1
|
Harwood M, Fahrenholtz SJ, Wellnitz CV, Kawashima A, Panda A. MRI in Adult Patients with Active and Inactive Implanted MR-conditional, MR-nonconditional, and Other Devices. Radiographics 2024; 44:e230102. [PMID: 38421911 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Active implanted medical devices (AIMDs) enable therapy and patient monitoring by way of electrical activity and typically have a battery and electrical leads. The most common types of AIMDs include cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), spinal cord stimulators, deep brain stimulators, bone growth or fusion stimulators, other neurostimulators, and drug infusion pumps. As more patients with AIMDs undergo MRI, it is important to consider the safety of patients who have these implanted devices during MRI. The authors review the physics concepts related to MRI safety, such as peak spatial gradient magnetic field, specific absorption rate, root mean square value of the effective magnetic component of the transmitted RF pulse, and gradient slew rate, as well as the parameters necessary to remain within safety limits. The roles of MRI safety personnel, as set forth by the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, are emphasized. In addition, the relevant information provided in vendor manuals is reviewed, with a focus on how to obtain relevant up-to-date information. The radiologist should be able to modify protocols to meet safety requirements, address possible alternatives to MRI, and weigh the potential benefits of MRI against the potential risks. A few more advanced topics, such as fractured or abandoned device leads and patients with multiple implanted medical devices, also are addressed. Recommended workflows for MRI in patients with implanted medical devices are outlined. It is important to implement an algorithmic MRI safety process, including a review of the MRI safety information; patient screening; optimal imaging; and monitoring patients before, during, and after the examination. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Shetty et al in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Harwood
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ (M.H., S.J.F., C.V.W., A.K., A.P.); and Carl T. Hayden Veterans' Administration Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ (M.H.)
| | - Samuel J Fahrenholtz
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ (M.H., S.J.F., C.V.W., A.K., A.P.); and Carl T. Hayden Veterans' Administration Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ (M.H.)
| | - Clinton V Wellnitz
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ (M.H., S.J.F., C.V.W., A.K., A.P.); and Carl T. Hayden Veterans' Administration Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ (M.H.)
| | - Akira Kawashima
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ (M.H., S.J.F., C.V.W., A.K., A.P.); and Carl T. Hayden Veterans' Administration Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ (M.H.)
| | - Anshuman Panda
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ (M.H., S.J.F., C.V.W., A.K., A.P.); and Carl T. Hayden Veterans' Administration Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ (M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhusal B, Jiang F, Vu J, Sanpitak P, Golestanirad L. Implants talk to each-other: RF heating changes when two DBS leads are present simultaneously during MRI. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2023; 2023:1-5. [PMID: 38082747 PMCID: PMC10838603 DOI: 10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has proven to be an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease and other brain disorders. The procedure often involves implanting two elongated leads aimed at specific brain nuclei in both the left and right hemispheres. However, evaluating the safety of MRI in patients with such implants has only been done on an individual lead basis, ignoring the possibility of crosstalk between the leads. This study evaluates the impact of crosstalk on power deposition at the lead tip through numerical simulation and phantom experiments. We used CT images to obtain patient-specific lead trajectories and compared the power deposition at the lead tip in cases with bilateral and unilateral DBS implants. Our results indicate that the RF power deposition at the lead tip can vary by up to 6-fold when two DBS leads are present together compared to when only one lead is present. Experimental measurements in a simplified case of two lead-only DBS systems confirmed the existence of crosstalk.Clinical Relevance-Our results indicate that RF heating of implanted leads during MRI can be affected by the presence of another lead in the body, which may increase or decrease the power deposition in the tissue depending on the position and configuration of the leads.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lottner T, Reiss S, Rieger SB, Schuettler M, Fischer J, Bielak L, Özen AC, Bock M. Radio-frequency induced heating of intra-cranial EEG electrodes: The more the colder? Neuroimage 2022; 264:119691. [PMID: 36375783 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Many neurological disorders are analyzed and treated with implantable electrodes. Many patients with such electrodes have to undergo MRI examinations - often unrelated to their implant - at the risk of radio-frequency induced heating. The number of electrode contact sites of these implants keeps increasing due to improvements in manufacturing and computational algorithms. Electrode grids with multiple receive channels couple to the RF fields present in MRI, but, due to their proximity, a combination of leads has a coupling response which is not a superposition of the individual leads' response. To investigate the problem of RF-induced heating of coupled multi-lead implants, temperature mapping was performed on a set of intra-cranial electroencephalogram (icEEG) electrode grid prototypes with increasing number of contact sites (1-16). Additionally, electric field measurements were used to investigate the radio-frequency heating characteristics of the implants in different media combinations, simulating the device being partially immersed inside the patient. MR measurements show RF-induced heating up to 19.6 K for the single electrode, reducing monotonically with larger number of contact sites to a minimum of 0.9 K for the largest grid. The SAR calculated from temperature measurements agrees well with electric field mapping: The same trend is visible for different insertion lengths, however, the energy dissipated by the whole implant varies with the grid size and insertion length. Thus, in the tested circumstances, a larger electrode number either reduced or had a similar risk of RF induced heating, indicating, that the size of electrode grids is a design parameter, which can be used to change an implants RF response and in turn to reduce the risk of RF induced heating and improve the safety of patient with neuro-implants undergoing MRI examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Lottner
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Reiss
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Johannes Fischer
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lars Bielak
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ali C Özen
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|