Normal infant after combination chemotherapy including teniposide for Burkitt's lymphoma in pregnancy

Gynaecological cancers in pregnancy

Cervical and ovarian cancers are the most common gynaecological cancers diagnosed during pregnancy. In early-stage cervical cancer during the first and at the beginning of the second trimester, the two main considerations for management of the patient are the tumour size (and stage) and nodal staging. MRI and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy are useful for clinicians planning a potentially conservative approach. The management of patients with locally advanced cervical disease is controversial and should be discussed on a case-by-case basis according to the tumour size, radiological findings, the term of pregnancy, and the patient's wishes. Different histological types of malignant ovarian diseases arise during pregnancy and their management depends on the diagnosis (histological subtypes, tumour differentiation, and nodal status), the tumour stage, and the trimester of the pregnancy. In patients with peritoneal spread or high-risk early-stage disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pregnancy preservation could be appropriate.

Burkitt’s Lymphoma of the Ovary in Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Burkitt's lymphoma is a rapidly growing and, if untreated, rapidly fatal tumor derived from B-lymphocytes. The occurrence of Burkitt's lymphoma during pregnancy is rare.

CASE

A patient with Burkitt's lymphoma presented at 12 weeks of gestation with abdominal and tooth pain. An 11 x 11 x 15 cm mass was seen on abdominal/pelvic ultrasonogram. She underwent a left salpingo-oophorectomy with removal of the mass, as well as a tooth extraction. The pathology examination confirmed lymphoma in the left ovary and in the tissue surrounding the extracted tooth. After surgical resection, she was treated with multiagent chemotherapy beginning at 13 4/7 weeks of gestation. At 39 weeks, she delivered a viable female infant weighing 2,270 g.

CONCLUSION

The finding of an adnexal mass in conjunction with head and neck symptoms led to consideration of Burkitt's lymphoma. Prompt treatment with multiagent chemotherapy should be considered for pregnant patients with Burkitt's lymphoma.

Successful chemotherapy including epirubicin in a pregnant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patient

We report a case of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) successfully treated with combination chemotherapy during pregnancy. The histological diagnosis was large-cell B-type NHL. Four courses of chemotherapy with epirubicin, vincristine and prednisolone were given before delivery. The patient is in complete remission and her baby, now four years old, has developed normally. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of epirubicin administration during pregnancy and in which chemotherapy was given safely to NHL patients during the second and third trimester of pregnancy.

International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of topoisomerase-interactive agents

Drugs that interact with DNA topoisomerases I and II hold great promise for the treatment of cancer, however, like many other anti-cancer agents, they are a double-edged sword and may themselves cause mutation and cancer. In vitro studies show that clinically effective agents, such as etoposide, doxorubicin and others, stabilize a ternary complex where topoisomerase II is covalently linked to DNA. This complex represents an intermediate in the topoisomerase-II catalyzed DNA supercoil relaxation reaction. Camptothecin and its analogues stabilize a similar ternary complex, in vitro, consisting of topoisomerase I covalently linked to DNA at single-strand breaks. Short-term tests of genotoxicity confirm that topoisomerase-interactive agents are mutagenic and suggest common mechanisms by which they induce mutation and selectively kill tumor cells. These agents induce sister-chromatid exchange, chromosomal aberrations and mutations in specific mammalian genes. Their propensity to induce small colonies in the L5178/TK+/(-)-3.7.2C assay implies that topoisomerase-interactive agents induce large DNA rearrangements and deletions. These may result from topoisomerase-subunit exchange at drug-stabilized ternary complexes or from attempts by the cell to bypass the replication block caused by stabilized ternary complexes. Studies in bacterial mutation assays suggest that topoisomerase-interactive agents may also induce mutations, albeit at a lower rate, through simple DNA intercalation or via generation of oxygen free radicals. Second malignancies observed in patients previously treated with topoisomerase II interactive agents suggest these may be an important clinical consequence of their capacity to induce mutation. In particular, a unique form of acute myelogenous leukemia is observed at strikingly high frequencies after treatment with relatively high doses of the epipodophyllotoxins etoposide and teniposide. This form of AML has been reported after the uses of other classes of topoisomerase-interactive agents as well. Cancer induction is therefore a toxic consequence predicted by short-term tests of genotoxicity and should be weighed against the potential therapeutic benefits of topoisomerase-interactive agents.