1
|
Hrbacek J, Kacperek A, Beenakker JWM, Mortimer L, Denker A, Mazal A, Shih HA, Dendale R, Slopsema R, Heufelder J, Mishra KK. PTCOG Ocular Statement: Expert Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in Ocular Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00748-X. [PMID: 38971383 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
Although rare cancers, ocular tumors are a threat to vision, quality of life, and potentially life expectancy of a patient. Ocular proton therapy (OPT) is a powerful tool for successfully treating this disease. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Ocular Group) formulated an Evidence and Expert-Based Executive Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in OPT: comparative dosimetric and clinical analysis with the different OPT systems is essential to set up planning guidelines, implement best practices, and establish benchmarks for eye preservation, vision, and quality of life measures. Contemporary prospective trials in select subsets of patients (eg, tumors near the optic disc and/or macula) may allow for dosimetric and clinical analysis between different radiation modalities and beamline systems to evaluate differences in radiation delivery and penumbra, and resultant tumor control, normal tissue complication rates, and overall clinical cost-effectiveness. To date, the combination of multimodal imaging (fundus photography, ultrasound, etc), ophthalmologist assessment, and clip surgery with radiation planning have been keys to successful treatment. Increased use of three-dimensional imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) is anticipated although its spatial resolution might be a limiting factor (eg, detection of flat diffuse tumor parts). Commercially produced ocular treatment-planning systems are under development and their future use is expected to expand across OPT centers. Future continuity of OPT will depend on the following: (1) maintaining and upgrading existing older dedicated low-energy facilities, (2) maintaining shared, degraded beamlines at large proton therapy centers, and (3) developing adapted gantry beams of sufficient quality to maintain the clinical benefits of sharp beam conformity. Option (1) potentially offers the sharpest beams, minimizing impact on healthy tissues, whereas (2) and (3) potentially offer the advantage of substantial long-term technical support and development as well as the introduction of new approaches. Significant patient throughputs and close cooperation between medical physics, ophthalmology, and radiation therapy, underpinned by mutual understanding, is crucial for a successful OPT service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hrbacek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
| | | | - Jan-Willem M Beenakker
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Linda Mortimer
- Medical Physics Department, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Birkenhead, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Denker
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Proton Therapy (BE-APT), Berlin, Germany
| | - Alejandro Mazal
- Medical Physics Service, Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Helen A Shih
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie Protontherapy Center, Orsay, France
| | - Roelf Slopsema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory Proton Therapy Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jens Heufelder
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BerlinProtonen am HZB, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kavita K Mishra
- Proton Ocular Radiation Therapy Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Osher Center for Integrative Health, Osher Foundation Endowed Chair in Clinical Programs in Integrative Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shi D, Ming X, Wang K, Wang X, Sheng Y, Jia S, Zhang J. Robot-assisted system for non-invasive wide-range flexible eye positioning and tracking in particle radiotherapy. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024:10.1007/s13246-024-01453-6. [PMID: 38922382 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01453-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
Particle (proton, carbon ion, or others) radiotherapy for ocular tumors is highly dependent on precise dose distribution, and any misalignment can result in severe complications. The proposed eye positioning and tracking system (EPTS) was designed to non-invasively position eyeballs and is reproducible enough to ensure accurate dose distribution by guiding gaze direction and tracking eye motion. Eye positioning was performed by guiding the gaze direction with separately controlled light sources. Eye tracking was performed by a robotic arm with cameras and a mirror. The cameras attached to its end received images through mirror reflection. To maintain a light weight, certain materials, such as carbon fiber, were utilized where possible. The robotic arm was controlled by a robot operating system. The robotic arm, turntables, and light source were actively and remotely controlled in real time. The videos captured by the cameras could be annotated, saved, and loaded into software. The available range of gaze guidance is 360° (azimuth). Weighing a total of 18.55 kg, the EPTS could be installed or uninstalled in 10 s. The structure, motion, and electromagnetic compatibility were verified via experiments. The EPTS shows some potential due to its non-invasive wide-range flexible eye positioning and tracking, light weight, non-collision with other equipment, and compatibility with CT imaging and dose delivery. The EPTS can also be remotely controlled in real time and offers sufficient reproducibility. This system is expected to have a positive impact on ocular particle radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dequan Shi
- Department of Instrument Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China
| | - Xue Ming
- Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
- Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, 200433, Shanghai, China
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of radiation oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
| | - Kundong Wang
- Department of Instrument Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jinan People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
| | - Xu Wang
- Department of Instrument Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China
| | - Yinxiangzi Sheng
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of radiation oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
| | - Shouqiang Jia
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jinan People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jinzhong Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jinan People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thariat J, Martel A, Matet A, Loria O, Kodjikian L, Nguyen AM, Rosier L, Herault J, Nahon-Estève S, Mathis T. Non-Cancer Effects following Ionizing Irradiation Involving the Eye and Orbit. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051194. [PMID: 35267502 PMCID: PMC8909862 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The irradiation of tumors involving the eye or orbit represents a complex therapeutic challenge due to the proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation. The challenges include tumor control, as it is often a surrogate for survival; organ (usually the eyeball) preservation; and the minimization of damage of sensitive tissues surrounding the tumor in order to preserve vision. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. The aim of the present review is to report the non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality. The pros and cons of conventional and advanced forms of radiation techniques and their clinical implementation are provided with a clinical perspective. Abstract The eye is an exemplarily challenging organ to treat when considering ocular tumors. It is at the crossroads of several major aims in oncology: tumor control, organ preservation, and functional outcomes including vision and quality of life. The proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation damage explain these challenges. Given a high enough dose of radiation, virtually any cancer will be destroyed with radiotherapy. Yet, the doses inevitably absorbed by normal tissues may lead to complications, the likelihood of which increases with the radiation dose and volume of normal tissues irradiated. Precision radiotherapy allows personalized decision-making algorithms based on patient and tumor characteristics by exploiting the full knowledge of the physics, radiobiology, and the modifications made to the radiotherapy equipment to adapt to the various ocular tumors. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. Radiation can damage the lacrimal gland, eyelashes/eyelids, cornea, lens, macula/retina, optic nerves and chiasma, each having specific dose–response characteristics. The present review is a report of non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534—ARCHADE, Unicaen—Université de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| | - Arnaud Martel
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- Laboratoire de Pathologie Clinique et Expérimentale, Biobank BB-0033-00025, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Alexandre Matet
- Service d’Oncologie Oculaire, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Olivier Loria
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurent Kodjikian
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Anh-Minh Nguyen
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurence Rosier
- Centre Rétine Galien, Centre d’Exploration et de Traitement de la Rétine et de la Macula, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Joël Herault
- Service de Radiothérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Sacha Nahon-Estève
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- INSERM, Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, 06200 Nice, France
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gollrad J, Rabsahl C, Riechardt AI, Heufelder J, Stroux A, Goerling U, Joussen A, Budach V, Boehmer D. Quality of life and treatment-related burden during ocular proton therapy: a prospective trial of 131 patients with uveal melanoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:174. [PMID: 34496895 PMCID: PMC8425039 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01902-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton beam therapy is a well-established treatment option for patients with uveal melanoma (UM). The treatment procedure, in general, includes placing radiopaque clips to ensure exact eye-positioning during radiotherapy, followed by the delivery of proton irradiation. The short-term burden associated with proton therapy in patients with UM has rarely been addressed. In this prospective study, we investigated the physiological and psychological aspects of proton therapy that might affect the well-being of patients during the different stages of treatment. METHODS During the treatment procedure, we conducted longitudinal assessments of the Quality of life (QOL), organ-specific symptoms, and psychological aspects in patients with UM with three questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-OPT30, and GAD-7). Patients completed questionnaires before clip surgery (T0), before proton therapy (T1), after completing treatment (T2), and three months after treatment completion (T3). We also collected data on tumor characteristics and socio-demographics to identify potential risk factors associated with high treatment burdens. RESULTS We prospectively included 131 consecutive patients. Questionnaire data showed a significant, temporary decline in global QOL and an increase in eye-related symptoms, as a result of the clip surgery (T0-T1). After treatment completion (T2), global QOL improved gradually, and none of the eye-related symptoms significantly deteriorated over the course of proton therapy. The global QOL returned to baseline levels three months after treatment (T3). We identified baseline anxiety as an independent risk factor for experiencing an acute treatment-related burden. Furthermore, we found interactions between GAD7 and patient sex showing that anxiety had a more pronounced effect on QOL outcome in female patients. CONCLUSION The short-term treatment-related burden of ocular proton therapy appeared to be largely associated with the preceding clip surgery, rather than the irradiation procedure. We found that anxiety was strongly associated with experiencing QOL issues during the treatment procedure. Our findings could contribute to the development of future strategies for improving the treatment process and psycho-oncologic patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Gollrad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christopher Rabsahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jens Heufelder
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Stroux
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Goerling
- Department of Psycho-Oncology, CCCC, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonia Joussen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Boehmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fleury E, Trnková P, Erdal E, Hassan M, Stoel B, Jaarma‐Coes M, Luyten G, Herault J, Webb A, Beenakker J, Pignol J, Hoogeman M. Three-dimensional MRI-based treatment planning approach for non-invasive ocular proton therapy. Med Phys 2021; 48:1315-1326. [PMID: 33336379 PMCID: PMC7986198 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based treatment planning approach for uveal melanomas (UM) in proton therapy. MATERIALS/METHODS For eight patients with UM, a segmentation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs) was performed on T1- and T2-weighted 7 Tesla MRI image data to reconstruct the patient MR-eye. An extended contour was defined with a 2.5-mm isotropic margin derived from the GTV. A broad beam algorithm, which we have called πDose, was implemented to calculate relative proton absorbed doses to the ipsilateral OARs. Clinically favorable gazing angles of the treated eye were assessed by calculating a global weighted-sum objective function, which set penalties for OARs and extreme gazing angles. An optimizer, which we have named OPT'im-Eye-Tool, was developed to tune the parameters of the functions for sparing critical-OARs. RESULTS In total, 441 gazing angles were simulated for every patient. Target coverage including margins was achieved in all the cases (V95% > 95%). Over the whole gazing angles solutions space, maximum dose (Dmax ) to the optic nerve and the macula, and mean doses (Dmean ) to the lens, the ciliary body and the sclera were calculated. A forward optimization was applied by OPT'im-Eye-Tool in three different prioritizations: iso-weighted, optic nerve prioritized, and macula prioritized. In each, the function values were depicted in a selection tool to select the optimal gazing angle(s). For example, patient 4 had a T2 equatorial tumor. The optimization applied for the straight gazing angle resulted in objective function values of 0.46 (iso-weighted situation), 0.90 (optic nerve prioritization) and 0.08 (macula prioritization) demonstrating the impact of that angle in different clinical approaches. CONCLUSIONS The feasibility and suitability of a 3D MRI-based treatment planning approach have been successfully tested on a cohort of eight patients diagnosed with UM. Moreover, a gaze-angle trade-off dose optimization with respect to OARs sparing has been developed. Further validation of the whole treatment process is the next step in the goal to achieve both a non-invasive and a personalized proton therapy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Fleury
- Department of Radiation OncologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiation OncologyHollandPTCDelftThe Netherlands
| | - P. Trnková
- Department of Radiation OncologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiation OncologyHollandPTCDelftThe Netherlands
| | - E. Erdal
- Department of Radiation OncologyHollandPTCDelftThe Netherlands
| | - M. Hassan
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - B. Stoel
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - M. Jaarma‐Coes
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - G. Luyten
- Department of OphthalmologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J. Herault
- Department of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | - A. Webb
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J.‐W. Beenakker
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of OphthalmologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J.‐P. Pignol
- Department of Radiation OncologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
| | - M. Hoogeman
- Department of Radiation OncologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiation OncologyHollandPTCDelftThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Via R, Hennings F, Pica A, Fattori G, Beer J, Peroni M, Baroni G, Lomax A, Weber DC, Hrbacek J. Potential and pitfalls of 1.5T MRI imaging for target volume definition in ocular proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 154:53-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|