The effectiveness of hydrodistension and physiotherapy following previously failed conservative management of frozen shoulder in a UK primary care centre

Association of Range of Motion Deficit and Recurrence of Pain After Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the factors influencing the duration of significant pain reduction after conservative management for adhesive capsulitis (AC).

METHODS

Follow-up for 6-8 months was performed with 141 patients with AC who experienced significant pain reduction after treatment. Clinical and demographic factors, numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were collected and assessed pretreatment (T0), at 5 weeks post-treatment (T1), and at 6-8 months post-treatment (T2). Patients were divided into successful (n = 96) and unsuccessful (n = 45) NRS groups according to the degree of pain reduction at T2. We assessed post-treatment NRS and ROM improvement scores within each group and compared these parameters between the two groups.

RESULTS

Significant NRS and ROM improvements were achieved in all patients who participated in our study. The unsuccessful NRS group demonstrated a lack of significant improvement in abduction at T1 and T2. All T1 and shoulder ROM measurements among the unsuccessful NRS group were significantly smaller than those among the successful NRS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to achieve a significant improvement in abduction angle after conservative management of AC was significantly associated with pain recurrence.

Efficacy of hydrodilatation in frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

It is unclear whether hydrodilatation is beneficial in the management of frozen shoulder compared with other common conservative management modalities. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of hydrodilatation for the management of frozen shoulder.

SOURCES OF DATA

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An extensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and CINAHL databases using multiple keyword combinations of 'shoulder', 'rotator', 'adhesive capsulitis', 'hydrodilatat*', 'distension' since inception of the databases to June 2023 was implemented.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Hydrodilatation leads to at least transient more marked improvements in shoulder disability and passive external rotation compared with intra-articular corticosteroid injections.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Hydrodilatation improves passive external rotation in the longer term. Moreover, hydrodilatation may be a preferable option over manipulation under anaesthesia, given its lower cost and better patient convenience.

GROWING POINTS

Intensive mobilization after hydrodilatation is a promising adjuvant treatment option for patients suffering from a frozen shoulder.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Although current evidence suggests that hydrodilatation provides a transient improvement in disability in patients with frozen shoulder, its clinical relevance remains unclear. Further research is necessary to establish its role in the management of the condition.

Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodistension for Adhesive Capsulitis: Is There Any Adjunct Effect of Immediate Post-Procedural Manipulation Over Instructed Physical Therapy?

OBJECTIVES

To compare the additive value of immediate post-procedural manipulation versus physiotherapy, following ultrasound (US)-guided hydrodistention of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC) and define predictors of outcome.

METHODS

Within a 19-month period, 161 consecutive patients with AC were prospectively enrolled and allocated to two groups according to treatment, based on patients' individual preferences: 1) group-I, US-guided hydrodistension plus immediate post-procedural manipulations and 2) group-II, US-guided hydrodistension plus supervised physiotherapy program. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used for clinical assessment at baseline (immediately after treatment), 1, 3, and 6 months. Comparisons were performed with Mann-Whitney U test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Linear regression was used to identify predictors of outcome. P value <.05 defined significance.

RESULTS

GHJ hydrodistension with manipulation or physiotherapy was linked to clinical improvement at all follow-up time-points. DASH scores of group-I remained constantly lower than DASH scores of group-II at all time-points (P < .001). VAS scores were lower in group-I than group-II at 1 and 3 months (P < .001 and P = .0019, respectively). Both groups had improved to a similar degree with respect to pain at 6 months (P = .29). The performance of post-interventional manipulations was predictive of improved shoulder functionality (as assessed with DASH scores) at all time-points, while low-grade disease and milder symptoms at presentation were associated with improved short-term pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate post-procedural manipulations appeared to be superior to physiotherapy following GHJ hydrodistension for AC in terms of shoulder functionality during a 6-month follow-up period. Post-interventional manipulations, the stage of AC and lower DASH and VAS scores at presentations were predictive of improved outcome.