Screening for Wilms' tumour in patients with aniridia, Beckwith syndrome, or hemihypertrophy

Genetic predisposition in pediatric oncology

Identifying patients with a genetic predisposition for developing malignant tumors has a significant impact on both the patient and family. Recognition of genetic predisposition, before diagnosing a malignant pathology, may lead to early diagnosis of a neoplasia. Recognition of a genetic predisposition syndrome after the diagnosis of neoplasia can result in a change of treatment plan, a specific follow-up of adverse treatment effects and, of course, a long-term follow-up focusing on the early detection of a second neoplasia.

Responsible for genetic syndromes that predispose individuals to malignant pathology are germline mutations. These mutations are present in all cells of conception, they can be inherited or can occur de novo.

Several mechanisms of inheritance are described: Mendelian autosomal dominant, Mendelian autosomal recessive, X-linked patterns, constitutional chromosomal abnormality and non-Mendelian inheritance.

In the following review we will present the most important genetic syndromes in pediatric oncology.

Phenotype, cancer risk, and surveillance in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome depending on molecular genetic subgroups

Patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) have an increased risk to develop cancer in childhood, especially Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma. The risk varies depending on the cause of BWS. We obtained clinical and molecular data in our cohort of children with BWS, including tumor occurrences, and correlated phenotype and genotype. We obtained similar data from larger cohorts reported in the literature. Phenotype, genotype and tumor occurrence were available in 229 of our own patients. Minor differences in phenotype existed depending on genotype/epigenotype, similar to earlier studies. By adding patients from the literature, we obtained data on genotype and tumor occurrence of in total 1,971 BWS patients. Tumor risks were highest in the IC1 (H19/IGF2:IG-DMR) hypermethylation subgroup (28%) and pUPD subgroup (16%) and were lower in the KCNQ1OT1:TSS-DMR (IC2) subgroup (2.6%), CDKN1C (6.9%) subgroup, and the group in whom no molecular defect was detectable (6.7%). Wilms tumors (median age 24 months) were frequent in the IC1 (24%) and pUPD (7.9%) subgroups. Hepatoblastoma occurred mostly in the pUPD (3.5%) and IC2 (0.7%) subgroups, never in the IC1 and CDKN1C subgroups, and always before 30 months of age. In the CDKN1C subgroup 2.8% of patients developed neuroblastoma. We conclude tumor risks in BWS differ markedly depending on molecular background. We propose a differentiated surveillance protocol, based on tumor risks in the various molecular subgroups causing BWS. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: growth pattern and tumor risk according to molecular mechanism, and guidelines for tumor surveillance

BACKGROUND

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is an overgrowth syndrome associated with an increased risk of pediatric tumors. The underlying molecular abnormalities may be genetic (CDKN1C mutations or 11p15 paternal uniparental isodisomy, pUPD) or epigenetic (imprinting center region 1, ICR1, gain of methylation, ICR1 GOM, or ICR2 loss of methylation, ICR2 LOM).

AIM

We aimed to describe a cohort of 407 BWS patients with molecular defects of the 11p15 domain followed prospectively after molecular diagnosis.

RESULTS

Birth weight and length were significantly higher in patients with ICR1 GOM than in the other groups. ICR2 LOM and CDKN1C mutations were associated with a higher prevalence of exomphalos. Mean adult height (regardless of molecular subtype, n = 35) was 1.8 ± 1.2 SDS, with 18 patients having a final height above +2 SDS. The prevalence of tumors was 8.6% in the whole population; 28.6 and 17.3% of the patients with ICR1 GOM (all Wilms tumors) and 11p15 pUPD, respectively, developed a tumor during infancy. Conversely, the prevalence of tumors in patients with ICR2 LOM and CDKN1C mutations were 3.1 and 8.8%, respectively, with no Wilms tumors.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results for a large cohort, we formulated guidelines for the follow-up of these patients according to the molecular subtype of BWS.

Innovations in the management of Wilms' tumor

Advances in the management of Wilms' tumor have been dramatic over the past half century, not in small part due to the institution of multimodal therapy and the formation of collaborative study groups. While different opinions exist in the management of Wilms' tumors depending on where one lives and practices, survival rates have surpassed 90% across the board in Western societies. With more children surviving into adulthood, the concerns about morbidity have reached the forefront and now represent as much a consideration as oncologic outcomes these days. Innovations in treatment are on the horizon in the form of potential tumor markers, molecular biological means of testing for chemotherapeutic responsiveness, and advances in the delivery of chemotherapy for recurrent or recalcitrant tumors. Other technological innovations are being applied to childhood renal tumors, such as minimally invasive and nephron-sparing approaches. Risk stratification also allows for children to forego potentially unnecessary treatments and their associated morbidities. Wilms' tumor stands as a great example of the gains that can be made through protocol-driven therapy with strenuous outcomes analyses. These gains continue to spark interest in minimization of morbidity, while avoiding any compromise in oncologic efficacy. While excitement and innovation are important in the advancement of treatment delivery, we must continue to temper this enthusiasm and carefully evaluate options in order to continue to provide the highest standard of care in the management of this now highly curable disease.

Incidence of abdominal tumors in syndromic and idiopathic hemihypertrophy/isolated hemihyperplasia

BACKGROUND

There is a reported increased risk of intra-abdominal tumors in children with both syndromic (SH) and isolated idiopathic hemihyperplasia (IH). Recommendations for tumor surveillance have been made, although there is no consensus for frequency and duration of screening. Our objective was to review the incidence of abdominal neoplasms in our pediatric population with SH and IH.

METHODS

We reviewed the diagnostic criteria, imaging findings, and any associated syndrome in all patients diagnosed with hemihypertrophy over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

One of 10 patients with SH, a child with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, developed a hepatoblastoma resulting in a 10% tumor incidence in patients with SH. Three of the 250 (1.2%) children with IH developed an abdominal neoplasm. One was diagnosed with adrenal carcinoma and the other 2 with Wilms tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an increased incidence of abdominal tumors in both SH and IH, however, our incidence of tumors with IH is lower than earlier reported studies. On the basis of this lower 1.2% incidence, the current literature on IH and available molecular genetic testing, it is reasonable to recommend referral of these patients to a clinical geneticist to identify subgroups with a higher risk for tumor development that are more likely to benefit from routine imaging surveillance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-Retrospective study.

Bilateral disease and new trends in Wilms tumour

Wilms tumour is a great therapeutic success story within paediatric oncology; its prognosis is excellent. Although mainly sporadic, occurring in otherwise well children, it occurs in a small number of genetically predisposed children. Thus regular surveillance imaging is performed in predisposed children in parts of the USA and Europe. The risks and benefits of surveillance are unclear, as the existing ad-hoc surveillance protocols are lacking in consistency of practice and equity of provision. We present guidelines for Wilms tumour surveillance based on a review of current practice and available evidence, outlined by a multidisciplinary working group in the UK. Wilms tumours are bilateral in 4-13% of affected children. Bilateral synchronous nephroblastomas are observed in 5% of affected children and are usually associated with the presence of nephrogenic rests, congenital malformations and predisposing syndromes. The major challenge in bilateral disease is to achieve a cure and at the same time to preserve sufficient functional renal tissue for normal growth and development. The association among Wilms tumour, nephrogenic rests and nephroblastomatosis makes detection and characterization of renal lesions with imaging extremely important. We discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different modalities used for diagnosis and follow-up in bilateral renal disease. We also discuss newly emerging diagnostic imaging tests such as (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). This technique, when fused with CT (PET-CT), allows accelerated metabolic activity to be accurately anatomically localised and so is potentially useful for staging, assessment of treatment response, and for surgical and radiotherapy planning. In addition, quantitative MRI techniques have been proved to be valuable in intracranial tumours, but no such role has been validated in abdominal disease. Diffusion-weighted imaging with calculation of ADC maps is feasible in abdominal tumours, and our own preliminary data suggest that tissue cellularity is an important determinant of ADC value, which might help in terms of early prediction of therapy response.

Surveillance for Wilms tumour in at-risk children: pragmatic recommendations for best practice

BACKGROUND

Most Wilms tumours occur in otherwise healthy children, but a small proportion occur in children with genetic syndromes associated with increased risks of Wilms tumour. Surveillance for Wilms tumour has become widespread, despite a lack of clarity about which children are at increased risk of these tumours and limited evidence of the efficacy of screening or guidance as to how screening should be implemented.

METHODS

The available literature was reviewed.

RESULTS

The potential risks and benefits of Wilms tumour surveillance are finely balanced and there is no clear evidence that screening reduces mortality or morbidity. Prospective evidence-based data on the efficacy of Wilms tumour screening would be difficult and costly to generate and are unlikely to become available in the foreseeable future.

CONCLUSIONS

The following pragmatic recommendations have been formulated for Wilms tumour surveillance in children at risk, based on our review: (1) Surveillance should be offered to children at >5% risk of Wilms tumour. (2) Surveillance should only be offered after review by a clinical geneticist. (3) Surveillance should be carried out by renal ultrasonography every 3-4 months. (4) Surveillance should continue until 5 years of age in all conditions except Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome and some familial Wilms tumour pedigrees where it should continue until 7 years. (5) Surveillance can be undertaken at a local centre, but should be carried out by someone with experience in paediatric ultrasonography. (6) Screen-detected lesions should be managed at a specialist centre.

Syndromes and constitutional chromosomal abnormalities associated with Wilms tumour

Wilms tumour has been reported in association with over 50 different clinical conditions and several abnormal constitutional karyotypes. Conclusive evidence of an increased risk of Wilms tumour exists for only a minority of these conditions, including WT1 associated syndromes, familial Wilms tumour, and certain overgrowth conditions such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. In many reported conditions the rare co-occurrence of Wilms tumour is probably due to chance. However, for several conditions the available evidence cannot either confirm or exclude an increased risk, usually because of the rarity of the syndrome. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that an increased risk of Wilms tumour occurs only in a subset of individuals for some syndromes. The complex clinical and molecular heterogeneity of disorders associated with Wilms tumour, together with the apparent absence of functional links between most of the known predisposition genes, suggests that abrogation of a variety of pathways can promote Wilms tumorigenesis.

Tumour surveillance in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and hemihyperplasia: a critical review of the evidence and suggested guidelines for local practice

There is strong evidence for an association between overgrowth disorders such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and the development of neoplasia. An increased cancer risk has also been observed in individuals with isolated hemihyperplasia. We critically review the evidence for tumour surveillance in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and isolated hemihyperplasia and suggest local practice guidelines.

Molecular subtypes and phenotypic expression of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome

Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS) results from mutations or epigenetic events involving imprinted genes at 11p15.5. Most BWS cases are sporadic and uniparental disomy (UPD) or putative imprinting errors predominate in this group. Sporadic cases with putative imprinting defects may be subdivided into (a) those with loss of imprinting (LOI) of IGF2 and H19 hypermethylation and silencing due to a defect in a distal 11p15.5 imprinting control element (IC1) and (b) those with loss of methylation at KvDMR1, LOI of KCNQ1OT1 (LIT1) and variable LOI of IGF2 in whom there is a defect at a more proximal imprinting control element (IC2). We investigated genotype/epigenotype-phenotype correlations in 200 cases with a confirmed molecular genetic diagnosis of BWS (16 with CDKN1C mutations, 116 with imprinting centre 2 defects, 14 with imprinting centre 1 defects and 54 with UPD). Hemihypertrophy was strongly associated with UPD (P<0.0001) and exomphalos was associated with an IC2 defect or CDKN1C mutation but not UPD or IC1 defect (P<0.0001). When comparing birth weight centile, IC1 defect cases were significantly heavier than the patients with CDKN1C mutations or IC2 defect (P=0.018). The risk of neoplasia was significantly higher in UPD and IC1 defect cases than in IC2 defect and CDKN1C mutation cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a risk of neoplasia for all patients of 9% at age 5 years, but 24% in the UPD subgroup. The risk of Wilms' tumour in the IC2 defect subgroup appears to be minimal and intensive screening for Wilms' tumour appears not to be indicated. In UPD patients, UPD extending to WT1 was associated with renal neoplasia (P=0.054). These findings demonstrate that BWS represents a spectrum of disorders. Identification of the molecular subtype allows more accurate prognostic predictions and enhances the management and surveillance of BWS children such that screening for Wilms' tumour and hepatoblastoma can be focused on those at highest risk.

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is a clinically heterogeneous overgrowth syndrome associated with an increased risk for embryonal tumor development. BWS provides an ideal model system to study epigenetic mechanisms. This condition is caused by a variety of genetic or epigenetic alterations within two domains of imprinted growth regulatory genes on human chromosome 11p15. Molecular studies of BWS have provided important data with respect to epigenotype/genotype-phenotype correlations; for example, alterations of Domain 1 are associated with the highest risk for tumor development, specifically Wilms' tumor. Further, the elucidation of the molecular basis for monozygotic twinning in BWS defined a critical period for imprint maintenance during pre-implantation embryonic development. In the future, such molecular studies in BWS will permit enhanced medical management and targeted genetic counseling.

Risk of tumorigenesis in overgrowth syndromes: a comprehensive review

Overgrowth syndromes (OGS) comprise a heterogeneous group of disorders in which the main characteristic is that either weight, height, or head circumference is 2-3 standard deviations (SD) above the mean for sex and age. A striking feature of OGS is the risk of neoplasms. Here, the relative frequency of specific tumors in each OGS, topographic location, and age of appearance is determined by reviewing published cases. In some OGS (Perlman, Beckwith-Wiedemann, and Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndromes and hemihyperplasia) more than 94% of tumors appeared in the abdomen usually before 10 years of age, mainly embryonal in type. In Perlman syndrome, only Wilms tumor has been recorded, whereas in Sotos syndrome, lympho-hematologic tumors are most frequent. Based on literature review, a specific schedule protocol for tumor screening is suggested for each OGS. A schedule with different intervals and specific tests is proposed for a more rational cost/benefit program for these disorders.

Tumor risk in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: A review and meta-analysis

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is an overgrowth syndrome associated with macroglossia, abdominal wall defects, ear anomalies, and an increased risk for embryonic tumors. Reported tumor risk estimates vary between 4% and 21%. It has been hypothesized that tumor predisposition in BWS is related to the imprinting status of the H19 and LIT1 genes on chromosome 11p15. A loss of imprinting (LOI) of H19 implies a higher tumor risk. However, a systematic analysis of available data is lacking. Therefore, we performed a review and meta-analysis of reported associations between the imprinting status of the LIT1 and H19 genes and the risk for tumor development in BWS. Five publications suitable for meta-analysis were identified by electronic database searches. Sufficient data were available for 402 out of 520 patients. Patients were divided into four groups based on the imprinting status of H19 and LIT1: group I with LOI of LIT1 (45%); group II with LOI of H19 (9%); group III with LOI of LIT1 and LOI of H19 (21%); and group IV with normal imprinting patterns (26%). Differences in tumor risk between groups were studied with random effects meta-analysis. Tumors occurred in 55 patients. The odds of tumor development was significantly lower in group I when compared to group II (OR=0.06; 95% CI: 0.02-0.21) and group III (OR=0.12; 95% CI: 0.04-0.37). Tumor risk did not differ significantly between groups II and III (OR=1.40; 95% CI: 0.56-3.50). Compared to group IV, tumor risk was significantly lower in group I (OR=0.33; 95% CI: 0.12-0.87) and higher in groups II (OR=4.0; 95% CI: 1.5-10.4) and III (OR=2.6; 95% CI: 1.2-5.7). Tumor incidence rate for group IV was 10.6% (95% CI: 3.6-17.7). Calculated absolute risks were 3% for group I, 43% for group II, and 28% for group III, respectively. No Wilms tumor was seen in group I. In total, other tumors were seen with comparable frequencies in groups I-III. The results show a strong association between a LOI of H19 and especially Wilms tumor development in BWS.

Characteristics and outcome of children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and Wilms' tumor: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group

PURPOSE

Children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) are at increased risk for developing Wilms' tumor (WT). We reviewed the National Wilms Tumor Study Group (NWTSG) records to assess clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with WT and BWS.

METHODS

In the NWTSG, treating clinicians were asked to report, for each enrolled patient, whether the patient had BWS. Between 1980 and 1995, 4,669 patients were treated on two consecutive NWTSG protocols (NWTS 3 and NWTS 4). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of BWS patients compared with patients with WT without BWS.

RESULTS

Fifty-three children enrolled onto NWTS 3 and 4 were reported to have BWS. BWS patients were more likely to present with lower-stage tumors (P =.0001), with more than half (27 of 53) presenting with stage I disease. The overall treatment outcomes for the BWS patients were nearly identical to those without BWS, with overall survival at 4 years from diagnosis at 89% and 90%, respectively. Overall, 21% of the patients with BWS had bilateral disease, either at diagnosis (nine of 53) or as metachronous contralateral recurrence (two of 53). BWS patients enrolled onto NWTS 4 had smaller tumors than those enrolled onto NWTS 3 (P =.02), a trend not seen in the non-BWS patients.

CONCLUSION

Like children without BWS, children with BWS and WT have an excellent prognosis with modern treatment regimens. There is a high risk of bilateral disease, and increasingly smaller tumors are being detected. This suggests that a national trial assessing the role of ultrasound screening followed by nephron-sparing surgery for some patients may be appropriate.

Intrarenal pelvic papillary Wilms' tumor associated with aniridia: a case report

BACKGROUND

Intrarenal pelvic Wilms' tumor in a papillary growth is rare in children. A case of a two-year-old infant with Wilms' tumor associated with congenital aniridia is reported.

RESULTS

A chromosomal abnormality (11p13 deletion) was found in this patient. The tumor was well evaluated by ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

DISCUSSION

Previous case reports are briefly reviewed and the clinical characteristics disclosed.

Pediatric renal tumors

A broad spectrum of renal tumors occurs in infants and children ranging from the benign cystic nephroma to the extremely aggressive malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney. A thorough understanding of these tumors is crucial to the optimal diagnosis and management of children with renal masses. The common renal tumors in infants and children are discussed and an orderly method for their evaluation is presented. Recent developments in the molecular biology of Wilms' tumor are outlined to provide insight into the origin of this tumor.

Screening for Wilms tumor in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome or idiopathic hemihypertrophy

BACKGROUND

Children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and idiopathic hemihypertrophy (BWS/HH) are at increased risk for developing Wilms tumor and screening with abdominal sonography is frequently recommended. However, there is a paucity of published data supporting this strategy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether sonographic screening at intervals of 4 months or less reduced the proportion of late-stage Wilms Tumor (WT) in children with BWS/HH.

PROCEDURE

A case series analysis was employed to compare the proportion of late-stage (stage III or IV) Wilms tumor in patients with BWS/HH who were screened with sonography (n = 15) to the proportion of late-stage Wilms tumor in unscreened patients with BWS/HH (n = 59). Patients were identified from the BWS Registry and from previously published studies. Screened patients had sonograms at intervals of 4 months or less.

RESULTS

None of the 12 screened children with Wilms tumor had late-stage disease, whereas 25 of 59 (42%) of unscreened children had late-stage Wilms tumor, a difference that was statistically significant (P < 0.003). Three children had false positive screening studies. They were operated on for suspected Wilms tumor but the lesions proved to be complicated renal cysts (n = 2) or nephroblastomatosis (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that children with BWS/HH may benefit from screening sonograms at intervals of 4 months or less. However, false positive screening exams may result in unnecessary surgery. Given the rarity of BWS/HH, a larger, prospective international screening study is necessary to determine if the benefits of screening outweigh the risks.

The approach to common abdominal diagnoses in infants and children. Part II

Part I (August 1998 issue, Pediatric Clinics), discussed appendicitis and common abdominal diagnoses in infants and in children associated with vomiting, as well as special considerations in the evaluation of immunologically suppressed and neurologically impaired pediatric patients. In this article, the authors continue to discuss the evaluation of constipation, gastrointestinal bleeding, common abdominal masses, and recurrent abdominal pain.

Outcome and cost analysis of operative versus nonoperative management of neonatal multicystic dysplastic kidneys

PURPOSE

We determine whether nephrectomy or observation is the more appropriate treatment of neonates with multicystic dysplastic kidney in terms of medical care and cost-effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our 10-year clinical experience with 17 female and 32 male neonates presenting with multicystic dysplastic kidney who were followed with serial renal ultrasound. The literature also was reviewed.

RESULTS

Nephrectomy was performed in 12 patients (24%) for various reasons, of which family request at concomitant surgery was the most common (7). No kidney was removed due to hypertension or tumor. In the remaining 37 patients followup continues (mean 42 months) with involution developing in 9 multicystic dysplastic kidneys (24%) and 9 patients (24%) lost to followup. The total cost of 1-hour outpatient simple nephrectomy was estimated at $5,000 to $7,000 and, when performed as a concomitant procedure, it cost $2,000 to $5,000, the equivalent charges incurred for 17 to 28 serial ultrasound studies performed by a radiologist. Our review of the literature revealed that children with multicystic dysplastic kidney are at minimal risk for hypertension, pain and infection. The most important reason to perform screening renal ultrasound in this condition is to detect earlier stage Wilms tumor (3 to 10-fold the general pediatric population risk of 1/10,000 cases). With a maximum risk of 0.1% for Wilms tumor controversy exists as to whether any screening program is necessary. When screening is instituted, options include monthly parental abdominal palpation versus serial renal ultrasound. Because Wilms tumor has a rapid growth rate, when screening renal ultrasound is instituted, it must be performed no less than every 3 months until age 8 years (total of 32 studies) to screen effectively for early stage tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The risks associated with multicystic dysplastic kidney are slight. Early nephrectomy is more cost-effective than observation in neonates with multicystic dysplastic kidney only when observation involves screening with ultrasonography every 3 months until age 8 years. Extensive parental counseling should be provided on the slight but definite risks of this condition.

Screening for Wilms' tumor in children with high-risk congenital syndromes: considerations for an intervention trial

Screening for cancer in children is uncommon. However, in children with congenital syndromes associated with Wilms' tumor, conditions exist that potentially make screening effective. This select population of children 1) are relatively easily identified; 2) have a high incidence of Wilms' tumor; 3) if identified before development of Wilms' tumor, may have a decrement in morbidity/mortality; and 4) are amenable to a simple and acceptable screening technology, renal sonography exams. Many clinicians have recommended screening for cancer in children with congenital syndromes associated with Wilms' tumor. However, neither costs nor effectiveness of such recommendations have been evaluated systematically. The strongest evidence for or against Wilms' tumor screening in this select population would be provided by a randomized screening trial. Prior to undertaking such a trial, the key parameters that dominate the cost and effectiveness of screening should be identified. Simulation models, such as cost effectiveness analysis, offer a starting point for deciding whether cancer screening is appropriate, and if so, under what set of conditions. We review basic conditions required for a successful screening trial in children with syndromes that are at increased risk of Wilms' tumor. We also discuss the use of cost-effectiveness analysis as a preliminary step in determining the feasibility of an intervention trial.

Is intensive follow-up for early detection of tumors effective in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome?

Two cases of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome who developed malignant tumor and eventually died are reported. The patients followed two different screening programs for early detection of cancer, and the most appropriate schedule of follow-up in carriers of this syndrome is discussed.