Robust visualization of middle cerebral artery main trunk by enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) for intracranial MRA

Turbo spin-echo-based enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling without electrocardiography or peripheral pulse unit triggering and contrast enhancement for lower extremity MRA

PURPOSE

Lower extremity magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) without electrocardiography (ECG) or peripheral pulse unit (PPU) triggering and contrast enhancement is beneficial for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD) while avoiding synchronization failure and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of turbo spin-echo-based enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) (TSE-Acc) of the lower extremities with that of turbo field-echo-based eAccASL (TFE-Acc) and triggered angiography non-contrast enhanced (TRANCE).

METHODS

Nine healthy volunteers and a patient with PAD were examined on a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. The artery-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The arterial visibility (1: poor, 4: excellent) and artifact contamination (1: severe, 4: no) were independently assessed by two radiologists. Phase-contrast MRI and digital subtraction angiography were referenced in a patient with PAD. Friedman's test and a post-hoc test according to the Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for the SIR, CNR, and visual assessment. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

No significant differences in nearly all the SIRs were observed among the three MRA methods. Higher CNRs were observed with TSE-Acc than those with TFE-Acc (anterior tibial artery, p = 0.014; peroneal artery, p = 0.029; and posterior tibial artery, p = 0.014) in distal arterial segments; however, no significant differences were observed upon comparison with TRANCE (all p > 0.05). The arterial visibility scores exhibited similar trends as the CNRs. The artifact contamination scores with TSE-Acc were significantly lower (but within an acceptable level) compared to those with TFE-Acc. In the patient with PAD, the sluggish peripheral arteries were better visualized using TSE-Acc than those using TFE-Acc, and the collateral and stenosis arteries were better visualized using TSE-Acc than those using TRANCE.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral arterial visualization was better with TSE-Acc than that with TFE-Acc in lower extremity MRA without ECG or PPU triggering and contrast enhancement, which was comparable with TRANCE as the reference standard. Furthermore, TSE-Acc may propose satisfactory diagnostic performance for diagnosing PAD in patients with arrhythmia and chronic kidney disease.

Optimized enhanced acceleration selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) for non-gated and non-enhanced MR angiography of the hands

PURPOSE

Enhanced acceleration selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) was introduced as non-enhanced and non-gated magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). This technique has not been applied to hand MRA. The objective of this study was to optimize the eAccASL for MRA of the hands and to investigate the factors for MRA visibility of the hands.

METHODS

Twenty healthy volunteers were examined on a 1.5 T MR system. To evaluate arterial visualization, we compared four different acceleration-encoding (AENC) values (i.e., 0.12, 0.29, 0.58, and 0.87 m/s²). Image quality score regarding the MRA depiction of the proximal artery (range, 0-10), the distal artery (0-5), and venous contamination (0-5) was evaluated by three radiologists. We measured the peak to peak arterial blood flow velocity (Vpp) measured by phase contrast cine MRI and hand temperature as the factors for arterial visualization. Qualitative scores were compared with Friedman's tests. Spearman's correlation of qualitative scores with Vpp and hand temperature was performed to analyze influencing factors.

RESULTS

For the distal arterial depiction, scores at AENC 0.12 (median, 9.0) and AENC 0.29 (8.0) were significantly better (both P < 0.0001) than those at AENC 0.87 (5.5). For the proximal arterial depiction, scores at AENC 0.12 (2.25) and AENC 0.29 (2.0) were significantly better (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively) than those at AENC 0.87 (1.5). Conversely, venous contamination scores at AENC 0.12 (3.0) and AENC 0.29 (3.0) were significantly worse (both P < 0.0001) than those at AENC 0.87 (4.0). There were significantly negative correlations between venous contamination and Vpp at AENC 0.12 (ρ = -0.56, P = 0.01), and 0.29 (ρ = -0.68, P = 0.001), whereas hand temperatures were not significantly correlated with scores (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

eAccASL MRA of the hands was optimized by using low AENC values (0.12-0.29 m/s²). Venous contamination may increase with elevation of arterial blood flow.

Non-enhanced and Non-gated MR Angiography for Robust Visualization of Peripheral Arteries Using Enhanced Acceleration-selective Arterial Spin Labeling (eAccASL)

This study aimed to assess the feasibility for applying enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) to non-electrocardiogram-gated and non-enhanced peripheral MRA. We compared eAccASL and background suppressed single shot turbo field echo (TFE)-triggered angiography non-contrast-enhanced sequence (BASS TRANCE) required electrocardiographic-gating in eight volunteers and three patients. In the volunteer study, eAccASL demonstrated a comparable arterial visualization compared with BASS TRANCE. In patient observation, the advantages with eAccASL were found in arterial visualization on the collateral vessels and without artifacts affected by arrhythmia events.