1
|
Wang H, Ma L. MCMC algorithm based on Markov random field in image segmentation. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0296031. [PMID: 38386655 PMCID: PMC10883568 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
In the realm of digital image applications, image processing technology occupies a pivotal position, with image segmentation serving as a foundational component. As the digital image application domain expands across industries, the conventional segmentation techniques increasingly challenge to cater to modern demands. To address this gap, this paper introduces an MCMC-based image segmentation algorithm based on the Markov Random Field (MRF) model, marking a significant stride in the field. The novelty of this research lies in its method that capitalizes on domain information in pixel space, amplifying the local segmentation precision of image segmentation algorithms. Further innovation is manifested in the development of an adaptive segmentation image denoising algorithm based on MCMC sampling. This algorithm not only elevates image segmentation outcomes, but also proficiently denoises the image. In the experimental results, MRF-MCMC achieves better segmentation performance, with an average segmentation accuracy of 94.26% in Lena images, significantly superior to other common image segmentation algorithms. In addition, the study proposes that the denoising model outperforms other algorithms in peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity in environments with noise standard deviations of 15, 25, and 50. In essence, these experimental findings affirm the efficacy of this study, opening avenues for refining digital image segmentation methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huazhe Wang
- College of Computer Engineering, Shangqiu Polytechnic, Shangqiu, China
| | - Li Ma
- Soft Vocational Technology Institute, Shangqiu Polytechnic, Shangqiu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boldrini L, D'Aviero A, De Felice F, Desideri I, Grassi R, Greco C, Iorio GC, Nardone V, Piras A, Salvestrini V. Artificial intelligence applied to image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT): a systematic review by the Young Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (yAIRO). LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:133-151. [PMID: 37740838 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01708-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has recently changed the workflow of radiation treatments by ensuring highly collimated treatments. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics are tools that have shown promising results for diagnosis, treatment optimization and outcome prediction. This review aims to assess the impact of AI and radiomics on modern IGRT modalities in RT. METHODS A PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase systematic review was conducted to investigate the impact of radiomics and AI to modern IGRT modalities. The search strategy was "Radiomics" AND "Cone Beam Computed Tomography"; "Radiomics" AND "Magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy"; "Radiomics" AND "on board Magnetic Resonance Radiotherapy"; "Artificial Intelligence" AND "Cone Beam Computed Tomography"; "Artificial Intelligence" AND "Magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy"; "Artificial Intelligence" AND "on board Magnetic Resonance Radiotherapy" and only original articles up to 01.11.2022 were considered. RESULTS A total of 402 studies were obtained using the previously mentioned search strategy on PubMed and Embase. The analysis was performed on a total of 84 papers obtained following the complete selection process. Radiomics application to IGRT was analyzed in 23 papers, while a total 61 papers were focused on the impact of AI on IGRT techniques. DISCUSSION AI and radiomics seem to significantly impact IGRT in all the phases of RT workflow, even if the evidence in the literature is based on retrospective data. Further studies are needed to confirm these tools' potential and provide a stronger correlation with clinical outcomes and gold-standard treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Boldrini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario IRCCS "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea D'Aviero
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Sassari, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiological, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Piras
- UO Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, Bagheria, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), 50139, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fast MF, Cao M, Parikh P, Sonke JJ. Intrafraction Motion Management With MR-Guided Radiation Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:92-106. [PMID: 38105098 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
High quality radiation therapy requires highly accurate and precise dose delivery. MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), integrating an MRI scanner with a linear accelerator, offers excellent quality images in the treatment room without subjecting patient to ionizing radiation. MRgRT therefore provides a powerful tool for intrafraction motion management. This paper summarizes different sources of intrafraction motion for different disease sites and describes the MR imaging techniques available to visualize and quantify intrafraction motion. It provides an overview of MR guided motion management strategies and of the current technical capabilities of the commercially available MRgRT systems. It describes how these motion management capabilities are currently being used in clinical studies, protocols and provides a future outlook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin F Fast
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Parag Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health - Cancer, Detroit, MI
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lombardo E, Dhont J, Page D, Garibaldi C, Künzel LA, Hurkmans C, Tijssen RHN, Paganelli C, Liu PZY, Keall PJ, Riboldi M, Kurz C, Landry G, Cusumano D, Fusella M, Placidi L. Real-time motion management in MRI-guided radiotherapy: Current status and AI-enabled prospects. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109970. [PMID: 37898437 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) is a highly complex treatment modality, allowing adaptation to anatomical changes occurring from one treatment day to the other (inter-fractional), but also to motion occurring during a treatment fraction (intra-fractional). In this vision paper, we describe the different steps of intra-fractional motion management during MRIgRT, from imaging to beam adaptation, and the solutions currently available both clinically and at a research level. Furthermore, considering the latest developments in the literature, a workflow is foreseen in which motion-induced over- and/or under-dosage is compensated in 3D, with minimal impact to the radiotherapy treatment time. Considering the time constraints of real-time adaptation, a particular focus is put on artificial intelligence (AI) solutions as a fast and accurate alternative to conventional algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elia Lombardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jennifer Dhont
- Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Institut Jules Bordet, Department of Medical Physics, Brussels, Belgium; Université Libre De Bruxelles (ULB), Radiophysics and MRI Physics Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Denis Page
- University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Cristina Garibaldi
- IEO, Unit of Radiation Research, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luise A Künzel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Coen Hurkmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H N Tijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Paul Z Y Liu
- Image X Institute, University of Sydney Central Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul J Keall
- Image X Institute, University of Sydney Central Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, a Partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Marco Fusella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abano Terme Hospital, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Landry G, Kurz C, Traverso A. The role of artificial intelligence in radiotherapy clinical practice. BJR Open 2023; 5:20230030. [PMID: 37942500 PMCID: PMC10630974 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20230030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
This review article visits the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiotherapy clinical practice. We will discuss how AI has a place in the modern radiotherapy workflow at the level of automatic segmentation and planning, two applications which have seen real-work implementation. A special emphasis will be placed on the role AI can play in online adaptive radiotherapy, such as performed at MR-linacs, where online plan adaptation is a procedure which could benefit from automation to reduce on-couch time for patients. Pseudo-CT generation and AI for motion tracking will be introduced in the scope of online adaptive radiotherapy as well. We further discuss the use of AI for decision-making and response assessment, for example for personalized prescription and treatment selection, risk stratification for outcomes and toxicities, and AI for quantitative imaging and response assessment. Finally, the challenges of generalizability and ethical aspects will be covered. With this, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current and future applications of AI in radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Steinsberger T, Donetti M, Lis M, Volz L, Wolf M, Durante M, Graeff C. Experimental Validation of a Real-Time Adaptive 4D-Optimized Particle Radiotherapy Approach to Treat Irregularly Moving Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1257-1268. [PMID: 36462690 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment of locally advanced lung cancer is limited by toxicity and insufficient local control. Particle therapy could enable more conformal treatment than intensity modulated photon therapy but is challenged by irregular tumor motion, associated range changes, and tumor deformations. We propose a new strategy for robust, online adaptive particle therapy, synergizing 4-dimensional optimization with real-time adaptive beam tracking. The strategy was tested and the required motion monitoring precision was determined. METHODS AND MATERIALS In multiphase 4-dimensional dose delivery (MP4D), a dedicated quasistatic treatment plan is delivered to each motion phase of periodic 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). In the new extension, "MP4D with residual tracking" (MP4DRT), lateral beam tracking compensates for the displacement of the tumor center-of-mass relative to the current phase in the planning 4DCT. We implemented this method in the dose delivery system of a clinical carbon facility and tested it experimentally for a lung cancer plan based on a periodic subset of a virtual lung 4DCT (planned motion amplitude 20 mm). Treatments were delivered in a quality assurance-like setting to a moving ionization chamber array. We considered variable motion amplitudes and baseline drifts. The required motion monitoring precision was evaluated by adding noise to the motion signal. Log-file-based dose reconstructions were performed in silico on the entire 4DCT phantom data set capable of simulating nonperiodic motion. MP4DRT was compared with MP4D, rescanned beam tracking, and internal target volume plans. Treatment quality was assessed in terms of target coverage (D95), dose homogeneity (D5-D95), conformity number, and dose to heart and lung. RESULTS For all considered motion scenarios and metrics, MP4DRT produced the most favorable metrics among the tested motion mitigation strategies and delivered high-quality treatments. The conformity was similar to static treatments. The motion monitoring precision required for D95 >95% was 1.9 mm. CONCLUSIONS With clinically feasible motion monitoring, MP4DRT can deliver highly conformal dose distributions to irregularly moving targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo Steinsberger
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany; Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Donetti
- Research and Development Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michelle Lis
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany; Physics Research, Leo Cancer Care, Middleton, Wisconsin; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
| | - Lennart Volz
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Moritz Wolf
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany; Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Christian Graeff
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany; Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Technical University, Darmstadt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hunt B, Gill GS, Alexander DA, Streeter SS, Gladstone DJ, Russo GA, Zaki BI, Pogue BW, Zhang R. Fast Deformable Image Registration for Real-Time Target Tracking During Radiation Therapy Using Cine MRI and Deep Learning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:983-993. [PMID: 36309075 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We developed a deep learning (DL) model for fast deformable image registration using 2-dimensional sagittal cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquired during radiation therapy and evaluated its potential for real-time target tracking compared with conventional image registration methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS Our DL model uses a pair of cine MRI images as input and provides a motion vector field (MVF) as output. The MVF is then applied to align the input images. A retrospective study was conducted to train and evaluate our model using cine MRI data from patients undergoing treatment for abdominal and thoracic tumors. For each treatment fraction, MR-linear accelerator delivery log files, tracking videos, and cine image files were analyzed. Individual MRI frames were temporally sampled to construct a large set of image registration pairs used to evaluate multiple methods. The DL model was optimized using 5-fold cross validation, and model outputs (transformed images and MVFs) using test set images were saved for comparison with 3 conventional registration methods (affine, b-spline, and demons). Evaluation metrics were 3-fold: (1) registration error, (2) MVF stability (both spatial and temporal), and (3) average computation time. RESULTS We analyzed >21 hours of cine MRI (>629,000 frames) acquired during 86 treatment fractions from 21 patients. In a test set of 10,320 image registration pairs, DL registration outperformed conventional methods in both registration error (affine, b-spline, demons, DL; root mean square error: 0.067, 0.040, 0.036, 0.032; paired t test demons vs DL: t[20] = 4.2, P < .001) and computation time per frame (51, 1150, 4583, 8 ms). Among deformable methods, spatial stability of resulting MVFs was comparable; however, the DL model had significantly improved temporal consistency. CONCLUSIONS DL-based image registration can leverage large-scale MR cine data sets to outperform conventional registration methods and is a promising solution for real-time deformable motion estimation in radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady Hunt
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
| | - Gobind S Gill
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Samuel S Streeter
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - David J Gladstone
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Gregory A Russo
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Bassem I Zaki
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Brian W Pogue
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kawula M, Hadi I, Nierer L, Vagni M, Cusumano D, Boldrini L, Placidi L, Corradini S, Belka C, Landry G, Kurz C. Patient-specific transfer learning for auto-segmentation in adaptive 0.35 T MRgRT of prostate cancer: a bi-centric evaluation. Med Phys 2023; 50:1573-1585. [PMID: 36259384 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online adaptive radiation therapy (RT) using hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerators (MR-Linacs) can administer a tailored radiation dose at each treatment fraction. Daily MR imaging followed by organ and target segmentation adjustments allow to capture anatomical changes, improve target volume coverage, and reduce the risk of side effects. The introduction of automatic segmentation techniques could help to further improve the online adaptive workflow by shortening the re-contouring time and reducing intra- and inter-observer variability. In fractionated RT, prior knowledge, such as planning images and manual expert contours, is usually available before irradiation, but not used by current artificial intelligence-based autocontouring approaches. PURPOSE The goal of this study was to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for automatic segmentation of bladder, rectum (organs at risk, OARs), and clinical target volume (CTV) for prostate cancer patients treated at 0.35 T MR-Linacs. Furthermore, we tested the CNNs generalization on data from independent facilities and compared them with the MR-Linac treatment planning system (TPS) propagated structures currently used in clinics. Finally, expert planning delineations were utilized for patient- (PS) and facility-specific (FS) transfer learning to improve auto-segmentation of CTV and OARs on fraction images. METHODS In this study, data from fractionated treatments at 0.35 T MR-Linacs were leveraged to develop a 3D U-Net-based automatic segmentation. Cohort C1 had 73 planning images and cohort C2 had 19 planning and 240 fraction images. The baseline models (BMs) were trained solely on C1 planning data using 53 MRIs for training and 10 for validation. To assess their accuracy, the models were tested on three data subsets: (i) 10 C1 planning images not used for training, (ii) 19 C2 planning, and (iii) 240 C2 fraction images. BMs also served as a starting point for FS and PS transfer learning, where the planning images from C2 were used for network parameter fine tuning. The segmentation output of the different trained models was compared against expert ground truth by means of geometric metrics. Moreover, a trained physician graded the network segmentations as well as the segmentations propagated by the clinical TPS. RESULTS The BMs showed dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.88(4) and 0.93(3) for the rectum and the bladder, respectively, independent of the facility. CTV segmentation with the BM was the best for intermediate- and high-risk cancer patients from C1 with DSC=0.84(5) and worst for C2 with DSC=0.74(7). The PS transfer learning brought a significant improvement in the CTV segmentation, yielding DSC=0.72(4) for post-prostatectomy and low-risk patients and DSC=0.88(5) for intermediate- and high-risk patients. The FS training did not improve the segmentation accuracy considerably. The physician's assessment of the TPS-propagated versus network-generated structures showed a clear advantage of the latter. CONCLUSIONS The obtained results showed that the presented segmentation technique has potential to improve automatic segmentation for MR-guided RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kawula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Indrawati Hadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Nierer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marica Vagni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Cusumano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mackay K, Bernstein D, Glocker B, Kamnitsas K, Taylor A. A Review of the Metrics Used to Assess Auto-Contouring Systems in Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:354-369. [PMID: 36803407 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Auto-contouring could revolutionise future planning of radiotherapy treatment. The lack of consensus on how to assess and validate auto-contouring systems currently limits clinical use. This review formally quantifies the assessment metrics used in studies published during one calendar year and assesses the need for standardised practice. A PubMed literature search was undertaken for papers evaluating radiotherapy auto-contouring published during 2021. Papers were assessed for types of metric and the methodology used to generate ground-truth comparators. Our PubMed search identified 212 studies, of which 117 met the criteria for clinical review. Geometric assessment metrics were used in 116 of 117 studies (99.1%). This includes the Dice Similarity Coefficient used in 113 (96.6%) studies. Clinically relevant metrics, such as qualitative, dosimetric and time-saving metrics, were less frequently used in 22 (18.8%), 27 (23.1%) and 18 (15.4%) of 117 studies, respectively. There was heterogeneity within each category of metric. Over 90 different names for geometric measures were used. Methods for qualitative assessment were different in all but two papers. Variation existed in the methods used to generate radiotherapy plans for dosimetric assessment. Consideration of editing time was only given in 11 (9.4%) papers. A single manual contour as a ground-truth comparator was used in 65 (55.6%) studies. Only 31 (26.5%) studies compared auto-contours to usual inter- and/or intra-observer variation. In conclusion, significant variation exists in how research papers currently assess the accuracy of automatically generated contours. Geometric measures are the most popular, however their clinical utility is unknown. There is heterogeneity in the methods used to perform clinical assessment. Considering the different stages of system implementation may provide a framework to decide the most appropriate metrics. This analysis supports the need for a consensus on the clinical implementation of auto-contouring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Mackay
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - D Bernstein
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - B Glocker
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK
| | - K Kamnitsas
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK; Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A Taylor
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Teuwen J, Gouw ZA, Sonke JJ. Artificial Intelligence for Image Registration in Radiation Oncology. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:330-342. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
11
|
Keall PJ, Brighi C, Glide-Hurst C, Liney G, Liu PZY, Lydiard S, Paganelli C, Pham T, Shan S, Tree AC, van der Heide UA, Waddington DEJ, Whelan B. Integrated MRI-guided radiotherapy - opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:458-470. [PMID: 35440773 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00631-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
MRI can help to categorize tissues as malignant or non-malignant both anatomically and functionally, with a high level of spatial and temporal resolution. This non-invasive imaging modality has been integrated with radiotherapy in devices that can differentially target the most aggressive and resistant regions of tumours. The past decade has seen the clinical deployment of treatment devices that combine imaging with targeted irradiation, making the aspiration of integrated MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) a reality. The two main clinical drivers for the adoption of MRIgRT are the ability to image anatomical changes that occur before and during treatment in order to adapt the treatment approach, and to image and target the biological features of each tumour. Using motion management and biological targeting, the radiation dose delivered to the tumour can be adjusted during treatment to improve the probability of tumour control, while simultaneously reducing the radiation delivered to non-malignant tissues, thereby reducing the risk of treatment-related toxicities. The benefits of this approach are expected to increase survival and quality of life. In this Review, we describe the current state of MRIgRT, and the opportunities and challenges of this new radiotherapy approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Keall
- ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Caterina Brighi
- ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carri Glide-Hurst
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Gary Liney
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Z Y Liu
- ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Suzanne Lydiard
- ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Trang Pham
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shanshan Shan
- ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - David E J Waddington
- ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brendan Whelan
- ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mylonas A, Booth J, Nguyen DT. A review of artificial intelligence applications for motion tracking in radiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:596-611. [PMID: 34288501 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
During radiotherapy, the organs and tumour move as a result of the dynamic nature of the body; this is known as intrafraction motion. Intrafraction motion can result in tumour underdose and healthy tissue overdose, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the treatment while increasing toxicity to the patients. There is a growing appreciation of intrafraction target motion management by the radiation oncology community. Real-time image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) can track the target and account for the motion, improving the radiation dose to the tumour and reducing the dose to healthy tissue. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches have been applied to motion management and have shown great potential. In this review, four main categories of motion management using AI are summarised: marker-based tracking, markerless tracking, full anatomy monitoring and motion prediction. Marker-based and markerless tracking approaches focus on tracking the individual target throughout the treatment. Full anatomy algorithms monitor for intrafraction changes in the full anatomy within the field of view. Motion prediction algorithms can be used to account for the latencies due to the time for the system to localise, process and act.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Mylonas
- ACRF Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeremy Booth
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Doan Trang Nguyen
- ACRF Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|