1
|
Vilches-Freixas G, Bosmans G, Douralis A, Martens J, Meijers A, Rinaldi I, Salvo K, Thomas R, Palmans H, Lourenço A. Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:105021. [PMID: 38640918 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad40f9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Objective. In this experimental work we compared the determination of absorbed dose to water using four ionization chambers (ICs), a PTW-34045 Advanced Markus, a PTW-34001 Roos, an IBA-PPC05 and a PTW-30012 Farmer, irradiated under the same conditions in one continuous- and in two pulsed-scanned proton beams.Approach. The ICs were positioned at 2 cm depth in a water phantom in four square-field single-energy scanned-proton beams with nominal energies between 80 and 220 MeV and in the middle of 10 × 10 × 10 cm3dose cubes centered at 10 cm or 12.5 cm depth in water. The water-equivalent thickness (WET) of the entrance window and the effective point of measurement was considered when positioning the plane parallel (PP) ICs and the cylindrical ICs, respectively. To reduce uncertainties, all ICs were calibrated at the same primary standards laboratory. We used the beam quality (kQ) correction factors for the ICs under investigation from IAEA TRS-398, the newly calculated Monte Carlo (MC) values and the anticipated IAEA TRS-398 updated recommendations.Main results. Dose differences among the four ICs ranged between 1.5% and 3.7% using both the TRS-398 and the newly recommendedkQvalues. The spread among the chambers is reduced with the newlykQvalues. The largest differences were observed between the rest of the ICs and the IBA-PPC05 IC, obtaining lower dose with the IBA-PPC05.Significance. We provide experimental data comparing different types of chambers in different proton beam qualities. The observed dose differences between the ICs appear to be related to inconsistencies in the determination of thekQvalues. For PP ICs, MC studies account for the physical thickness of the entrance window rather than the WET. The additional energy loss that the wall material invokes is not negligible for the IBA-PPC05 and might partially explain the lowkQvalues determined for this IC. To resolve this inconsistency and to benchmark MC values,kQvalues measured using calorimetry are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Vilches-Freixas
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Bosmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jonathan Martens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Arturs Meijers
- Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland (current address), University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ilaria Rinaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Salvo
- UZ Leuven, Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Russell Thomas
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hugo Palmans
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Ana Lourenço
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blum I, Wong JS, Godino Padre K, Stolzenberg J, Fuchs H, Baumann KS, Poppe B, Looe HK. Fano cavity test and investigation of the response of the Roos chamber irradiated by proton beams in perpendicular magnetic fields up to 1 T. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:085021. [PMID: 38452383 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad311a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this work is to investigate the response of the Roos chamber (type 34001) irradiated by clinical proton beams in magnetic fields.Approach. At first, a Fano test was implemented in Monte Carlo software package GATE version 9.2 (based on Geant4 version 11.0.2) using a cylindrical slab geometry in a magnetic field up to 1 T. In accordance to an experimental setup (Fuchset al2021), the magnetic field correction factorskQB⃗of the Roos chamber were determined at different energies up to 252 MeV and magnetic field strengths up to 1 T, by separately simulating the ratios of chamber signalsMQ/MQB⃗,without and with magnetic field, and the dose-conversion factorsDw,QB⃗/Dw,Qin a small cylinder of water, with and without magnetic field. Additionally, detailed simulations were carried out to understand the observed magnetic field dependence.Main results. The Fano test was passed with deviations smaller than 0.25% between 0 and 1 T. The ratios of the chamber signals show both energy and magnetic field dependence. The maximum deviation of the dose-conversion factors from unity of 0.22% was observed at the lowest investigated proton energy of 97.4 MeV andB⃗= 1 T. The resultingkQB⃗factors increase initially with the applied magnetic field and decrease again after reaching a maximum at around 0.5 T; except for the lowest 97.4 MeV beam that show no observable magnetic field dependence. The deviation from unity of the factors is also larger for higher proton energies, where the maximum lies at 1.0035(5), 1.0054(7) and 1.0069(7) for initial energies ofE0= 152, 223.4 and 252 MeV, respectively.Significance. Detailed Monte Carlo studies showed that the observed effect can be mainly attributed to the differences in the transport of electrons produced both outside and inside of the air cavity in the presence of a magnetic field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Blum
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Jing Syuen Wong
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Krishna Godino Padre
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Jessica Stolzenberg
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Fuchs
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kilian-Simon Baumann
- University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany
- University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Björn Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Hui Khee Looe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nagake Y, Yasui K, Ooe H, Ichihara M, Iwase K, Toshito T, Hayashi N. Investigation of ionization chamber perturbation factors using proton beam and Fano cavity test for the Monte Carlo simulation code PHITS. Radiol Phys Technol 2024; 17:280-287. [PMID: 38261133 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00777-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
The reference dose for clinical proton beam therapy is based on ionization chamber dosimetry. However, data on uncertainties in proton dosimetry are lacking, and multifaceted studies are required. Monte Carlo simulations are useful tools for calculating ionization chamber dosimetry in radiation fields and are sensitive to the transport algorithm parameters when particles are transported in a heterogeneous region. We aimed to evaluate the proton transport algorithm of the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport Code System (PHITS) using the Fano test. The response of the ionization chamber f Q and beam quality correction factors k Q were calculated using the same parameters as those in the Fano test and compared with those of other Monte Carlo codes for verification. The geometry of the Fano test consisted of a cylindrical gas-filled cavity sandwiched between two cylindrical walls. f Q was calculated as the ratio of the absorbed dose in water to the dose in the cavity in the chamber. We compared the f Q calculated using PHITS with that of a previous study, which was calculated using other Monte Carlo codes (Geant4, FULKA, and PENH) under similar conditions. The flight mesh, a parameter for charged particle transport, passed the Fano test within 0.15%. This was shown to be sufficiently accurate compared with that observed in previous studies. The f Q calculated using PHITS were 1.116 ± 0.002 and 1.124 ± 0.003 for NACP-02 and PTW-30013, respectively, and the k Q were 0.981 ± 0.008 and 1.027 ± 0.008, respectively, at 150 MeV. Our results indicate that PHITS can calculate the f Q and k Q with high precision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuya Nagake
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Keisuke Yasui
- School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
| | - Hiromu Ooe
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | | | - Kaito Iwase
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Toshito
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Naoki Hayashi
- School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baumann KS, Derksen L, Witt M, Adeberg S, Zink K. The influence of different versions of FLUKA and GEANT4 on the calculation of response functions of ionization chambers in clinical proton beams. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:24NT01. [PMID: 37939402 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0ad4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Objective.To investigate the influence of different versions of the Monte Carlo codesgeant4 andflukaon the calculation of overall response functionsfQof air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams.Approach. fQfactors were calculated for six plane-parallel and four cylindrical ionization chambers withgeant4 andfluka. These factors were compared to already published values that were derived using older versions of these codes.Main results.Differences infQfactors calculated with different versions of the same Monte Carlo code can be up to ∼1%. Especially forgeant4, the updated version leads to a more pronounced dependence offQon proton energy and to smallerfQfactors for high energies.Significance.Different versions of the same Monte Carlo code can lead to differences in the calculation offQfactors of up to ∼1% without changing the simulation setup, transport parameters, ionization chamber geometry modeling, or employed physics lists. These findings support the statement that the dominant contributor to the overall uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculatedfQfactors are type-B uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian-Simon Baumann
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany
- University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| | - Larissa Derksen
- University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany
| | - Matthias Witt
- University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
- Universitäres Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (UCT) Frankfurt - Marburg, Germany
| | - Klemens Zink
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany
- University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kugel F, Wulff J, Bäumer C, Janson M, Kretschmer J, Brodbek L, Behrends C, Verbeek N, Looe HK, Poppe B, Timmermann B. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine. Z Med Phys 2023; 33:529-541. [PMID: 36577626 PMCID: PMC10751706 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary fluence of a proton pencil beam exiting the accelerator is enveloped by a region of secondaries, commonly called "spray". Although small in magnitude, this spray may affect dose distributions in pencil beam scanning mode e.g., in the calculation of the small field output, if not modelled properly in a treatment planning system (TPS). The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically benchmark the Monte Carlo (MC) dose engine of the RayStation TPS (v.10A) in small proton fields and systematically compare single Gaussian (SG) and double Gaussian (DG) modeling of initial proton fluence providing a more accurate representation of the nozzle spray. METHODS The initial proton fluence distribution for SG/DG beam modeling was deduced from two-dimensional measurements in air with a scintillation screen with electronic readout. The DG model was either based on direct fits of the two Gaussians to the measured profiles, or by an iterative optimization procedure, which uses the measured profiles to mimic in-air scan-field factor (SF) measurements. To validate the DG beam models SFs, i.e. relative doses to a 10 × 10 cm2 field, were measured in water for three different initial proton energies (100MeV, 160MeV, 226.7MeV) and square field sizes from 1×1cm2 to 10×10cm2 using a small field ionization chamber (IBA CC01) and an IBA ProteusPlus system (universal nozzle). Furthermore, the dose to the center of spherical target volumes (diameters: 1cm to 10cm) was determined using the same small volume ionization chamber (IC). A comprehensive uncertainty analysis was performed, including estimates of influence factors typical for small field dosimetry deduced from a simple two-dimensional analytical model of the relative fluence distribution. Measurements were compared to the predictions of the RayStation TPS. RESULTS SFs deviated by more than 2% from TPS predictions in all fields <4×4cm2 with a maximum deviation of 5.8% for SG modeling. In contrast, deviations were smaller than 2% for all field-sizes and proton energies when using the directly fitted DG model. The optimized DG model performed similarly except for slightly larger deviations in the 1×1cm2 scan-fields. The uncertainty estimates showed a significant impact of pencil beam size variations (±5%) resulting in up to 5.0% standard uncertainty. The point doses within spherical irradiation volumes deviated from calculations by up to 3.3% for the SG model and 2.0% for the DG model. CONCLUSION Properly representing nozzle spray in RayStation's MC-based dose engine using a DG beam model was found to reduce the deviation to measurements in small spherical targets to below 2%. A thorough uncertainty analysis shows a similar magnitude for the combined standard uncertainty of such measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Kugel
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany; Faculty of Physics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Jörg Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | | | - Jana Kretschmer
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie Brodbek
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; EBG MedAustron GmbH, Marie Curie-Straße 5, A-2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Carina Behrends
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany; Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Nico Verbeek
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany
| | - Hui Khee Looe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Björn Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baumann KS, Gomà C, Wulff J, Kretschmer J, Zink K. Monte Carlo calculated ionization chamber correction factors in clinical proton beams - deriving uncertainties from published data. Phys Med 2023; 113:102655. [PMID: 37603909 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
For the update of the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice (CoP), global ionization chamber factors (fQ) and beam quality correction factors (kQ) for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams have been calculated with different Monte Carlo codes. In this study, average Monte Carlo calculated fQ and kQ factors are provided and the uncertainty of these factors is estimated. Average fQ factors in monoenergetic proton beams with energies between 60 MeV and 250 MeV were derived from Monte Carlo calculated fQ factors published in the literature. Altogether, 195 fQ factors for six plane-parallel and three cylindrical ionization chambers calculated with penh, fluka and geant4 were incorporated. Additionally, a weighted standard deviation of fQ factors was calculated, where the same weight was assigned to each Monte Carlo code. From average fQ factors, kQ factors were derived and compared to the values from the IAEA TRS-398 CoP published in 2000 as well as to the values of the upcoming version. Average Monte Carlo calculated fQ factors are constant within 0.6% over the energy range investigated. In general, the different Monte Carlo codes agree within 1% for low energies and show larger differences up to 2% for high energies. As a result, the standard deviation of fQ factors increases with energy and is ∼0.3% for low energies and ∼0.8% for high energies. kQ factors derived from average Monte Carlo calculated fQ factors differ from the values presented in the IAEA TRS-398 CoP by up to 2.4%. The overall estimated uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculated kQ factors is ∼0.5%-1% smaller than the uncertainties estimated in IAEA TRS-398 CoP since the individual ionization chamber characteristics (e.g. fluence perturbations) are considered in detail in Monte Carlo calculations. The agreement between Monte Carlo calculated kQ factors and the values of the upcoming version of IAEA TRS-398 CoP is better with deviations smaller than 1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian-Simon Baumann
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany; University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany; Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Carles Gomà
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jörg Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Center (WPE), Essen, Germany
| | - Jana Kretschmer
- Carl-von-Ossietzky University, University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Klemens Zink
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany; University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany; Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khan AU, Nelson NP, Culberson WS, DeWerd LA. On the perturbation effect and LET dependence of beam quality correction factors in carbon ion beams. Med Phys 2023; 50:1105-1120. [PMID: 36334024 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a recent study, we reported beam quality correction factors, fQ , in carbon ion beams using Monte Carlo (MC) methods for a cylindrical and a parallel-plate ionization chamber (IC). A non-negligible perturbation effect was observed; however, the magnitude of the perturbation correction due to the specific IC subcomponents was not included. Furthermore, the stopping power data presented in the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) report 73 were used, whereas the latest stopping power data have been reported in the ICRU report 90. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to extend our previous work by computing fQ correction factors using the ICRU 90 stopping power data and by reporting IC-specific perturbation correction factors. Possible energy or linear energy transfer (LET) dependence of the fQ correction factor was investigated by simulating both pristine beams and spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs). METHODS The TOol for PArticle Simulation (TOPAS)/GEANT4 MC code was used in this study. A 30 × 30 × 50 cm3 water phantom was simulated with a uniform 10 × 10 cm2 parallel beam incident on the surface. A Farmer-type cylindrical IC (Exradin A12) and two parallel-plate ICs (Exradin P11 and A11) were simulated in TOPAS using the manufacturer-provided geometrical drawings. The fQ correction factor was calculated in pristine carbon ion beams in the 150-450 MeV/u energy range at 2 cm depth and in the middle of the flat region of four SOBPs. The kQ correction factor was calculated by simulating the fQo correction factor in a 60 Co beam at 5 cm depth. The perturbation correction factors due to the presence of the individual IC subcomponents, such as the displacement effect in the air cavity, collecting electrode, chamber wall, and chamber stem, were calculated at 2 cm depth for monoenergetic beams only. Additionally, the mean dose-averaged and track-averaged LET was calculated at the depths at which the fQ was calculated. RESULTS The ICRU 90 fQ correction factors were reported. The pdis correction factor was found to be significant for the cylindrical IC with magnitudes up to 1.70%. The individual perturbation corrections for the parallel-plate ICs were <1.0% except for the A11 pcel correction at the lowest energy. The fQ correction for the P11 IC exhibited an energy dependence of >1.00% and displayed differences up to 0.87% between pristine beams and SOBPs. Conversely, the fQ for A11 and A12 displayed a minimal energy dependence of <0.50%. The energy dependence was found to manifest in the LET dependence for the P11 IC. A statistically significant LET dependence was found only for the P11 IC in pristine beams only with a magnitude of <1.10%. CONCLUSIONS The perturbation and kQ correction factor should be calculated for the specific IC to be used in carbon ion beam reference dosimetry as a function of beam quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahtesham Ullah Khan
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Nicholas P Nelson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Wesley S Culberson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Larry A DeWerd
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Palmans H, Lourenço A, Medin J, Vatnitsky S, Andreo P. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. To review the currently available data on beam quality correction factors,
k
Q
,
for ionization chambers in clinical proton beams and derive their current best estimates for the updated recommendations of the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice. Approach. The reviewed data come from 20 publications from which
k
Q
values can be derived either directly from calorimeter measurements, indirectly from comparison with other chambers or from Monte Carlo calculated overall chamber factors,
f
Q
.
For cylindrical ionization chambers, a distinction is made between data obtained in the centre of a spread-out Bragg peak and those obtained in the plateau region of single-energy fields. For the latter, the effect of depth dose gradients has to be considered. To this end an empirical model for previously published displacement correction factors for single-layer scanned beams was established, while for unmodulated scattered beams experimental data were used. From all the data, chamber factors,
f
Q
,
and chamber perturbation correction factors,
p
Q
,
were then derived and analysed. Main results. The analysis showed that except for the beam quality dependence of the water-to-air mass stopping power ratio and, for cylindrical ionization chambers in unmodulated beams, of the displacement correction factor, there is no remaining beam quality dependence of the chamber perturbation correction factors
p
Q
.
Based on this approach, average values of the beam quality independent part of the perturbation factors were derived to calculate
k
Q
values consistent with the data in the literature. Significance. The resulting data from this analysis are current best estimates of
k
Q
values for modulated scattered beams and single-layer scanned beams used in proton therapy. Based on this, a single set of harmonized values is derived to be recommended in the update of IAEA TRS-398.
Collapse
|
9
|
Vedelago J, Karger CP, Jäkel O. A review on reference dosimetry in radiation therapy with proton and light ion beams: status and impact of new developments. RADIAT MEAS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2022.106844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
10
|
Kretschmer J, Brodbek L, Looe HK, van der Graaf E, Jan van Goethem M, Kiewiet H, Olivari F, Meyer C, Poppe B, Brandenburg S. Investigating the lateral dose response functions of point detectors in proton beams. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac783c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. Point detector measurements in proton fields are perturbed by the volume effect originating from geometrical volume-averaging within the extended detector’s sensitive volume and density perturbations by non-water equivalent detector components. Detector specific lateral dose response functions K(x) can be used to characterize the volume effect within the framework of a mathematical convolution model, where K(x) is the convolution kernel transforming the true dose profile D(x) into the measured signal profile of a detector M(x). The aim of this work is to investigate K(x) for detectors in proton beams. Approach. The K(x) for five detectors were determined by iterative deconvolution of measurements of D(x) and M(x) profiles at 2 cm water equivalent depth of a narrow 150 MeV proton beam. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out for two selected detectors to investigate a potential energy dependence, and to study the contribution of volume-averaging and density perturbation to the volume effect. Main results. The Monte Carlo simulated and experimentally determined K(x) agree within 2.1% of the maximum value. Further simulations demonstrate that the main contribution to the volume effect is volume-averaging. The results indicate that an energy or depth dependence of K(x) is almost negligible in proton beams. While the signal reduction from a Semiflex 3D ionization chamber in the center of a gaussian shaped field with 2 mm sigma is 32% for photons, it is 15% for protons. When measuring the field with a microDiamond the trend is less pronounced and reversed with a signal reduction for protons of 3.9% and photons of 1.9%. Significance. The determined K(x) can be applied to characterize the influence of the volume effect on detectors measured signal profiles at all clinical proton energies and measurement depths. The functions can be used to derive the actual dose distribution from point detector measurements.
Collapse
|
11
|
Medin J, Andreo P, Palmans H. Experimental determination of kQfactors for two types of ionization chambers in scanned proton beams. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35081517 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4efa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Experimental determination of beam qualitykQfactors for two types of Farmer ionization chambers, NE2571 and IBA FC65-G, in a scanned proton beam for three nominal energies (140 MeV, 180 MeV and 220 MeV) based on water calorimetry.Approach.Beam quality correction factors were determined comparing the results obtained with water calorimetry and ionometry. Water calorimetry was performed to determine the absorbed dose at a depth of measurement in water of 5 g cm-2, limited by the extension of the calorimeter glass vessel used. For the ionometry, two chambers of each type were included in the study. The ionization chambers were calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in60Co at the Swedish Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory, directly traceable to the BIPM, and were used according to the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice.Main results. ThekQvalues determined in the present work have been compared with the values tabulated in TRS-398 and its forthcoming update and also with those obtained in previous water calorimetric measurements and Monte Carlo calculations. All results were found to agree within the combined uncertainties of the different data.Significance. It is expected that the present work will serve as an experimental contribution tokQ-factors for the two chamber types and three scanned proton beam qualities used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joakim Medin
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Pedro Andreo
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hugo Palmans
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.,National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baumann KS, Derksen L, Witt M, Michael Burg J, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Zink K. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using FLUKA. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34378546 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac1c4b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose.To provide Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors (kQ) for monoenergetic proton beams using the Monte Carlo codefluka.Materials and methods.The Monte Carlo codeflukawas used to calculate the dose absorbed in a water-filled reference volume and the air-filled cavities of six plane-parallel and four cylindrical ionization chambers. The chambers were positioned at the entrance region of monoenergetic proton beams with energies between 60 and 250 MeV. Based on these dose values,fQas well askQfactors were calculated whilefQ0factors were taken from Andreoet al(2020Phys. Med. Biol.65095011).Results. kQfactors calculated in this work were found to agree with experimentally determinedkQfactors on the 1%-level, with only two exceptions with deviations of 1.4% and 1.9%. The comparison offQfactors calculated usingflukawithfQfactors calculated using the Monte Carlo codesgeant4 andpenhshowed a general good agreement for low energies, while differences for higher energies were pronounced. For high energies, in most cases the Monte Carlo codesflukaandgeant4 lead to comparable results while thefQfactors calculated withpenhare larger.Conclusion.flukacan be used to calculatekQfactors in clinical proton beams. The divergence of Monte Carlo calculatedkQfactors for high energies suggests that the role of nuclear interaction models implemented in the different Monte Carlo codes needs to be investigated in more detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian-Simon Baumann
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany.,University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Larissa Derksen
- University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany
| | - Matthias Witt
- University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jan Michael Burg
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany.,University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Klemens Zink
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany.,University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|