A computational study of 2J(HH)(gem) indirect spin-spin coupling constants in simple hydrides of the second and third periods

RPA(D) and HRPA(D): Two new models for calculations of NMR indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants

In this article, the RPA(D) and HRPA(D) models for the calculation of linear response functions are presented. The performance of the new RPA(D) and HRPA(D) models is compared to the performance of the established RPA, HRPA, and SOPPA models in calculations of indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants using the CCSD model as a reference. The doubles correction offers a significant improvement on both the RPA and HRPA models; however, the improvement is more dramatic in the case of the RPA model. For all coupling types investigated in this study, the results obtained using the HRPA(D) model are comparable in accuracy to those given by the SOPPA model, while requiring between 30% and 90% of the calculation time needed for SOPPA. The RPA(D) model, while of slightly lower accuracy compared to the CCSD model than HRPA(D), offered calculation times of only approximately 25% of those required for SOPPA for all the investigated molecules. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A Systematic Comparison of Second-Order Polarization Propagator Approximation (SOPPA) and Equation-of-Motion Coupled Cluster Singles and Doubles (EOM-CCSD) Spin-Spin Coupling Constants for Selected Singly Bonded Molecules, and the Hydrides NH3, H2O, and HF and Their Protonated and Deprotonated Ions and Hydrogen-Bonded Complexes

Second-order polarization propagator approximation (SOPPA) and equation-of-motion coupled cluster singles and doubles (EOM-CCSD) methods have been employed for the calculation of one-bond spin-spin coupling constants in series of small molecules and ions, and of one- and two-bond coupling constants across X-H···Y hydrogen bonds. For isolated molecules, one-bond SOPPA coupling constants (1)J(X-Y) involving (13)C, (15)N, (17)O, and (19)F have larger absolute values than corresponding EOM-CCSD coupling constants, with the EOM-CCSD values being in significantly better agreement with available experimental data. The difference between SOPPA and EOM-CCSD tends to increase as the number of nonbonding electrons on the coupled atoms increases, and the SOPPA values for O-F coupling are significantly in error. Similarly, the absolute values of SOPPA one-bond coupling constants (1)J(X-H) for the hydrides NH3, H2O, and FH and their protonated and deprotonated ions are greater than EOM-CCSD values, with the largest differences occurring for F-H coupling. One- and two-bond coupling constants (1)J(X-H), (1h)J(H-Y), and (2h)J(X-Y) across X-H···Y hydrogen bonds in neutral, protonated, and deprotonated complexes formed from the hydrides are similar at SOPPA and EOM-CCSD, with the largest differences again found for (1)J(F-H) in complexes with F-H as the proton donor, and (2h)J(F-F) for (FHF)(-). The signs of (1)J(X-H), (1h)J(H-Y), and (2h)J(X-Y) are the same at both levels of theory, as is their variation across the proton-transfer coordinate in F-H···NH3. SOPPA would appear to provide a reliable and more cost-effective alternative approach for computing coupling constants across hydrogen bonds, although couplings involving F may be problematic.

Benchmarking NMR indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants: SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), and SOPPA(CCSD) versus CCSD

Accurate calculations of NMR indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants require especially optimized basis sets and correlated wave function methods such as CCSD or SOPPA(CCSD). Both methods scale as N(6), where N is the number of orbitals, which prevents routine applications to molecules with more than 10-15 nonhydrogen atoms. We have therefore developed a modification of the SOPPA(CCSD) method in which the CCSD singles and doubles amplitudes are replaced by CC2 singles and doubles amplitudes. This new method, called SOPPA(CC2), scales only as N(5), like the original SOPPA-method. The performance of the SOPPA(CC2) method for the calculation of indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants is compared to SOPPA and SOPPA(CCSD) employing a set of benchmark molecules. We also investigate the basis set dependence by employing three different basis sets optimized for spin-spin coupling constants, namely the HuzIV-su4, ccJ-pVTZ, and ccJ-pVQZ basis sets. The results of the corresponding CCSD calculations are used as a theoretical reference.

A theoretical structural analysis of the factors that affect (1)J(NH), (1h)J(NH) and (2h)J(NN) in N-H...N hydrogen-bonded complexes

Calculations of (1)J(NH), (1h)J(NH) and (2h)J(NN) spin-spin coupling constants of 27 complexes presenting N-H...N hydrogen bonds have allowed to analyze these through hydrogen-bond coupling as a function of the hybridization of both nitrogen atoms and the charge (+1, 0, - 1) of the complex. The main conclusions are that the hybridization of N atom of the hydrogen bond donor is much more important than that of the hydrogen bond acceptor. Positive and negative charges (cationic and anionic complexes) exert opposite effects while the effect of the transition states 'proton-in-the-middle' is considerable.

Complete basis set B3LYP NMR calculations of CDCl3 solvent's water fine spectral details

The assignment of singlet at 1.55 ppm and the 1:1:1 triplet at 1.519 ppm to H(2)O and HOD in the 400 MHz (1)H NMR spectrum of CDCl(3) solvent were supported by complete basis set (CBS) GIAO-B3LYP calculated chemical shift and the CBS B3LYP estimated (2)J(D,H) spin-spin coupling constant (SSCC). The CBS fitting of B3LYP/cc-pCVxZ and B3LYP/pcJ-n predicted SSCC values, the accurate value of (2)J(D,H) = -1.082 +/- 0.030 Hz of HOD in chloroform-d(1) and the H/D isotopic shift of 0.0307(1) ppm were reported for the first time. The agreement between CBS B3LYP predicted chemical shift, spin-spin values and experiment was good.