1
|
Berk K, Kron T, Hardcastle N, Yeo AU. Efficacious patient-specific QA for Vertebra SBRT using a high-resolution detector array SRS MapCHECK: AAPM TG-218 analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14276. [PMID: 38414322 PMCID: PMC11163485 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for vertebra stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) presents challenges due to highly modulated small fields with high-dose gradients between the target and spinal cord. This study aims to explore the use of the SRS MapCHECK® (SRSMC) for vertebra SBRT PSQA. METHODS Twenty vertebra SBRT treatment plans including prescriptions 20 Gy/1 fraction and 24 Gy/2 fractions were selected for each of Millennium (M)-Multileaf Collimator (MLC), and high-definition (HD)-MLC. All 40 plans were measured using Gafchromic EBT3 film (film) and SRSMC, using the StereoPHAN phantom. Plan complexity was assessed using modulation complexity score (MCS), edge metric (EM) (mm-1), modulation factor (MU/cGy), and average leaf pair opening (ALPO) (mm) and its correlation with gamma-pass rate was investigated. The high dose gradient between the target and the spinal cord was analyzed for film and SRSMC and compared against the treatment planning system (TPS). Applying the methodology proposed by AAPM TG-218, action and tolerance values specific to the SRSMC for vertebra SBRT were determined for β values ranging from 5 to 8. RESULTS Film and SRSMC gamma-pass rates showed no correlation (p > 0.05). A moderate negative correlation (R = -0.57, p = 0.01) is present between EM and SRSMC 3%/1 mm gamma-pass rate for HD-MLC plans. Both film and SRSMC accurately measured high dose gradients between the target and the spinal cord (R2 > 0.86, p ≤ 0.05). Notably, dose-gradient of HD-MLC plans is 22% steeper and has a smaller standard deviation to M-MLC plans (p ≤ 0.05). Applying TG-218, the film tolerance limit was 96% with action limit 95% for 5%/1 mm (β = 6) and for the SRSMC tolerance limit was 97% with an action limit of 96% for 4%/1 mm (β = 6). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that universal TG-218 limits may not be suitable for vertebra SBRT PSQA. This study demonstrates that SRSMC is a viable tool for vertebra SBRT PSQA, supported by TG-218 implementation of process-based tolerance and action limits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kemal Berk
- Department of Physical SciencesPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical SciencesPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncologythe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNSWAustralia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical SciencesPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncologythe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNSWAustralia
| | - Adam Unjin Yeo
- Department of Physical SciencesPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncologythe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Erickson B, Cui Y, Alber M, Wang C, Fang Yin F, Kirkpatrick J, Adamson J. Independent Monte Carlo dose calculation identifies single isocenter multi-target radiosurgery targets most likely to fail pre-treatment measurement. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14290. [PMID: 38289874 PMCID: PMC11163499 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE For individual targets of single isocenter multi-target (SIMT) Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we assess dose difference between the treatment planning system (TPS) and independent Monte Carlo (MC), and demonstrate persistence into the pre-treatment Quality Assurance (QA) measurement. METHODS Treatment plans from 31 SIMT SRS patients were recalculated in a series of scenarios designed to investigate sources of discrepancy between TPS and independent MC. Targets with > 5% discrepancy in DMean[Gy] after progressing through all scenarios were measured with SRS MapCHECK. A matched pair analysis was performed comparing SRS MapCHECK results for these targets with matched targets having similar characteristics (volume & distance from isocenter) but no such MC dose discrepancy. RESULTS Of 217 targets analyzed, individual target mean dose (DMean[Gy]) fell outside a 5% threshold for 28 and 24 targets before and after removing tissue heterogeneity effects, respectively, while only 5 exceeded the threshold after removing effect of patient geometry (via calculation on StereoPHAN geometry). Significant factors affecting agreement between the TPS and MC included target distance from isocenter (0.83% decrease in DMean[Gy] per 2 cm), volume (0.15% increase per cc), and degree of plan modulation (0.37% increase per 0.01 increase in modulation complexity score). SRS MapCHECK measurement had better agreement with MC than with TPS (2%/1 mm / 10% threshold gamma pass rate (GPR) = 99.4 ± 1.9% vs. 93.1 ± 13.9%, respectively). In the matched pair analysis, targets exceeding 5% for MC versus TPS also had larger discrepancies between TPS and measurement with no GPR (2%/1 mm / 10% threshold) exceeding 90% (71.5% ± 16.1%); whereas GPR was high for matched targets with no such MC versus TPS difference (96.5% ± 3.3%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Independent MC complements pre-treatment QA measurement for SIMT SRS by identifying problematic individual targets prior to pre-treatment measurement, thus enabling plan modifications earlier in the planning process and guiding selection of targets for pre-treatment QA measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett Erickson
- Department of Radiation OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Radiation OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Fang Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - John Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Justus Adamson
- Department of Radiation OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee TK. Technical note: Patient-specific quality assurance for multi-target single-isocenter SRS-A target-specific approach. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38810282 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As radiotherapy techniques advance, so do planning methods for multi-target intracranial SRS cases. Multi-target-single-isocenter (MTSI) planning offers high-precision beam delivery with shortened duration. However, accommodating all targets in a single Patient-Specific-Quality-Assurance (PSQA) with QA devices like SRS MapCHECK (SRS MC) is generally impractical. PURPOSE Consequently, we conducted PSQA, using a custom script, by relocating each Target or Neighboring-Target-Group (T-NTG) relative to the beam isocenter on the PSQA device, ensuring each target's dose coverage at high precision. METHODS SRS treatment plans use 6MV-FFF beams, consisting of four Volumetric Modulated ARC Therapy (VMAT) arcs, including one full-arc and three half arcs with couch-kicks. A custom script calculated T-NTG coordinates relative to the beam isocenter. QA verification plans were created for each T-NTG, redefining the beam isocenter for precise alignment with the center of the SRS MC. CBCT images were acquired during PSQA for SRS MC alignment, and gamma-index analysis (GIA) was performed. A single-tail paired t-test assessed the passing rate (PR) for 75 QA verification plans. RESULTS GIA with l.0 mm/2.0% criteria for each QA plan yielded a PR > 95.5%, with an average of 98.9%. Plans achieving PR > 99.0% and > 97.0% constituted 63% and 92% of studied plans, respectively. Statistical significance was observed in a t-test with an ideal PR value of 100%, while insignificance was found with a PR value of 99%, suggesting that PSQA for individual targets consistently approaches 99% PR. In MTSI cases using 6MV-FFF beams, targets within the lateral dose-fall-off region require careful verification for acceptability. Our clinical study on individual T-NTG relocation demonstrates that the presented PSQA methods are generally acceptable, supported by a statistically insignificant PR against a 99% PR value. CONCLUSIONS Presented statistical analysis results indicate that the proposed PSQA approach can serve as a reliable tool in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Kyu Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University Health Arnett, Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu Q, Fan J, Vinogradskiy Y, Chawla AK, Kubicek G, Yang H, Huynh K, LaCouture T, Grimm J, Nie W. Feasibility of patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for real-time robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) based on tumor motion traces. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14352. [PMID: 38696697 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To design a patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) process for the CyberKnife Synchrony system and quantify its dosimetric accuracy using a motion platform driven by patient tumor traces with rotation. METHODS The CyberKnife Synchrony system was evaluated using a motion platform (MODUSQA) and a SRS MapCHECK phantom. The platform was programed to move in the superior-inferior (SI) direction based on tumor traces. The detector array housed by the StereoPhan was placed on the platform. Extra rotational angles in pitch (head down, 4.0° ± 0.15° or 1.2° ± 0.1°) were added to the moving phantom to examine robot capability of angle correction during delivery. A total of 15 Synchrony patients were performed SBRT PSQA on the moving phantom. All the results were benchmarked by the PSQA results based on static phantom. RESULTS For smaller pitch angles, the mean gamma passing rates were 99.75% ± 0.87%, 98.63% ± 2.05%, and 93.11% ± 5.52%, for 3%/1 mm, 2%/1 mm, and 1%/1 mm, respectively. Large discrepancy in the passing rates was observed for different pitch angles due to limited angle correction by the robot. For larger pitch angles, the corresponding mean passing rates were dropped to 93.00% ± 10.91%, 88.05% ± 14.93%, and 80.38% ± 17.40%. When comparing with the static phantom, no significant statistic difference was observed for smaller pitch angles (p = 0.1 for 3%/1 mm), whereas a larger statistic difference was observed for larger pitch angles (p < 0.02 for all criteria). All the gamma passing rates were improved, if applying shift and rotation correction. CONCLUSIONS The significance of this work is that it is the first study to benchmark PSQA for the CyberKnife Synchrony system using realistically moving phantoms with rotation. With reasonable delivery time, we found it may be feasible to perform PSQA for Synchrony patients with a realistic breathing pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianyi Xu
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jiajin Fan
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashish K Chawla
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - Gregory Kubicek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Haihua Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kiet Huynh
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - Tamara LaCouture
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellstar Health System, Marietta, Georgia, USA
| | - Wei Nie
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
May L, Hardcastle N, Hernandez V, Saez J, Rosenfeld A, Poder J. Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to delivery errors. Med Phys 2024; 51:910-921. [PMID: 38141043 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of modulated techniques for intra-cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) results in highly modulated fields with small apertures, which may be susceptible to uncertainties in the delivery device. PURPOSE This study aimed to quantify the impact of simulated delivery errors on treatment plan dosimetry and how this is affected by treatment planning system (TPS), plan geometry, delivery technique, and plan complexity. A beam modelling error was also included as context to the dose uncertainties due to treatment delivery errors. METHODS Delivery errors were assessed for multiple-target brain SRS plans obtained through the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) international treatment planning challenge (2018). The challenge dataset consisted of five intra-cranial targets, each with a prescription of 20 Gy. Of the final dataset of 54 plans, 51 were created using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique and three used intensity modulated arc therapy (IMRT). Thirty-five plans were from the Varian Eclipse TPS, 17 from Elekta Monaco TPS, and one plan each from RayStation and Philips Pinnacle TPS. The errors introduced included: monitor unit calibration errors, multi-leaf collimator (MLC) bank offset, single MLC leaf offset, couch rotations, and collimator rotations. Dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) error was also included as a beam modelling error. Dose to targets was assessed via dose covering 98% of planning target volume (PTV) (D98%), dose covering 2% of PTV (D2%), and dose covering 99% of gross tumor volume (GTV) (D99%). Dose to organs at risk (OARs) was assessed using the volume of normal brain receiving 12 Gy (V12Gy), mean dose to normal brain, and maximum dose covering 0.03cc brainstem (D0.03cc). Plan complexity was also assessed via edge metric, modulation complexity score (MCS), mean MLC gap, mean MLC speed, and plan modulation (PM). RESULTS PTV D98% showed high robustness on average to most errors with the exception of a bank shift of 1.0 mm and large rotational errors ≥1.0° for either the couch or collimator. However, in some cases, errors close to or within generally accepted machine tolerances resulted in clinically relevant impacts. The greatest impact upon normal brain V12Gy, mean dose to normal brain, and D0.03cc brainstem was found for DLG error in alignment with other recent studies. All delivery errors had on average a minimal impact across these parameters. Comparing plans from the Monaco TPS and the Eclipse TPS, showed a lesser increase to V12Gy, mean dose to normal brain, and D0.03cc brainstem for Monaco plans (p < 0.01) when DLG error was simulated. Monaco plans also correlated to lower plan complexity. Using Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) a strong negative correlation (r ≤ -0.8) was found between the mean MLC gap and dose to OARs for DLG errors. CONCLUSIONS Reducing MLC complexity and using larger mean MLC gaps is recommended to improve plan robustness and reduce sensitivity to delivery and modelling errors. For cases in which the calculated dose distribution or dose indices are close to the clinically acceptable limits, this is especially important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren May
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, North Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, North Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Victor Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Jordi Saez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, North Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Joel Poder
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, North Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- St George Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
- School of Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stedem A, Tutty M, Chofor N, Langhans M, Kleefeld C, Schönfeld AA. Systematic evaluation of spatial resolution and gamma criteria for quality assurance with detector arrays in stereotactic radiosurgery. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14274. [PMID: 38265979 PMCID: PMC10860444 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize detector array spacing and gamma index for quality assurance (QA) of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) deliveries. Use the Nyquist theorem to determine the required detector spacing in SRS fields, and find optimal gamma indices to detect MLC errors using the SRS MapCHECK, ArcCHECK, and a portal imaging device (EPID). METHODS The required detector spacing was determined via Fourier analysis of small radiation fields and profiles of typical SRS treatment plans. The clinical impact of MLC errors of 0.5, 1, and 2 mm was evaluated. Global gamma (low-dose threshold 10%) was evaluated for the three detector systems using various combinations of the distance to agreement and the dose difference. RESULTS While MLC errors only slightly affected mean dose to PTV and a 2 mm thick surrounding structure (PTV_2 mm), significant PTV underdose incurred with increase in maximum dose to PTV_2 mm. Gamma indices with highest sensitivity to the introduced errors at 95% tolerance level for plans on target volumes of 3.2 cm3 (plan 3 cc) and 35.02 cm3 (plan 35 cc) were 2%/1 mm for the SRS MapCHECK and 2%/3 mm for the ArcCHECK, with 3%/1 mm (plan 3cc) and 2%/1 mm (plan 35cc) for the EPID. Drops in passing rates for a 2 mm MLC error were (46.2%, 41.6%) for the SRS MapCHECK and (12.2%, 4.2%) for the ArcCHECK for plan 3cc and plan 35cc, respectively. For Portal Dose, values were 4.5% (plan 3cc) and 7% (plan 35cc). The Nyquist frequency of two SRS dose distributions lie between 0.26 and 0.1 mm-1 , corresponding to detector spacings of 1.9 and 5 mm. Evaluation of SRS MapCHECK data with doubled detector density indicates that increased detector density may reduce the system's sensitivity to errors, necessitating a tighter gamma index. CONCLUSIONS The present results give insight on the performance of detector arrays and gamma indices for the investigated detectors during SRS QA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann‐Kathrin Stedem
- Asklepios Klinik St. GeorgHermann‐Holthusen‐Institut für StrahlentherapieHamburgGermany
| | - Mark Tutty
- Radiotherapy DepartmentBeacon HospitalDublinIreland
| | - Ndimofor Chofor
- Physics Research and OutreachSun NuclearA Mirion Medical CompanyNorderstedtGermany
| | | | - Christoph Kleefeld
- National University of IrelandSchool of PhysicsUniversity RoadGalwayIreland
| | - Andreas A. Schönfeld
- Physics Research and OutreachSun NuclearA Mirion Medical CompanyNorderstedtGermany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schofield A, Newall M, Inwood D, Downes S, Corde S. Commissioning of Aktina SRS cones and dosimetric validation of the RayStation photon Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:1503-1518. [PMID: 37603132 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01315-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Clinical implementation of SRS cones demands particular experimental care and dosimetric considerations in order to deliver precise and safe radiotherapy to patients. The purpose of this work was to present the commissioning data of recent Aktina cones combined with a 6MV flattened beam produced by an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator. Additionally, the modelling process, and an assessment of dosimetric accuracy of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for cone based SRS was performed. There are currently no studies presenting beam data for this equipment and none that outlines the modelling parameters and validation of dose calculation using RayStation's photon Monte Carlo dose engine with cones. Beam data was measured using an SFD and a microDiamond and benchmarked against EBT3 film for cones of diameter 5-39 mm. Modelling was completed and validated within homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms. End-to-end image-guided validation was performed using a StereoPHAN™ housing, an SRS MapCHECK and EBT3 film, and calculation time was investigated as a function of statistical uncertainty and field diameter. The TPS calculations agreed with measured data within their estimated uncertainties and clinical treatment plans could be calculated in under a minute. The data presented serves as a reference for others commissioning Aktina stereotactic cones and the modelling parameters serve similarly, while providing a starting point for those commissioning the same TPS algorithm for use with cones. It has been shown in this work that RayStation's Monte Carlo photon dose algorithm performs satisfactorily in the presence of SRS cones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Schofield
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Matthew Newall
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Dean Inwood
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Simon Downes
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Stéphanie Corde
- Radiation Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
- Illawara Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neupane T, Shang C, Kassel M, Muhammad W, Leventouri T, Williams TR. Viability of the virtual cone technique using a fixed small multi-leaf collimator field for stereotactic radiosurgery of trigeminal neuralgia. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14148. [PMID: 37722766 PMCID: PMC10691631 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Dosimetric uncertainties in very small (≤1.5 × 1.5 cm2 ) photon fields are remarkably higher, which undermines the validity of the virtual cone (VC) technique with a diminutive and variable MLC fields. We evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the VC method with a very small, fixed MLC field setting, called a fixed virtual cone (fVC), for small target radiosurgery such as trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). The fVC is characterized by 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm high-definition (HD) MLC field of 10MV FFF beam defined at 100 cm SAD, while backup jaws are positioned at 1.5 cm x 1.5 cm. A spherical dose distribution equivalent to 5 mm (diameter) physical cone was generated using 10-14 non-coplanar, partial arcs. Dosimetric accuracy was validated using SRS diode (PTW 60018), SRS MapCHECK (SNC) measurements. As a quality assurance measure, 10 treatment plans (SRS) for TGN, consisting of various arc ranges at different collimator angles were analyzed using 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF beams, including a field-by-field study (n = 130 fields). Dose outputs were compared between the Eclipse TPS and measurements (SRS MapCHECK). Moreover, dosimetric changes in the field defining fVC, prompted by a minute (± 0.5-1.0 mm) leaf shift, was examined among TPS, diode measurements, and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The beam model for fVC was validated (≤3% difference) using SRS MapCHECK based absolute dose measurements. The equivalent diameters of the 50% isodose distribution were found comparable to that of a 5 mm cone. Additionally, the comparison of field output factors, dose per MU between the TPS and SRS diode measurements using the fVC field, including ± 1 mm leaf shift, yielded average discrepancies within 5.5% and 3.5% for 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF beams, respectively. Overall, the fVC method is a credible alternative to the physical cone (5 mm) that can be applied in routine radiosurgical treatment of TGN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taindra Neupane
- Department of PhysicsFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonFloridaUSA
| | - Charles Shang
- RSOSouth Florida Proton Therapy InstituteDelray BeachFloridaUSA
| | - Maxwell Kassel
- Department of PhysicsFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonFloridaUSA
| | - Wazir Muhammad
- Department of PhysicsFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonFloridaUSA
| | - Theodora Leventouri
- Center for Biological and Materials Physics (CBAMP)Department of PhysicsFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonFloridaUSA
| | - Timothy R. Williams
- Medical DirectorSouth Florida Proton Therapy InstituteDelray BeachFloridaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malatesta T, Scaggion A, Giglioli FR, Belmonte G, Casale M, Colleoni P, Falco MD, Giuliano A, Linsalata S, Marino C, Moretti E, Richetto V, Sardo A, Russo S, Mancosu P. Patient specific quality assurance in SBRT: a systematic review of measurement-based methods. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:21TR01. [PMID: 37625437 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf43a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
This topical review focuses on Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) approaches to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT requires stricter accuracy than standard radiation therapy due to the high dose per fraction and the limited number of fractions. The review considered various PSQA methods reported in 36 articles between 01/2010 and 07/2022 for SBRT treatment. In particular comparison among devices and devices designed for SBRT, sensitivity and resolution, verification methodology, gamma analysis were specifically considered. The review identified a list of essential data needed to reproduce the results in other clinics, highlighted the partial miss of data reported in scientific papers, and formulated recommendations for successful implementation of a PSQA protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziana Malatesta
- Medical Physics Unit, Department of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology and Radiology, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina-Gemelli Isola Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scaggion
- Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Gina Belmonte
- Medical Physics Department, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | - Michelina Casale
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera 'Santa Maria', Terni, Italy
| | - Paolo Colleoni
- UOC Medical Physics Unit-ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Maria Daniela Falco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 'SS. Annunziata' Hospital, 'G. D'Annunzio' University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Alessia Giuliano
- Medical Physics Unit, Pisa University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana', Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefania Linsalata
- Medical Physics Unit, Pisa University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana', Pisa, Italy
| | - Carmelo Marino
- Medical Physics and Radioprotection Unit, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco (CT), Italy
| | - Eugenia Moretti
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, ASUFC Udine, Italy
| | - Veronica Richetto
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Anna Sardo
- UOSD Medical Physics, ASLCN2, Verduno, Italy
| | - Serenella Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano - Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Khaledi N, Khan R, Gräfe JL. Historical Progress of Stereotactic Radiation Surgery. J Med Phys 2023; 48:312-327. [PMID: 38223793 PMCID: PMC10783188 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_62_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy have established themselves as precise and accurate areas of radiation oncology for the treatment of brain and extracranial lesions. Along with the evolution of other methods of radiotherapy, this type of treatment has been associated with significant advances in terms of a variety of modalities and techniques to improve the accuracy and efficacy of treatment. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the progress in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) over several decades, and includes a review of various articles and research papers, commencing with the emergence of stereotactic techniques in radiotherapy. Key clinical aspects of SRS, such as fixation methods, radiobiology considerations, quality assurance practices, and treatment planning strategies, are presented. In addition, the review highlights the technological advancements in treatment modalities, encompassing the transition from cobalt-based systems to linear accelerator-based modalities. By addressing these topics, this study aims to offer insights into the advancements that have shaped the field of SRS, that have ultimately enhanced the accuracy and effectiveness of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navid Khaledi
- Department of Medical Physics, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Rao Khan
- Department of Physics, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physics and Astronomy and Department of Radiation Oncology, Howard University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - James L. Gräfe
- Department of Physics, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Cancer Care Program, Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Center. 300 Prince Philip Drive St. John’s, NL, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
García‐Fuentes JD, Sevillano D, Colmenares R, Capuz AB, Morís R, Cámara M, Galiano P, Williamson S, Béjar MJ, Prieto D, García‐Vicente F. Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14053. [PMID: 37247259 PMCID: PMC10476977 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The CyberKnife quality assurance (QA) program relies mainly on the use of radiochromic film (RCF). We aimed at evaluating high-resolution arrays of detectors as an alternative to films for CyberKnife machine QA. METHODS This study will test the SRS Mapcheck (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, Florida, USA) diode array and its own software, which allows three tests of the CyberKnife QA program to be performed. The first one is a geometrical accuracy test based on the delivery of two orthogonal beams (Automated Quality Assurance, AQA). Besides comparing the constancy and repeatability of both methods, known errors will be introduced to check their sensitivity. The second checks the constancy of the iris collimator field sizes (Iris QA). Changes in the field sizes will be introduced to study the array sensitivity. The last test checks the correct positioning of the multileaf collimator (MLC). It will be tested introducing known systematic displacements to whole banks and to single leaves. RESULTS The results of the RCF and diode array were equivalent (maximum differences of 0.18 ± 0.14 mm) for the AQA test, showing the array a higher reproducibility. When known errors were introduced, both methods behaved linearly with similar slopes. Regarding Iris QA, the array measurements are highly linear when changes in the field sizes are introduced. Linear regressions show slopes of 0.96-1.17 with r2 above 0.99 in all field sizes. Diode array seems to detect changes of 0.1 mm. In MLC QA, systematic errors of the whole bank of leaves were not detected by the array, while single leaf errors were detected. CONCLUSIONS The diode array is sensitive and accurate in the AQA and Iris QA tests, which give us the possibility of substituting RCF with a diode array. QA would be performed faster than using the film procedure, obtaining reliable results. Regarding the MLC QA, the inability to detect systematic displacements make it difficult to confidently use the detector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Sevillano
- Department of Medical PhysicsHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRyCISMadridSpain
- Department of RadiologyRehabilitation and PhysiotherapyUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
| | - Rafael Colmenares
- Department of Medical PhysicsHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRyCISMadridSpain
| | - Ana B. Capuz
- Department of Medical PhysicsHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRyCISMadridSpain
| | - Rafael Morís
- Department of Medical PhysicsHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRyCISMadridSpain
| | - Miguel Cámara
- Department of Medical PhysicsHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRyCISMadridSpain
| | - Pablo Galiano
- Department of Medical PhysicsHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRyCISMadridSpain
| | - Sandra Williamson
- Department of Medical PhysicsHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRyCISMadridSpain
| | - María J. Béjar
- Department of Medical PhysicsHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRyCISMadridSpain
| | - Daniel Prieto
- Department of Medical PhysicsHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRyCISMadridSpain
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yamada T, Nakano H, Tanabe S, Sakai T, Tanabe S, Oka T, Sakai H, Oshikane T, Nakano T, Ohta A, Kanazawa T, Kaidu M, Ishikawa H. Verification of Qfix Encompass™ couch modeling using the Acuros XB algorithm and HypeArc™ using a high-spatial-resolution two-dimensional diode array. Med Dosim 2023; 48:261-266. [PMID: 37455221 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
We modeled the Qfix Encompass™ immobilization system and further verified the calculated dose distribution of the AcurosXB (AXB) dose calculation algorithm using SRS MapCHECKⓇ (SRSMC) in the HyperArc™ (HA) clinical plan. An Encompass system with a StereoPHAN™ QA phantom was scanned by SOMATOM go.Sim and imported to an Eclipse™ treatment planning system to create a treatment plan for Encompass modeling. The Encompass modeling was performed in the StereoPHAN with a pinpoint ion chamber for 6 MV and 6 MV flattening filter free (6 MV FFF), and 2 × 2 cm2, 4 × 4 cm2, and 6 × 6 cm2 irradiation field sizes. The dose calculation algorithm used was AXB ver. 15.5 with a 1.0 mm calculation grid size. The Hounsfield unit (HU) values of the Encompass modeling were set to 400, -100, -200, and -300 for Encompass, and -400, -600, -700, and -800 for the Encompass base. We evaluated the dose distribution after Encompass modeling by SRSMC using gamma analysis in 12 patients. We adopted HU values of -200 for Encompass, -800 for Encompass base for 6 MV, and -200 for Encompass and -700 for Encompass. Base for 6 MV FFF was adopted as the HU values for the Encompass modeling based on the measurement results. The proposed Encompass modeling resulted in a mean pass rate evaluation >98% for both 6 MV and 6 MV FFF when the 1%/1 mm criterion was used, demonstrating that the proposed HU value can be adopted to calculate more accurate dose distributions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takumi Yamada
- Section of Radiology, Department of Clinical Support, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, 951-8520, Japan
| | - Hisashi Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata 951-8520, Japan; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Tanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata 951-8520, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sakai
- Section of Radiology, Department of Clinical Support, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, 951-8520, Japan
| | - Shunpei Tanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata 951-8520, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Oka
- Section of Radiology, Department of Clinical Support, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, 951-8520, Japan
| | - Hironori Sakai
- Section of Radiology, Department of Clinical Support, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, 951-8520, Japan
| | - Tomoya Oshikane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata 951-8520, Japan
| | - Toshimichi Nakano
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, 951-8122, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ohta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata 951-8520, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Kanazawa
- Section of Radiology, Department of Clinical Support, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, 951-8520, Japan
| | - Motoki Kaidu
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, 951-8122, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ishikawa
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, 951-8122, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baltz GC, Manigold R, Seier R, Kirsner SM. A hybrid method to improve efficiency of patient specific SRS and SBRT QA using 3D secondary dose verification. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13858. [PMID: 36583305 PMCID: PMC10018667 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient Specific QA (PSQA) by direct phantom measurement for all intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) cases is labor intensive and an inefficient use of the Medical Physicist's time. The purpose of this work was to develop a hybrid quality assurance (QA) technique utilizing 3D dose verification as a screening tool to determine if a measurement is necessary. METHODS This study utilized Sun Nuclear DoseCHECK (DC), a 3D secondary verification software, and Fraction 0, a trajectory log IMRT QA software. Twenty-two Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and thirty single isocentre multi-lesion SRS (MLSRS) plans were retrospectively analysed in DC. Agreement of DC and the TPS dose for selected dosimetric criteria was recorded. Calculated 95% confidence limits (CL) were used to establish action limits. All cases were delivered and measured using the Sun Nuclear stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) MapCheck. Trajectory logs of the delivery were used to calculate Fraction 0 results for the same criteria calculated by DC. Correlation of DC and Fraction 0 results were calculated. Phantom measured QA was compared to Fraction 0 QA results for the cases which had DC criteria action limits exceeded. RESULTS Correlation of DC and Fraction 0 results were excellent, demonstrating the same action limits could be used for both and DC can predict Fraction 0 results. Based on the calculated action limits, zero lung SBRT cases and six MLSRS cases were identified as requiring a measurement. All plans that passed the DC screening had a passing measurement based PSQA and agreed with Fraction 0 results. CONCLUSION Using 95% CL action limits of dosimetric criteria, a 3D secondary dose verification can be used to determine if a measurement is required for PSQA. This method is efficient for it is part of the normal clinical workflow when verifying any clinical treatment. In addition, it can drastically reduce the number of measurements needed for PSQA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett C Baltz
- Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Remy Manigold
- Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Richard Seier
- Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ono T, Kido T, Nakamura M, Iramina H, Kakino R, Mizowaki T. Automatic measurement of beam-positioning accuracy at off-isocenter positions. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13844. [PMID: 36420973 PMCID: PMC10018661 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study performed an automatic measurement of the off-axis beam-positioning accuracy at a single isocenter via the TrueBeam Developer mode and evaluated the beam-positioning accuracy considering the effect of couch rotational errors. METHODS TrueBeam STx and the Winston-Lutz test-dedicated phantom, with a 3 mm diameter steel ball, were used in this study. The phantom was placed on the treatment couch, and the Winston-Lutz test was performed at the isocenter for four gantry angles (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°) using an electronic portal imaging device. The phantom offset positions were at distances of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mm from the isocenter along the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and left-right directions. Seventeen patterns of multileaf collimator-shaped square fields of 10 × 10 mm2 were created at the isocenter and off-axis positions for each gantry angle. The beam-positioning accuracy was evaluated with couch rotation along the yaw-axis (0°, ± 0.5°, and ± 1.0°). RESULTS The mean beam-positioning errors at the isocenter and off-isocenter distances (from the isocenter to ±100 mm) were 0.46-0.60, 0.44-0.91, and 0.42-1.11 mm for the couch angles of 0°, ±0.5°, and ±1°, respectively. The beam-positioning errors increased as the distance from the isocenter and couch rotation increased. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that the beam-positioning accuracy at the isocenter and off-isocenter positions can be evaluated quickly and automatically using the TrueBeam Developer mode. The proposed procedure is expected to contribute to an efficient evaluation of the beam-positioning accuracy at off-isocenter positions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Ono
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied TherapyKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Takahisa Kido
- Department of Information Technology and Medical EngineeringHuman Health SciencesGraduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Information Technology and Medical EngineeringHuman Health SciencesGraduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Hiraku Iramina
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied TherapyKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Ryo Kakino
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, OsakaMedical and Pharmaceutical UniversityTakatsukiJapan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied TherapyKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stepanek CJ, Haynes JA, Fletcher S. Evaluation of a complementary metal oxide semiconductor detector as a tool for stereotactic body radiotherapy plan quality assurance. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 25:100418. [PMID: 36755894 PMCID: PMC9900433 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose A sub-mm resolution Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor sensor has been developed for stereotactic radiotherapy quality assurance. Herein we evaluate its basic dosimetric performance and its application for linac C-arm stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plan quality assurance. Materials and methods The detector was integrated into its accompanying phantom or in Water Equivalent Plastic (WEP). The measurement reproducibility, stability, dose linearity and dependence on angularity, dose rate and field size were investigated. Clinical plan measurements were compared to our radiotherapy treatment planning system and radiochromic film. Sensitivity to introduced Multi Leaf Collimator (MLC) offsets was evaluated by simulating single MLC offsets in SBRT plans and comparing measurements to expected doses. Results Signal reproducibility was within ± 0.1 % and output calibration was stable over a 6 month period. Detector showed good linearity with dose (r2 = 1). Signal decreased by 5 % when dose rate was decreased from 1300 MU/min to 300 MU/min. Output factors agreed within 0.5 % of chamber measurements for 1x1 cm field sizes or greater. Angularity measurements showed good agreement with reference. For measurement of planned clinical doses, gamma pass-rates were 98.5 % ± 2.3 % (treatment planning system reference, 2 %/2mm) and 99.2 % ± 1.0 % (film reference, 2 %,2mm). The detector also showed sensitivity to errors of 1 mm offsets in MLC positioning. Conclusion The detector performed well when used for pre-treatment SBRT plan quality assurance, offering a good alternative to radiochromic film.
Collapse
|
16
|
Sano K, Fujiwara M, Okada W, Tanooka M, Takaki H, Shibata M, Nakamura K, Sakai Y, Suzuki H, Takahashi K, Tanaka M, Yamakado K. Optimal threshold of a control parameter for tomotherapy respiratory tracking: A phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13901. [PMID: 36635847 PMCID: PMC10161055 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radixact Synchrony® , a real-time motion tracking and compensating modality, is used for helical tomotherapy. Control parameters are used for the accurate application of irradiation. Radixact Synchrony® uses the potential difference, which is an index of the accuracy of the prediction model of target motion and is represented by a statistical prediction of the 3D distance error. Although there are several reports on Radixact Synchrony® , few have reported the appropriate settings of the potential difference threshold. PURPOSE This study aims to determine the optimal threshold of the potential difference of Radixact Synchrony® during respiratory tumor-motion-tracking irradiation. METHODS The relationship among the dosimetric accuracy, motion tracking accuracy, and control parameter was evaluated using a moving platform, a phantom with a basic respiratory model (the fourth power of a sinusoidal wave), and several irregular respiratory model waveforms. The dosimetric accuracy was evaluated by gamma analysis (3%, 1 mm, 10% dose threshold). The tracking accuracy was measured by the distance error of the difference between the tracked and driven positions of the phantom. The largest potential difference for 95% of treatment time was evaluated, and its correlation with the gamma-pass ratio and distance error was investigated. The optimal threshold of the potential difference was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS A linear correlation was identified between the potential difference and the gamma-pass ratio (R = -0.704). A linear correlation was also identified between the potential difference and distance error (R = 0.827). However, as the potential difference increased, it tended to underestimate the distance error. The ROC analysis revealed that the appropriate cutoff value of the potential difference was 3.05 mm. CONCLUSION The irradiation accuracy with motion tracking by Radixact Synchrony® could be predicted from the potential difference, and the threshold of the potential difference should be set to ∼3 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Sano
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Fujiwara
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Wataru Okada
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masao Tanooka
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Haruyuki Takaki
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mayuri Shibata
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakamura
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sakai
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hitomi Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kanae Takahashi
- Department of Biostatistics, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tanaka
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Koichiro Yamakado
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Esteves J, Pivot O, Ribouton J, Jalade P, Zouaoui A, Desbat L, Rit S, Blanc F, Haefeli G, Hopchev P, Galvan JM, Lu GN, Pittet P. A novel QA phantom based on scintillating fiber ribbons with implementation of 2D dose tomography for small-field radiotherapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:619-632. [PMID: 35933612 PMCID: PMC10087208 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a novel instrument for real-time quality assurance (QA) procedures in radiotherapy. The system implements a scintillation-based phantom and associated signal acquisition and processing modules and aims to monitor two-dimensional (2D) dose distributions of small fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the proposed phantom, we have designed and realized a prototype implementing six high-resolution tissue-equivalent scintillating fiber ribbons stacked with in-plane 30° rotated orientations from each other. Each ribbon output is coupled to a silicon photodiode linear array (with an element pitch of 400 μm) to detect scintillating signal, which represents the projected irradiation profile perpendicular to the ribbon's orientation. For the system providing six acquired projected dose profiles at different orientations, we have developed a two-step signal processing method to perform 2D dose reconstruction. The first step is to determine irradiation field geometry parameters using a tomographic geometry approach, and the second one is to perform specific penumbra estimation. The QA system prototype has been tested on a Novalis TrueBeam STX with a 6-MV photon beam for small elliptic fields defined by 5- and 10-mm cone collimators and for 10 × 10- and 20 × 10-mm2 rectangular fields defined by the micro-multileaf collimator. Gamma index analysis using EBT3 films as reference has been carried out with tight 2%-dose-difference (DD)/700-μm-distance-to-agreement (DTA) as well as 1%-DD/1-mm-DTA criteria for evaluating the system performances. The testing also includes an evaluation of the proposed two-step field reconstruction method in comparison with two conventional methods: filtered back projection (FBP) and simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique (SIRT). RESULTS The reconstructed 2D dose distributions have gamma index pass rates higher than 95% for all the tested configurations as compared with EBT3 film measurements with both 2%-DD/700-μm-DTA and 1%-DD/1-mm criteria. 2D global gamma analysis shows that the two-step and FBP radiation field reconstruction methods systematically outperform the SIRT approach. Moreover, higher gamma index success rates are obtained with the two-step method than with FBP in the case of the fields defined with the stereotactic cones. CONCLUSIONS The proposed small-field QA system makes a use of six water-equivalent scintillating detectors (fiber ribbons) to acquire dose distribution. The developed two-step signal processing method performs tomographic 2D dose reconstruction. A system prototype has been built and tested using hospital facilities with small rectangular and elliptic fields. Testing results show 2D reconstructed dose distributions with high accuracy and resolution. Such a system could potentially be an alternative approach to film dosimetry for small-field QA, which is still widely used as reference in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josué Esteves
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Odran Pivot
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | - Julien Ribouton
- Service de Radiophysique et Radiovigilance, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Patrice Jalade
- Service de Radiophysique et Radiovigilance, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Abdelaali Zouaoui
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Laurent Desbat
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | - Simon Rit
- Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, CREATIS, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Jean-Marc Galvan
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Guo-Neng Lu
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Patrick Pittet
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
U’wais FA, Radzi Y, Noor Rizan N, Zin HM. Validation of a digital method for patient-specific verification of VMAT treatment using a 2D ionisation detector array. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
19
|
Lim SB, Kuo L, Li T, Li X, Ballangrud AM, Lovelock M, Chan MF. Comparative study of SRS end-to-end QA processes of a diode array device and an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with GafChromic XD film. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13747. [PMID: 35946865 PMCID: PMC9512337 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE End-to-end testing (E2E) is a necessary process for assessing the readiness of the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) program and annual QA of an SRS system according to the AAPM MPPG 9a. This study investigates the differences between using a new SRS MapCHECK (SRSMC) system and an anthropomorphic phantom film-based system in a large network with different SRS delivery techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS Three SRS capable Linacs (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) at three different regional sites were chosen to represent a hospital network, a Trilogy with an M120 multi-leaf collimator (MLC), a TrueBeam with an M120 MLC, and a TrueBeam Stx with an HD120 MLC. An anthropomorphic STEEV phantom (CIRS, Norfolk, VA) and a phantom/diode array: StereoPHAN/SRSMC (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) were CT scanned at each site. The new STV-PHANTOM EBT-XD films (Ashland, Bridgewater, NJ) were used. Six plans with various complexities were measured with both films and SRSMC in the StereoPHAN to establish their dosimetric correlations. Three SRS cranial plans with a total of sixteen fields using dynamic conformal arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy, with 1-4 targets, were planned with Eclipse v15.5 treatment planning system (TPS) using a custom SRS beam model for each machine. The dosimetric and localization accuracy were compared. The time of analysis for the two systems by three teams of physicists was also compared to assess the throughput efficiency. RESULTS The correlations between films and SRSMC were found to be 0.84 (p = 0.03) and 0.16 (p = 0.76) for γ (3%, 1 mm) and γ (3%, 2 mm), respectively. With film, the local dose differences (ΔD) relative to the average dose within the 50% isodose line from the three sites were found to be -3.2%-3.7%. The maximum localization errors (Elocal ) were found to be within 0.5 ± 0.2 mm. With SRSMC, the ΔD was found to be within 5% of the TPS calculation. Elocal were found to be within 0.7 to 1.1 ± 0.4 mm for TrueBeam and Trilogy, respectively. Comparing with film, an additional uncertainty of 0.7 mm was found with SRSMC. The delivery and analysis times were found to be 6 and 2 h for film and SRSMC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The SRS MapCHECK agrees dosimetrically with the films within measurement uncertainties. However, film dosimetry shows superior sub-millimeter localization resolving power for the MPPG 9a implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seng Boh Lim
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - LiCheng Kuo
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tianfang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Xiang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ase M Ballangrud
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Lovelock
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maria F Chan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kawabata F, Kamomae T, Okudaira K, Komori M, Oguchi H, Sasaki M, Mori M, Kawamura M, Abe S, Ishihara S, Naganawa S. Development of a high-resolution two-dimensional detector-based dose verification system for tumor-tracking irradiation in the CyberKnife system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13645. [PMID: 35789532 PMCID: PMC9359009 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
We aim to evaluate the basic characteristics of SRS MapCHECK (SRSMC) for CyberKnife (CK) and establish a dose verification system using SRSMC for the tumor‐tracking irradiation for CK. The field size and angular dependence of SRSMC were evaluated for basic characterization. The output factors (OPFs) and absolute doses measured by SRSMC were compared with those measured using microDiamond and microchamber detectors and those calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The angular dependence was evaluated by comparing the SRSMC with a microchamber. The tumor‐tracking dose verification system consists of SRSMC and a moving platform. The doses measured using SRSMC were compared with the doses measured using a microchamber and radiochromic film. The OPFs and absolute doses of SRSMC were within ±3.0% error for almost all field sizes, and the angular dependence was within ±2.0% for all incidence angles. The absolute dose errors between SRSMC and TPS tended to increase when the field size was smaller than 10 mm. The absolute doses of the tumor‐tracking irradiation measured using SRSMC and those measured using a microchamber agreed within 1.0%, and the gamma pass rates of SRSMC in comparison with those of the radiochromic film were greater than 95%. The basic characteristics of SRSMC for CK presented acceptable results for clinical use. The results of the tumor‐tracking dose verification system realized using SRSMC were equivalent to those of conventional methods, and this system is expected to contribute toward improving the efficiency of quality control in many facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumitaka Kawabata
- Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kamomae
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kuniyasu Okudaira
- Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masataka Komori
- Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Oguchi
- Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Motoharu Sasaki
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Masaki Mori
- Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shinji Abe
- Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shunichi Ishihara
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Prentou G, Pappas EP, Prentou E, Yakoumakis N, Paraskevopoulou C, Koutsouveli E, Pantelis E, Papagiannis P, Karaiskos P. Impact of systematic MLC positional uncertainties on the quality of single-isocenter multi-target VMAT-SRS treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13708. [PMID: 35733367 PMCID: PMC9359048 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To study the impact of systematic MLC leaf positional uncertainties (stemming from mechanical inaccuracies or sub‐optimal MLC modeling) on the quality of intracranial single‐isocenter multi‐target VMAT‐SRS treatment plans. An estimation of appropriate tolerance levels is attempted. Methods Five patients, with three to four metastases and at least one target lying in close proximity to organs‐at‐risk (OARs) were included in this study. A single‐isocenter multi‐arc VMAT plan per patient was prepared, which served as the reference for dosimetric impact evaluation. A range of leaf offsets was introduced (±0.03 mm up to ±0.30 mm defined at the MLC plane) to both leaf banks, by varying the leaf offset MLC modeling parameter in Monaco for all the prepared plans, in order to simulate projected leaf offsets of ±0.09 mm up to ±0.94 mm at the isocenter plane, respectively. For all offsets simulated and cases studied, dose distributions were re‐calculated and compared with the corresponding reference ones. An experimental dosimetric procedure using the SRS mapCHECK diode array was also performed to support the simulation study results and investigate its suitability to detect small systematic leaf positional errors. Results Projected leaf offsets of ±0.09 mm were well‐tolerated with respect to both target dosimetry and OAR‐sparing. A linear relationship was found between D95% percentage change and projected leaf offset (slope: 12%/mm). Impact of projected offset on target dosimetry was strongly associated with target volume. In two cases, plans that could be considered potentially clinically unacceptable (i.e., clinical dose constraint violation) were obtained even for projected offsets as small as 0.19 mm. The performed experimental dosimetry check can detect potential small systematic leaf errors. Conclusions Plan quality indices and dose–volume metrics are very sensitive to systematic sub‐millimeter leaf positional inaccuracies, projected at the isocenter plane. Acceptable and tolerance levels in systematic MLC uncertainties need to be tailored to VMAT‐SRS spatial and dosimetric accuracy requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Prentou
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleftherios P Pappas
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Prentou
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Evaggelos Pantelis
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Papagiannis
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Pantelis Karaiskos
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pudsey LMM, Biasi G, Ralston A, Rosenfeld A, Poder J. Detection of rotational errors in single-isocenter multiple-target radiosurgery: Is a routine off-axis Winston-Lutz test necessary? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13665. [PMID: 35713881 PMCID: PMC9512335 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Recently the use of linear accelerator (linac)‐based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has increased, including single‐isocenter multiple‐target SRS. The workload of medical physicists has grown as a result and so has the necessity of maximizing the efficiency of quality assurance (QA). This study aimed to determine if measurement‐based patient‐specific QA with a high‐spatial‐resolution dosimeter is sensitive to rotational errors, potentially reducing the need for routine off‐axis Winston–Lutz (WL) testing. Methods The impact of rotational errors along gantry, couch, and collimator axes on dose coverage of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) was determined with a 1‐mm GTV/PTV expansion margin. Two techniques, the off‐axis WL test using the StereoPHAN MultiMet‐WL Cube (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, Florida, USA) and patient‐specific QA using the SRS MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, Florida, USA), were assessed on their ability to detect introduced errors before target coverage was compromised. These findings were also considered in the context of routine machine QA of rotational axis calibrations. Results Rotational errors significantly impacted PTV dose coverage, especially in the couch angle. GTV dose coverage remained unaffected except for with large couch angle errors (≥1.5°). The off‐axis WL test was shown to be sensitive to rotational errors with results consistently exceeding tolerance levels when or before coverage fell below departmentally accepted limits. Although patient‐specific QA using the SRS MapCHECK was previously validated for SRS, this study showed inconsistency in detection of rotational errors. Conclusions It is recommended that off‐axis WL testing be conducted regularly to supplement routine monthly machine QA, as it is sensitive to errors that patient‐specific QA may not detect. This frequency should be determined by individual departments, with consideration of GTV–PTV margins used, limitations on target off‐axis distances, and routine mechanical QA results for particular linacs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M M Pudsey
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Giordano Biasi
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Ralston
- St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joel Poder
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Using a fixed-jaw technique to achieve superior delivery accuracy and plan quality in single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jrras.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
24
|
Goodall SK, Dunn L, Dunning J, Muñoz L, Rowshanfarzad P, Ebert MA. Matched linac stereotactic radiotherapy: An assessment of delivery similarity and distributive patient‐specific quality assurance feasibility. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13652. [DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K Goodall
- School of Physics, Mathematics, and Computing, Faculty of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
- GenesisCare Wembley Western Australia Australia
| | - Leon Dunn
- GenesisCare Fitzroy Victoria Australia
| | | | - Luis Muñoz
- GenesisCare Bedford Park South Australia Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics University of Wollongong New South Wales Australia
| | - Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Physics, Mathematics, and Computing, Faculty of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics, and Computing, Faculty of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia
- 5D Clinics Perth Western Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Xu Q, Huynh K, Nie W, Rose MS, Chawla AK, Choe KS, Kanani S, Kubicek GJ, Fan J. Implementing and evaluating a high-resolution diode array for patient-specific quality assurance of robotic brain stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13569. [PMID: 35278033 PMCID: PMC9121027 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to introduce and evaluate a high-resolution diode array for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) of CyberKnife brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Thirty-three intracranial plans were retrospectively delivered on the SRS MapCHECK using fixed cone, Iris, and multileaf collimator (MLC). The plans were selected to cover a range of sites from large tumor bed, single/multiple small brain metastases (METs) to trigeminal neuralgia. Fiducial tracking using the four fiducials embedded around the detector plane was used as image guidance. Results were analyzed before and after registration based on absolute dose gamma criterion of 1 mm distance-to-agreement and 0.5%-3% dose-difference. Overall, the gamma passing rates (1 mm and 3% criterion) before registration for all the patients were above 90% for all three treatment modalities (96.8 ± 3.5%, the lowest passing rate of 90.4%), and were improved after registration (99.3 ± 1.5%). When tighter criteria (1 mm and 2%) were applied, the gamma passing rates after registration for all the cases dropped to 97.3 ± 3.2%. For trigeminal neuralgia cases, we applied 1 mm and 0.5% criterion and the passing rates dropped from 100 ± 0.0% to 98.5 ± 2.0%. The mean delivery time was 33.4 ± 11.7 min, 24.0 ± 4.9 min, and 17.1 ± 2.6 min for the fixed cone, Iris, and MLC, respectively. With superior gamma passing rates and reasonable quality assurance (QA) time, we believe the SRS MapCHECK could be a good option for routine PSQA for CyberKnife SRS/SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianyi Xu
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton TherapyInova Schar Cancer InstituteFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Kiet Huynh
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton TherapyInova Schar Cancer InstituteFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Wei Nie
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton TherapyInova Schar Cancer InstituteFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | | | - Ashish K. Chawla
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton TherapyInova Schar Cancer InstituteFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Kevin S. Choe
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton TherapyInova Schar Cancer InstituteFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Samir Kanani
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton TherapyInova Schar Cancer InstituteFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Gregory J. Kubicek
- Department of Radiation OncologyMD Anderson Cancer Center at CooperCamdenNew JerseyUSA
| | - Jiajin Fan
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton TherapyInova Schar Cancer InstituteFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mehrens H, Nguyen T, Edward S, Hartzell S, Glenn M, Branco D, Hernandez N, Alvarez P, Molineu A, Taylor P, Kry S. The current status and shortcomings of stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac058. [PMID: 35664554 PMCID: PMC9154323 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a common treatment for intracranial lesions. This work explores the state of SRS treatment delivery to characterize current treatment accuracy based on treatment parameters. Methods NCI clinical trials involving SRS rely on an end-to-end treatment delivery on a patient surrogate (credentialing phantom) from the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) to test their treatment accuracy. The results of 1072 SRS phantom irradiations between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis and random forest models were used to associate irradiation conditions with phantom performance. The following categories were evaluated in terms of how they predicted outcomes: year of irradiation, TPS algorithm, machine model, energy, and delivered field size. Results Overall, only 84.6% of irradiations have met the IROC/NCI acceptability criteria. Pass rate has remained constant over time, while dose calculation accuracy has slightly improved. Dose calculation algorithm (P < .001), collimator (P = .024), and field size (P < .001) were statistically significant predictors of pass/fail. Specifically, pencil beam algorithms and cone collimators were more likely to be associated with failing phantom results. Random forest modeling identified the size of the field as the most important factor for passing or failing followed by algorithm. Conclusion Constant throughout this retrospective study, approximately 15% of institutions fail to meet IROC/NCI standards for SRS treatment. In current clinical practice, this is particularly associated with smaller fields that yielded less accurate results. There is ongoing need to improve small field dosimetry, beam modeling, and QA to ensure high treatment quality, patient safety, and optimal clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter Mehrens
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Trang Nguyen
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Sharbacha Edward
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Shannon Hartzell
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Mallory Glenn
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Daniela Branco
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Nadia Hernandez
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Paola Alvarez
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Andrea Molineu
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Paige Taylor
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| | - Stephen Kry
- Department of Outreach Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wegener S, Schindhelm R, Sauer OA. Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13577. [PMID: 35234345 PMCID: PMC9121032 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Any Linac will show geometric imprecisions, including non‐ideal alignment of the gantry, collimator and couch axes, and gantry sag or wobble. Their angular dependence can be quantified and resulting changes of the dose distribution predicted (Wack, JACMP 20(5), 2020). We analyzed whether it is feasible to correct geometric shifts during treatment planning. The successful implementation of such a correction procedure was verified by measurements of different stereotactic treatment plans. Methods: Isocentric shifts were quantified for two Elekta Synergy Agility Linacs using the QualiForMed ISO‐CBCT+ module, yielding the shift between kV and MV isocenters, the gantry flex and wobble as well as the positions of couch and collimator rotation axes. Next, the position of each field's isocenter in the Pinnacle treatment planning system was adjusted accordingly using a script. Fifteen stereotactic treatment plans of cerebral metastases (0.34 to 26.53 cm3) comprising 9–11 beams were investigated; 54 gantry and couch combinations in total. Unmodified plans and corrected plans were measured using the Sun Nuclear SRS‐MapCHECK with the Stereophan phantom and evaluated using gamma analysis. Results: Geometric imprecisions, such as shifts of up to 0.8 mm between kV and MV isocenter, a couch rotation axis 0.9 mm off the kV isocente,r and gantry flex with an amplitude of 1.1 mm, were found. For eight, mostly small PTVs D98 values declined more than 5% by simulating these shifts. The average gamma (2%/2 mm, absolute, global, 20% threshold) was reduced from 0.53 to 0.31 (0.32 to 0.30) for Linac 1 (Linac 2) when including the isocentric corrections. Thus, Linac 1 reached the accuracy level of Linac 2 after correction. Conclusion: Correcting for Linac geometric deviations during the planning process is feasible and was dosimetrically validated. The dosimetric impact of the geometric imperfections can vary between Linacs and should be assessed and corrected where necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Robert Schindhelm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Popple RA, Sullivan RJ, Yuan Y, Wu X, Covington EL. Evaluation of a two-dimensional diode array for patient-specific quality assurance of HyperArc. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:203-210. [PMID: 34725909 PMCID: PMC8664143 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate a two-dimensional diode array for patient-specific quality assurance of VMAT stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans. METHODS The diode array, an SRS MapCHECK (SRSMC), was composed of a 77 mm ×77 mm face-centered array having a spacing of 2.47 mm. Sixty SRS plans were selected from our clinical database, 30 for treatment of a single target and 30 for multiple targets. The target sizes ranged from 2.4 mm to 44.7 mm equivalent diameter (median 8.7 mm). The plans were delivered to the diode array. For multiple target plans, two measurements were obtained at two locations, one corresponding to the largest target and the other to the smallest target. Gamma using a 3%/1 mm criteria and the dose to the center diode were compared with radiochromic film (RCF). Dose to selected regions of the detector electronics was calculated. RESULTS The mean difference between the center diode and RCF was -1.2%. For a threshold of at least 95% of detectors/pixels having gamma < 1 for a 3%/1 mm criteria, SRSMC and RCF gave consistent results for 79 of the 90 measurements. For plans with an arc having a patient support angle of 90° or 270°, the median dose to the electronics was 0.65% of the prescription dose. CONCLUSIONS SRSMC is an efficient tool for accurate patient-specific quality assurance of VMAT single and multiple target radiosurgery, yielding similar clinical decisions as radiochromic film.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Rodney J Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Yuan Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Xingen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Covington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Practical Considerations for Single Isocenter LINAC Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:195-199. [PMID: 34619373 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to summarize treatment guidelines for the performance of single isocenter LINAC radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases developed and used by 3 experienced centers. This article is not meant to provide consensus guidelines. Rather, this is a practical, "how we do it" reference without substantial discussion. To serve as a treatment reference, the great majority of the information is presented in topic-specific tables.
Collapse
|
30
|
Pérez P, Torres PR, Bruna A, Brunetto M, Aon E, Franco D, Mattea F, Figueroa R, Santibáñez M, Valente M. Fricke gel xylenol orange dosimeter layers for stereotactic radiosurgery: A preliminary approach. Appl Radiat Isot 2021; 178:109936. [PMID: 34592691 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Investigations regarding the feasibility, reliability, and accuracy of Fricke gel dosimeter layers for stereotactic radiosurgery are presented. A representative radiosurgery plan consisting of two targets has been investigated. Absorbed dose distributions measured using radiochromic films and gelatin Fricke Gel dosimetry in layers have been compared with dose distributions calculated by using a treatment planning system and Monte Carlo simulations. The different dose distributions have been compared by means of the gamma index demonstrating that gelatin Fricke gel dosimeter layers showed agreements of 100%, 100%, and 93%, with dose and distance tolerances of 2% and 2 mm, with respect to film dosimetry, treatment planning system and Monte Carlo simulations, respectively. The capability of the developed system for three-dimensional dose mapping was shown, obtaining promising results when compared with well-established dosimetry methods. The obtained results support the viability of Fricke gel dosimeter layers analyzed by optical methods for stereotactic radiosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Pérez
- Laboratorio de Investigación e Instrumentación en Física Aplicada a la Medicina e Imágenes de Rayos X (LIIFAMIR(x)), Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía, Física y Computación, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina; Instituto de Física Enrique Gaviola (IFEG), CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina.
| | - P Rico Torres
- Laboratorio de Investigación e Instrumentación en Física Aplicada a la Medicina e Imágenes de Rayos X (LIIFAMIR(x)), Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía, Física y Computación, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina; Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Venezuela
| | - A Bruna
- FiMe - Física Médica SRL, Argentina
| | - M Brunetto
- Centro Médico Privado Deán Funes, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - E Aon
- Centro Médico Privado Deán Funes, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - D Franco
- Centro Médico Privado Deán Funes, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - F Mattea
- Laboratorio de Investigación e Instrumentación en Física Aplicada a la Medicina e Imágenes de Rayos X (LIIFAMIR(x)), Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía, Física y Computación, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina; Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina; Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ingeniería de Procesos y Química Aplicada (IPQA), CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - R Figueroa
- Centro de excelencia de Física e Ingeniería en Salud (CFIS), Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile; Departamento de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - M Santibáñez
- Departamento de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - M Valente
- Laboratorio de Investigación e Instrumentación en Física Aplicada a la Medicina e Imágenes de Rayos X (LIIFAMIR(x)), Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía, Física y Computación, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina; Instituto de Física Enrique Gaviola (IFEG), CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina; Centro de excelencia de Física e Ingeniería en Salud (CFIS), Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile; Departamento de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Janiak PT, Kukołowicz PF. Comparison of calculation algorithms to predict the IQM detector response for various modulation degrees of VMAT treatment plans on linear accelerator equipped with the HD120 MLC. Med Phys 2021; 48:7372-7381. [PMID: 34499756 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The calculation model for the integral quality monitor (IQM) system does not take into account the characteristics of the HD120 multileaf collimator (MLC), which some Varian accelerators are equipped with. Some treatment plans prepared with this collimator are characterized by a high level of modulation. The aim of the work was to prepare a model for that collimator and to determine the influence of modulation on results of the verification carried out with the use of IQM system. METHODS The short and long stabilities of the IQM detector response were verified by measuring the signal for a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) beam with the static field of 10 × 10 cm2 size. The obtained results were compared with the measurements performed with the PTW Farmer chamber. Next, the signals for 35 static square fields 4 × 4 cm2 , covering the whole field 38 × 20 cm2 , were measured with the IQM. Based on the results of these measurements, the original calculation model has been changed in order to achieve the smallest differences between calculations and measurements. While tuning the model, the characteristics of the HD120 MLC were included. Measurements were performed for 30 clinical plans (86 arcs) prepared with 6 MV FFF beams. Among those 30 plans, there were were multitarget plans with single isocenter. For each plan, the modulation complexity score (MCS) was calculated. The measurement results were compared with the calculation results performed with the original and authors' calculation model. RESULTS Very good stability of the short and long stabilities of the IQM detector response was obtained. Measurements performed for 35 static fields revealed that for the manufacturer's and for the authors' models, the deviation exceeded 3% for 12 and five of the 35 static fields, respectively. The differences for the manufacturer's and authors' algorithms were in the range of ±2% for the 15 and 26 of the fields, respectively. For original and the authors' models, the differences between measured and calculated signals (starting with the segment number 40) were within the range of ±3.5% for 87.6% and 96.7% of all arcs for the respective models. For both models, the dependence of the compliance of measurements and calculations on the MCS was observed. For most of the very modulated arcs, the measured signal was at least 3% lower than the calculated one. The largest differences between measurements and calculations were obtained for single-isocenter multitarget plans. CONCLUSIONS The signal predicted by an algorithm taking into account the real geometry of the collimating system of the Edge accelerator (equipped with the HD120 MLC) made it possible to obtain greater consistency between the measurements and calculations. We characterized the dependence between the MCS of each arc and the compliance of the measurements and calculations. Much worse results were obtained for single-isocenter multitarget plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Przemysław T Janiak
- Medical Physics Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł F Kukołowicz
- Medical Physics Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Banos-Capilla MC, Lago-Martin JD, Gil P, Larrea LM. Sensitivity and specificity analysis of 2D small field measurement array: Patient-specific quality assurance of small target treatments and spatially fractionated radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:104-119. [PMID: 34449110 PMCID: PMC8504597 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this paper is to describe the tests carried out on a SRSMapCheck array, to verify its reliability and sensitivity for quality assurance (QA) of high gradient treatments as an alternative system to the use of high spatial resolution detectors, such as gafchromic film, whose processing requires meticulous and time‐consuming procedures. Methods In an initial step, general functionality tests were carried out to verify that the equipment meets the manufacturer's specifications. A study of the accuracy of the application of correction factors to compensate for variation in detector response due to dose rate, field size and beam angle incidence has been included. Besides, to assess the ability of the array to detect inaccurately delivered treatments, systematic errors corresponding to the deviation in the position of the leaves and the accuracy of the gantry position, have been introduced. Based on these results, an estimate of sensitivity and specificity values of the device has been completed. The final step included a study applied to high gradient treatment for real cases of spatially fractionated radiotherapy, where the results of SRSMapCheck measurements have been compared with gafchromic films. Results General commissioning tests meet the manufacturer's specifications. dose rate (DR) response variation is better than 1.5% and for DR above 50 MU/min better than 1%. The results for beam incidences are better than 1% for all gantry angles, including beam incidences parallel to the array. Field size response differences are within the range of ±1% for sizes up to 2 × 2 cm2, with a maximum value obtained of 3.5%, for 1 × 1 cm2. From the systematic error study, using a Gamma function Γ (2%, 2 mm), the detector presents a high specificity with a value greater than 90% at its lower limit, while its sensitivity has a moderate mean value of 81%. Sensitivity values increase above 86% when we apply a Gamma function Γ (2%, 1 mm) is applied. Finally, the study of actual cases comprises 17 patients, distributed into 11 lung tumors, 3 gynecological and 3 soft tissue tumors. The gafchromic film showed a lower passing rate with an average value of Γ (2%, 2 mm) = 94.1% compared to Γ (2%, 2 mm) = 98.6% reached by the measurements with the array. Conclusions Gamma function obtained with the SRSMapCheck array always presented a higher value than gafchromic film measurements, resulting in a greater number of plans considered correct. This fact, together with the sensitivity and specificity study carried out, allows us to conclude the recommendation that a restrictive metric must be established, in this way we will improve sensitivity, and therefore we will reduce the rate of incorrect plans qualified as correct. The characteristics of the equipment together with the correction factors applied, led to reliably performing acquisitions for complex treatments with multiple small targets in oblique rotational incidences. The spatial resolution of detectors allows the verification of high gradient dose plans such as those achieved in spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Carmen Banos-Capilla
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Vithas Consuelo, Valencia, Spain.,Mathematical and Fluid Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, National University of Distance Education (UNED), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Patricia Gil
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Vithas Consuelo, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Maria Larrea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Vithas Consuelo, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Culcasi R, Baran G, Dominello M, Burmeister J. Stereotactic radiosurgery commissioning and QA test cases-A TG-119 approach for Stereotactic radiosurgery. Med Phys 2021; 48:7568-7579. [PMID: 34258770 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a standardized set of representative clinical treatment cases that pose a range of optimization problems for evaluating the plan quality and dosimetric accuracy within the commissioning process for linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS Five test cases with increasing complexity were created to validate delivery accuracy in SRS commissioning similar to the approach used by AAPM TG-119 in developing a test suite for IMRT commissioning. Standardized structure sets, planning goals, and delivery requirements were specified for each case including a small sphere target, irregular target, irregular target placed off-axis, multi-target, and abutting organs-at-risk (OARs). Various VMAT field arrangements including a single arc, two coplanar arcs, full arc and vertex half arc, and four noncoplanar arcs were tested to generate clinically appropriate treatment plans. RESULTS The small spherical target was 1.0 cm in diameter. The irregular target was a clinical cavity (2.3 × 2.2 × 1.4 cm³) and was shifted 4.5 cm for the irregular target off-axis case. The multi-target case used the irregular target and four spherical targets representing metastases ranging 0.9 to 1.6 cm in diameter, placed up to 7.5 cm off-axis. The abutting OARs case included an acoustic neuroma and target placed near the optic nerve. All spherical targets received 24 Gy and the cavity received 18 Gy. The abutting OAR cases included a 3.74 cc lesion adjacent to the brainstem receiving 13 Gy and a 1.11 cc lesion adjacent to the optic nerve receiving 12 Gy. All plans used a single-isocenter placed at the target center or geometric center of multiple targets. Planning goals for all cases included constraints for the target and brain minus PTV, along with brainstem and optic nerve where applicable. Deliverability was assessed through ion chamber measurements, in addition to composite and per-field planar measurements on Gafchromic film and small-field diode array. A mean and SD for measured versus planned doses of 101.0% ± 2.9% was observed over the 14 ion chamber measurements. Mean and SD for gamma pass rates were 98.5% ± 2.2% and 97.1% ± 4.9% for film and diode array, respectively, for gamma criteria of 2% and 1 mm. CONCLUSION These cases could provide the preliminary groundwork for a novel benchmark for institutions to evaluate linac-based SRS commissioning and delivery accuracy prior to clinical implementation. The rapid widespread implementation of linac-based SRS, the complexity associated with dosimetry and delivery, and high-profile treatment deviations that have already resulted from its use, highlight the importance of such a benchmark test suite. Comprehensive dosimetric measurements from this standardized set of SRS optimization problems were used to fine-tune and understand the limitations of our SRS planning and delivery system and establish a set of baseline data for comparison with other delivery platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael Dominello
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.,Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jay Burmeister
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.,Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
McKenna JT. The development and testing of a novel spherical radiotherapy phantom system for the commissioning and patient-specific quality assurance of mono-isocentric multiple mets SRS plans. Med Phys 2020; 48:105-113. [PMID: 33119902 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a single radiotherapy phantom system capable of performing both patient-specific quality assurance (QA) measurements and commissioning measurements for mono-isocentric LinAc-based stereotactic radiosurgery ("mLSRS") treatment plans. METHODS Design A 20-cm diameter spherical phantom was designed which contained within it a film cartridge. The surface of the sphere was machined to display a set of angular markings at both the equator and the meridian representing a spherical coordinate system. A stand was designed which allows for free rotation about any vector passing through the center of the sphere. A program was created using Python 3 to: (a) Compute the measurement setup necessary to intersect exactly one film plane with three user specified dicom points contained within the QA plan; (b) Extract the intersection dose plane from the three dimensional DICOM dose file and; (c) Generate a synthetic computed tomography (CT) in the exact measurement geometry which is subsequently used for phantom positioning during the QA measurement. TESTING To assess the functionality of the phantom system dynamic conformal arc mLSRS plans that were generated by a clinically commissioned multiple metastasis treatment planning system (BrainLab Elements version 2.0) using patient-specific data. A total of seven patient plans were created that contained a total of 31 targets {<Volume> = (0.382 ± 0.534) cc: Range [0.051, 2.05] cc, <Off-Axis Distance> = (30 ± 16) mm: Range[0, 55] mm} 27 of which were directly measured with film and analyzed. Each planned isocenter was mapped to the phantom's center and the dose was recomputed. From the phantom dose distribution dicom points of interest were selected in sets of three and input into the provided software. The software computed the plane that intersects with the entered three points and instructed the user on the setup geometry to place the film in the intersecting plane. The software then generated a synthetic CT scan with embedded fiducial markers rotated into the setup orientation. This CT was then used as the setup reference image in ExacTrac image guidance system (tolerance 0.7 mm & 0.5deg). All plans were delivered on a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator with HDMLC, Exactrac and a 6 degree of freedom couch. After delivery of each test plan a 10 × 10 reference field was delivered to a known dose approximately equal to the maximum dose contained within the plan for film calibration. The test film was scanned simultaneously with the 10 × 10 reference film and a film that received zero dose using an Epson 10000XL flatbed scanner after waiting 24 hours. The test film was scaled according to the reference film and analyzed via the gamma analysis (3%, 1 mm, 10%) implemented in Ashland Film QA Pro software. RESULTS The spherical phantom system was able to perform validation measurements on a variety of patient-specific plan geometries. The average gamma pass-rate γ(3%, 1 mm,10%) for all measurements was 96.7% (σ = 3.6%). CONCLUSIONS A novel spherical radiotherapy phantom system has been designed and tested on clinically relevant test plans.
Collapse
|
35
|
Öllers MC, Swinnen ACC, Verhaegen F. Acuros
®
dose verification of ultrasmall lung lesions with EBT‐XD film in a homogeneous and heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom setup. Med Phys 2020; 47:5829-5837. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michel C. Öllers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro) GROW School for Oncology Maastricht University Medical Centre+ Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - Ans C. C. Swinnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro) GROW School for Oncology Maastricht University Medical Centre+ Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - Frank Verhaegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro) GROW School for Oncology Maastricht University Medical Centre+ Maastricht The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
McCulloch J, Pawlowski J, Kirby N, Rasmussen K, Shi Z, Myers P, Stathakis S, Papanikolaou N, Saenz DL. Patient-specific dose quality assurance of single-isocenter multiple brain metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery using PTW Octavius 4D. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:107-115. [PMID: 32681753 PMCID: PMC7497916 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Single‐isocenter multiple brain metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery is an efficient treatment modality increasing in clinical practice. The need to provide accurate, patient‐specific quality assurance (QA) for these plans is met by several options. This study reviews some of these options and explores the use of the Octavius 4D as a solution for patient‐specific plan quality assurance. Methods The Octavius 4D Modular Phantom (O4D) with the 1000 SRS array was evaluated in this study. The array consists of 977 liquid‐filled ion chambers. The center 5.5 cm × 5.5 cm area has a detector spacing of 2.5 mm. The ability of the O4D to reconstruct three‐dimensional (3D) dose was validated against a 3D gel dosimeter, ion chamber, and film measurements. After validation, 15 patients with 2–11 targets had their plans delivered to the phantom. The criteria used for the gamma calculation was 3%/1 mm. The portion of targets which were measurable by the phantom was countable. The accompanying software compiled the measured doses allowing each target to be counted from the measured dose distribution. Results Spatial resolution was sufficient to verify the high dose distributions characteristic of SRS. Amongst the 15 patients there were 74 targets. Of the 74 targets, 61 (82%) of them were visible on the measured dose distribution. The average gamma passing rate was 99.3% (with sample standard deviation of 0.68%). Conclusions The high resolution provided by the O4D with 1000 SRS board insert allows for very high‐resolution measurement. This high resolution in turn can allow for high gamma passing rates. The O4D with the 1000 SRS array is an acceptable method of performing quality assurance for single‐isocenter multiple brain metastasis SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James McCulloch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jamie Pawlowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Neil Kirby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Karl Rasmussen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Zheng Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Pamela Myers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Sotirios Stathakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Niko Papanikolaou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Daniel L Saenz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|