Developing a Tailored Smoking Cessation Intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Theoretical components of smoking cessation interventions for persons with physical disabilities: A scoping review

Rationale Persons with physical disabilities report higher cigarette smoking rates and a lower likelihood of accessing health services (e.g., smoking cessation services). Explicit and systematic application of behaviour change theory may be a promising approach to addressing these inequities and developing impactful smoking cessation interventions for persons with physical disabilities.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to explore how behaviour change theory and intervention components have been used to design smoking cessation interventions for persons with physical disabilities.

METHODS

Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science) were systematically searched. Smoking cessation interventions for persons with physical disabilities were identified. Behaviour change theory and intervention components, including behaviour change techniques, intervention functions, mode of delivery, intervention source, and setting, were extracted from the included articles.

RESULTS

Among the eleven included articles, there were nine unique smoking cessation interventions for persons with physical disabilities. Three interventions mentioned theory, but none of these articles explicitly applied or tested the theory. Intervention components were consistently combined to deliver pharmacotherapy and behavioural counselling-based interventions.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review highlight the scarcity of theory-based smoking cessation interventions for persons with physical disabilities. While the interventions were not theory-based, they were evidence-based and aligned with recommendations for smoking cessation treatment (i.e., behavioural counselling plus pharmacotherapy). Future research should take a theory-based approach to intervention development to enhance the likelihood that smoking cessation interventions for persons with physical disabilities are effective, replicable, and equitable.

Patient Perspectives on Smoking Cessation and Interventions in Rheumatology Clinics

OBJECTIVE

Although smoking is a risk factor for cardiovascular and rheumatic disease severity, only 10% of rheumatology visits document cessation counseling. After implementing a rheumatology clinic protocol that increased tobacco quitline referrals 20-fold, we undertook this study to examine patients' barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation based on prior rheumatology experiences, to solicit reactions to the new cessation protocol, and to identify patient-centered outcomes or signs of cessation progress following improved care.

METHODS

We recruited 19 patients who smoke (12 with rheumatoid arthritis [RA] and 7 with systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) to participate in 1 of 3 semistructured focus groups. Transcripts of the focus group discussions were analyzed using thematic analysis to classify barriers, facilitators, and signs of cessation progress.

RESULTS

Participant-reported barriers and facilitators to cessation involved psychological, health-related, and social and economic factors, as well as health care messaging and resources. Commonly discussed barriers included viewing smoking as a crutch amid rheumatic disease, rarely receiving cessation counseling in rheumatology clinics, and very limited awareness that smoking can worsen rheumatic diseases or reduce efficacy of some rheumatic disease medications. Participants endorsed our cessation protocol with rheumatology-specific education and accessible resources, such as a quitline. Beyond quitting, participants prioritized knowing why and how to quit as signs of progress outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Focus groups identified themes and categories of facilitators/barriers to smoking cessation at the levels of patient and health system. Two key outcomes of improving cessation care for patients with RA and SLE were knowing why and how to quit. Emphasizing rheumatologic health benefits and cessation resources is essential when designing and evaluating rheumatology smoking cessation interventions.

Smoking cessation intervention for reducing disease activity in chronic autoimmune inflammatory joint diseases

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory joint diseases (IJDs) affect 1% to 2% of the population in developed countries. IJDs include rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and other forms of spondyloarthritis (SpA). Tobacco smoking is considered a significant environmental risk factor for developing IJDs. There are indications that smoking exacerbates the symptoms and worsens disease outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to investigate the evidence for effects of smoking cessation interventions on smoking cessation and disease activity in smokers with IJD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Library; PubMed/MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); and three trials registers to October 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials testing any form of smoking cessation intervention for adult daily smokers with a diagnosis of IJD, and measuring smoking cessation at least six months after baseline.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two studies with 57 smokers with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We identified no studies including other IJDs. One pilot study compared a smoking cessation intervention specifically for people with RA with a less intensive, generic smoking cessation intervention. People included in the study had a mean age of 56.5 years and a disease duration of 7.7 years (mean). The second study tested effects of an eight-week cognitive-behavioural patient education intervention on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk for people with RA and compared this with information on CVD risk only. The intervention encouraged participants to address multiple behaviours impacting CVD risk, including smoking cessation, but did not target smoking cessation alone. People included in the study had a mean age of 62.2 years (intervention group) and 60.8 years (control group), and disease duration of 11.6 years (intervention group) and 14.1 years (control group). It was not appropriate to perform a meta-analysis of abstinence data from the two studies due to clinical heterogeneity between interventions. Neither of the studies individually provided evidence to show benefit of the interventions tested. Only one study reported on adverse effects. These effects were non-serious, and numbers were comparable between trial arms. Neither of the studies assessed or reported disease activity or any of the predefined secondary outcomes. We assessed the overall certainty of evidence as very low due to indirectness, imprecision, and high risk of detection bias based on GRADE.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found very little research investigating the efficacy of smoking cessation intervention specifically in people with IJD. Included studies are limited by imprecision, risk of bias, and indirectness. Neither of the included studies investigated whether smoking cessation intervention reduced disease activity among people with IJD. High-quality, adequately powered studies are warranted. In particular, researchers should ensure that they measure disease markers and quality of life, in addition to long-term smoking cessation.

A Brief, Integrated, Telephone-Based Intervention for Veterans Who Smoke and Have Chronic Pain: A Feasibility Study

Objective

High rates of co-occurring smoking and chronic pain are observed in the veteran population. Individuals who smoke and have chronic pain report lower self-efficacy to quit and are less successful in their attempts.

Design

In this pilot study, we assess the feasibility of a telephone-delivered intervention designed to integrate evidence-based smoking cessation and pain management components in a way that allows patients to understand the interplay between the two while attempting to have them build off each other and develop coping skills to address both concerns.

Patients

Study participants (N = 7) were veterans who received primary care in the VA Healthcare System and reported current smoking and a worst pain intensity score of 4 or greater.

Intervention

A five-session telephone intervention was delivered over eight weeks. Participants completed a survey at baseline and 10-week follow-up.

Outcome Measures

Feasibility was assessed by examining engagement with the intervention.

Results

Four out of seven participants completed all five sessions. Two out of seven veterans reported quitting smoking, and five out of seven reported clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity and functional interference.

Conclusions

Insights gained from this study were used to modify an intervention being examined in a randomized controlled trial to test its effectiveness on both smoking and pain outcomes.

Reconceptualizing motivation for smoking cessation among people with rheumatoid arthritis as incentives and facilitators

OBJECTIVES

Smokers with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may have different motivations for, and barriers to, quitting. Understanding the motivations of smokers and ex-smokers with RA will help in the design and implementation of targeted smoking cessation interventions for people with RA that are not based solely on extrapolation from the general population or populations with other chronic illnesses.

METHODS

Twenty-nine smokers and 10 recent ex-smokers with RA participated in semi-structured interviews via telephone 18 months after being offered a smoking cessation intervention in Aotearoa/New Zealand. The sample consisted of 27 women and 12 men (age range 32-78 years), of whom 14 had received the intervention, 14 had been in the control group and 11 had declined participation in the trial.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis led to the formulation of four "incentives" to quit and five "facilitators" of quitting for people with RA. Desiring improvements to health (overall and specific to arthritis), social relationships and avoiding costs were incentives to quit. Coping with stress without smoking, commitment, mental preparedness, willpower and interventions were facilitators of quitting.

CONCLUSIONS

Becoming aware of the effects of smoking on arthritis provides an important motivation to quit smoking that may counter RA-specific barriers to smoking cessation. Further research is needed to test whether similar incentives and facilitators of smoking cessation exist in other chronic illnesses, and how to develop interventions to address these motivational processes.

Exploring perceptions of a rheumatoid arthritis-specific smoking cessation programme

AIM

Smoking cessation is an important consideration in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of the present study was to determine which aspects of a novel three-month smoking cessation intervention were most useful for people with RA, and to identify areas for improvement.

METHOD

Thirty-eight current smokers with RA (19 intervention and 19 control) enrolled in a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) of smoking cessation and two arthritis educators who had provided the intervention were interviewed. The data were analysed thematically using a combination of deductive and inductive approaches to identify themes.

RESULTS

Intervention participants and the educators identified individualized support and advice as the two most important components of the smoking cessation intervention. The generic smoking cessation components and education about the links between smoking and RA were also identified as important. Nicotine replacement therapy was provided to all participants and was the most commonly reported facilitator of smoking cessation. People with RA who reported being ready to quit smoking had more success at smoking cessation. The educators were positive about ongoing provision of the smoking cessation intervention.

CONCLUSION

The novel RA-specific smoking cessation intervention that had formed the basis of the previous RCT provided useful and varied options to assist quitting smoking in RA. Successful quitters were ready and motivated to quit smoking regardless of their randomization status, with nicotine replacement therapy an effective aid to quitting. Support offered by the educators was critical in the participants' perspective.

Efficacy of a Rheumatoid Arthritis-Specific Smoking Cessation Program: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

OBJECTIVE

Smoking adversely influences comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether smoking cessation is increased following a 3-month smoking cessation intervention tailored for people with RA.

METHODS

Thirty-nine current smokers with RA were recruited. Participants were randomized into the control group to receive the current local standard of care for smoking cessation (i.e., ABC = brief advice and subsidized nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], or into the intervention group to receive ABC plus additional smoking cessation advice for 3 months (ABC+), including face-to-face, telephone, and e-mail contact. Advice was tailored to the participants' specific needs from a range of intervention tools focused on education about smoking and RA, pain control, exercise, coping, and support. The primary outcome was smoking cessation at 6 months. The secondary outcome was sustained reduction in smoking at 6 months. Disease and psychosocial characteristics of quitters and nonquitters were examined.

RESULTS

The overall smoking cessation rate was 24%. There was no significant difference in smoking cessation rates between the ABC and ABC+ groups (21% versus 26%; P = 0.70). The mean number of cigarettes smoked daily was reduced by 44% (P < 0.001) but did not differ between ABC and ABC+ groups (mean reduction 47% versus 41%; P = 0.72). Successful quitters had more years in education and had smoked less across their lifetime, but these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Smoking cessation in RA may lead to a reduced comorbid burden. The lack of added benefit of the tailored intervention suggests that brief advice and NRT are currently the best practice for supporting people with RA who wish to quit smoking.

The influence of lifestyle habits on quality of life in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis-A constant balancing between ideality and reality

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory, and systemic disease with symptoms that limit activities and affect quality of life. RA is associated with an increased risk of developing comorbidities, some of which are also known to be associated with lifestyle habits such as physical activity, diet, smoking, and alcohol. There has been an augmented focus on the implementation and maintenance of healthy lifestyle habits even for patients with RA in the past decade, but little is known about the link between patients’ experiences of lifestyle habits and quality of life. The aim of the study was thus to describe and explore how patients with established RA experience the influence of lifestyle habits on quality of life.

Methods

The study had a descriptive and explorative design, based on qualitative content analysis. Strategic sampling was used in order to achieve variations in experiences. Twenty-two patients with RA (14 women and 8 men) from 30 to 84 years old, with a disease duration ranging from 8 to 23 years, were interviewed.

Results

The analysis of the influence of lifestyle habits on quality of life resulted in the theme balancing between ideality and reality. Three categories emerged about how lifestyle habits influenced quality of life by limitations (including insufficiency and adaptation), self-regulation (including guilt and motivation), and companionship (including belonging and pleasure).

Conclusions

Quality of life for patients with established RA was influenced by the balance between ideality and reality in the lifestyle habits: physical activity, diet, smoking, and alcohol. This is important new knowledge for health professionals when discussing lifestyle habits with RA patients.