Systematic and random errors of PET‐based 90 Y 3D dose quantification

Intraprocedural C-arm dual-phase cone-beam enhancement patterns correlate with tumor absorbed dose after radioembolization

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown a clear relationship between absorbed dose and tumor response to treatment after hepatic radioembolization. These findings help to create more personalized treatment planning and dosimetry. However, crucial to this goal is the ability to predict the dose distribution prior to treatment. The microsphere distribution is ultimately determined by (i) the hepatic vasculature and the resulting blood flow dynamics and (ii) the catheter position.

PURPOSE

To show that pretreatment, intra-procedural imaging of blood flow patterns, as quantified by catheter-directed intra-arterial contrast enhancement, correlate with posttreatment microsphere accumulation and, consequently, absorbed dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who participated in a clinical trial (NCT01177007) and for whom both a pretreatment dual-phase contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT (CBCT) and a posttreatment 90Y PET/CT scan were available were included in this retrospective study. Tumors and perfused volumes were manually delineated on the CBCT by an experienced radiologist. The mean, sum, and standard deviation of the voxels in each volume were recorded. The delineations were transferred to the PET-based absorbed dose maps by coregistration of the corresponding CTs. Linear multiple regression was used to correlate pretreatment CBCT enhancement to posttreatment 90Y PET/CT-based absorbed dose in each region. Leave-one-out cross-validation and Bland-Altman analyses were performed on the predicted versus measured absorbed doses.

RESULTS

Nine patients, with a total of 23 tumors were included. All presented with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Visually, all patients had a clear correspondence between CBCT enhancement and absorbed dose. The correlation between CBCT enhancement and posttherapy absorbed tumor dose based was strong (R2 = 0.91), and moderate for the non-tumor liver tissue (R2 = 0.61). Limits of agreement were approximately ±55 Gray for tumor tissue.

CONCLUSION

There is a linear relationship between pretreatment blood dynamics in HCC tumors and posttreatment absorbed dose, which, if shown to be generalizable, allows for pretreatment tumor absorbed dose prediction.

The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for permanent implant brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for liver tumors

PURPOSE

To develop a multidisciplinary consensus for high quality multidisciplinary implementation of brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE) for primary and metastatic cancers in the liver.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and colleagues with multidisciplinary expertise in liver tumor therapy formulated guidelines for 90Y TARE for unresectable primary liver malignancies and unresectable metastatic cancer to the liver. The consensus is provided on the most recent literature and clinical experience.

RESULTS

The ABS strongly recommends the use of 90Y microsphere brachytherapy for the definitive/palliative treatment of unresectable liver cancer when recommended by the multidisciplinary team. A quality management program must be implemented at the start of 90Y TARE program development and follow-up data should be tracked for efficacy and toxicity. Patient-specific dosimetry optimized for treatment intent is recommended when conducting 90Y TARE. Implementation in patients on systemic therapy should account for factors that may enhance treatment related toxicity without delaying treatment inappropriately. Further management and salvage therapy options including retreatment with 90Y TARE should be carefully considered.

CONCLUSIONS

ABS consensus for implementing a safe 90Y TARE program for liver cancer in the multidisciplinary setting is presented. It builds on previous guidelines to include recommendations for appropriate implementation based on current literature and practices in experienced centers. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use this document as a guide to formulate their clinical practices and to adopt the most recent dose reporting policies that are critical for a unified outcome analysis of future effectiveness studies.

Impact of contouring methods on pre-treatment and post-treatment dosimetry for the prediction of tumor control and survival in HCC patients treated with selective internal radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the contouring methods on dose metrics and their predictive value on tumor control and survival, in both situations of pre-treatment and post-treatment dosimetry, for patients with advanced HCC treated with SIRT.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients who underwent SIRT between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. Target volumes were delineated using two methods: MRI-based contours manually drawn by a radiologist and then registered on SPECT/CT and PET/CT via deformable registration (Pre-C_MRI and Post-C_MRI), ^99mTc-MAA-SPECT and ⁹⁰Y-microspheres-PET 10% threshold contouring (Pre-C_SPECT and Post-C_PET). The mean absorbed dose (Dm) and the minimal absorbed dose delivered to 70% of the tumor volume (D70) were evaluated with both contouring methods; the tumor-to-normal liver uptake ratio (TNR) was evaluated with MRI-based contours only. Tumor response was assessed using the mRECIST criteria on the follow-up MRIs.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found for Dm and TNR between pre- and post-treatment. TNR evaluated with radiologic contours (Pre-C_MRI and Post-C_MRI) were predictive of tumor control at 6 months on pre- and post-treatment dosimetry (OR 5.9 and 7.1, respectively; p = 0.02 and 0.01). All dose metrics determined with both methods were predictive of overall survival (OS) on pre-treatment dosimetry, but only Dm with MRI-based contours was predictive of OS on post-treatment images with a median of 23 months for patients with a supramedian Dm versus 14 months for the others (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In advanced HCC treated with SIRT, Dm and TNR determined with radiologic contours were predictive of tumor control and OS. This study shows that a rigorous clinical workflow (radiologic contours + registration on scintigraphic images) is feasible and should be prospectively considered for improving therapeutic strategy.

Lung shunt and lung dose calculation methods for radioembolization treatment planning

Radioembolization, also known as selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), is firmly established in the management of patients with unresectable liver cancers. Advances in normal and tumor liver dosimetry and new knowledge about tumor dose response relationships have helped promote the safe use of higher prescribed doses, consequently transitioning radioembolization from palliative to curative therapy. The lungs are considered a critical organ of risk for radioembolization treatment planning. Unfortunately, lung dosimetry has not achieved similar advances in dose calculation methodology as liver dosimetry. Current estimations of lung dose are dependent on a number of parameters associated with data acquisition and processing algorithms, leading to poor accuracy and precision. Therefore, the efficacy of curative radioembolization may be compromised in patients for whom the lung dose derived using currently available methods unnecessarily limits the desired administered activity to the liver. We present a systematic review of the various methods of determining the lung shunt fraction (LSF) and lung mean dose (LD). This review encompasses pretherapy estimations and post-therapy assessments of the LSF and LD using both 2D planar and 3D SPECT/CT based calculations. The advantages and limitations of each of these methods are deliberated with a focus on accuracy and practical considerations. We conclude the review by presenting a lexicon to precisely describe the methodology used for the estimation of LSF and LD; specifically, category, agent, modality, contour and algorithm, in order to aid in their interpretation and standardization in routine clinical practice.