Body-loop related MRI radiofrequency-induced heating hazards: Observations, characterizations, and recommendations

Systematic review of MRI safety literature in relation to radiofrequency thermal injury prevention

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a rapidly evolving modality, generally considered safe due to lack of ionising radiation. While MRI technology and techniques are improving, many of the safety concerns remain the same as when first established. Patient thermal injuries are the most frequently reported adverse event, accounting for 59% of MRI incidents to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Surveys indicate many incidents remain unreported. Patient thermal injuries are preventable and various methods for their mitigation have been published. However, recommendations can be variable, fragmented and confusing. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on MRI safety and associated skin injuries and offer comprehensive recommendations for radiographers to prevent skin thermal injuries.

METHODS

Four journal databases were searched for sources published January 2010-May 2023, presenting information on MRI safety and thermal injuries.

RESULTS

Of 26,801 articles returned, after careful screening and based on the eligibility criteria, only 79 articles and an additional 19 grey literature sources were included (n = 98). Included studies were examined using thematic analysis to determine if holistic recommendations can be provided to assist in preventing skin burns. This resulted in three simplified recommendations: Remove any electrically conductive items Insulate the patient to prevent any conductive loops or contact with objects Communicate regularly CONCLUSION: By implementing the above recommendations, it is estimated that 97% of skin burns could be prevented. With thermal injuries continuing to impact MRI safety, strategies to prevent skin burns and heating are essential. Assessing individual risks, rather than blanket policies, will help prevent skin thermal injuries occurring, improving patient care.

Investigation of alternative RF power limit control methods for 0.5T, 1.5T, and 3T parallel transmission cardiac imaging: A simulation study

PURPOSE

To investigate safety and performance aspects of parallel-transmit (pTx) RF control-modes for a body coil atB 0 ≤ 3 T $$ {B}_0\le 3\mathrm{T} $$ .

METHODS

Electromagnetic simulations of 11 human voxel models in cardiac imaging position were conducted forB 0 = 0.5 T $$ {B}_0=0.5\mathrm{T} $$ ,1.5 T $$ 1.5\mathrm{T} $$ and3 T $$ 3\mathrm{T} $$ and a body coil with a configurable number of transmit channels (1, 2, 4, 8, 16). Three safety modes were considered: the 'SAR-controlled mode' (SCM), where specific absorption rate (SAR) is limited directly, a 'phase agnostic SAR-controlled mode' (PASCM), where phase information is neglected, and a 'power-controlled mode' (PCM), where the voltage amplitude for each channel is limited. For either mode, safety limits were established based on a set of 'anchor' simulations and then evaluated in 'target' simulations on previously unseen models. The comparison allowed to derive safety factors accounting for varying patient anatomies. All control modes were compared in terms of theB 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ amplitude and homogeneity they permit under their respective safety requirements.

RESULTS

Large safety factors (approximately five) are needed if only one or two anchor models are investigated but they shrink with increasing number of anchors. The achievableB 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ is highest for SCM but this advantage is reduced when the safety factor is included. PCM appears to be more robust against variations of subjects. PASCM performance is mostly in between SCM and PCM. Compared to standard circularly polarized (CP) excitation, pTx offers minorB 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ improvements if local SAR limits are always enforced.

CONCLUSION

PTx body coils can safely be used atB 0 ≤ 3 T $$ {B}_0\le 3\mathrm{T} $$ . Uncertainties in patient anatomy must be accounted for, however, by simulating many models.

Progress in Understanding Radiofrequency Heating and Burn Injuries for Safer MR Imaging

RF electromagnetic wave exposure during MRI scans induces heat and occasionally causes burn injuries to patients. Among all the types of physical injuries that have occurred during MRI examinations, RF burn injuries are the most common ones. The number of RF burn injuries increases as the static magnetic field of MRI systems increases because higher RFs lead to higher heating. The commonly believed mechanisms of RF burn injuries are the formation of a conductive loop by the patient's posture or cables, such as an electrocardiogram lead; however, the mechanisms of RF burn injuries that occur at the contact points, such as the bore wall and the elbow, remain unclear. A comprehensive understanding of RF heating is needed to address effective countermeasures against all RF burn injuries for safe MRI examinations. In this review, we summarize the occurrence of RF burn injury cases by categorizing RF burn injuries reported worldwide in recent decades. Safety standards and regulations governing RF heating that occurs during MRI examinations are presented, along with their theoretical and physiological backgrounds. The experimental assessment techniques for RF heating are then reviewed, and the development of numerical simulation techniques is explained. In addition, a comprehensive theoretical interpretation of RF burn injuries is presented. By including the results of recent experimental and numerical simulation studies on RF heating, this review describes the progress achieved in understanding RF heating from the standpoint of MRI burn injury prevention.

Gradient coil and radiofrequency induced heating of orthopaedic implants in MRI: influencing factors

Patients with implanted orthopaedic devices represent a growing number of subjects undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans each year. MRI safety labelling is required for all implants under the EU Medical Device Regulations to ensure regulatory compliance, with each device assessed through standardised testing procedures. In this paper, we employ parametric studies to assess a range of clinically relevant factors that cause tissue heating, performing simulations with both radiofrequency (RF) and gradient coil (GC) switching fields, the latter of which is often overlooked in the literature. A series of 'worst-case' scenarios for both types of excitation field is discussed. In the case of GC fields, large volume implants and large plate areas with the field orientated perpendicular to the plane cause the highest heating levels, along with sequences with high rates of field switching. Implant heating from RF fields is driven primarily from the 'antenna effect', with thin, linear implants of resonant length resulting in the highest temperature rises. In this work, we show that simplifications may be made to the field sequence and in some cases the device geometry without significantly compromising the accuracy of the simulation results, enabling the possibility for generic estimates of the implant heating for orthopaedic device manufacturers and opportunities to simplify the safety compliance process.