Treatment planning system and beam data validation for the ZAP-X: A novel self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system

Benchmarking Tests of Contemporary SRS Platforms: Have Technological Developments Resulted in Improved Treatment Plan Quality?

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery treatment delivery can be performed with a range of devices, each of which have evolved over recent years. We sought to evaluate the differences in performance of contemporary stereotactic radiosurgery platforms and also to compare them with earlier platform iterations from a previous benchmarking study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The following platforms were selected as "state of the art" in 2022: Gamma Knife Icon (GK), CyberKnife S7 (CK), Brainlab Elements (Elekta VersaHD and Varian TrueBeam), Varian Edge with HyperArc (HA), and Zap-X. Six benchmarking cases were used from a 2016 study. To reflect the evolution of increasing numbers of metastases treated per patient, a 14-target case was added. The 28 targets among the 7 patients ranged from 0.02 to 7.2 cc in volume. Participating centers were sent images and contours for each patient and asked to plan them to the best of their ability. Although some variation in local practice was allowed (eg, margins), groups were asked to prescribe a specified dose to each target and tolerance doses to organs at risk were agreed upon. Parameters compared included coverage, selectivity, Paddick conformity index, gradient index (GI), R50%, efficiency index, doses to organs at risk, and planning and treatment times.

RESULTS

Mean coverage for all targets ranged from 98.2% (Brainlab/Elekta) to 99.7% (HA-6X). Paddick conformity index values ranged from 0.722 (Zap-X) to 0.894 (CK). GI ranged from a mean of 3.52 (GK), representing the steepest dose gradient, to 5.08 (HA-10X). The GI appeared to follow a trend with beam energy, with the lowest values from the lower energy platforms (GK, 1.25 MeV; Zap-X, 3 MV) and the highest value from the highest energy (HA-10X). Mean R50% values ranged from 4.48 (GK) to 5.98 (HA-10X). Treatment times were lowest for C-arm linear accelerators.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with earlier studies, newer equipment appears to deliver higher quality treatments. CyberKnife and linear accelerator platforms appear to give higher conformity whereas lower energy platforms yield a steeper dose gradient.

Machine performance and stability of the first clinical self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system: Initial 2-year experience

This study provides insight into the overall system performance, stability, and delivery accuracy of the first clinical self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system. Quality assurance procedures specifically developed for this unit are discussed, and trends and variations over the course of 2-years for beam constancy, targeting and dose delivery are presented. Absolute dose calibration for this 2.7 MV unit is performed to deliver 1 cGy/MU at d_max  = 7 mm at a source-to-axis-distance (SAD) of 450 mm for a 25 mm collimator. Output measurements were made with 2-setups: a device that attaches to a fixed position on the couch (daily) and a spherical phantom that attaches to the collimating wheel (monthly). Beam energy was measured using a cylindrical acrylic phantom at depths of 100 (D₁₀ ) and 200 (D₂₀ ) mm. Beam profiles were evaluated using Gafchromic film and compared with TPS beam data. Accuracy in beam targeting was quantified with the Winston-Lutz (WL) and end-to-end (E2E) tests. Delivery quality assurance (DQA) was performed prior to clinical treatments using Gafchromic EBT3/XD film. Net cumulative output adjustments of 15% (pre-clinical), 9% (1st year) and 3% (2nd year) were made. The mean output was 0.997 ± 0.010 cGy/MU (range: 0.960-1.046 cGy/MU) and 0.993 ± 0.029 cGy/MU (range: 0.884-1.065 cGy/MU) for measurements with the daily and monthly setups, respectively. The mean relative beam energy (D₁₀ /D₂₀ ) was 0.998 ± 0.004 (range: 0.991-1.006). The mean total targeting error was 0.46 ± 0.17 mm (range: 0.06-0.98 mm) for the WL and 0.52 ± 0.28 mm (range: 0.11-1.27 mm) for the E2E tests. The average gamma pass rates for DQA measurements were 99.0% and 90.5% for 2%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm gamma criteria, respectively. This SRS unit meets tolerance limits recommended by TG-135, MPPG 9a., and TG-142 with a treatment delivery accuracy similar to what is achieved by other SRS systems.

Technical note: Absolute dose measurements of a vault-free radiosurgery system

BACKGROUND

Methods for accurate absolute dose (AD) calibration are essential for the proper functioning of radiotherapy treatment machines. Many systems do not conform to TG-51 calibration standards, and modifications are required. TG-21 calibration is also a viable methodology for these situations with the appropriate setup, equipment, and factors. It has been shown that both these methods result in minimal errors. A similar approach has been taken in calibrating the dose for a recent vault-free radiosurgery system.

PURPOSE

To evaluate modified TG-21 and TG-51 protocols for AD calibrations of the ZAP-X radiosurgery system using ion chambers, film, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).

METHODS

The current treatment planning system for ZAP-X requires AD calibration at d_max (7 mm) and 450 mm source-to-axis distance. Both N D , w 60 C o [ G y / C ] $N_{D,w}^{{60}Co}[ {Gy/C} ]$ and N_x [R/C] calibration coefficients were provided by an accredited dosimetry calibration laboratory for a physikalisch technische werkstatten (PTW) 31010 chamber (0.125 cc). The vendor provides an f-bracket that can be mounted on the collimator. Various phantoms can then be attached to the f-bracket. A custom acrylic phantom was designed based on recommendations from TG-21 and technical report series-398 that places the chamber at 500 mm from the source with a depth of 44-mm acrylic and 456-mm SSD. N_x along with other TG-21 parameters was used to calculate the AD. Measurements using a PTW MP3-XS water tank and the same chamber were used to calculate AD using N D , w 60 C o $N_{D,w}^{{60}Co}$ and TG-51 factors. Dose verification was performed using Gafchromic film and 3rd party TLDs.

RESULTS

Measurements from TG-51, TG-21 (utilizing the custom acrylic phantom), film, and TLDs agreed to within ± 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified TG-51 AD calculation in water is preferred but may not be practical due to the difficulty in tank setup. The TG-21 modified protocol using a custom acrylic phantom is an accurate alternative option for dose calibration. Both of these methods are within acceptable agreement and provide confidence in the system's AD calibration.

Self-Shielding Gyroscopic Radiosurgery - A First Clinical Experience, Case Series, and Dosimetric Comparison

BACKGROUND

Self-shielding gyroscopic radiosurgery (GRS) represents a technical innovation in the field of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). GRS does not require a radiation vault and is optimized for radiosurgical treatments. Reports on its usage are limited. We describe the first clinical experience of GRS at our institution to assess the application of GRS in the treatment of cranial tumors. Moreover, we perform a dosimetric comparison to robotic radiosurgery (RRS) with vestibular schwannoma (VS) GRS patients.

METHODS

Patients who were treated with GRS between July and November 2021 were included. Patient, tumor, and dosimetric characteristics were retrospectively summarized and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with 48 intracranial tumors were included. Tumor entities mostly comprised VS, brain metastases, and meningiomas. The median prescription dose and isodose line were 13.5 Gy and 50.0% for benign neoplasia vs. 20 Gy and 60.0% for malignant tumors, respectively. The mean planning target volume was 1.5 cubic centimeters. All patients received a single-fraction treatment without encountering any technical setup difficulties. Treatment plan comparisons with RRS revealed comparable plan characteristics, dose gradients, and organs at risk doses. Significant differences were detected concerning the new conformity index and number of monitor units per treatment (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This case series provides more evidence on the usage of self-shielding GRS in the management of cranial tumors. Dosimetric comparisons for VS cases revealed mostly equivalent dosimetric characteristics to RRS. Further clinical and physical analyses for GRS are on their way.

Small-field beam data acquisition, detector dependency, and film-based validation for a novel self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system

PURPOSE

This study reports a single-institution experience with beam data acquisition and film-based validation for a novel self-shielded sterotactic radiosurgery unit and investigates detector dependency on field output factors (OFs), off-axis ratios (OARs), and percent depth dose (PDD) measurements within the context of small-field dosimetry.

METHODS

The delivery platform for this unit consists of a 2.7-MV S-band linear accelerator mounted on coupled gimbals that rotate around a common isocenter (source-to-axis distance [SAD] = 450 mm), allowing for more than 260 noncoplanar beam angles. Beam collimation is achieved via a tungsten collimator wheel with eight circular apertures ranging from 4 mm to 25 mm in diameter. Three diodes (PTW 60012 Diode E, PTW 60018 SRS Diode, and Sun Nuclear EDGE) and a synthetic diamond detector (PTW 60019 micro Diamond [µD] detector) were used for OAR, PDD, and OF measurements. OFs were also acquired with a PTW 31022 PinPoint ionization chamber. Beam scanning was performed using a 3D water tank at depths of 7, 50, 100, 200, and 250 mm with a source-to-surface distance of 450 mm. OFs were measured at the depth of maximum dose (d_max  = 7 mm) with the SAD at 450 mm. Gafchromic EBT3 film was used to validate OF and profile measurements and as a reference detector for estimating correction factors for active detector OFs. Deviations in field size, penumbra, and PDDs across the different detectors were quantified.

RESULTS

Relative OFs (ROFs) for the diodes were within 1.4% for all collimators except for 5 and 7.5 mm, for which SRS Diode measurements were higher by 1.6% and 2.6% versus Diode E. The µD ROFs were within 1.4% of the diode measurements. PinPoint ROFs were lower by >10% for the 4-mm and 5-mm collimators versus the Diode E and µD. Corrections to OFs using EBT3 film as a reference were within 1.2% for all diodes and the µD detector for collimators 10 mm and greater and within 2.0%, 2.8%, and 1.1% for the 7.5-, 5-, and 4-mm collimators, respectively. The maximum difference in full width at half maximum (FWHM) between the Diode E and the other active detectors was for the 25-mm collimator and was 0.09 mm (µD), 0.16 mm (SRS Diode), and 0.65 mm (EDGE). Differences seen in PDDs beyond the depth of d_max were <1% across the three diodes and the µD. FWHM and penumbra measurements made using EBT3 film were within 1.34% and 3.26%, respectively, of the processed profile data entered into the treatment planning system.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal differences were seen in OAR and PDD measurements acquired with the diodes and the µD. ROFs measured with the three diodes were within 2.6% and within 1.4% versus the µD. Gafchromic Film measurements provided independent verification of the OAR and OF measurements. Estimated corrections to OFs using film as a reference were <1.6% for the Diode E, EDGE, and µD detector.