Out-of-field dose assessment for a 1.5 T MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters

Electron streaming dose measurements and calculations on a 1.5 T MR-Linac

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of different dosimeters and the treatment planning system (TPS) for assessing the skin dose due to the electron streaming effect (ESE) on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR)-linac.

METHOD

Skin dose due to the ESE on an MR-linac (Unity, Elekta) was investigated using a solid water phantom rotated 45° in the x-y plane (IEC61217) and centered at the isocenter. The phantom was irradiated with 1 × 1, 3 × 3, 5 × 5, 10 × 10, and 22 × 22 cm2 fields, gantry at 90°. Out-of-field doses (OFDs) deposited by electron streams generated at the entry and exit surface of the angled phantom were measured on the surface of solid water slabs placed ±20.0 cm from the isocenter along the x-direction. A high-resolution MOSkin™ detector served as a benchmark due to its shallower depth of measurement that matches the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended depth for skin dose assessment (0.07 mm). MOSkin™ doses were compared to EBT3 film, OSLDs, a diamond detector, and the TPS where the experimental setup was modeled using two separate calculation parameters settings: a 0.1 cm dose grid with 0.2% statistical uncertainty (0.1 cm, 0.2%) and a 0.2 cm dose grid with 3.0% statistical uncertainty (0.2 cm, 3.0%).

RESULTS

OSLD, film, the 0.1 cm, 0.2%, and 0.2 cm, 3.0% TPS ESE doses, underestimated skin doses measured by the MOSkin™ by as much as -75.3%, -7.0%, -24.7%, and -41.9%, respectively. Film results were most similar to MOSkin™ skin dose measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that electron streams can deposit significant doses outside the primary field and that dosimeter choice and TPS calculation settings greatly influence the reported readings. Due to the steep dose gradient of the ESE, EBT3 film remains the choice for accurate skin dose assessment in this challenging environment.

Assessing the Impact of a 1.5 T Transverse Magnetic Field in Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Patients

Purpose: Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy enables visualization of static anatomy, capturing tumor motion, and extracting quantitative image features for treatment verification and outcome monitoring. However, magnetic fields in online MR imaging (MRI) require efforts to ensure accurate dose measurements. This study aimed to assess the dosimetric impact of a 1.5 T magnetic field in esophageal cancer radiotherapy using MR-linac, exploring treatment adaptation potential and personalized medicine benefits. Methods: A prospective cohort study enrolled 100 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing 4DCT and 3DCT scans before radiotherapy. The heart was contoured on 3DCT, 4DCT end expiration (EE), and 4DCT end inhalation (EI) images by the same radiation oncologist. Reference RT plans were designed on 3DCT, with adjustments for different phases generating 5 plan types per patient. Variations in dose-volume parameters for organs at risk and the target area among different plans were compared using Monaco 5.40.04. Results: Slight dose distortions at air-tissue interfaces were observed in the magnetic field's presence. Dose at air-tissue interfaces (chest wall and heart wall) was slightly higher in some patients (3.0% tissue increased by 4.3 Gy on average) compared to nonmagnetic conditions. Average clinical target volume coverage V100 dropped from 99% to 95% compared to reference plans (planEI and planEE). Dose-volume histogram variation between the original plan and reference plans was within 2.3%. Superior-inferior (SI) direction displacement was significantly larger than lateral and anterior-posterior directions (P < .05). Conclusion: Significant SI direction shift in lower esophageal cancerous regions during RT indicates the magnetic field's dosimetric impact, including the electron return effect at tissue-air boundaries. Changes in OAR dose could serve as valuable indicators of organ impairment and target dose alterations, especially for cardiac tissue when using the 1.5 T linac method. Reoptimizing the plan with the magnetic field enhances the feasibility of achieving a clinically acceptable treatment plan for esophageal cancer patients.

Magnetic field influence on the light yield from fiber-coupled BCF-60 plastic scintillators of relevance for output factor dosimetry in MR-linacs

Organic plastic scintillators are of interest for ionizing radiation dosimetry in megavoltage photon beams because plastic scintillators have a mass density very similar to that of water. This leads to insignificant perturbation of the electron fluence at the point of measurement in a water phantom. This feature is a benefit for dosimetry in strong magnetic fields (e.g., 1.5 T) as found in linacs with magnetic resonance imaging. The objective of this work was to quantify if the light yield per dose for the scintillating fiber BCF-60 material from Saint-Gobain Ceramics and Plastics Inc. is constant regardless of the magnetic flux density. This question is of importance for establishing traceable measurement in MR linacs using this detector type. Experiments were carried out using an accelerator combined with an electromagnet (max 0.7 T). Scintillator probes were read out using chromatic stem-removal techniques based on two optical channels or full spectral information. Reference dosimetry was carried out with PTW31010 and PTW31021 ionization chambers. TOPAS/GEANT4 was used for modelling. The light yield per dose for the BCF-60 was found to be strongly influenced by the magnitude of the magnetic field from about 1 mT to 0.7 T. The light yield per dose increased (1.3 ± 0.2)% (k = 1) from 1 mT to 10 mT and it increased (4.5 ± 0.9)% (k = 1) from 0 T to 0.7 T. Previous studies of the influence of magnetic fields on medical scintillator dosimetry have been unable to clearly identify if observed changes in scintillator response with magnetic field strength were related to changes in dose, stem signal removal, or scintillator light yield. In the current study of BCF-60, we see a clear change in light yield with magnetic field, and none of the other effects.

Out-of-Field Dose Measurement by TLD Dosimetry and Estimation of Radiation-Induced Secondary Cancer Risk of Thyroid and Breast from Head Radiotherapy

Background

Radiation therapy, the most common form of cancer treatment, can result in late complications, such as secondary breast and thyroid cancers.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of secondary cancers using two radiobiological models of Excess Absolute Risk (EAR) and Excess Relative Risk (ERR) in patients with brain cancer undergoing radiotherapy for improved survival rates of cancer patients.

Material and Methods

In this expository cross-sectional study, 45 patients under the age of 40 years underwent Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) using a compact accelerator in Shahid Ramezanzadeh Hospital, Yazd, Iran. Out-of-field organ dose measurement was performed using a Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD) to determine the dose to thyroid and breast tissues. The risk of secondary cancers in these organs was calculated 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years after radiation therapy.

Results

The mean values of thyroid cancer risk in men and women were 0.418±0.509 and 0.274±0.306, respectively. ERR values of breast cancer in 3-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year women undergoing radiation therapy were 1.084±2.938, 0.594±1.407, 0.248±0.497, 0.138±0.248, and 0.091±0.148, respectively. EAR values of breast cancer in 3-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year women following radiation therapy were 0.064±0.060, 0.077±0.071, 0.119±0.100, 0.178±0.248, and 0.259±0.178, respectively.

Conclusion

After irradiation, the risk of secondary cancer is affected by factors, such as the patient's age and gender. The secondary thyroid cancer is higher than that of other organs, such as the breast, in the patients undergoing WBRT.

High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac

The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin™, for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin™ entry surface doses, relative to D_max, were (9.9 ± 0.2)%, (10.1 ± 0.3)%, (11.3 ± 0.6)%, (12.9 ± 1.0)%, and (13.4 ± 1.0)% for 1 × 1 cm², 3 × 3 cm², 5 × 5 cm², 10 × 10 cm², and 22 × 22 cm² fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin™ measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 × 10 cm² field size using the MOSkin™ and 17.9% for the 22 × 22 cm² field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin™ detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.

Compact bunker shielding assessment for 1.5 T MR-Linac

This study evaluated the effect of the 1.5 T magnetic field of the magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) on the radiation leakage doses penetrating the bunker radiation shielding wall. The evaluated 1.5 T MR-Linac Unity system has a bunker of the minimum recommended size. Unlike a conventional Linac, both primary beam transmission and secondary beam leakage were considered independently in the design and defined at the machine boundary away from the isocenter. Moreover, additional shielding was designed considering the numerous ducts between the treatment room and other rooms. The Linac shielding was evaluated by measuring the leakage doses at several locations. The intrinsic vibration and magnetic field were inspected at the proposed isocenter of the system. For verification, leakage doses were measured before and after applying the magnetic field. The intrinsic vibration and magnetic field readings were below the permitted limit. The leakage dose (0.05–12.2 µSv/week) also complied with internationally stipulated limits. The special shielding achieved a five-fold reduction in leakage dose. Applying the magnetic field increased the leakage dose by 0.12 to 4.56 µSv/week in several measurement points, although these values fall within experimental uncertainty. Thus, the effect of the magnetic field on the leakage dose could not be ascertained.

Out-of-field dose and its constituent components for a 1.5 T MR-Linac

This study aims to quantify the relative contributions of phantom scatter, collimator scatter and head leakage to the out-of-field doses (OFDs) of both static fields and clinical intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments in a 1.5 T MR-Linac. The OFDs of static fields were measured at increasing distances from the field edge in an MR-conditional water phantom. Inline scans at depths of dmax (14 mm), 50 and 100 mm were performed for static fields of 5 × 5, 10 × 10 and 15 × 15 cm²under three different conditions: full scatter, with phantom scatter prevented, and head leakage only. Crossline scans at isocenter and offset positions were performed in full scatter condition. EBT3 radiochromic films were placed at 100 mm depth of solid water phantom to measure the OFD of clinical IMRT plans. All water tank data were normalized to Dmax of a 10 × 10 cm²field and the film results were presented as a fraction of the target mean dose.The OFD in the inline direction varied from 3.5% (15 × 15 cm², 100 mm depth, 50 mm distance) to 0.014% (5 × 5 cm², dmax, 400 mm distance). For all static fields, the collimator scatter was higher than the phantom scatter and head leakage at a distance of 100-400 mm. Head leakage remained the smallest among the three components, except at long distances (>375 mm) with small field size. Compared to the inline scans, the crossline scans at the isocenter showed higher doses at distances longer than 80 mm. All crossline profiles at longitudinal offset positions showed a cone shape with laterally shifted maxima. The OFD of IMRT deliveries varied with different target size. For prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment, the OFD decreased from 2% to 0.03% at a distance of 50-500 mm. The OFDs have been measured for a 1.5 T MR-Linac. The presented dosimetric data are valuable for radiation safety assessments on patients treated with the MR-Linac, such as evaluating carcinogenic risk and radiation exposure to cardiac implantable electronic devices.