1
|
Cap V, Rocha dos Santos VR, Repnin K, Červený D, Laistler E, Meyerspeer M, Frass-Kriegl R. Combining Dipole and Loop Coil Elements for 7 T Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Human Calf Muscle. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:3309. [PMID: 38894105 PMCID: PMC11174775 DOI: 10.3390/s24113309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Combining proton and phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy offers a unique opportunity to study the oxidative and glycolytic components of metabolism in working muscle. This paper presents a 7 T proton calf coil design that combines dipole and loop elements to achieve the high performance necessary for detecting metabolites with low abundance and restricted visibility, specifically lactate, while including the option of adding a phosphorus array. We investigated the transmit, receive, and parallel imaging performance of three transceiver dipoles with six pair-wise overlap-decoupled standard or twisted pair receive-only coils. With a higher SNR and more efficient transmission decoupling, standard loops outperformed twisted pair coils. The dipoles with standard loops provided a four-fold-higher image SNR than a multinuclear reference coil comprising two proton channels and 32% more than a commercially available 28-channel proton knee coil. The setup enabled up to three-fold acceleration in the right-left direction, with acceptable g-factors and no visible aliasing artefacts. Spectroscopic phantom measurements revealed a higher spectral SNR for lactate with the developed setup than with either reference coil and fewer restrictions in voxel placement due to improved transmit homogeneity. This paper presents a new use case for dipoles and highlights their advantages for the integration in multinuclear calf coils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronika Cap
- High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Vasco Rafael Rocha dos Santos
- High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Kostiantyn Repnin
- High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - David Červený
- High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Elmar Laistler
- High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Meyerspeer
- High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Roberta Frass-Kriegl
- High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lopez Kolkovsky AL, Carlier PG, Marty B, Meyerspeer M. Interleaved and simultaneous multi-nuclear magnetic resonance in vivo. Review of principles, applications and potential. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 35:e4735. [PMID: 35352440 PMCID: PMC9542607 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance signals from different nuclei can be excited or received at the same time,rendering simultaneous or rapidly interleaved multi-nuclear acquisitions feasible. The advan-tages are a reduction of total scan time compared to sequential multi-nuclear acquisitions or that additional information from heteronuclear data is obtained at thesame time and anatomical position. Information content can be qualitatively increased by delivering a more comprehensive MR-based picture of a transient state (such as an exercise bout). Also, combiningnon-proton MR acquisitions with 1 Hinformation (e.g., dynamic shim updates and motion correction) can be used to improve data quality during long scans and benefits image coregistration. This work reviews the literature on interleaved and simultaneous multi-nuclear MRI and MRS in vivo. Prominent use cases for this methodology in clinical and research applications are brain and muscle, but studies have also been carried out in other targets, including the lung, knee, breast and heart. Simultaneous multi-nuclear measurements in the liver and kidney have also been performed, but exclusively in rodents. In this review, a consistent nomenclature is proposed, to help clarify the terminology used for this principle throughout the literature on in-vivo MR. An overview covers the basic principles, the technical requirements on the MR scanner and the implementations realised either by MR system vendors or research groups, from the early days until today. Considerations regarding the multi-tuned RF coils required and heteronuclear polarisation interactions are briefly discussed, and fields for future in-vivo applications for interleaved multi-nuclear MR pulse sequences are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo L. Lopez Kolkovsky
- NMR Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation CenterInstitute of MyologyParisFrance
- NMR laboratoryCEA, DRF, IBFJParisFrance
| | - Pierre G. Carlier
- NMR Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation CenterInstitute of MyologyParisFrance
- NMR laboratoryCEA, DRF, IBFJParisFrance
| | - Benjamin Marty
- NMR Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation CenterInstitute of MyologyParisFrance
- NMR laboratoryCEA, DRF, IBFJParisFrance
| | - Martin Meyerspeer
- High‐Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical EngineeringMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wishart DS, Cheng LL, Copié V, Edison AS, Eghbalnia HR, Hoch JC, Gouveia GJ, Pathmasiri W, Powers R, Schock TB, Sumner LW, Uchimiya M. NMR and Metabolomics-A Roadmap for the Future. Metabolites 2022; 12:678. [PMID: 35893244 PMCID: PMC9394421 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12080678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Metabolomics investigates global metabolic alterations associated with chemical, biological, physiological, or pathological processes. These metabolic changes are measured with various analytical platforms including liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). While LC-MS methods are becoming increasingly popular in the field of metabolomics (accounting for more than 70% of published metabolomics studies to date), there are considerable benefits and advantages to NMR-based methods for metabolomic studies. In fact, according to PubMed, more than 926 papers on NMR-based metabolomics were published in 2021-the most ever published in a given year. This suggests that NMR-based metabolomics continues to grow and has plenty to offer to the scientific community. This perspective outlines the growing applications of NMR in metabolomics, highlights several recent advances in NMR technologies for metabolomics, and provides a roadmap for future advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S. Wishart
- Departments of Biological Sciences and Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
| | - Leo L. Cheng
- Department of Pathology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Valérie Copié
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA;
| | - Arthur S. Edison
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; (A.S.E.); (G.J.G.); (M.U.)
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-0001, USA
| | - Hamid R. Eghbalnia
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, Farmington, CT 06030-3305, USA; (H.R.E.); (J.C.H.)
| | - Jeffrey C. Hoch
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, Farmington, CT 06030-3305, USA; (H.R.E.); (J.C.H.)
| | - Goncalo J. Gouveia
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; (A.S.E.); (G.J.G.); (M.U.)
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-0001, USA
| | - Wimal Pathmasiri
- Nutrition Research Institute, Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
| | - Robert Powers
- Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA
- Nebraska Center for Integrated Biomolecular Communication, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA
| | - Tracey B. Schock
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Charleston, SC 29412, USA;
| | - Lloyd W. Sumner
- Interdisciplinary Plant Group, MU Metabolomics Center, Bond Life Sciences Center, Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
| | - Mario Uchimiya
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; (A.S.E.); (G.J.G.); (M.U.)
| |
Collapse
|