Sphingosine-1-phosphate reduces atresia of primordial follicles occurring during slow-freezing and thawing of human ovarian cortical strips

Gynotoxic Effects of Chemotherapy and Potential Protective Mechanisms

Chemotherapy is one of the leading cancer treatments. Unfortunately, its use can contribute to several side effects, including gynotoxic effects in women. Ovarian reserve suppression and estrogen deficiency result in reduced quality of life for cancer patients and are frequently the cause of infertility and early menopause. Classic alkylating cytostatics are among the most toxic chemotherapeutics in this regard. They cause DNA damage in ovarian follicles and the cells they contain, and they can also induce oxidative stress or affect numerous signaling pathways. In vitro tests, animal models, and a few studies among women have investigated the effects of various agents on the protection of the ovarian reserve during classic chemotherapy. In this review article, we focused on the possible beneficial effects of selected hormones (anti-Müllerian hormone, ghrelin, luteinizing hormone, melatonin), agents affecting the activity of apoptotic pathways and modulating gene expression (C1P, S1P, microRNA), and several natural (quercetin, rapamycin, resveratrol) and synthetic compounds (bortezomib, dexrazoxane, goserelin, gonadoliberin analogs, imatinib, metformin, tamoxifen) in preventing gynotoxic effects induced by commonly used cytostatics. The presented line of research appears to provide a promising strategy for protecting and/or improving the ovarian reserve in the studied group of cancer patients. However, well-designed clinical trials are needed to unequivocally assess the effects of these agents on improving hormonal function and fertility in women treated with ovotoxic anticancer drugs.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate mediates FSH-induced cell viability but not steroidogenesis in bovine granulosa cells

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulates the proliferation, survival, and estradiol synthesis of granulosa cells by binding to their G protein-coupled receptors. Although FSH activates sphingosine kinase-1 (SPHK1) to induce sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) synthesis, which is required to mediate the proliferative and survival effect of this gonadotrophin, the mechanisms, and the role of S1P in estradiol synthesis have not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the importance of FSH-induced S1P synthesis as a mediator of the effects of this gonadotrophin on granulosa cell viability and steroidogenesis and to determine if FSH-induced S1P synthesis depends on estradiol, cAMP, PKA, or PKC. To achieve these objectives, we tested the effects of FSH, a sphingosine kinase-1 inhibitor (SKI-178), estradiol and inhibitors of aromatase, cAMP, PKA, and PKC (Formestane, MDL-12330A, H-89 dihydrochloride hydrate and Calphostin C respectively), on granulosa cell viability, S1P and estradiol production, and the mRNA expression of CYP19A1 and STAR in four in vitro culture experiments. The addition of FSH (1 ng/mL) increased (P < 0.05) granulosa cells number and S1P concentration in the culture media. Conversely, the addition of SKI-178 (10 μM) reduced (P < 0.05) S1P concentration negating the effect of FSH on cell viability. Inhibition of PKC and PKA, but not cAMP, reduced (P < 0.05) S1P secretion of FSH treated granulosa cells. It is important to note that the reduction in S1P secretion was strong (49 %) with the use of the PKC inhibitor. The use of formestane (10 μg) did not modify (P > 0.05) S1P secretion in FSH-treated cells; however, the addition of 5 or 10 ng/mL of estradiol increased (P < 0.05) S1P secretion. Finally, FSH increased (P < 0.05) estradiol concentration in the culture media, but this effect was not blocked by the inhibition of S1P synthesis. Similarly, FSH, SKI-178 or their combination did not modify the mRNA expression of CYP19A1 and STAR. In conclusion, S1P synthesis is stimulated FSH in granulosa cells and mediated mainly by PKC. S1P in turn promotes the granulosa cell viability, however, this does not influence estradiol synthesis. Additionally, estradiol synthesis induced by FSH is not essential for S1P synthesis, however high estradiol concentration may stimulate S1P production by granulosa cells.

Roles of follicle stimulating hormone and sphingosine 1-phosphate co-administered in the process in mouse ovarian vitrification and transplantation

Some major challenges of ovarian tissue vitrification and transplantation include follicle apoptosis induced by cryopreservation and ischemia-reperfusion injury, as well as ovarian follicle loss during post-transplantation. This research aimed to investigate the protective effects and underlying mechanisms of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) on vitrified and post-transplantation ovaries. Ovaries from 21-day-old mice were cryopreservation by vitrification with 0.3 IU/mL FSH, 2 µM S1P, and 0.3 IU/mL FSH + 2 µM S1P, respectively, for follicle counting and detection of apoptosis-related indicators. The results demonstrated that FSH and S1P co-intervention during the vitrification process could preserve the primordial follicle pool and inhibit follicular atresia by suppressing cell apoptosis. The thawed ovaries were transplanted under the renal capsule of 6-8 week-old ovariectomized mice and removed 24 h or 7 days after transplantation. The results indicated that FSH and S1P co-intervention can inhibit apoptosis and autophagy in ovaries at 24 h after transplantation, and promote follicle survival by up-regulating Cx37 and Cx43 expression, enhanced angiogenesis in transplanted ovaries by promoting VEGF expression, as well as increased the E2 levels to restore ovarian endocrine function at 7 days after transplantation. The hypoxia and ischemia cell model was established by CoCl2 treatment for hypoxia in human granulosa-like tumor cell line (KGN), as well as serum-free culture system was used for ischemia. The results confirmed that ischemia-hypoxia-induced apoptosis in ovarian granulosa cells was reduced by FSH and S1P co-intervention, and granulosa cell autophagy was inhibited by up-regulating the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. In summary, co-administration of FSH and S1P can maintain ovarian survival during ovarian vitrification and increase follicle survival and angiogenesis after transplantation.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate Treatment Improves Cryopreservation Efficiency in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells

The actin cytoskeleton plays a crucial role not only in maintaining cell shape and viability but also in homing/engraftment properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), a valuable source of cell therapy. Therefore, during the cryopreservation process of MSCs, protecting the actin cytoskeleton from the freezing/thawing stress is critical in maintaining their functionality and therapeutic potential. In this study, the safety and cryoprotective potential of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), which has a stabilizing effect on actin cytoskeleton, on dental pulp-derived MSCs (DP-MSCs) was investigated. Our results demonstrated that S1P treatment did not adversely affect viability and stemness of DP-MSCs. Furthermore, S1P pretreatment enhanced cell viability and proliferation properties of post-freeze/thaw DP-MSCs, protecting them against damage to the actin cytoskeleton and adhesion ability as well. These findings suggest that a new cryopreservation method using S1P pretreatment can enhance the overall quality of cryopreserved MSCs by stabilizing the actin cytoskeleton and making them more suitable for various applications in regenerative medicine and cell therapy.

Review of ovarian tissue cryopreservation techniques for fertility preservation

Ovarian failure and ovarian malfunction are among major fertility problems in women of reproductive age (18-35 years). It is known that various diseases, such as ovarian cancer and premature ovarian failure, besides certain treatments, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy of other organs, can affect the normal process of folliculogenesis and cause infertility. In recent years, various procedures have been proposed for the treatment of infertility. One of the newest methods is the use of cryopreservation ovarian fragments after cancer treatment. According to some studies, this method yields very satisfactory results. Although ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is an accepted technique of fertility preservation, the relative efficacy of cryopreservation protocols remains controversial. Considering the controversies about these methods and their results, in this study, we aimed to compare different techniques of ovarian cryopreservation and investigate their advantages and disadvantages. Reviewing the published articles may be possible to identify appropriate strategies and improve infertility treatment in these patients.

Role of Stem Cells in the Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Transplantation for Fertility Preservation

Although the cancer survival rate has increased, cancer treatments, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, can cause ovarian failure and infertility in women of reproductive age. Preserving fertility throughout cancer treatment is critical for maintaining quality of life. Fertility experts should propose individualized fertility preservation methods based on the patient’s marital status, pubertal status, partner status, and the urgency of treatment. Widely practiced fertility preservation methods, including ovarian transposition and embryo and oocyte cryopreservation, are inappropriate for prepubertal girls or those needing urgent initiation of cancer treatment. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation, an emerging new technology, may be a solution for these cancer patients. The use of stem cells in ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation increases oxygenation, angiogenesis, and follicle survival rates. This review discusses the recent advances in ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation with special focus on the use of stem cells to improve fertilization techniques.

State of the Art in Fertility Preservation for Female Patients Prior to Oncologic Therapies

Quality of life improvement stands as one of the main goals of the medical sciences. Increasing cancer survival rates associated with better early detection and extended therapeutic options led to the specific modeling of patients’ choices, comprising aspects of reproductive life that correlated with the evolution of modern society, and requires better assessment. Of these, fertility preservation and ovarian function conservation for pre-menopause female oncologic patients pose a contemporary challenge due to procreation age advance in evolved societies and to the growing expectations regarding cancer treatment. Progress made in cell and tissue-freezing technologies brought hope and shed new light on the onco-fertility field. Additionally, crossing roads with general fertility and senescence studies proved highly beneficial due to the enlarged scope and better synergies and funding. We here strive to bring attention to this domain of care and to sensitize all medical specialties towards a more cohesive approach and to better communication among caregivers and patients.

The Impact of Chemotherapy on the Ovaries: Molecular Aspects and the Prevention of Ovarian Damage

Cancer treatment, such as chemotherapy, induces early ovarian follicular depletion and subsequent infertility. In order to protect gametes from the gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapy, several fertility preservation techniques—such as oocyte or embryo cryopreservation with or without ovarian stimulation, or cryopreservation of the ovarian cortex—should be considered. However, these methods may be difficult to perform, and the future use of cryopreserved germ cells remains uncertain. Therefore, improving the methods currently available and developing new strategies to preserve fertility represent major challenges in the area of oncofertility. Animal and ovarian culture models have been used to decipher the effects of different cytotoxic agents on ovarian function and several theories regarding chemotherapy gonadotoxicity have been raised. For example, cytotoxic agents might (i) have a direct detrimental effect on the DNA of primordial follicles constituting the ovarian reserve and induce apoptosis; (ii) induce a massive growth of dormant follicles, which are then destroyed; or (ii) induce vascular ovarian damage. Thanks to improvements in the understanding of the mechanisms involved, a large number of studies have been carried out to develop molecules limiting the negative impact of chemotherapy on the ovaries.

Female Fertility Preservation through Stem Cell-based Ovarian Tissue Reconstitution In Vitro and Ovarian Regeneration In Vivo

Historically, approaches designed to offer women diagnosed with cancer the prospects of having a genetically matched child after completion of their cytotoxic treatments focused on the existing oocyte population as the sole resource available for clinical management of infertility. In this regard, elective oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, as well as autologous ovarian cortical tissue grafting posttreatment, have gained widespread support as options for young girls and reproductive-age women who are faced with cancer to consider. In addition, the use of ovarian protective therapies, including gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and sphingosine-1-phosphate analogs, has been put forth as an alternative way to preserve fertility by shielding existing oocytes in the ovaries in vivo from the side-effect damage caused by radiotherapy and many chemotherapeutic regimens. This viewpoint changed with the publication of now numerous reports that adult ovaries of many mammalian species, including humans, contain a rare population of oocyte-producing germ cells-referred to as female germline or oogonial stem cells (OSCs). This new line of study has fueled research into the prospects of generating new oocytes, rather than working with existing oocytes, as a novel approach to sustain or restore fertility in female cancer survivors. Here, we overview the history of work from laboratories around the world focused on improving our understanding of the biology of OSCs and how these cells may be used to reconstitute "artificial" ovarian tissue in vitro or to regenerate damaged ovarian tissue in vivo as future fertility-preservation options.