1
|
van Houdt PJ, Ragunathan S, Berks M, Ahmed Z, Kershaw LE, Gurney-Champion OJ, Tadimalla S, Arvidsson J, Sun Y, Kallehauge J, Dickie B, Lévy S, Bell L, Sourbron S, Thrippleton MJ. Contrast-agent-based perfusion MRI code repository and testing framework: ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging (OSIPI). Magn Reson Med 2024; 91:1774-1786. [PMID: 37667526 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Software has a substantial impact on quantitative perfusion MRI values. The lack of generally accepted implementations, code sharing and transparent testing reduces reproducibility, hindering the use of perfusion MRI in clinical trials. To address these issues, the ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging (OSIPI) aimed to establish a community-led, centralized repository for sharing open-source code for processing contrast-based perfusion imaging, incorporating an open-source testing framework. METHODS A repository was established on the OSIPI GitHub website. Python was chosen as the target software language. Calls for code contributions were made to OSIPI members, the ISMRM Perfusion Study Group, and publicly via OSIPI websites. An automated unit-testing framework was implemented to evaluate the output of code contributions, including visual representation of the results. RESULTS The repository hosts 86 implementations of perfusion processing steps contributed by 12 individuals or teams. These cover all core aspects of DCE- and DSC-MRI processing, including multiple implementations of the same functionality. Tests were developed for 52 implementations, covering five analysis steps. For T1 mapping, signal-to-concentration conversion and population AIF functions, different implementations resulted in near-identical output values. For the five pharmacokinetic models tested (Tofts, extended Tofts-Kety, Patlak, two-compartment exchange, and two-compartment uptake), differences in output parameters were observed between contributions. CONCLUSIONS The OSIPI DCE-DSC code repository represents a novel community-led model for code sharing and testing. The repository facilitates the re-use of existing code and the benchmarking of new code, promoting enhanced reproducibility in quantitative perfusion imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michael Berks
- Quantitative Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Zaki Ahmed
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Diagnostic Radiology, Royal Oak, USA
| | - Lucy E Kershaw
- Edinburgh Imaging and Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Oliver J Gurney-Champion
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sirisha Tadimalla
- Institute of Medical Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan Arvidsson
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Yu Sun
- Institute of Medical Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jesper Kallehauge
- Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ben Dickie
- Division of Informatics, Imaging, and Data Science, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Simon Lévy
- MR Research Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Laura Bell
- Genentech, Inc, Clinical Imaging Group, South San Francisco, USA
| | - Steven Sourbron
- University of Sheffield, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael J Thrippleton
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Imaging and Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kooreman ES, van Pelt V, Nowee ME, Pos F, van der Heide UA, van Houdt PJ. Longitudinal Correlations Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI During Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:897130. [PMID: 35747819 PMCID: PMC9210504 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.897130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is a promising technique that can acquire perfusion information without the use of contrast agent, contrary to the more established dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) technique. This is of interest for treatment response monitoring, where patients can be imaged on each treatment fraction. In this study, longitudinal correlations between IVIM- and DCE parameters were assessed in prostate cancer patients receiving radiation treatment. Materials and Methods 20 prostate cancer patients were treated on a 1.5 T MR-linac with 20 x 3 or 3.1 Gy. Weekly IVIM and DCE scans were acquired. Tumors, the peripheral zone (PZ), and the transition zone (TZ) were delineated on a T2-weighted scan acquired on the first fraction. IVIM and DCE scans were registered to this scan and the delineations were propagated. Median values from these delineations were used for further analysis. The IVIM parameters D, f, D* and the product fD* were calculated. The Tofts model was used to calculate the DCE parameters Ktrans, kep and ve. Pearson correlations were calculated for the IVIM and DCE parameters on values from the first fraction for each region of interest (ROI). For longitudinal analysis, the repeated measures correlation coefficient was used to determine correlations between IVIM and DCE parameters in each ROI. Results When averaging over patients, an increase during treatment in all IVIM and DCE parameters was observed in all ROIs, except for D in the PZ and TZ. No significant Pearson correlations were found between any pair of IVIM and DCE parameters measured on the first fraction. Significant but low longitudinal correlations were found for some combinations of IVIM and DCE parameters in the PZ and TZ, while no significant longitudinal correlations were found in the tumor. Notably in the TZ, for both f and fD*, significant longitudinal correlations with all DCE parameters were found. Conclusions The increase in IVIM- and DCE parameters when averaging over patients indicates a measurable response to radiation treatment with both techniques. Although low, significant longitudinal correlations were found which suggests that IVIM could potentially be used as an alternative to DCE for treatment response monitoring.
Collapse
|
3
|
Fan X, Chatterjee A, Pittman JM, Yousuf A, Antic T, Karczmar GS, Oto A. Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI with a Split Dose of Gadoterate Meglumine for Detection of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol 2022; 29:796-803. [PMID: 34583866 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI with a split injection of 30% followed by 70% of a standard dose (30PSD and 70PSD) of gadoterate meglumine (DOTAREM) can improve diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS MRI for twenty patients was performed on a Philips Ingenia 3T scanner without an endorectal coil followed by subsequent radical prostatectomy. DCE 3D T1-FFE data were acquired with injection of 0.03 mmol/kg followed after 2 minutes by 0.07 mmol/kg of DOTAREM. Regions-of-interest on histologically verified PCa and normal tissue in different prostate zones and the iliac artery were drawn. Average signal intensity as function of time was calculated for each ROI and fitted by using the signal intensity form of the Tofts (SI-Tofts) model to extract physiological parameters (Ktrans and ve). In addition, the scaled arterial input function (AIF) obtained from 30PSD data was used to analyze 70PSD data. RESULTS The AIF obtained from 30PSD data showed both first and second passes clearly and had much higher peak magnitude than AIFs from 70PSD data. Ktrans was significantly (p < 0.05) larger in PCa than in normal tissue in peripheral zone (PZ) and central zone (CZ) for both 70PSD and 70PSD data analyzed with a scaled AIF. Ktrans in cancer overlapped with that of normal tissue in the transition zone (TZ). There was no statistical difference in ve between cancer and normal tissue. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that use of the AIF from 30PSD data to analyze 70PSD data increased the diagnostic efficacy of Ktrans in the PZ and CZ. CONCLUSION The split dose protocol for injection of Dotarem increased diagnostic accuracy of quantitative analysis with the SI-Tofts model.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bliesener Y, Lebel RM, Acharya J, Frayne R, Nayak KS. Pseudo Test-Retest Evaluation of Millimeter-Resolution Whole-Brain Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Patients with High-Grade Glioma. Radiology 2021; 300:410-420. [PMID: 34100683 PMCID: PMC8328086 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021203628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Advances in sub-Nyquist–sampled dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI enable monitoring of brain tumors with millimeter resolution and whole-brain coverage. Such undersampled quantitative methods need careful characterization regarding achievable test-retest reproducibility. Purpose To demonstrate a fully automated high-resolution whole-brain DCE MRI pipeline with 30-fold sparse undersampling and estimate its reproducibility on the basis of reference regions of stable tissue types during multiple posttreatment time points by using longitudinal clinical images of high-grade glioma. Materials and Methods Two methods for sub-Nyquist–sampled DCE MRI were extended with automatic estimation of vascular input functions. Continuously acquired three-dimensional k-space data with ramped-up flip angles were partitioned to yield high-resolution, whole-brain tracer kinetic parameter maps with matched precontrast-agent T1 and M0 maps. Reproducibility was estimated in a retrospective study in participants with high-grade glioma, who underwent three consecutive standard-of-care examinations between December 2016 and April 2019. Coefficients of variation and reproducibility coefficients were reported for histogram statistics of the tracer kinetic parameters plasma volume fraction and volume transfer constant (Ktrans) on five healthy tissue types. Results The images from 13 participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 61 years ± 10; nine women) with high-grade glioma were evaluated. In healthy tissues, the protocol achieved a coefficient of variation less than 57% for median Ktrans, if Ktrans was estimated consecutively. The maximum reproducibility coefficient for median Ktrans was estimated to be at 0.06 min–1 for large or low-enhancing tissues and to be as high as 0.48 min–1 in smaller or strongly enhancing tissues. Conclusion A fully automated, sparsely sampled DCE MRI reconstruction with patient-specific vascular input function offered high spatial and temporal resolution and whole-brain coverage; in healthy tissues, the protocol estimated median volume transfer constant with maximum reproducibility coefficient of 0.06 min–1 in large, low-enhancing tissue regions and maximum reproducibility coefficient of less than 0.48 min–1 in smaller or more strongly enhancing tissue regions. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lenkinski in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Bliesener
- From the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.)
| | - R Marc Lebel
- From the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.)
| | - Jay Acharya
- From the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.)
| | - Richard Frayne
- From the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.)
| | - Krishna S Nayak
- From the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Houdt PJ, Kallehauge JF, Tanderup K, Nout R, Zaletelj M, Tadic T, van Kesteren ZJ, van den Berg CAT, Georg D, Côté JC, Levesque IR, Swamidas J, Malinen E, Telliskivi S, Brynolfsson P, Mahmood F, van der Heide UA. Phantom-based quality assurance for multicenter quantitative MRI in locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:114-121. [PMID: 32931890 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A wide variation of MRI systems is a challenge in multicenter imaging biomarker studies as it adds variation in quantitative MRI values. The aim of this study was to design and test a quality assurance (QA) framework based on phantom measurements, for the quantitative MRI protocols of a multicenter imaging biomarker trial of locally advanced cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen institutes participated (five 1.5 T and ten 3 T scanners). Each institute optimized protocols for T2, diffusion-weighted imaging, T1, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-)MRI according to system possibilities, institutional preferences and study-specific constraints. Calibration phantoms with known values were used for validation. Benchmark protocols, similar on all systems, were used to investigate whether differences resulted from variations in institutional protocols or from system variations. Bias, repeatability (%RC), and reproducibility (%RDC) were determined. Ratios were used for T2 and T1 values. RESULTS The institutional protocols showed a range in bias of 0.88-0.98 for T2 (median %RC = 1%; %RDC = 12%), -0.007 to 0.029 × 10-3 mm2/s for the apparent diffusion coefficient (median %RC = 3%; %RDC = 18%), and 0.39-1.29 for T1 (median %RC = 1%; %RDC = 33%). For DCE a nonlinear vendor-specific relation was observed between measured and true concentrations with magnitude data, whereas the relation was linear when phase data was used. CONCLUSION We designed a QA framework for quantitative MRI protocols and demonstrated for a multicenter trial for cervical cancer that measurement of consistent T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient values is feasible despite protocol differences. For DCE-MRI and T1 mapping with the variable flip angle method, this was more challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Remi Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Marko Zaletelj
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tony Tadic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zdenko J van Kesteren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | | | - Dietmar Georg
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Of Vienna, Austria
| | - Jean-Charles Côté
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Canada
| | - Ives R Levesque
- Medical Physics Unit and Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jamema Swamidas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Sven Telliskivi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, North-Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Patrik Brynolfsson
- Department of Translational Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koopman T, Martens RM, Lavini C, Yaqub M, Castelijns JA, Boellaard R, Marcus JT. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck. Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 68:1-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
7
|
Bliesener Y, Lingala SG, Haldar JP, Nayak KS. Impact of (k,t) sampling on DCE MRI tracer kinetic parameter estimation in digital reference objects. Magn Reson Med 2019; 83:1625-1639. [PMID: 31605556 PMCID: PMC6982604 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the impact of (k,t) data sampling on the variance of tracer‐kinetic parameter (TK) estimation in high‐resolution whole‐brain dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) using digital reference objects. We study this in the context of TK model constraints, and in the absence of other constraints. Methods Three anatomically and physiologically realistic brain‐tumor digital reference objects were generated. Data sampling strategies included uniform and variable density; zone‐based, lattice, pseudo‐random, and pseudo‐radial; with 50‐time frames and 4‐fold to 25‐fold undersampling. In all cases, we assume a fully sampled first time frame, and prior knowledge of the arterial input function. TK parameters were estimated by indirect estimation (i.e., image‐time‐series reconstruction followed by model fitting), and direct estimation from the under‐sampled data. We evaluated methods based on the Cramér‐Rao bound and Monte‐Carlo simulations, over the range of signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) seen in clinical brain DCE‐MRI. Results Lattice‐based sampling provided the lowest SDs, followed by pseudo‐random, pseudo‐radial, and zone‐based. This ranking was consistent for the Patlak and extended Tofts model. Pseudo‐random sampling resulted in 19% higher averaged SD compared to lattice‐based sampling. Zone‐based sampling resulted in substantially higher SD at undersampling factors above 10. CRB analysis showed only a small difference between uniform and variable density for both lattice‐based and pseudo‐random sampling up to undersampling factors of 25. Conclusion Lattice sampling provided the lowest SDs, although the differences between sampling schemes were not substantial at low undersampling factors. The differences between lattice‐based and pseudo‐random sampling strategies with both uniform and variable density were within the range of error induced by other sources, at up to 25‐fold undersampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Bliesener
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sajan G Lingala
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Justin P Haldar
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Krishna S Nayak
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Houdt PJ, Ghobadi G, Schoots IG, Heijmink SW, Jong J, Poel HG, Pos FJ, Rylander S, Bentzen L, Haustermans K, Heide UA. Histopathological Features of MRI‐Invisible Regions of Prostate Cancer Lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 51:1235-1246. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Petra J. Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncologythe Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Ghazaleh Ghobadi
- Department of Radiation Oncologythe Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G. Schoots
- Department of Radiologythe Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineErasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen Jong
- Department of Pathologythe Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. Poel
- Department of Urologythe Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Floris J. Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncologythe Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Rylander
- Department of Medical PhysicsAarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - Lise Bentzen
- Department of OncologyAarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Uulke A. Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncologythe Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Klawer EME, van Houdt PJ, Simonis FFJ, van den Berg CAT, Pos FJ, Heijmink SWTPJ, Isebaert S, Haustermans K, van der Heide UA. Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients. Magn Reson Med 2019; 81:3358-3369. [PMID: 30656738 PMCID: PMC6590420 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The arterial input function (AIF) is a major source of uncertainty in tracer kinetic (TK) analysis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI data. The aim of this study was to investigate the repeatability of AIFs extracted from the complex signal and of the resulting TK parameters in prostate cancer patients. Methods Twenty‐two patients with biopsy‐proven prostate cancer underwent a 3T MRI exam twice. DCE‐MRI data were acquired with a 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence. AIFs were extracted from the magnitude of the signal (AIFMAGN), phase (AIFPHASE), and complex signal (AIFCOMPLEX). The Tofts model was applied to extract Ktrans, kep and ve. Repeatability of AIF curve characteristics and TK parameters was assessed with the within‐subject coefficient of variation (wCV). Results The wCV for peak height and full width at half maximum for AIFCOMPLEX (7% and 8%) indicated an improved repeatability compared to AIFMAGN (12% and 12%) and AIFPHASE (12% and 7%). This translated in lower wCV values for Ktrans (11%) with AIFCOMPLEX in comparison to AIFMAGN (24%) and AIFPHASE (15%). For kep, the wCV was 16% with AIFMAGN, 13% with AIFPHASE, and 13% with AIFCOMPLEX. Conclusion Repeatability of AIFPHASE and AIFCOMPLEX is higher than for AIFMAGN, resulting in a better repeatability of TK parameters. Thus, use of either AIFPHASE or AIFCOMPLEX improves the robustness of quantitative analysis of DCE‐MRI in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edzo M E Klawer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank F J Simonis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Imaging Division, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis A T van den Berg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Imaging Division, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sofie Isebaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|