Hybrid U-Net-based deep learning model for volume segmentation of lung nodules in CT images

Systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning applications in computed tomography lung cancer segmentation

BACKGROUND

Accurate segmentation of lung tumors on chest computed tomography (CT) scans is crucial for effective diagnosis and treatment planning. Deep Learning (DL) has emerged as a promising tool in medical imaging, particularly for lung cancer segmentation. However, its efficacy across different clinical settings and tumor stages remains variable.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until November 7, 2023. We assessed the quality of these studies by using the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tools. This analysis included data from various clinical settings and stages of lung cancer. Key performance metrics, such as the Dice similarity coefficient, were pooled, and factors affecting algorithm performance, such as clinical setting, algorithm type, and image processing techniques, were examined.

RESULTS

Our analysis of 37 studies revealed a pooled Dice score of 79 % (95 % CI: 76 %-83 %), indicating moderate accuracy. Radiotherapy studies had a slightly lower score of 78 % (95 % CI: 74 %-82 %). A temporal increase was noted, with recent studies (post-2022) showing improvement from 75 % (95 % CI: 70 %-81 %). to 82 % (95 % CI: 81 %-84 %). Key factors affecting performance included algorithm type, resolution adjustment, and image cropping. QUADAS-2 assessments identified ambiguous risks in 78 % of studies due to data interval omissions and concerns about generalizability in 8 % due to nodule size exclusions, and CLAIM criteria highlighted areas for improvement, with an average score of 27.24 out of 42.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates DL algorithms' promising but varied efficacy in lung cancer segmentation, particularly higher efficacy noted in early stages. The results highlight the critical need for continued development of tailored DL models to improve segmentation accuracy across diverse clinical settings, especially in advanced cancer stages with greater challenges. As recent studies demonstrate, ongoing advancements in algorithmic approaches are crucial for future applications.

Development and validation of a deep learning model for multicategory pneumonia classification on chest computed tomography: a multicenter and multireader study

Background

Accurate diagnosis of pneumonia is vital for effective disease management and mortality reduction, but it can be easily confused with other conditions on chest computed tomography (CT) due to an overlap in imaging features. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model based on chest CT for accurate classification of viral pneumonia (VP), bacterial pneumonia (BP), fungal pneumonia (FP), pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), and no pneumonia (NP) conditions.

Methods

In total, 1,776 cases from five hospitals in different regions were retrospectively collected from September 2019 to June 2023. All cases were enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and ultimately 1,611 cases were used to develop the DL model with 5-fold cross-validation, with 165 cases being used as the external test set. Five radiologists blindly reviewed the images from the internal and external test sets first without and then with DL model assistance. Precision, recall, F1-score, weighted F1-average, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the model performance.

Results

The F1-scores of the DL model on the internal and external test sets were, respectively, 0.947 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.936-0.958] and 0.933 (95% CI: 0.916-0.950) for VP, 0.511 (95% CI: 0.487-0.536) and 0.591 (95% CI: 0.557-0.624) for BP, 0.842 (95% CI: 0.824-0.860) and 0.848 (95% CI: 0.824-0.873) for FP, 0.843 (95% CI: 0.826-0.861) and 0.795 (95% CI: 0.767-0.822) for PTB, and 0.975 (95% CI: 0.968-0.983) and 0.976 (95% CI: 0.965-0.986) for NP, with a weighted F1-average of 0.883 (95% CI: 0.867-0.898) and 0.846 (95% CI: 0.822-0.871), respectively. The model performed well and showed comparable performance in both the internal and external test sets. The F1-score of the DL model was higher than that of radiologists, and with DL model assistance, radiologists achieved a higher F1-score. On the external test set, the F1-score of the DL model (F1-score 0.848; 95% CI: 0.824-0.873) was higher than that of the radiologists (F1-score 0.541; 95% CI: 0.507-0.575) as was its precision for the other three pneumonia conditions (all P values <0.001). With DL model assistance, the F1-score for FP (F1-score 0.541; 95% CI: 0.507-0.575) was higher than that achieved without assistance (F1-score 0.778; 95% CI: 0.750-0.807) as was its precision for the other three pneumonia conditions (all P values <0.001).

Conclusions

The DL approach can effectively classify pneumonia and can help improve radiologists' performance, supporting the full integration of DL results into the routine workflow of clinicians.

Factors influencing the outcome of volumetry tools for pulmonary nodule analysis: a systematic review and attempted meta-analysis

Health systems worldwide are implementing lung cancer screening programmes to identify early-stage lung cancer and maximise patient survival. Volumetry is recommended for follow-up of pulmonary nodules and outperforms other measurement methods. However, volumetry is known to be influenced by multiple factors. The objectives of this systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42022370233) are to summarise the current knowledge regarding factors that influence volumetry tools used in the analysis of pulmonary nodules, assess for significant clinical impact, identify gaps in current knowledge and suggest future research. Five databases (Medline, Scopus, Journals@Ovid, Embase and Emcare) were searched on the 21st of September, 2022, and 137 original research studies were included, explicitly testing the potential impact of influencing factors on the outcome of volumetry tools. The summary of these studies is tabulated, and a narrative review is provided. A subset of studies (n = 16) reporting clinical significance were selected, and their results were combined, if appropriate, using meta-analysis. Factors with clinical significance include the segmentation algorithm, quality of the segmentation, slice thickness, the level of inspiration for solid nodules, and the reconstruction algorithm and kernel in subsolid nodules. Although there is a large body of evidence in this field, it is unclear how to apply the results from these studies in clinical practice as most studies do not test for clinical relevance. The meta-analysis did not improve our understanding due to the small number and heterogeneity of studies testing for clinical significance. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Many studies have investigated the influencing factors of pulmonary nodule volumetry, but only 11% of these questioned their clinical relevance in their management. The heterogeneity among these studies presents a challenge in consolidating results and clinical application of the evidence. KEY POINTS: • Factors influencing the volumetry of pulmonary nodules have been extensively investigated. • Just 11% of studies test clinical significance (wrongly diagnosing growth). • Nodule size interacts with most other influencing factors (especially for smaller nodules). • Heterogeneity among studies makes comparison and consolidation of results challenging. • Future research should focus on clinical applicability, screening, and updated technology.

Deep neural network pulmonary nodule segmentation methods for CT images: Literature review and experimental comparisons

Automatic and accurate segmentation of pulmonary nodules in CT images can help physicians perform more accurate quantitative analysis, diagnose diseases, and improve patient survival. In recent years, with the development of deep learning technology, pulmonary nodule segmentation methods based on deep neural networks have gradually replaced traditional segmentation methods. This paper reviews the recent pulmonary nodule segmentation algorithms based on deep neural networks. First, the heterogeneity of pulmonary nodules, the interpretability of segmentation results, and external environmental factors are discussed, and then the open-source 2D and 3D models in medical segmentation tasks in recent years are applied to the Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative (LIDC) and Lung Nodule Analysis 16 (Luna16) datasets for comparison, and the visual diagnostic features marked by radiologists are evaluated one by one. According to the analysis of the experimental data, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) In the pulmonary nodule segmentation task, the performance of the 2D segmentation models DSC is generally better than that of the 3D segmentation models. (2) 'Subtlety', 'Sphericity', 'Margin', 'Texture', and 'Size' have more influence on pulmonary nodule segmentation, while 'Lobulation', 'Spiculation', and 'Benign and Malignant' features have less influence on pulmonary nodule segmentation. (3) Higher accuracy in pulmonary nodule segmentation can be achieved based on better-quality CT images. (4) Good contextual information acquisition and attention mechanism design positively affect pulmonary nodule segmentation.