performance and AFOV will depend on its intended usage.

Quantifying bias and precision of kinetic parameter estimation on the PennPET Explorer, a long axial field-of-view scanner

Long axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET scanners allow for full-body dynamic imaging in a single bed-position at very high sensitivity. However, the benefits for kinetic parameter estimation have yet to be studied. This work uses (1) a dynamic GATE simulation of [¹⁸F]-fluorothymidine (FLT) in a modified NEMA IQ phantom and (2) a lesion embedding study of spheres in a dynamic [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) human subject imaged on the PennPET Explorer. Both studies were designed using published kinetic data of lung and liver cancers and modeled using two tissue compartments. Data were reconstructed at various emulated doses. Sphere time-activity curves (TACs) were measured on resulting dynamic images, and TACs were fit using a two-tissue-compartment model (k₄ ≠ 0) for the FLT study and both a two-tissue-compartment model (k₄ = 0) and Patlak graphical analysis for the FDG study to estimate flux (K_i) and delivery (K₁) parameters. Quantification of flux and K1 shows lower bias and better precision for both radiotracers on the long AFOV scanner, especially at low doses. Dynamic imaging on a long AFOV system can be achieved for a greater range of injected doses, as low as 0.5-2 mCi depending on the sphere size and flux, compared to a standard AFOV scanner, while maintaining good kinetic parameter estimation.

Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives

Dynamic PET (dPET) studies have been used until now primarily within research purposes. Although it is generally accepted that the information provided by dPET is superior to that of conventional static PET acquisitions acquired usually 60 min post injection of the radiotracer, the duration of dynamic protocols, the limited axial field of view (FOV) of current generation clinical PET systems covering a relatively small axial extent of the human body for a dynamic measurement, and the complexity of data evaluation have hampered its implementation into clinical routine. However, the development of new-generation PET/CT scanners with an extended FOV as well as of more sophisticated evaluation software packages that offer better segmentation algorithms, automatic retrieval of the arterial input function, and automatic calculation of parametric imaging, in combination with dedicated shorter dynamic protocols, will facilitate the wider use of dPET. This is expected to aid in oncological diagnostics and therapy assessment. The aim of this review is to present some general considerations about dPET analysis in oncology by means of kinetic modeling, based on compartmental and noncompartmental approaches, and parametric imaging. Moreover, the current clinical applications and future perspectives of the modality are outlined.